scholarly journals Increased Diagnostic Certainty of Periprosthetic Joint Infections by Combining Microbiological Results with Histopathological Samples Gained via a Minimally Invasive Punching Technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 3364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Enz ◽  
Johanna Becker ◽  
Philipp Warnke ◽  
Friedrich Prall ◽  
Christoph Lutter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Joint Infection ◽  
Punch Biopsy ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Preoperative Biopsy ◽  
Diagnostic Certainty ◽  
Microbiological Sample ◽  
Diagnostic Approaches ◽  
Single Method ◽  
Minor Criteria

Background: The diagnosis of low-grade infections of endoprostheses is challenging. There are still no unified guidelines for standardised diagnostic approaches, recommendations are categorised into major and minor criteria. Additional histopathological samples might sustain the diagnosis. However, ambulatory preoperative biopsy collection is not widespread. Method: 102 patients with hip or knee endoprosthesis and suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were examined by arthrocentesis with microbiological sample and histopathological punch biopsy. The data were retrospectively analysed for diagnosis concordance. Results: Preoperative microbiology compared to intraoperative results was positive in 51.9% (sensitivity 51.9%, specificity 97.3%). In comparison of preoperative biopsy to intraoperative diagnostic results 51.9% cases were positive (sensitivity 51.9%, specificity 100.0%). The combination of preoperative biopsy and microbiology in comparison to intraoperative results was positive in 70.4% of the cases (sensitivity 70.4%, specificity 97.3%). Conclusion: The diagnosis of PJI is complex. One single method to reliably detect an infection is currently not available. With the present method histopathological samples might be obtained quickly, easily and safely for the preoperative detection of PJI. A combination of microbiological and histopathological sampling increases the sensitivity up to 18.5% to detect periprosthetic infection.

scholarly journals Synovial Complement Factors in Patients with Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Undergoing Revision Arthroplasty of the Hip or Knee Joint

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 434
Author(s):  
Frank Sebastian Fröschen ◽  
Sophia Schell ◽  
Matthias Dominik Wimmer ◽  
Gunnar Thorben Rembert Hischebeth ◽  
Hendrik Kohlhof ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Synovial Fluid ◽  
Multiple Regression ◽  
Complement System ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Factor H ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Complement Factors ◽  
Fluid Levels

The role and diagnostic value of the synovial complement system in patients with low-grade periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are unclear. We sought to evaluate, for the first time, the usefulness of synovial complement factors in these patients by measuring the individual synovial fluid levels of complement factors (C1q, C3b/iC3b, C4b, C5, C5a, C9, factor B, factor D, factor H, factor I, properdin, and mannose-binding lectin [MBL]). The patients (n = 74) were classified into septic (n = 28) and aseptic (n = 46). Receiver-operator characteristic curves and a multiple regression model to determine the feasibility of a combination of the tested cytokines to determine the infection status were calculated. The synovial fluid levels of C1q, C3b/C3i, C4b, C5, C5a, MBL, and properdin were significantly elevated in the PJI group. The best sensitivity and specificity was found for C1q. The multiple regression models revealed that the combination of C1q, C3b/C3i, C4b, C5, C5a, and MBL was associated with the best sensitivity (83.3%) and specificity (79.2%) for a cutoff value of 0.62 (likelihood ratio: 4.0; area under the curve: 0.853). Nevertheless, only a combined model showed acceptable results. The expression patterns of the complement factors suggested that PJI activates all three pathways of the complement system.

scholarly journals Nanotechnology as an Anti-Infection Strategy in Periprosthetic Joint Infections (PJI)

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Pier Francesco Indelli ◽  
Stefano Ghirardelli ◽  
Ferdinando Iannotti ◽  
Alessia Maria Indelli ◽  
Gennaro Pipino
Keyword(s):  
Joint Infection ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Treatment Protocols ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
Efficient Control ◽  
Cement Joint ◽  
Clay Nanotubes

