scholarly journals Migration of the Lag Screw after Intramedullary Treatment of AO/OTA 31.A2.1-3 Pertrochanteric Fractures Does Not Result in Higher Incidence of Cut-Outs, Regardless of Which Implant Was Used: A Comparison of Gamma Nail with and without U-Blade (RC) Lag Screw and Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation (PFNA)

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaus Wilhelm Lang ◽  
Robert Breuer ◽  
Hannes Beiglboeck ◽  
Alexandru Munteanu ◽  
Stefan Hajdu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Gamma Nail ◽  
Pertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Lag Screw ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tip Apex Distance ◽  
Proximal Femur Nail ◽  
Screw Group

The best intramedullary nail for the treatment of unstable AO/OTA 31.A2.1-3 fractures remains uncertain. A total of 237 patients (45 male, 192 female) were eligible for the assessment with an average age of 81.9 ± 10.5 years and a minimum follow-up of six months. We assessed the cut-out rate, the TAD and calTAD (Tip Apex distance) of three different implants. An overall cut-out rate of 2.5% (n = 6) was observed. The cut-out rate was 1.2% (n = 1) in the Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation (PFNA) group, 3.7% (n = 3) in the Gamma Nail group and 2.9% (n = 2) in the Gamma3® with a U-Blade (RC) lag-screw group. The TAD and calTAD differed between the cut-out and non-cut group—20.0 mm vs. 18.5 mm and 13.1 mm vs. 15.3 mm, respectively. A significantly higher TAD of 32.5 mm could be seen in the cut-out after PFNA (p < 0.0001). The only significant change in follow-up using Parker’s ratio was observed in the PFNA group (p < 0.0001). The rate of patients requiring surgery after complications was 8.4% (n = 20) without any significant difference between the three groups. The PFNA blade showed significant migration within the femoral head, however the cut-out rate remained the smallest compared to Gamma3 with or without additional U-Blade (RC) lag screw.

scholarly journals Treatment of thoracolumbar trauma by short-segment percutaneous transpedicular screw instrumentation: prospective comparative study with a minimum 2-year follow-up

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petr Vanek ◽  
Ondrej Bradac ◽  
Renata Konopkova ◽  
Patricia de Lacy ◽  
Jiri Lacman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Working Ability ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
Transpedicular Screw ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Screw Group

Object The main aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes after stabilization by a percutaneous transpedicular system and stabilization from the standard open approach for thoracolumbar spine injury. Methods Thirty-seven consecutive patients were enrolled in the study over a period of 16 months. Patients were included in the study if they experienced 1 thoracolumbar fracture (A3.1–A3.3, according to the AO/Magerl classification), had an absence of neurological deficits, had no other significant injuries, and were willing to participate. Eighteen patients were treated by short-segment, minimally invasive, percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation. The control group was composed of 19 patients who were stabilized using a short-segment transpedicular construct, which was performed through a standard midline incision. The pain profile was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS), and overall satisfaction by a simple 4-stage scale relating to performance of daily activities. Working ability and return to original occupation were also monitored. Radiographic follow-up was defined by the vertebral body index (VBI), vertebral body angle (VBA), and bisegmental Cobb angle. The accuracy of screw placement was examined using CT. Results The mean surgical duration in the percutaneous screw group was 53 ± 10 minutes, compared with 60 ± 9 minutes in the control group (p = 0.032). The percutaneous screw group had a significantly lower perioperative blood loss of 56 ± 17 ml, compared with 331 ± 149 ml in the control group (p < 0.001). Scores on the VAS in patients in the percutaneous screw group during the first 7 postoperative days were significantly lower than those in the control group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups in VBI, VBA, and Cobb angle values during follow-up. There was no significant difference in screw placement accuracy between the groups and no patients required surgical revision. There was no significant difference between groups in overall satisfaction at the 2-year follow-up (p = 0.402). Working ability was insignificantly better in the percutaneous screw group; previous working position was achieved in 17 patients in this group and in 12 cases in the control group (p = 0.088). Conclusions This study confirms that the percutaneous transpedicular screw technique represents a viable option in the treatment of preselected thoracolumbar fractures. A significant reduction in blood loss, postoperative pain, and surgical time were the main advantages associated with this minimally invasive technique. Clinical, functional, and radiological results were at least the same as those achieved using the open technique after a 2-year follow-up. The short-term benefits of the percutaneous transpedicular screw technique are apparent, and long-term results have to be studied in other well-designed studies evaluating the theoretical benefit of the percutaneous technique and assessing whether the results of the latter are as durable as the ones achieved by open surgery.

