scholarly journals Evaluation of the Effect of Container Ship Characteristics on Added Resistance in Waves

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 696
Author(s):  
Ivana Martić ◽  
Nastia Degiuli ◽  
Andrea Farkas ◽  
Ivan Gospić
Keyword(s):  
Point Of View ◽  
Irregular Waves ◽  
Design Stage ◽  
Radius Of Gyration ◽  
Container Ship ◽  
Added Resistance ◽  
Head Waves ◽  
Calm Water ◽  
Added Resistance In Waves ◽  
Longitudinal Position

Added resistance in waves is one of the main causes of an increase in required power when a ship operates in actual service conditions. The assessment of added resistance in waves is important from both an economic and environmental point of view, owing to increasingly stringent rules set by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) with the aim to reduce CO2 emission by ships. For that reason, it is desirable to evaluate the added resistance in waves already in the preliminary ship design stage both in regular and irregular waves. Ships are traditionally designed and optimized with respect to calm water conditions. Within this research, the effect of prismatic coefficient, longitudinal position of the centre of buoyancy, trim, pitch radius of gyration, and ship speed on added resistance is investigated for the KCS (Kriso Container Ship) container ship in regular head waves and for different sea states. The calculations are performed using the 3D panel method based on Kelvin type Green function. The results for short waves are corrected to adequately take into account the diffraction component. The obtained results provide an insight into the effect of variation of ship characteristics on added resistance in waves.

Sailing Yacht Performance in Calm Water and in Waves

1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gerritsma ◽  
J. A. Keuning ◽  
A. Versluis
Keyword(s):  
Model Experiment ◽  
Irregular Waves ◽  
Current Interest ◽  
Added Resistance ◽  
Hull Form ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Calm Water ◽  
Added Resistance In Waves ◽  
Sailing Yacht ◽  
Calculated Analysis

The Delft systematic Yatch Hull Series has been extended to a total of 39 hull form variations, covering a wide range of length displacement ratios and other form of parameters. The total set of model experiment results, upright and heeled resistance as well as sideforce and stability, had been analysed and polynomial expressions to approximate these quantities are presented. In view of the current interest in the performance of sailing yachts in waves, the added resistance in irregular waves of 8 widely different hull variations has been calculated. Analysis of the results shows that the added resistance in waves strongly depends on the product of displacement-length ratio and the gyradius of the pitching motion.

The Effect of Bow Steepness and Flare on the Resistance of Sailing Yachts in Calm Water and Waves

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Keuning ◽  
R. Onnink ◽  
A. Damman
Keyword(s):  
Water Resistance ◽  
Added Resistance ◽  
University Of Technology ◽  
Head Waves ◽  
Master Thesis ◽  
Calm Water ◽  
Added Resistance In Waves ◽  
Bow Flare ◽  
Sailing Yacht ◽  
Resistance Performance

In this paper some results are presented of two studies carried out at the Ship hydromechanics Department of the Delft University of Technology: one, on the influence of an increase of stem steepness of a sailing yacht, and another, which was largely carried out by T.J.E. Tincelin as part of his master thesis at Delft University of Technology, on the effect of above waterline bow flare are presented. To investigate the influence of bow steepness a model of the Delft Systematic Yacht Hull Series (DSYHS) has been used as a parent model of a new small subseries with two additional derivatives each with increased bow steepness. The influence on both the calm water resistance and the added resistance in head waves has been investigated. To investigate the influence of bow flare, two models of a typical "Open 60" design have been used: one "normal" and one with almost no flare in the bowsections. These have been tested in calm water and in both head- and following­waves to investigate the effects of this difference in bow shape on the calm water resistance, on added resistance in waves, and on the relative motions at the bow. The results are presented and some comparisons with calculations made. Also some general conclusions with respect to resistance, performance and safety are drawn.

