scholarly journals Update on Weaning from Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enzo Lüsebrink ◽  
Christopher Stremmel ◽  
Konstantin Stark ◽  
Dominik Joskowiak ◽  
Thomas Czermak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Biomarkers ◽  
Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Ventricular Assist ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Hemodynamic Compromise ◽  
Successful Weaning ◽  
Bridge To Decision ◽  
Va Ecmo

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides temporary cardiac and respiratory support and has emerged as an established salvage intervention for patients with hemodynamic compromise or shock. It is thereby used as a bridge to recovery, bridge to permanent ventricular assist devices, bridge to transplantation, or bridge to decision. However, weaning from VA-ECMO differs between centers, and information about standardized weaning protocols are rare. Given the high mortality of patients undergoing VA-ECMO treatment, it is all the more important to answer the many questions still remaining unresolved in this field Standardized algorithms are recommended to optimize the weaning process and determine whether the VA-ECMO can be safely removed. Successful weaning as a multifactorial process requires sufficient recovery of myocardial and end-organ function. The patient should be considered hemodynamically stable, although left ventricular function often remains impaired during and after weaning. Echocardiographic and invasive hemodynamic monitoring seem to be indispensable when evaluating biventricular recovery and in determining whether the VA-ECMO can be weaned successfully or not, whereas cardiac biomarkers may not be useful in stratifying those who will recover. This review summarizes the strategies of weaning of VA-ECMO and discusses predictors of successful and poor weaning outcome.

Temporary Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Ten-Year Experience at a Cardiac Transplant Center

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 288-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bao G. Tran ◽  
Kim De La Cruz ◽  
Stuart Grant ◽  
Joseph Meltzer ◽  
Peyman Benharash ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Heart Transplant ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Ventricular Assist ◽  
Assist Devices ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Va Ecmo

Objective: Advances in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) have enabled rapid deployment in a wide range of clinical settings. We report our experience with venoarterial (VA) ECMO in adult patients over 10 years and aim to identify predictors of mortality. Design: This is a retrospective analysis of all adult patients undergoing VA ECMO at a tertiary care center from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2013. Results: A total of 224 consecutive cases were reviewed. Eighty (35.7%) patients survived to discharge and 144 (64.3%) patients died. Patients requiring ECMO for heart transplant graft failure had lower mortality (51.6%) compared to all other etiologies (69.1%; P = .02). Forty-two percent (94 of the 224) of the patients required cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) preceding ECMO and had higher rate of in-hospital mortality (74.5%) compared with patients without cardiac arrest (56.9%; P = .01). Patients with less than 30 minutes of CPR had a mortality rate of 40.0% compared to 91.4% for CPR > 30 minutes ( P = .001). In all, 24.1% of patients (54 of the 224) experienced ECMO-associated complications without significant increase in mortality, and 22.3% (50 of the 224) of the patients were transitioned to ventricular assist devices (VADs) or transplant. Patients bridged to a VAD including left ventricular assist devices and biventricular assist devices had a mortality rate of 56.1% versus 22.2% when bridged directly to transplant ( P = .01). Paradoxically, patients with an ejection fraction (EF) > 35% had a higher mortality compared to patients with an EF < 35% (75.3% vs 49.4%, respectively, P = .001). Conclusion: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with heart transplant graft failure had the best outcome. In patients who had cardiac arrest, prolonged CPR > 30 minutes was associated with very high mortality. Paradoxically, patients with EF > 35% had a higher mortality than patients with EF < 35%, likely reflecting patients with diastolic heart failure or noncardiac causes necessitating ECMO. For transplant candidates, direct bridge from ECMO to transplant could achieve a very good outcome.

Prevention and treatment of pulmonary congestion in patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (38) ◽  
pp. 3753-3761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enzo Lüsebrink ◽  
Mathias Orban ◽  
Danny Kupka ◽  
Clemens Scherer ◽  
Christian Hagl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Circulatory Support ◽  
Pulmonary Congestion ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Va Ecmo