scholarly journals Is It Necessary to Reduce Thoracolumbar Compression Fractures  with Intermediate Screws in the Fractured Vertebra?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZeJun Xing ◽  
Shuai Hao ◽  
XiaoFei Wu
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Body Height ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
Compression Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Screw Group

Abstract PurposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous short-segment pedicle screws fixation (PPSF) with or without intermediate screws (IS) for the treatment of thoracolumbar compression fractures.MethodsFrom January 2016 to March 2019, a retrospective study of 38 patients with thoracolumbar compression fractures conducted. The patients were divided into a 4-screw group (without IS) and a 6-screw group (with IS) according to whether pedicle screws were placed in the fractured vertebrae. Combined positional reduction effects with the technique of pre-contoured lordotic rods were used to reduce the fracture by lengthening the anterior column of the fractured vertebrae. The posterior structure of the fractured vertebrae was undertaken as the fulcrum point for both groups. The operation time, intra-operative blood loss, visual analogue scale (VAS), anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), segment kyphosis（SK）before and after operation and complications were recorded.ResultsAlthough the operation time and blood loss in the 6-screw group were higher than in the 4-screw group, difference was not significant (P＞0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS, AVBH and SK between the two groups (P＞0.05). Nevertheless, these results were significant differences between the preoperative and the immediate postoperative, between preoperative and follow-up groups (P < 0.001). No neurologic injury was observed in either groups. ConclusionsIn the treatment of thoracolumbar compression fractures, percutaneous short-segment pedicle screws fixation without intermediate screws in the 4-screw construct may obtain the same clinical effect as that in the 6-screw construct.

The Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation: An Identifiable Improvement in the Treatment of Unstable Pertrochanteric Fractures?

2011 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tjibbe J. Gardenbroek ◽  
Michiel J. M. Segers ◽  
Rogier K. J. Simmermacher ◽  
Eric R. Hammacher
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Pertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Proximal Femur Nail

scholarly journals Intertrochanteric fracture fixation with Dynamic Hip Screw: Is tip-apex distance measurement useful for predicting fixation failure?

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Goh KL ◽  
Zamzuri Z ◽  
Mohd Ariff S ◽  
Mohamed Azril MA
Keyword(s):  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Optimal Placement ◽  
Fixation Failure ◽  
Lag Screw ◽  
Hip Screw ◽  
Tip Apex Distance ◽  
One Year

Introduction: Application of dynamic hip screw (DHS) implant for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures continues to raise concern related to risk of lag screw cut-out with or without subsequent damage to the acetabulum. Measurement of tip-apex distances (TAD) has been recommended to guide the optimal placement of lag screw and to predict subsequent risk of screw cut-out. In this study, the value of TAD was evaluated to verify its usefulness. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 33 consecutive patients with intertrochanteric fracture treated with DHS. Demographic data of the patients were traced from their case notes. Post-operative radiographs were reviewed by focusing on measurement of TAD on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Radiographs at one year follow-up were reviewed to depict any fixation-related failure or complication. Results: Fifty two percent of patients did not achieved the recommended TAD of ≤ 25mm. The mean post-operative TAD was 25.9mm and elderly patients were likely to achieve TAD of ≤ 25mm. The overall complication rate of 6% was attributed to screw cut-out in two cases. The unstable left-sided fracture was identified to be a potential risk for screw cut-out or migration. Conclusion: TAD is a valuable measurement to guide optimal placement of lag screw during DHS fixation of intertrochanteric fracture.

scholarly journals Clinical study on the Minimally Invasive Treatment of Early Necrosis of the Femoral Head with Hydroxyapatite Coated Hollow Titanium Rod Supporting the Femoral Head to Prevent Collapse

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinmin Yang ◽  
Ye Tian ◽  
Yao Yao
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Articular Surface ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Minimally Invasive Treatment ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Improvement Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Harris Score

