scholarly journals Coronary Physiology in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samit Shah ◽  
Steven Pfau
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Coronary Flow ◽  
Coronary Physiology ◽  
Catheterization Laboratory ◽  
Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory ◽  
Flow Reserve ◽  
Artery Disease

Coronary angiography has been the principle modality for assessing the severity of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease for several decades. However, there is a complex relationship between angiographic coronary stenosis and the presence or absence of myocardial ischemia. Recent technological advances now allow for the assessment of coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory at the time of diagnostic coronary angiography. Early studies focused on coronary flow reserve (CFR) but more recent work has demonstrated the physiologic accuracy and prognostic value of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR) for the assessment of coronary artery disease. These measurements have been validated in large multi-center clinical trials and have become indispensable tools for guiding revascularization in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The physiological assessment of chest pain in the absence of epicardial coronary artery disease involves coronary thermodilution to obtain the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) or Doppler velocity measurement to determine the coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR). Physiology-based coronary artery assessment brings “personalized medicine” to the catheterization laboratory and allows cardiologists and referring providers to make decisions based on objective findings and evidence-based treatment algorithms. The purpose of this review is to describe the theory, technical aspects, and relevant clinical trials related to coronary physiology assessment for an intended audience of general medical practitioners.

The detection of multivessel coronary artery disease: the value of quantitative myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve assessment

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Zavadovskiy ◽  
A Mochula ◽  
A Maltseva ◽  
A Boshchenko ◽  
A Baev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Myocardial Blood Flow ◽  
Coronary Flow ◽  
Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Czt Camera ◽  
Flow Reserve ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Background/Introduction The recent Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride (CZT) camera for MPS allows evaluating absolute MBF and CFR, possibly increasing the accuracy in detecting of multivessel CAD. Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) quantitation performed by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) for the detection of multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods Fifty-two patients with suspected or known CAD were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent CZT MPS, with the evaluation of MBF and CFR, followed by invasive coronary angiography. According to MPS and coronary angiography results, patients were divided into three groups. 1) non-obstructive CAD and normal MPS scan (control group) (n=7), 2) one vessel disease (1VD) (n=16), with significant coronary stenosis (≥70%) in one major epicardial coronary artery, 3) multivessel disease (MVD) group (n=29), with two or more major epicardial coronary arteries with (≥70%) stenoses or with ≥50% LMA stenosis. Results Absolute MBF and CFR were significantly reduced in patients with MVD as compared to those with 1VD [0.93 (IQR 0.76; 1.39) vs 1.94 (1.37; 2.21) ml/min/g, p=0.00012] and [1.4 (IQR 1.02; 1.85) vs 2.3 (1.8; 2.67), p=0.0004], respectively. The Syntax score correlated with global stress MBF (ρ=−0.64; p<0.0001) and CFR (ρ=−0.53; p=0.0003). ROC analysis showed higher sensitivity and specificity for stress MBF (85.2% and 81%), and CFR (88.9% and 80%) compared with semiquantitative MPS stress evaluation (69% and 69%). Multivariate regression analysis showed that only stress MBF [OR (95% CI) 0.59 (0.42–0.82); p<0.0003] was an independent predictor of MVD. Conclusion The use of absolute myocardial blood flow analysis with the CZT camera may identify high risk patients, such as those with multivessel disease. This approach could be used in clinical practice, increasing the accuracy in the evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document