scholarly journals Outcomes of Liver Resections after Liver Transplantation at a High-Volume Hepatobiliary Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 3685
Author(s):  
Julian M. O. Pohl ◽  
Nathanael Raschzok ◽  
Dennis Eurich ◽  
Michael Pflüger ◽  
Leke Wiering ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Biliary Tree ◽  
Lymphoproliferative Disease ◽  
Meld Score ◽  
Liver Resections ◽  
Liver Transplantations ◽  
End Stage

Although more than one million liver transplantations have been carried out worldwide, the literature on liver resections in transplanted livers is scarce. We herein report a total number of fourteen patients, who underwent liver resection after liver transplantation (LT) between September 2004 and 2017. Hepatocellular carcinomas and biliary tree pathologies were the predominant indications for liver resection (n = 5 each); other indications were abscesses (n = 2), post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (n = 1) and one benign tumor. Liver resection was performed at a median of 120 months (interquartile range (IQR): 56.5–199.25) after LT with a preoperative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of 11 (IQR: 6.75–21). Severe complications greater than Clavien–Dindo Grade III occurred in 5 out of 14 patients (36%). We compared liver resection patients, who had a treatment option of retransplantation (ReLT), with actual ReLTs (excluding early graft failure or rejection, n = 44). Bearing in mind that late ReLT was carried out at a median of 117 months after first transplantation and a median of MELD of 32 (IQR: 17.5–37); three-year survival following liver resection after LT was similar to late ReLT (50.0% vs. 59.1%; p = 0.733). Compared to ReLT, liver resection after LT is a rare surgical procedure with significantly shorter hospital (mean 25, IQR: 8.75–49; p = 0.034) and ICU stays (mean 2, IQR: 1–8; p < 0.001), acceptable complications and survival rates.

scholarly journals Adoption of MELD score increases the number of liver transplant

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Souto NACIF ◽  
Wellington ANDRAUS ◽  
Rodrigo Bronze MARTINO ◽  
Vinicius Rocha SANTOS ◽  
Rafael Soares PINHEIRO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Sao Paulo ◽  
Meld Score ◽  
The State ◽  
São Paulo ◽  
Liver Transplants ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Before And After ◽  
End Stage

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation is performed at large transplant centers worldwide as a therapeutic intervention for patients with end-stage liver diseases. AIM: To analyze the outcomes and incidence of liver transplantation performed at the University of São Paulo and to compare those with the State of São Paulo before and after adoption of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. METHOD: Evaluation of the number of liver transplantations before and after adoption of the MELD score. Mean values and standard deviations were used to analyze normally distributed variables. The incidence results were compared with those of the State of São Paulo. RESULTS: There was a high prevalence of male patients, with a predominance of middle-aged. The main indication for liver transplantation was hepatitis C cirrhosis. The mean and median survival rates and overall survival over ten and five years were similar between the groups (p>0.05). The MELD score increased over the course of the study period for patients who underwent liver transplantation (p>0.05). There were an increased number of liver transplants after adoption of the MELD score at this institution and in the State of São Paulo (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The adoption of the MELD score led to increase the number of liver transplants performed in São Paulo.

scholarly journals Prognosis of liver transplantation: Does postoperative ileus matter?

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruiping Bai ◽  
Rui An ◽  
Kunyu Han ◽  
Mengwen Xue ◽  
Simei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Postoperative Ileus ◽  
Total Bilirubin ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Meld Score ◽  
Gastrointestinal Dysfunction ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Relative Factors

Abstract Background Nowadays, liver transplantation has become a main therapy for end-stage liver disease. However, studies show that there are high mortality and severe complications after liver transplantation. Although gastrointestinal dysfunction is a common and major complication after liver transplantation, there was rarely relative research. This study aims to elucidate the factors about ileus after liver transplantation and patients’ survival. Methods We collected and analyzed the data (n = 318, 2016–2019) from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University. After excluding cases, a total of 293 patients were included for this study. The subjects were divided into a non-ileus group and an ileus group. We reviewed 38 variables (including preoperative, operative and postoperative relative factors). Additionally, other complications after liver transplantation and survival data were compared between two groups. Results Of the 293 patients, 23.2% (n = 68) experienced postoperative ileus. Ileus patients were not different with non-ileus patients in preoperative, operative and postoperative factors. HBV-positive patients with ileus had a lower MELD score (P = 0.025), and lower postoperative total bilirubin was correlated with ileus (P = 0.049). Besides, Child–Pugh score of HCC patients with ileus was low (P = 0.029). The complications after liver transplantation were not different between two groups. Compared with the patients without ileus, the patients with ileus had a higher mortality rate. Conclusion According to our research, ileus-patients had a lower 1-year survival rates. The preoperative MELD score and postoperative total bilirubin of HBV-positive patients with ileus were lower, and Child–Pugh score of HCC patients with ileus was also lower.