EFD and CFD Study of Forces, Ship Motions, and Flow Field for KRISO Container Ship Model in Waves

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (01) ◽  
pp. 61-80
Author(s):  
Ping-Chen Wu ◽  
Md. Alfaz Hossain ◽  
Naoki Kawakami ◽  
Kento Tamaki ◽  
Htike Aung Kyaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Dynamics ◽  
Flow Field ◽  
Flow Simulation ◽  
Wake Flow ◽  
Ship Motions ◽  
Container Ship ◽  
Added Resistance ◽  
Ocean Engineering ◽  
Ship Model ◽  
Calm Water

Ship motion responses and added resistance in waves have been predicted by a wide variety of computational tools. However, validation of the computational flow field still remains a challenge. In the previous study, the flow field around the Korea Research Institute for Ships and Ocean Engineering (KRISO) Very Large Crude-oil Carrier 2 tanker model with and without propeller condition and without rudder condition was measured by the authors, as well as the resistance and self-propulsion tests in waves. In this study, the KRISO container ship model appended with a rudder was used for the higher Froude number .26 and smaller block coefficient .65. The experiments were conducted in the Osaka University towing tank using a 3.2-m-long ship model for resistance and self-propulsion tests in waves. Viscous flow simulation was performed by using CFDShip-Iowa. The wave conditions proposed in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Workshop 2015 were considered, i.e., the wave-ship length ratio λ/L = .65, .85, 1.15, 1.37, 1.95, and calm water. The objective of this study was to validate CFD results by Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD) data for ship vertical motions, added resistance, and wake flow field. The detailed flow field for nominal wake and self-propulsion condition will be analyzed for λ/L = .65, 1.15, 1.37, and calm water. Furthermore, bilge vortex movement and boundary layer development on propeller plane, propeller thrust, and wake factor oscillation in waves will be studied.

Experiments and Computations for KCS Added Resistance for Variable Heading

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid Sadat-Hosseini ◽  
Serge Toxopeus ◽  
Dong Hwan Kim ◽  
Teresa Castiglione ◽  
Yugo Sanada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Profile ◽  
Engine Performance ◽  
Head Wave ◽  
Added Resistance ◽  
Local Flow ◽  
Wake Field ◽  
Head Waves ◽  
Calm Water ◽  
Free Surface Profile ◽  
Peak Location

Experiments, CFD and PF studies are performed for the KCS containership advancing at Froude number 0.26 in calm water and regular waves. The validation studies are conducted for variable wavelength and wave headings with wave slope of H/λ=1/60. CFD computations are conducted using two solvers CFDShip-Iowa and STAR-CCM+. PF studies are conducted using FATIMA. For CFD computations, calm water and head wave simulations are performed by towing the ship fixed in surge, sway, roll and yaw, but free to heave and pitch. For variable wave heading simulations, the roll motion is also free. For PF, the ship model moves at a given speed and the oscillations around 6DOF motions are computed for variable wave heading while the surge motion for head waves is restrained by adding a very large surge damping. For calm water, computations showed E<4%D for the resistance,<8%D for the sinkage, and <40%D for the trim. In head waves with variable wavelength, the errors for first harmonic variables for CFD and PF computations were small, <5%DR for amplitudes and <4%2π for phases. The errors for zeroth harmonics of motions and added resistance were large. For the added resistance, the largest error was for the peak location at λ/L=1.15 where the data also show large scatter. For variable wave heading at λ/L=1.0, the errors for first harmonic amplitudes were <17%DR for CFD and <26%DR for PF. The comparison errors for first harmonic phases were E<24%2π. The errors for the zeroth harmonic of motions and added resistance were again large. PF studies for variable wave headings were also conducted for more wavelength condition, showing good predictions for the heave and pitch motions for all cases while the surge and roll motions and added resistance were often not well predicted. Local flow studies were conducted for λ/L=1.37 to investigate the free surface profile and wake field predicted by CFD. The results showed a significant fluctuation in the wake field which can affect the propeller/engine performance. Additionally it was found that the average propeller inflow to the propeller is significantly higher in waves.