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a devastating consequence of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) because of its high morbidity and its high impact on patient quality of life. The lack of standardized preventive and treatment strategies is a major challenge for arthroplasty surgeons. The purpose of this article was to explore the potential and future uses of nanotechnology as a tool for the prevention and treatment of PJI. Methods: Multiple review articles from the PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were reviewed in order to establish the current efficacy of nanotechnology in PJI preventive or therapeutic scenarios. Results: As a prevention tool, anti-biofilm implants equipped with nanoparticles (silver, silk fibroin, poly nanofibers, nanophase selenium) have shown promising antibacterial functionality. As a therapeutic tool, drug-loaded nanomolecules have been created and a wide variety of carrier materials (chitosan, titanium, calcium phosphate) have shown precise drug targeting and efficient control of drug release. Other nanotechnology-based antibiotic carriers (lipid nanoparticles, silica, clay nanotubes), when added to common bone cements, enhanced prolonged drug delivery, making this technology promising for the creation of antibiotic-added cement joint spacers. Conclusion: Although still in its infancy, nanotechnology has the potential to revolutionize prevention and treatment protocols of PJI. Nevertheless, extensive basic science and clinical research will be needed to investigate the potential toxicities of nanoparticles.

scholarly journals High Accuracy of Second Generation Unyvero ITI Automated Multiplex PCR Analysis of Joint Fluid Aspirate in Low-Grade Prosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0030
Author(s):  
Christian Suren ◽  
Susanne Feihl ◽  
Sabrina Cabric ◽  
Ingo Banke ◽  
Bernhard Haller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiplex Pcr ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Joint Fluid ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Tissue Biopsy ◽  
Conventional Culture ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Fluid Culture

Aims and Objectives: A major obstacle for the treatment of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is the identification of the organism causing it. While the diagnostic criteria ruling PJIs in or out have become ever more accurate, detecting the causative pathogen(s) still relies mostly on conventional culture. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of a second generation multiplex PCR assay (Unyvero ITI G2, Curetis AG, Holzgerlingen, Germany) used on synovial fluid specimens. Materials and Methods: Prospectively collected frozen joint fluid specimens from 26 patients undergoing arthroplasty revision surgery of the hip or knee for any reason were tested as per the manufacturer’s protocol. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the Chi-squared-test and a combination of the serum CRP level, leukocyte count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, joint fluid culture, tissue biopsy culture, and tissue biopsy histology served as gold standard. Results: Of the 26 cases included in the study, 15 were infected and 11 aseptic. Conventional joint fluid culture showed a sensitivity 0.67 and a specificity of 0.91. Joint fluid multiplex PCR yielded a sensitivity of 0.8 and a specificity of 1.0. Conclusion: This is the first study to assess the second generation Unyvero ITI cartridge on joint fluid aspirate for the detection of prosthetic joint infection. In our setting, the method achieved a higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional culture. We conclude that, to improve pathogen detection before revision surgery, this method represents a valuable tool.

scholarly journals Bone and Joint Infections among Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 209-215
Author(s):  
Cybele Lara Abad ◽  
Vania Phuoc ◽  
Prashant Kapoor ◽  
Pritish K. Tosh ◽  
Irene G. Sia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Septic Arthritis ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Bone And Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract. Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients are at increased risk for infection. This study describes bone and joint infections (BJI) among HSCT recipients.Methods: We reviewed 5861 patients who underwent HSCT at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN from January 1, 2005 through January 1, 2015 for study inclusion. BJI was defined as native septic arthritis, prosthetic joint infection, osteomyelitis, and orthopedic implant infection. All adults with BJI after HSCT were included in the analysis.Results: Of 5861 patients, 33 (0.6%) developed BJI. Native joint septic arthritis was the most common BJI occurring in 15/33 (45.4%) patients. Patients were predominantly male (24/33, 72.7%), with median age of 58 (range 20-72) years. BJI was diagnosed a median of 39 (range 1-114) months after allogeneic (14/33, 42.4%) or autologous (19/33, 57.6%) HSCT. Organisms were recovered via tissue (24/27, 88.9%), synovial fluid (13/17, 76.5%), and/or blood cultures (16/25, 64%). Most underwent surgical debridement (23/33, 69.7%). Patients were followed a median of 78.3 months (range 74-119). Therapy was unsuccessful in 4/33 (12.1%), with death related to the underlying BJI in two (50%). Failure occurred a median of 3.4 (0.1-48.5) months from diagnosis. At last follow up, 7/33 (21.2%) patients were alive. Median overall survival was 13 months (0.07-70.6).Conclusion: BJI among HSCT recipients is infrequent. The most common infection is native joint septic arthritis. Pathogens appear similar to patients without HSCT. Treatment involving surgical-medical modalities is successful, with most patients surviving >1 year after BJI.