Abstract Background: To investigate the treatment effect of minimally invasive treatment of early osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) with hydroxyapatite coated hollow titanium rod. Methods: From 1, January 2003 to 1, January 2019, 72 patients with ONFHⅡ Stage were selected. There were 50 males and 20 females, aged from 28 to 56. Onset time was 8~28 months. Lesion site: 18 left, 38 right, 16 bilateral. Causes of ONFH: 30 alcohol, 28 hormone, 9 trauma and 5 idiopathic patients. ARCO stage: 14 IIA, 33 IIB, 25 IIC. All patients underwent arthroscopic assisted minimally invasive percutaneous core decompression and bone grafting with hydroxyapatite coated titanium rod surgery. Visua Analogue Scales (VAS), Harris score and Images were used for assessing pain, hip joint function and the stability, respectively. Hip replacement was performed finally. Results: 16 patients with heavy hormone use history and femoral head collapse underwent Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (THRA) at the last follow-up. 24 months later, 8 ⅡB cases progressed to ⅡC, 2 cases were stable at ⅡC, 6 cases increased to Ⅲ, and underwent THRA. 12ⅡC cases progressed to Ⅲ, 2 cases were stable at Ⅲ, and 10 cases had articular cartilage surface collapse. THRA was administered 30 months after surgery. VAS score of individual patients increased and Harris score decreased 24 months after surgery, but there was no significant difference between the scores of 12 months and 24 months. The clinical effect of the last follow-up showed that the postoperative improvement rate of this group was 76.13%, among which the best was 100% in IIA, 79.48% in IIB, and the lowest was 58.06 in IIC. Both the patients with IIB or IIC, cases with aggravation and without change were hormonal ONFH. Conclusion: The treatment of ONFH with hydroxyapatite coated hollow titanium rod supporting the femoral head to prevent collapse is feasible. In addition to the Glucocorticoid-induced ONFH stage ⅡC outside, this method to other Ⅱ period lesions in improving the curative effect and preventing the collapse of femoral head articular surface is good and safe.

scholarly journals Robot-assisted core decompression combined with bone grafting can improve the early clinical results in femoral head necrosis: a prospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Run Tian ◽  
Sen Luo ◽  
Chunsheng Wang ◽  
Kunzheng Wang ◽  
Pei Yang
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Core Decompression ◽  
Femoral Head Necrosis ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Surgery Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Robot Assisted Surgery

Abstract Background: To explore the clinical effect of robot-assisted core decompression combined with bone grafting in the treatment of femoral head necrosis involved in early stage.Methods: This study is a prospective cohort study. The study included 49 patients (78 hips) who attended the Department of Orthopedics and Joint Surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from August 2019 to February 2021. All the patients suffering Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) II stage of femoral head necrosis underwent core decompression and bone grafting. Among the patients undergoing surgery, 30 patients (54 hips) were treated with traditional surgical methods, and 19 patients (24 hips) were assisted by the made-in-China orthopedic robot system. All operations were performed by the same operator. The baseline data of the two groups of patients, the time of unilateral operation, the number of unilateral X-ray fluoroscopy, the Harris hip score (HHS) at the last follow-up after surgery, the visual analog score (VAS), and the collapse rate at the last follow-up were collected and compared. Results: A total of 41 patients (70 hips) were followed up, including 24 cases (42 hips) in the traditional surgery group and 17 cases in the robot-assisted group (28 hips). The average follow-up time of all cases was (13.9±3.4) months (range: 8-18 months). At the last follow-up, a total of 13 patients (13 hips) suffered femoral head surface collapse, including 11 patients in the traditional surgery group (11 hips) and 2 patients in the robot-assisted group (2 hips). The rate of femoral head collapse between the two groups had statistical difference. The average operation time of unilateral hip in the traditional operation group was (22.5±5.5) min, and (18.2±4.0) min in the robot-assisted group, with significant difference. The number of X-ray fluoroscopy of unilateral hip in the traditional operation group was (14.7±3.1) times, and (10.1±3.1) times in the robot-assisted group, with significant difference. The HHS before surgery in the traditional surgery group was (63.8±3.2) points, and (84.6±3.4) points at the last follow-up,while the preoperative HHS of the robot-assisted surgery group was (65.5±3.5) points, and (85.9±3.1) points at the last follow-up. The HHS at the last follow-up of the two groups were significantly different from those before the operation, but there was no difference between the two groups. The preoperative VAS of the traditional surgery group was (4.8±0.8) points, and (1.7±1.2) points at the last follow-up. The preoperative VAS of the robot-assisted surgery group was (5.0±0.7) points, and (0.9±0.7) points at the last follow-up. At the last follow-up of the two groups, there were significant differences in VAS, and significant difference between the two groups was also detected.Conclusion: Core decompression combined with bone grafting have a definite effect in the treatment of femoral head necrosis at early stage. Compared with traditional surgery, robot-assisted surgery can achieve better short-term results and head preservation rate. Trial registration: the research has been registered in China National Medical Research Registration and Filing System

