scholarly journals Multiomics Analysis Reveals that GLS and GLS2 Differentially Modulate the Clinical Outcomes of Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subbroto Saha ◽  
S.M. Islam ◽  
M. Abdullah-AL-Wadud ◽  
Saiful Islam ◽  
Farman Ali ◽  
...  

Kidney-type glutaminase (GLS) and liver-type glutaminase (GLS2) are dysregulated in many cancers, making them appealing targets for cancer therapy. However, their use as prognostic biomarkers is controversial and remains an active area of cancer research. Here, we performed a systematic multiomic analysis to determine whether glutaminases function as prognostic biomarkers in human cancers. Glutaminase expression and methylation status were assessed and their prominent functional protein partners and correlated genes were identified using various web-based bioinformatics tools. The cross-cancer relationship of glutaminases with mutations and copy number alterations was also investigated. Gene ontology (GO) and pathway analysis were performed to assess the integrated effect of glutaminases and their correlated genes on various cancers. Subsequently, the prognostic roles of GLS and GLS2 in human cancers were mined using univariate and multivariate survival analyses. GLS was frequently over-expressed in breast, esophagus, head-and-neck, and blood cancers, and was associated with a poor prognosis, whereas GLS2 overexpression implied poor overall survival in colon, blood, ovarian, and thymoma cancers. Both GLS and GLS2 play oncogenic and anti-oncogenic roles depending on the type of cancer. The varying prognostic characteristics of glutaminases suggest that GLS and GLS2 expression differentially modulate the clinical outcomes of cancers.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan-Hua Huang ◽  
Sun-Jun Yin ◽  
Yuan-Yuan Gong ◽  
Zhi-Ran Li ◽  
Qin Yang ◽  
...  

Aim: A comprehensive meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the association between high PARP1 expression and clinical outcomes in diverse types of cancers. Materials & methods: The electronic databases for all articles about PARP1 expression and cancers were searched. Additionally, bioinformatics analysis was utilized to validate the results of the meta-analysis. Results: Fifty-two studies with a total of 7140 patients were included in the current meta-analysis. High PARP1 expression was found to be significantly associated with poor overall survival and recurrence in various cancers, which were further strengthened and complemented by the results of bioinformatic analysis. Furthermore, increased PAPR1 expression was also related to clinicopathological features. Conclusion: Our findings confirmed that PARP1 might be a promising biomarker for prognosis in human cancers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628482110356
Author(s):  
Lina Zhang ◽  
Huanqin Han ◽  
Xuan Li ◽  
Caozhen Chen ◽  
Xiaobing Xie ◽  
...  

Background and aims: Currently, there are no definitive therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Gut microbial dysbiosis has been proved to be associated with COVID-19 severity and probiotics is an adjunctive therapy for COIVD-19. However, the potential benefit of probiotics in COVID-19 has not been studied. We aimed to assess the relationship of probiotics use with clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a propensity-score matched retrospective cohort study of adult patients with COVID-19. Eligible patients received either probiotics plus standard care (probiotics group) or standard care alone (non-probiotics group). The primary outcome was the clinical improvement rate, which was compared among propensity-score matched groups and in the unmatched cohort. Secondary outcomes included the duration of viral shedding, fever, and hospital stay. Results: Among the propensity-score matched groups, probiotics use was related to clinical improvement rates (log-rank p = 0.028). This relationship was driven primarily by a shorter (days) time to clinical improvement [difference, −3 (−4 to −1), p = 0.022], reduction in duration of fever [−1.0 (−2.0 to 0.0), p = 0.025], viral shedding [−3 (−6 to −1), p < 0.001], and hospital stay [−3 (−5 to −1), p = 0.009]. Using the Cox model with time-varying exposure, use of probiotics remained independently related to better clinical improvement rate in the unmatched cohort. Conclusion: Our study suggested that probiotics use was related to improved clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Further studies are required to validate the effect of probiotics in combating the COVID-19 pandemic.


Heliyon ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. e06420
Author(s):  
Caroline Azevedo Martins ◽  
Maria Conceição B dos Santos ◽  
Cassiano Felippe Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque ◽  
Hugo Caire Castro-Faria-Neto ◽  
Mauro Velho Castro-Faria ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene S. Chung ◽  
Lin Guo ◽  
Donald E. Casey ◽  
Cheryl Bartone ◽  
Santosh Menon ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 904
Author(s):  
Daniel O’Hair ◽  
Michael Reardon ◽  
Steven Yakubov ◽  
Shuzhen Li ◽  
G. Michael Deeb

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi118-vi118
Author(s):  
Diana Shi ◽  
Mary Jane Lim-Fat ◽  
Amin Nassar ◽  
Jared Woods ◽  
Gilbert Youssef ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND We evaluated sex-based differences in clinical outcomes and tumor genomics in patients with newly-diagnosed GBM. METHODS We reviewed 665 IDH-wild type GBM patients with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥60 treated at our institution from 2010-2019 including; 585 patients with targeted exome sequencing of 447 cancer associated genes (OncoPanel). Deleterious mutations were defined as homozygous deletions or loss of function mutations of known tumor suppressors (as reported in TCGA, ≥ 3 times in the COSMIC database, or predicted as “damaging” in SIFT and/or “probably damaging” in Polyphen 2) or known oncogenic mutations in proto-oncogenes (reported in TCGA or ≥ 3 times in COSMIC). RESULTS There were 384 (57.7%) males and 281 (42.3%) females. Median OS was 22.5 months for females and 19.3 months for males (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI 1.03-1.48, p = 0.02). On multivariable analysis adjusted for age, KPS ≥90, extent of resection, and MGMT methylation status, female sex (adjusted hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI [0.64-0.95], p = 0.015) was associated with improved OS. Superior OS in females was observed in MGMT-unmethylated patients (HR 0.69, 95% CI [0.54-0.90], p = 0.005) but not MGMT-methylated patients. Thirteen genes were deleteriously altered in ≥5% of our cohort: CDK4 (12.1% male vs. 7.8% female), CDKN2A (46.5% vs. 45.7%), CDKN2B (41.8% vs. 43.3%), EGFR (34.7% vs. 40.0%, MTAP (18.2% vs. 18.8%), NF1 (11.5% vs. 9.4%), PTEN (28.2% vs. 29.8%), TP53 (28.2% vs. 30.2%), RB1 (5.6% vs. 6.5%), MDM4 (6.2% vs. 5.7%), ATM (5.9% vs. 3.7%), MDM2 (7.4% vs. 4.1%), PIK3R1 (6.2% vs. 4.1%). There were no differences in frequency of mutations in these individual genes between males and females (χ 2 [1, N=585] = 0.05-2.86, p = 0.09-0.86). CONCLUSIONS Female sex is associated with improved survival. We did not identify sex-based differences in deleterious genomic alterations amongst commonly altered genes in GBM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document