Head Wave Simulation of a KCS Model Using OpenFOAM for the Assessment of Sea-Margin

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hafizul Islam ◽  
C. Guedes Soares
Keyword(s):  
Head Wave ◽  
Container Ship ◽  
Added Resistance ◽  
Free Condition ◽  
Wave Simulation ◽  
Calm Water ◽  
Sinkage And Trim ◽  
Simulation Results ◽  
Design Speed ◽  
Propulsion Power

Abstract The paper presents calm water and head wave simulation results for a KRISO Container Ship (KCS) model. All simulations have been performed using the open source CFD toolkit, OpenFOAM. Initially, a systematic verification study has been performed using the ITTC guideline to assess the simulation associated uncertainties. After that, a validation study has been performed to assess the accuracy of the results. Next, calm water simulations have been performed with sinkage and trim free condition at varying speeds. Later, head wave simulations have been performed with heave and pitch free motion. Simulations were repeated for varying wave lengths to assess the encountered added resistance by the ship in design speed. The results have been validated against available experimental data. Finally, power predictions have been made for both calm water and head wave cases to assess the required propulsion power. The paper tries to assess the validity of using 25% addition as sea margin over calm water prediction to consider wave encounters.

scholarly journals Impact of trim on added resistance of KRISO container ship (KCS) in head waves: An experimental and numerical study

2020 ◽  
Vol 211 ◽  
pp. 107594
Author(s):  
Emil Shivachev ◽  
Mahdi Khorasanchi ◽  
Sandy Day ◽  
Osman Turan
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Study ◽  
Container Ship ◽  
Added Resistance ◽  
Head Waves

Numerical Analysis of a Surface Ship in Waves

2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn Aram
Keyword(s):  
Stokes Equations ◽  
Body Motion ◽  
Irregular Waves ◽  
Design Stage ◽  
Fluid Viscosity ◽  
Sea Waves ◽  
Added Resistance ◽  
Physical Mechanisms ◽  
Strip Theory ◽  
Seakeeping Analysis

Abstract Ship's resistance and engine power to sustain ship's speed in seaways are augmented due to complex non-linear interactions between the ship and the ambient sea (waves). Ship designers, in early design stage, use an ad hoc "sea margin" to account for the effects of seaways in selecting propeller and engine. A numerical tool capable of accurately predicting added resistance and power of a ship cruising in waves would greatly help select its powering (margin) requirement and determine the optimal operating point that can maximize the energy efficiency. For seakeeping analysis, strip theory-based methods have long been used. More recently, nonlinear time-domain three-dimensional (3D) panel methods have started being used widely. A more physics-based avenue to seakeeping analysis is offered by coupled solutions of two-phase unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations and six degrees-of-freedom rigid-body motion (RBM) equations. The URANS approach also avails itself of including the effects of propulsors, either explicitly or approximately. By accounting for all the nonlinear effects in hydrodynamic forces and moments and the resulting ship motions, and the effects of fluid viscosity and turbulence, the coupled URANS-RBM method is believed not only able to predict added resistance and speed loss more accurately, but also to provide valuable insights into the physical mechanisms underlying added resistance and power. The objectives of this study are: (1) to validate a coupled URANS-RBM solver developed for high-fidelity prediction of added resistance, speed loss and added power on ships cruising in regular head sea and irregular waves, and (2) to conduct a detailed analysis of the interactions among ship hull, propeller and waves for a 1/49 scaled model of the ONR Tumblehome (ONRT) (Model 5613) in order to shed light on the physical mechanisms leading to added resistance, speed loss and added power. Figure 1 depicts the ONRT self-propellers with two 4-bladed propellers in regular waves. The main flow features such as the free surface, the hub vortices and blade-tip vortices from the propeller, as well as vortices generated by the sonar dome, shafts, shaft brackets and bilge keels are captured.

scholarly journals Full-Scale CFD Analysis of Double-M Craft Seakeeping Performance in Regular Head Waves

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 504
Author(s):  
Deniz Ozturk ◽  
Cihad Delen ◽  
Simone Mancini ◽  
Mehmet Ozan Serifoglu ◽  
Turgay Hizarci
Keyword(s):  
Full Scale ◽  
Stokes Wave ◽  
Added Resistance ◽  
Motion Responses ◽  
Seakeeping Performance ◽  
Head Waves ◽  
Calm Water ◽  
Maximum Improvement ◽  
Fifth Order ◽  
Regular Head Waves