scholarly journals Effect of Osteonecrosis Intervention Rod Versus Core Decompression Using Multiple Small Drill Holes on Early Stages of Necrosis of the Femoral Head: A Prospective Study on a Series of 60 Patients with a Minimum 1-Year-Follow-Up

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haixiong Miao ◽  
Dongping Ye ◽  
Weiguo Liang ◽  
Yicun Yao
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Core Decompression ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Early Stages ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Harris Score ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Drill Holes ◽  
Partial Weight

Introduction: The conventional CD used 10 mm drill holes associated with a lack of structural support. Thus, alternative methods such as a tantalum implant, small drill holes, and biological treatment were developed to prevent deterioration of the joint. The treatment of CD by multiple 3.2 mm drill holes could reduce the femoral neck fracture and partial weight bearing was allowed. This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of osteonecrosis intervention rod versus core decompression using multiple small drill holes on early stages of necrosis of the femoral head. Method: From January 2011 to January 2012, 60 patients undergoing surgery for osteonecrosis with core decompression were randomly assigned into 2 groups based on the type of core decompression used: (1) a total of 30 osteonecrosis patients (with 16 hips on Steinburg stageⅠ,20 hips on Steinburg stageⅡ) were treated with a porous tantalum rod insertion. The diameter of the drill hole for the intervention rod was 10mm.(2) a total of 30 osteonecrosis patients (with 14 hips on Steinburg stageⅠ,20 hips on Steinburg stageⅡ) were treated with core decompression using five drill holes on the lateral femur, the diameter of the hole was 3.2 mm. The average age of the patient was 32.6 years (20-45 years) and the average time of follow-up was 25.6 months (12- 28 months) in the rod implanted group. The average age of the patient was 35.2 years (22- 43 years) and the average time of follow-up was 26.3 months (12-28 months) in the small drill holes group. Results: The average of surgical time was 40 min, and the mean volume of blood loss was 30 ml in both surgical groups. The average of Harris score was improved from 56.2 ± 7.1 preoperative to 80.2 ± 11.4 at the last follow-up in the rod implanted group (p < 0.05). The mean Harris score was improved from 53.8 ± 6.6 preoperative to 79.7 ± 13.2 at the last follow-up in the small drill holes group (p<0. 05). No significant difference was observed in Harris score between the two groups. At the last follow-up, 28 of 36 hips were at the same radiographic stages as pre-operation, and 8 deteriorated in the rod implanted group. 26 of 34 hips were at the same radiographic stage as pre-operation, and 8 deteriorated in the small drill holes group. No significant difference was observed in radiographic stage between the two groups. There was no favourable result on the outcome of a tantalum intervention implant compared to multiple small drill holes. Discussion: CD via multiple small drill holes would allow similar postoperative load-bearing and seems to result in similar or even better clinical outcome without the prolonged implantation of an expensive tantalum implant. A tantalum rod intervention and core decompression using multiple small drill holes were effective on the stage I hips rather than stage II hips.

Assessment of Intraosseous Femoral Head Pressures During Cement Augmentation of the Perforated Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation Blade

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 398-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Blankstein ◽  
Daniel Widmer ◽  
Michael Götzen ◽  
Ladina Hofmann-Fliri ◽  
Robert G. Richards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Cement Augmentation ◽  
Proximal Femur Nail

scholarly journals Errores de osteosíntesis en fracturas laterales de cadera tratadas con placa/tornillo deslizante [Osteosynthesis pitfalls in lateral hip fractures treated with plate / sliding screw system].