Outcomes of single- and two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic joint infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (8) ◽  
pp. 1373-1379
Author(s):  
Hosam E. Matar ◽  
Benjamin V. Bloch ◽  
Susan E. Snape ◽  
Peter J. James
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Recurrent Infection ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Total Knee

Aims Single-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is gaining popularity in treating chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). We have introduced this approach to our clinical practice and sought to evaluate rates of reinfection and re-revision, along with predictors of failure of both single- and two-stage rTKA for chronic PJI. Methods A retrospective comparative cohort study of all rTKAs for chronic PJI between 1 April 2003 and 31 December 2018 was undertaken using prospective databases. Patients with acute infections were excluded; rTKAs were classified as single-stage, stage 1, or stage 2 of two-stage revision. The primary outcome measure was failure to eradicate or recurrent infection. Variables evaluated for failure by regression analysis included age, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, infecting organisms, and the presence of a sinus. Patient survivorship was also compared between the groups. Results A total of 292 consecutive first-time rTKAs for chronic PJI were included: 82 single-stage (28.1%); and 210 two-stage (71.9%) revisions. The mean age was 71 years (27 to 90), with 165 females (57.4%), and a mean BMI of 30.9 kg/m2 (20 to 53). Significantly more patients with a known infecting organism were in the single-stage group (93.9% vs 80.47%; p = 0.004). The infecting organism was identified preoperatively in 246 cases (84.2%). At a mean follow-up of 6.3 years (2.0 to 17.6), the failure rate was 6.1% in the single-stage, and 12% in the two-stage groups. All failures occurred within four years of treatment. The presence of a sinus was an independent risk factor for failure (odds ratio (OR) 4.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.593 to 15.505; p = 0.006), as well as age > 80 years (OR 5.962; 95% CI 1.156 to 30.73; p = 0.033). The ten-year patient survivorship rate was 72% in the single-stage group compared with 70.5% in the two-stage group. This difference was not significant (p = 0.517). Conclusion Single-stage rTKA is an effective strategy with a high success rate comparable to two-stage approach in appropriately selected patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(8):1373–1379.

Unexpected low-grade infections in revision hip arthroplasty for aseptic loosening

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (6) ◽  
pp. 1070-1077
Author(s):  
Christian Hipfl ◽  
Wiebke Mooij ◽  
Carsten Perka ◽  
Sebastian Hardt ◽  
Georgi I. Wassilew
Keyword(s):  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Implant Failure ◽  
Revision Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus ◽  
Histopathological Analysis ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Single Specimen ◽  
Musculoskeletal Infection