This study presents the full-scale resistance and seakeeping performance of an awarded Double-M craft designed as a 15 m next-generation Emergency Response and Rescue Vessel (ERRV). For this purpose, the Double-M craft is designed by comprising the benchmark Delft 372 catamaran with an additional center and two side hulls. First, the resistance and seakeeping analyses of Delft 372 catamaran are simulated on the model scale to verify and compare the numerical setup for Fr = 0.7. Second, the seakeeping performance of the full-scale Double-M craft is examined at Fr = 0.7 in regular head waves (λ/L = 1 to 2.5) for added resistance and 2-DOF motion responses. The turbulent flow is simulated by the unsteady RANS method with the Realizable Two-Layer k-ε scheme. The calm water is represented by the flat VOF (Volume of Fluid) wave, while the incident long waves are represented by the fifth-order Stokes wave. The residual resistance of the Double-M craft is improved by 2.45% compared to that of the Delft 372 catamaran. In the case of maximum improvement (at λ/L = 1.50), the relative added resistance of the Double-M craft is 10.34% lower than the Delft 372 catamaran; moreover, the heave and pitch motion responses were 72.5% and 35.5% less, respectively.

Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Added Resistance of Ships in Waves

2016 ◽  
Vol 139 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ould el Moctar ◽  
Sebastian Sigmund ◽  
Jens Ley ◽  
Thomas E. Schellin
Keyword(s):  
Water Resistance ◽  
Frictional Resistance ◽  
Medium Size ◽  
Total Resistance ◽  
Added Resistance ◽  
Short Waves ◽  
Radiation Forces ◽  
Calm Water ◽  
Added Resistance In Waves ◽  
Force Components

Two Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) based field methods numerically predicted added resistance in regular head waves for a 14,000 TEU containership and a medium size cruise ship. Long and short waves of different frequencies were considered. Added resistance was decomposed into diffraction and radiation force components, whereby diffraction forces were obtained by restraining the ship in waves and radiation forces by prescribing the motions of the ship in calm water. In short waves, the diffraction part of total resistance was dominant as almost no ship motions were induced. In long waves, the sum of diffraction and radiation forces exceeded total resistance, i.e., the interaction of these two force components, which caused the reduction of total resistance, needed to be accounted for. Predictions were compared with model test measurements. Particular emphasis was placed on the following aspects: discretization errors, frictional resistance as part of total added resistance in waves, and diffraction and radiation components of added resistance in waves. Investigations comprised two steps, namely, a preliminary simulation to determine calm water resistance and a second simulation to compute total resistance in waves, always using the same grids. Added resistance was obtained by subtracting calm water resistance from total averaged wave resistance. When frictional resistance dominated over calm water resistance, which holds for nearly all conventional ships at moderate Froude numbers, high grid densities were required in the neighborhood surrounding the hull as well as prism cells on top of the model's surface.

Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Added Resistance of Ships in Waves

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ould el Moctar ◽  
Sebastian Sigmund ◽  
Thomas E. Schellin
Keyword(s):  
Water Resistance ◽  
Frictional Resistance ◽  
Medium Size ◽  
Total Resistance ◽  
Added Resistance ◽  
Short Waves ◽  
Radiation Forces ◽  
Calm Water ◽  
Added Resistance In Waves ◽  
Force Components

A RANS-based field method numerically predicted added resistance in regular head waves for a 14000 TEU containership (Duisburg Test Case) and a medium-size cruise ship. We concentrated our investigations on short waves. For different frequencies, we decomposed added resistance into diffraction and radiation force components, whereby diffraction forces were obtained by restraining the ship in waves and radiation forces, by prescribing the motions of the ship in calm water. In short waves, the diffraction part of total resistance was dominant as almost no ship motions were induced. In long waves, the sum of diffraction and radiation forces exceeded total resistance, i.e., the interaction of these two force components, which caused the reduction of total resistance, had to be accounted for. Predictions were compared with model test measurements. Particular emphasis was placed on the following aspects: discretization errors, frictional resistance as part of total added resistance in waves, diffraction and radiation components of added resistance in waves, and the influence of surge motion on added resistance. Investigations comprised two steps, namely, a preliminary simulation to determine calm-water resistance and a second simulation to compute total resistance in waves, always using the same grids. Added resistance was obtained by subtracting calm-water resistance from total averaged wave resistance. When frictional resistance dominated calm-water resistance, which holds for nearly all conventional ships at moderate Froude numbers, high grid densities were required in the neighborhood surrounding the hull.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document