2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 328-335
Author(s):  
César Ángel Pesciallo ◽  
Leonel Pérez Alamino ◽  
Germán Garabano ◽  
Hernán Del Sel
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Femoral Head ◽  
Failure Rate ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Medial Migration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Proximal Screw

Introducción: El uso de los sistemas placa/tornillo deslizante para fracturas intertrocantéricas ha demostrado ser un método de fijación eficaz, pero no está exento de fallas. El propósito de este estudio fue evaluar las causas de falla en los pacientes con fracturas laterales de cadera, tratados con placa/tornillo deslizante, puntualizando los defectos técnicos en la colocación.Materiales y Métodos: En nuestro centro, se trató a 177 pacientes por fractura lateral de cadera, a 151 de ellos se les practicó osteosíntesis con placa/tornillo deslizante. Se analizaron la adecuada reducción posoperatoria, la medición de la distancia punta a vértice, la posición del tornillo cefálico en la cabeza femoral y las posibles complicaciones.Resultados: La serie quedó conformada por 143 pacientes. El seguimiento promedio fue de 18 meses (rango 12-48). La tasa de fallas fue del 8,4% (n = 12): 7 (4,8%) por migración cefálica (cut-out) del tornillo proximal, 2 (1,4%) por migración medial (cut-through), 2 (1,4%) presentaron seudoartrosis y un caso (0,70%) de reducción inadecuada en varo. El porcentaje de una segunda operación fue del 7,7% (n = 11). La peor posición fue la superior/posterior con un 100% de migración (n = 4) (p <0,001, diferencia estadísticamente significativa).Conclusión: El posicionamiento superior/posterior del tornillo cefálico podría incrementar la posibilidad de migración y, en consecuencia, la tasa de falla del sistema. AbstractIntroduction: The use of Dynamic Hip/Sliding Screw (DHS) for intertrochanteric fractures has proven to be an effective fixation method, but it also has its failures.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reason of failures in patients with lateral hip fractures that were treated with a DHS.Method:177 patients were treated in our center for lateral hip fracture. In 151 of them we used a DHS. The adequate postoperative reduction, the measurement of the tip-to-apex distance, the position of the cephalic screw in the femoral head and the possible complications were analyzed.Results: The series was made up of 143 patients. The average follow-up was 18 months (range 12-48). The failure rate was 8.4% (n = 12): 7 (4.8%) due to cephalic migration (cut-out) of the proximal screw, 2 (1.4%) due to medial migration (cut-through) , 2 (1.4%) presented pseudoarthrosis and one case (0.70%) of inadequate reduction in varus. The percentage of a second operation was 7.7% (n = 11). The worst position was the superior / posterior with 100% migration (n = 4) (p <0.001, statistically significant difference).Conclusion: The superior / posterior positioning of the head screw could increase the possibility of migration and, consequently, the failure rate of the system.

scholarly journals Gamma 3 U-Blade lag screws in patients with trochanteric femur fractures: are rotation control lag screws better than others?

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jehyun Yoo ◽  
Sangmin Kim ◽  
Junyoung Choi ◽  
Jihyo Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Walking Ability ◽  
Fixation Failure ◽  
Neck Shaft Angle ◽  
Lag Screw ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Shaft Angle ◽  
Sliding Distance ◽  
Screw Group

Abstract Background Intramedullary hip nails may be classified as blades or screws depending on the type of lag screw used. Recently, a combination of lag screw types with a U-clip insertion has also been used. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of these new screw types. Methods A total of 185 patients with trochanteric femoral fractures (age ≥ 65 years) who underwent surgery with intramedullary nails were selected. Surgeries with InterTrochanteric/SubTrochanteric (ITST), Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA), and Gamma 3 U-Blade lag screws were performed between January 2011 and June 2016. The AO/OTA classification, presence of a basicervical fracture type on 3D-CT, BMI, BMD, reduction quality, position of the lag screw, TAD (tip apex distance) of the lag screw, sliding distance of the lag screw, varus change (neck shaft angle), radiological union period, fixation failure and functional outcome as determined by walking ability were analyzed. Results There were 3/60 (5.0%) cases of fixation failure in the ITST group, all caused by cut-out; 4/57 (7.0%) in the PFNA II group: 3 caused by cut-through and 1 by metal fracture; 1/68 (1.5%) in the Gamma 3 U-Blade lag screw group (P = 0.301). In each group, the sliding distance of the lag screw showed a significant difference (P = 0.017), whereas significant sliding over 10 mm showed no statistically significant results. Conclusion There was only one (1.5%) case of fixation failure in the Gamma 3 U-Blade lag screw group. The sliding distance of the U-Blade was found to be in the middle, between the PFNA II (shorter) and ITST (longer) implants. The new rotational control lag screw seems to be comparable to other screw types.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document