scholarly journals Prognosis of Liver Transplantation: Does Postoperative Ileus Matter ?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruiping Bai ◽  
Rui An ◽  
Kunyu Han ◽  
Xin Shen ◽  
Zheng Shaohua
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Postoperative Ileus ◽  
Total Bilirubin ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Meld Score ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Relative Factors

Abstract Background: Nowadays, liver transplantation has become a main therapy for end-stage liver disease. However, studies show that there are high mortality and severe complications after liver transplantation. Although gastrointestinal dysfunction is a common and major complication among complications, there was rarely relative research. The study aims to elucidate the factors about ileus after liver transplantation and patients’ survival rate. Methods: We collected data (n=318, 2016–2019) from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University. After excluding cases, a total of 293 patients were included for this study. The subjects were divided into a non-ileus group and an ileus group. We reviewed 38 variables (including preoperative, operative and postoperative relative factors). In addition, other complications after liver transplantation and survival data were compared among groups. Results: Of the 293 patients, 23.2% (n=68) experienced postoperative ileus. Ileus patients were not different with non-ileus patients in preoperative, operative and postoperative factors. HBV-positive patients with ileus had a lower MELD score (P=0.025), and lower postoperative total bilirubin was correlated with ileus (P=0.049). Besides, Child-Pugh score of HCC patients with ileus was low (P=0.029). The complications after liver transplantation and survival rate were all not different among groups. Conclusions: According to our research, compared with non-ileus patients, we didn’t obtain the risk factors for patients with ileus. Ileus-patients didn’t increase complications after liver transplantation and didn’t decrease post-LT survival rates. But the preoperative MELD score and postoperative total bilirubin of HBV-positive patients with ileus were lower, and Child-Pugh score of HCC patients with ileus was also lower.

scholarly journals Implementing a robotic liver resection program does not always require prior laparoscopic experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Balzano ◽  
Lorenzo Bernardi ◽  
Giovanni Tincani ◽  
Davide Ghinolfi ◽  
Fabio Melandro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Laparoscopic Liver Resection ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Meld Score ◽  
Robotic Liver Resection ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Pringle’S Maneuver

Abstract Background Preliminary experience in laparoscopic liver surgery is usually suggested prior to implementation of a robotic liver resection program. Methods This was a retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing robotic (RLR) versus laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma at a center with concomitant initiation of robotic and laparoscopic programs Results A total of 92 consecutive patients operated on between May 2014 and February 2019 were included: 40 RLR versus 52 LLR. Median age (69 vs. 67; p = 0.74), male sex (62.5% vs. 59.6%; p = 0.96), incidence of chronic liver disease (97.5% vs.98.1%; p = 0.85), median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (8 vs. 9; p = 0.92), and median largest nodule size (22 vs. 24 mm) were similar between RLR and LLR. In the LLR group, there was a numerically higher incidence of nodules located in segment 4 (20.0% vs. 16.6%; p = 0.79); a numerically higher use of Pringle’s maneuver (32.7% vs. 20%; p = 0.23), and a shorter duration of surgery (median of 165.5 vs. 217.5 min; p = 0.04). Incidence of complications (25% vs.32.7%; p = 0.49), blood transfusions (2.5% vs.9.6%; p = 0.21), and median length of stay (6 vs. 5; p = 0.54) were similar between RLR and LLR. The overall (OS) and recurrence-free (RFS) survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 100 and 79 and 95 and 26% for RLR versus 96.2 and 76.9 and 84.6 and 26.9% for LLR (log-rank p = 0.65 for OS and 0.72 for RFS). Conclusions Based on our results, concurrent implementation of a robotic and laparoscopic liver resection program appears feasible and safe, and is associated with similar oncologic long-term outcomes.

scholarly journals Motion – Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Should Undergo Early Liver Transplantation: Arguments for the Motion

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 697-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-Mee Lee
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis ◽  
Sclerosing Cholangitis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Biliary Tree ◽  
Unknown Etiology ◽  
Dismal Prognosis ◽  
History Of ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Extrahepatic Biliary Tree