Abstract Cardiogenic shock is still a major driver of mortality on intensive care units and complicates ∼10% of acute coronary syndromes with contemporary mortality rates up to 50%. In the meantime, percutaneous circulatory support devices, in particular venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), have emerged as an established salvage intervention for patients in cardiogenic shock. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation provides temporary circulatory support until other treatments are effective and enables recovery or serves as a bridge to ventricular assist devices, heart transplantation, or decision-making. In this critical care perspective, we provide a concise overview of VA-ECMO utilization in cardiogenic shock, considering rationale, critical care management, as well as weaning aspects. We supplement previous literature by focusing on therapeutic issues related to the vicious circle of retrograde aortic VA-ECMO flow, increased left ventricular (LV) afterload, insufficient LV unloading, and severe pulmonary congestion limiting prognosis in a relevant proportion of patients receiving VA-ECMO treatment. We will outline different modifications in percutaneous mechanical circulatory support to meet this challenge. Besides a strategy of running ECMO at lowest possible flow rates, novel therapeutic options including the combination of VA-ECMO with percutaneous microaxial pumps or implementation of a venoarteriovenous-ECMO configuration based on an additional venous cannula supplying towards pulmonary circulation are most promising among LV unloading and venting strategies. The latter may even combine the advantages of venovenous and venoarterial ECMO therapy, providing potent respiratory and circulatory support at the same time. However, whether VA-ECMO can reduce mortality has to be evaluated in the urgently needed, ongoing prospective randomized studies EURO-SHOCK (NCT03813134), ANCHOR (NCT04184635), and ECLS-SHOCK (NCT03637205). These studies will provide the opportunity to investigate indication, mode, and effect of LV unloading in dedicated sub-analyses. In future, the Heart Teams should aim at conducting a dedicated randomized trial comparing VA-ECMO support with vs. without LV unloading strategies in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with concomitant Impella versus concomitant intra-aortic-balloon-pump for cardiogenic shock

Perfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 026765912110339
Author(s):  
Shek-yin Au ◽  
Ka-man Fong ◽  
Chun-Fung Sunny Tsang ◽  
Ka-Chun Alan Chan ◽  
Chi Yuen Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Mechanical Circulatory Support ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Circulatory Support ◽  
Queen Elizabeth Hospital ◽  
Intra Aortic Balloon Pump ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Va Ecmo

Introduction: The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and Impella are left ventricular unloading devices with peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in place and later serve as bridging therapy when VA-ECMO is terminated. We aimed to determine the potential differences in clinical outcomes and rate of complications between the two combinations of mechanical circulatory support. Methods: This was a retrospective, single institutional cohort study conducted in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong. Inclusion criteria included all patients aged ⩾18 years, who had VA-ECMO support, and who had left ventricular unloading by either IABP or Impella between January 1, 2018 and October 31, 2020. Patients <18 years old, with central VA-ECMO, who did not require left ventricular unloading, or who underwent surgical venting procedures were excluded. The primary outcome was ECMO duration. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) in the ICU, hospital LOS, mortality, and complication rate. Results: Fifty-two patients with ECMO + IABP and 14 patients with ECMO + Impella were recruited. No statistically significant difference was observed in terms of ECMO duration (2.5 vs 4.6 days, p = 0.147), ICU LOS (7.7 vs 10.8 days, p = 0.367), and hospital LOS (14.8 vs 16.5 days, p = 0.556) between the two groups. No statistically significant difference was observed in the ECMO, ICU, and hospital mortalities between the two groups. Specific complications related to the ECMO and Impella combination were also noted. Conclusions: Impella was not shown to offer a statistically significant clinical benefit compared with IABP in conjunction with ECMO. Clinicians should be aware of the specific complications of using Impella.

scholarly journals Successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation resuscitation of patient with cardiogenic shock induced by phaeochromocytoma crisis mimicking hyperthyroidism: A case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 746-751
Author(s):  
Tao Wang ◽  
Qiancheng Xu ◽  
Xiaogan Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Tumour Size ◽  
Acute Onset ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Vanillylmandelic Acid ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
First Case ◽  
Va Ecmo

Abstract A 29-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with the acute onset of palpitations, shortness of breath, and haemoptysis. She reported having an abortion (56 days of pregnancy) 1 week before admission because of hyperthyroidism diagnosis during pregnancy. The first diagnoses considered were cardiomyopathy associated with hyperthyroidism, acute left ventricular failure, and hyperthyroidism crisis. The young woman’s cardiocirculatory system collapsed within several hours. Hence, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) was performed for this patient. Over the next 3 days after ECMO was established, repeat transthoracic echocardiography showed gradual improvements in biventricular function, and later the patient recovered almost completely. The patient’s blood pressure increased to 230/130 mm Hg when the ECMO catheter was removed, and then the diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma was suspected. Computed tomography showed a left suprarenal tumour. The tumour size was 5.8 cm × 5.7 cm with central necrosis. The vanillylmandelic acid concentration was 63.15 mg/24 h. Post-operation, pathology confirmed phaeochromocytoma. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of a patient with cardiogenic shock induced by phaeochromocytoma crisis mimicking hyperthyroidism which was successfully resuscitated by VA ECMO.