Aims The purpose of this study was to evaluate unexpected positive cultures in total hip arthroplasty (THA) revisions for presumed aseptic loosening, to assess the prevalence of low-grade infection using two definition criteria, and to analyze its impact on implant survival after revision. Methods A total of 274 THA revisions performed for presumed aseptic loosening from 2012 to 2016 were reviewed. In addition to obtaining intraoperative tissue cultures from all patients, synovial and sonication fluid samples of the removed implant were obtained in 215 cases (79%) and 101 cases (37%), respectively. Histopathological analysis was performed in 250 cases (91%). Patients were classified as having low-grade infections according to institutional criteria and Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2013 criteria. Low-grade infections according to institutional criteria were treated with targeted antibiotics for six weeks postoperatively. Implant failure was defined as the need for re-revision resulting from periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic reasons. The mean follow-up was 68 months (26 to 95). Results Unexpected positive intraoperative samples were found in 77 revisions (28%). Low-grade infection was diagnosed in 36 cases (13%) using institutional criteria and in nine cases (3%) using MSIS ICM 2013 criteria. In all, 41 patients (15%) had single specimen growth of a low-virulent pathogen and were deemed contaminated. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and anaerobes were the most commonly isolated bacteria. Implant failure for PJI was higher in revisions with presumed contaminants (5/41, 12%) compared to those with low-grade infections (2/36, 6%) and those with negative samples (5/197, 3%) (p = 0.021). The rate of all-cause re-revision was similar in patients diagnosed with low-grade infections (5/36, 14%) and those with presumed contaminants (6/41, 15%) and negative samples (21/197, 11%) (p = 0.699). Conclusion Our findings suggest that the presumption of culture contamination in aseptic revision hip arthroplasty may increase the detection of PJI. In this cohort, the presence of low-grade infection did not increase the risk of re-revision. Further studies are needed to assess the relevance of single specimen growth and the benefits of specific postoperative antibiotic regimens. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1070–1077.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the standard procedure for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in Germany - Results of a survey within the EndoCert initiative

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Rimke ◽  
Andreas Enz ◽  
Hermann Josef Bail ◽  
Peter Heppt ◽  
Bernd Kladny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Standard Procedure ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Joint Replacements ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Standardized Treatment ◽  
Principles Of Treatment ◽  
Further Development

Abstract Background: The periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication in the field of arthroplasty. Despite the rising number of primary joint replacements, no unified therapeutic standard has been established for the treatment of PJI yet.Methods: A survey on the principles of treatment of PJI in Germany wasconducted. A total of 515 EndoProthetikZentren (EPZ) were included, resulting in a response rate of 100%.Results: For early infections 97.6% of the centers use prosthesis-preserving procedures (DAIR). A one-stage exchange was implemented by less than 50% of the centers. If implemented, this treatment entails a prior selection of patients for a successful treatment. The two-stage exchange is performed in all centers, and most centers proceed with the implantation of a cemented spacer between stages. 75% of the centers proceed with a center-based concept for the treatment of PJI.Conclusion: The aim of a uniform PJI standard at the centers has not yet been fully achieved. Further improvements within the certification were initiated. The most relevant treatment options in Germany are displayed. The two-stage revision with a cemented spacer is the most widely implemented treatment. This exposition of principles could help for the further development of standardized treatment guidelines and definitions.

Should all patients with a culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection be treated with antibiotics?

2022 ◽  
Vol 104-B (1) ◽  
pp. 183-188
Author(s):  
Maxime van Sloten ◽  
Joan Gómez-Junyent ◽  
Tristan Ferry ◽  
Nicolò Rossi ◽  
Sabine Petersdorf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Recurrent Infection ◽  
Molecular Techniques ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Causative Microorganism ◽  
Culture Negative

Aims The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) when adequate methods of culture are used, and to evaluate the outcome in patients who were treated with antibiotics for a culture-negative PJI compared with those in whom antibiotics were withheld. Methods A multicentre observational study was undertaken: 1,553 acute and 1,556 chronic PJIs, diagnosed between 2013 and 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. Culture-negative PJIs were diagnosed according to the Muskuloskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), International Consensus Meeting (ICM), and European Bone and Joint Society (EBJIS) definitions. The primary outcome was recurrent infection, and the secondary outcome was removal of the prosthetic components for any indication, both during a follow-up period of two years. Results None of the acute PJIs and 70 of the chronic PJIs (4.7%) were culture-negative; a total of 36 culture-negative PJIs (51%) were treated with antibiotics, particularly those with histological signs of infection. After two years of follow-up, no recurrent infections occurred in patients in whom antibiotics were withheld. The requirement for removal of the components for any indication during follow-up was not significantly different in those who received antibiotics compared with those in whom antibiotics were withheld (7.1% vs 2.9%; p = 0.431). Conclusion When adequate methods of culture are used, the incidence of culture-negative PJIs is low. In patients with culture-negative PJI, antibiotic treatment can probably be withheld if there are no histological signs of infection. In all other patients, diagnostic efforts should be made to identify the causative microorganism by means of serology or molecular techniques. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(1):183–188.