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a condition of unknown etiology that causes progressive inflammation, fibrosis and obliteration of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary tree. There is no medical cure, and ursodeoxycholic acid and other drugs have not been shown to affect the natural history of the disease. Endoscopic dilation is of value only in the relief of symptoms and complications related to dominant strictures. Cholangiocarcinoma occurs in a substantial minority of cases, especially those with ulcerative colitis and cirrhosis, and is often not clinically apparent before surgery. There are no good serologic tests for early cancers. Because this tumour has such a dismal prognosis, some authorities recommend that liver transplantation be undertaken before its development. This procedure is the only curative option for PSC, and excellent survival rates have been reported. There is evidence that early transplantation, before end stage liver disease or cholangiocarcinoma have developed, improves the survival and quality of life of patients with PSC. Because it is the only procedure of proven benefit, patients with PSC should be considered for liver transplantation early in the course of the disease.

Radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (10) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Liver Resections ◽  
Multi Stage

Introduction: Radical liver resection is the only method for the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM); however, only 20–30% of patients with CLMs can be radically treated. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the possible methods of palliative treatment in such patients. Methods: RFA was performed in 381 patients with CLMs between 01 Jan 2001 and 31 Dec 2018. The mean age of the patients was 65.2±8.7 years. The male to female ratio was 2:1. Open laparotomy was done in 238 (62.5%) patients and the CT-navigated transcutaneous approach was used in 143 (37.5%) patients. CLMs <5 cm (usually <3 cm) in diameter were the indication for RFA. We used RFA as the only method in 334 (87.6%) patients; RFA in combination with resection was used in 36 (9.4%), and with multi-stage resection in 11 (3%) patients. We performed RFA in a solitary CLM in 170 (44.6%) patients, and in 2−5 CLMs in 211 (55.6%) patients. We performed computed tomography in each patient 48 hours after procedure. Results: The 30-day postoperative mortality was zero. Complications were present in 4.8% of transcutaneous and in 14.2% of open procedures, respectively, in the 30-day postoperative period. One-, 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 94.8, 66.8, 43.9 and 16.6%, respectively, in patients undergoing RFA, and 90.6, 69.1, 52.8 and 39.2%, respectively, in patients with liver resections. Disease free survival was 63.2, 30.1, 18.4 and 13.1%, respectively, in the same patients after RFA, and 71.1, 33.3, 22.8 and 15.5%, respectively, after liver resections. Conclusion: RFA is a palliative thermal ablation method, which is one of therapeutic options in patients with radically non-resectable CLMs. RFA is useful especially in a non-resectable, or resectable (but for the price of large liver resection) solitary CLM <3 cm in diameter and in CLM relapses. RFA is also part of multi-stage liver procedures.

scholarly journals RIPK3-Mediated Necroptosis and Neutrophil Infiltration Are Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Alcoholic Cirrhosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenzhen Zhang ◽  
Guomin Xie ◽  
Li Liang ◽  
Hui Liu ◽  
Jing Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Alcoholic Cirrhosis ◽  
Normal Liver ◽  
Neutrophil Infiltration ◽  
Meld Score ◽  
End Stage Liver Disease ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
End Stage

Alcoholic cirrhosis is an end-stage liver disease with impaired survival and often requires liver transplantation. Recent data suggests that receptor-interacting protein kinase-3- (RIPK3-) mediated necroptosis plays an important role in alcoholic cirrhosis. Additionally, neutrophil infiltration is the most characteristic pathologic hallmark of alcoholic hepatitis. Whether RIPK3 level is correlated with neutrophil infiltration or poor prognosis in alcoholic cirrhotic patients is still unknown. We aimed to determine the correlation of RIPK3 and neutrophil infiltration with the prognosis in the end-stage alcoholic cirrhotic patients. A total of 20 alcoholic cirrhotic patients subjected to liver transplantation and 5 normal liver samples from control patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Neutrophil infiltration and necroptosis were assessed by immunohistochemical staining for myeloperoxidase (MPO) and RIPK3, respectively. The noninvasive score system (model for end-stage liver disease (MELD)) and histological score systems (Ishak, Knodell, and ALD grading and ALD stage) were used to evaluate the prognosis. Neutrophil infiltration was aggravated in patients with a high MELD score (≥32) in the liver. The MPO and RIPK3 levels in the liver were positively related to the Ishak score. The RIPK3 was also significantly and positively related to the Knodell score. In conclusion, RIPK3-mediated necroptosis and neutrophil-mediated alcoholic liver inflammatory response are highly correlated with poor prognosis in patients with end-stage alcoholic cirrhosis. RIPK3 and MPO might serve as potential predictors for poor prognosis in alcoholic cirrhotic patients.