Radiographic appearance of extracorporeal membrane oxygenations versus left ventricular assist device

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 831-832
Author(s):  
Phillip M Mackie ◽  
Giles J Peek ◽  
Jeffrey P Jacobs ◽  
Mark S Bleiweis
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist Device ◽  
Ventricular Assist Device ◽  
Chest Radiography ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Assist Device ◽  
Ventricular Assist ◽  
Radiographic Appearance ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist

AbstractChest radiography compares left ventricular decompression in the same patient supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with atrial septal fenestration and subsequently supported with left ventricular assist device with apical cannulation.

scholarly journals The ‘Inextricabilis Syndrome’: a case with no solution

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. K13-K16
Author(s):  
Tigran Khachatryan ◽  
Roy Beigel ◽  
Reza Arsanjani ◽  
Robert J Siegel
Keyword(s):  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Cardiac Monitoring ◽  
List Type ◽  
Ventricular Assist ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist ◽  
Bridge To Decision

Summary We describe a case of a 58-year-old man with cardiogenic shock who underwent triple vessel coronary artery bypass and a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. His course was complicated by stroke, worsening mitral regurgitation, aortic regurgitation, and multiple cardiac thrombi while on the device. We provide the details of the patient's hospital course, management, and echocardiographic findings. We also discuss the utility of echocardiography before LVAD insertion and its role for continued monitoring after insertion. Learning points Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are used as bridge to decision, transplant, recovery, or destination therapy in patients with advanced heart failure and cardiogenic shock. VADs improve survival and the quality of life but have significant associated complications. Echocardiography plays an essential role before VAD insertion and for postoperative cardiac monitoring. Information provided by echocardiography is used in device selection, consideration for corrective surgical interventions, and device explantation.

Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: An Anesthesia Perspective

2021 ◽  
pp. 108925322199854
Author(s):  
Dash F. T. Newington ◽  
Fabrizio De Rita ◽  
Alan McCheyne ◽  
Claire Louise Barker
Keyword(s):  
Congenital Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Anesthetic Management ◽  
Inotropic Support ◽  
Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Ventricular Assist ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Delayed Sternal Closure

Background Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are increasingly being implanted in children, yet there is little literature to guide anesthetic management for these procedures. Aims To describe the pediatric population presenting for VAD implantation and the anesthetic management these patients receive. To compare (a) children under and over 12 months of age and (b) children with and without congenital heart disease. Methods Retrospective review of patients aged 0 to 17 years who underwent VAD implantation at a single center between 2014 and 2019. Results Seventy-seven VADs were implanted in 68 patients (46 left VADs, 24 biventricular VADs, 6 right VADs, and 1 univentricular VAD). One procedure was abandoned. Preoperatively, 20 (26%) patients were supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and 57 (73%) patients were ventilated. Intraoperative donor blood products were required in 74 (95%) cases. Postimplantation inotropic support was required in 66 (85%) cases overall and 46 (100%) patients receiving a left VAD. Infants under 12 months were more likely to require preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (42% vs 19%), have femoral venous access (54% vs 28%), receive an intraoperative vasoconstrictor (42% vs 24%), and have delayed sternal closure (63 vs 22%). Mortality was higher in patients under 12 months (25% vs 19%) and in patients with congenital heart disease (25% vs 20%). Conclusions Children undergoing VAD implantation require high levels of preoperative organ support, high-dose intraoperative inotropic support, and high-volume blood transfusion. Children under 12 months and those with congenital heart disease are particularly challenging for anesthesiologists and have worse overall outcomes.

scholarly journals Outcomes of severe systemic rheumatic disease patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Bay ◽  
Guillaume Lebreton ◽  
Alexis Mathian ◽  
Pierre Demondion ◽  
Cyrielle Desnos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Arterial Lactate ◽  
Saps Ii ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Saps Ii Score ◽  
Va Ecmo ◽  
Vv Ecmo

Abstract Background Systemic rheumatic diseases (SRDs) are a group of inflammatory disorders that can require intensive care unit (ICU) admission because of multiorgan involvement with end-organ failure(s). Critically ill SRD patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were studied to gain insight into their characteristics and outcomes. Methods This French monocenter, retrospective study included all SRD patients requiring venovenous (VV)- or venoarterial (VA)-ECMO admitted to a 26-bed ECMO-dedicated ICU from January 2006 to February 2020. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Results Ninety patients (male/female ratio: 0.5; mean age at admission: 41.6 ± 15.2 years) admitted to the ICU received VA/VV-ECMO, respectively, for an SRD-related flare (n = 69, n = 38/31) or infection (n = 21, n = 10/11). SRD was diagnosed in-ICU for 31 (34.4%) patients. In-ICU and in-hospital mortality rates were 48.9 and 51.1%, respectively. Nine patients were bridged to cardiac (n = 5) or lung transplantation (n = 4), or left ventricular assist device (n = 2). The Cox multivariable model retained the following independent predictors of in-hospital mortality: in-ICU SRD diagnosis, day-0 Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II score ≥ 70 and arterial lactate ≥ 7.5 mmol/L for VA-ECMO–treated patients; diagnosis other than vasculitis, day-0 SAPS II score ≥ 70, ventilator-associated pneumonia and arterial lactate ≥ 7.5 mmol/L for VV-ECMO–treated patients. Conclusions ECMO support is a relevant rescue technique for critically ill SRD patients, with 49% survival at hospital discharge. Vasculitis was independently associated with favorable outcomes of VV-ECMO–treated patients. Further studies are needed to specify the role of ECMO for SRD patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document