scholarly journals Do Prosthetic Joint Infections Worsen the Functional Ambulatory Outcome of Patients with Joint Replacements? A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 872
Author(s):  
Isabel Mur ◽  
Marcos Jordán ◽  
Alba Rivera ◽  
Virginia Pomar ◽  
José Carlos González ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Assistive Device ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Knee Prostheses ◽  
Matched Cohort Study ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections ◽  
Hip Arthroplasties

Objectives: To assess the effect on the functional ambulatory outcome of postoperative joint infection (PJI) cured at the first treatment attempt versus not developing PJI in patients with hip and knee prostheses. Methods: In a single-hospital retrospectively matched cohort study, each patient with PJI between 2007 and 2016 was matched on age, sex, type of prosthesis and year of implantation with two other patients with uninfected arthroplasties. The definition of a PJI cure included infection eradication, no further surgical procedures, no PJI-related mortality and no suppressive antibiotics. Functional ambulatory status evaluated one year after the last surgery was classified into four simple categories: able to walk without assistance, able to walk with one crutch, able to walk with two crutches, and unable to walk. Patients with total hip arthroplasties (THAs), total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) and partial hip arthroplasties (PHAs) were analysed separately. Results: A total of 109 PJI patients (38 TKA, 41 THA, 30 PHA) and 218 non-PJI patients were included. In a model adjusted for clinically relevant variables, PJI was associated with a higher risk of needing an assistive device for ambulation (vs. walking without aid) among THA (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.10, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.26–7.57; p = 0.014) and TKA patients (OR 5.40, 95% CI 2.12–13.67; p < 0.001), and with requiring two crutches to walk or being unable to walk (vs. walking unaided or with one crutch) among PHA patients (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.01–9.20; p = 0.047). Conclusions: Ambulatory outcome in patients with hip and knee prostheses with postoperative PJI is worse than in patients who do not have PJI.

scholarly journals The Right Time to Safely Re-Evaluate Empirical Antimicrobial Treatment of Hip or Knee Prosthetic Joint Infections

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 2113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deroche ◽  
Bémer ◽  
Valentin ◽  
Jolivet-Gougeon ◽  
Tandé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Joint Infection ◽  
Antimicrobial Treatment ◽  
Microbiological Diagnosis ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Time To Positivity ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
The Right ◽  
Polymicrobial Infections

Currently, no guideline provides recommendations on the duration of empirical antimicrobial treatment (EAT) in prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of our study was to describe the time to growth of bacteria involved in PJI, rendering possible decreased duration of EAT. Based on a French multicentre prospective cohort study, culture data from patients with confirmed hip or knee PJI were analysed. For each patient, five samples were processed. Time to positivity was defined as the first positive medium in at least one sample for virulent pathogens and as the first positive medium in at least two samples for commensals. Definitive diagnosis of polymicrobial infections was considered the day the last bacteria were identified. Among the 183 PJIs, including 28 polymicrobial infections, microbiological diagnosis was carried out between Day 1 (D1) and D5 for 96.7% of cases. There was no difference in the average time to positivity between acute and chronic PJI (p = 0.8871). Microbiological diagnosis was given earlier for monomicrobial than for polymicrobial infections (p = 0.0034). When an optimized culture of peroperative samples was carried out, almost all cases of PJI were diagnosed within five days, including polymicrobial infections. EAT can be re-evaluated at D5 according to microbiological documentation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document