Current State and Future Possibilities in Liver Transplantation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Rademacher ◽  
◽  
Niklas Aehling ◽  
Robert Sucher ◽  
Thomas Berg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Meld Score ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Industrialized Countries ◽  
Normothermic Machine Perfusion ◽  
Donor Characteristics

Due to medical and surgical progress, liver transplantation (LT) is is nowadays a routine treatment for terminal liver failure and hepatic malignancies. However, in recent years there has been a change in the indications for LT. Especially in western industrialized countries, the use of LT for chronic hepatis B and hepatitis C cirrhosis is continuously decreasing since the introduction of effective antiviral drugs. Liver cirrhosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), alcoholic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis are now among the leading indications for LT. Due to tremendous progress in oncology, immunology, and technical aspects, multidisciplinary cancer treatment increasingly includes LT for non-HCC hepatobiliary malignancies. Excellent 5-year survival rates of 75 to 80% can now be achieved after LT. However, in patients with liver cirrhosis, the implementation of a ‘sickest first’ principle for liver allocation has led to an increasing number of critically ill patients undergoing liver transplantation. This results in an increased morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. Moreover, donor characteristics have markedly shifted to less ideal grafts due to an increasing shortage of donor organs in many countries. In this context, normothermic machine perfusion with oxygenated blood components using pulsatile flow has been shown to reduce liver damage despite a prolonged preservation time and might be able to provide viability testing for otherwise discarded organs. With favorable donor and recipient conditions, excellent long-term results can be obtained with a 10-year survival rate of close to 70%. However, in patients with a high MELD score (>30), survival rates markedly decrease by 12-18%. Future research should focus on optimization of organ allocation, optimization of immunosuppression including tolerance induction, and on increasing the donor organ pool to further improve and the numbers of successful LT.

scholarly journals Liver Transplantation: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J Wall
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Alcoholic Cirrhosis ◽  
Liver Transplants ◽  
Recidivism Rates ◽  
Societal Challenges ◽  
Therapeutic Value ◽  
Future Challenges ◽  
Will Force ◽  
End Stage

Liver transplantation has evolved from a rare and risky operation of questionable therapeutic value to the preferred treatment for an extensive list of end-stage liver diseases. Superior immunosuppression (cyclosporine), and improvements in surgery and anesthesia brought liver grafting to its current level of success. Nearly 60,000 liver transplants have been performed, and survival rates are very good; however liver grafting faces serious immediate and long term challenges, mainly due to the widening gap between donor supply and recipient demand. Increasing numbers of sick candidates, recurrent disease (especially hepatitis C) and recidivism rates after transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis will force increasingly difficult decisions on candidate selection and priority listing of potential recipients. Although xenotransplantation may be the ultimate solution, it has its own specific set of biological and societal challenges - the full extent of which should be revealed in the next several years.

scholarly journals The use of MELD scores in critically ill cirrhotic patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (16) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Supannee Rassameehiran ◽  
Tinsay Woreta
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Meld Score ◽  
Chronic Liver Failure ◽  
End Stage Liver Disease ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
End Stage

The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) was originally created to predict survival following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and was subsequently found to accurately predict mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. It has been used in the United States for liver allocation since 2002, and implementation of the MELD score resulted in a reduction in total number of deaths on the waitlist and a reduction in waiting time. Critically ill cirrhotic patients have an in-hospital mortality greater than 50%. Although the MELD score was also found to be an accurate predictor of in-ICU mortality and in-hospital mortality after ICU admission in critically ill cirrhotic patients, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score appears to perform better in many studies. The Chronic Liver Failure Consortium Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (CLIF-C ACLF) score was later developed by using specific cut-points for each organ failure score system in CLIF patients to predict mortality in patients with ACLF. Neither the MELD nor SOFA score independently predicts post-liver transplantation mortality in cirrhotic patients with extrahepatic organ failure and should not be use as a delisting criterion for these patients. More data are needed to determine the accuracy of the CLIF-C ACLF score in predicting post-liver transplantation outcomes. Prospective evaluation of critically ill cirrhotic patients is needed to optimize liver organ allocation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document