scholarly journals Colorectal Cancer Prognosis is Not Associated with BRAF and KRAS Mutations-A STROBE Compliant Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joon-Hyop Lee ◽  
Jiyoung Ahn ◽  
Won Seo Park ◽  
Eun Kyung Choe ◽  
Eunyoung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Viral Oncogene ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Mutation Group ◽  
Viral Oncogene Homolog

Background: We investigated the associations between v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAFV600E, henceforth BRAF) and v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations and colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis, using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE39582) datasets. Materials and Methods: The effects of BRAF and KRAS mutations on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of CRC were evaluated. Results: The mutational status of BRAF and KRAS genes was not associated with overall survival (OS) or DFS of the CRC patients drawn from the TCGA database. The 3-year OS and DFS rates of the BRAF mutation (+) vs. mutation (−) groups were 92.6% vs. 90.4% and 79.7% vs. 68.4%, respectively. The 3-year OS and DFS rates of the KRAS mutation (+) vs. mutation (−) groups were 90.4% vs. 90.5% and 65.3% vs. 73.5%, respectively. In stage II patients, however, the 3-year OS rate was lower in the BRAF mutation (+) group than in the mutation (−) group (85.5% vs. 97.7%, p <0.001). The mutational status of BRAF genes of 497 CRC patients drawn from the GSE39582 database was not associated with OS or DFS. The 3-year OS and DFS rates of BRAF mutation (+) vs. mutation (−) groups were 75.7% vs. 78.9% and 73.6% vs. 71.1%, respectively. However, KRAS mutational status had an effect on 3-year OS rate (71.9% mutation (+) vs. 83% mutation (−), p = 0.05) and DFS rate (66.3% mutation (+) vs. 74.6% mutation (−), p = 0.013). Conclusions: We found no consistent association between the mutational status of BRAF nor KRAS and the OS and DFS of CRC patients from the TCGA and GSE39582 databases. Studies with longer-term records and larger patient numbers may be necessary to expound the influence of BRAF and KRAS mutations on the outcomes of CRC.

scholarly journals BRAF and KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer: future perspectives for personalized therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 192-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi-Nan Li ◽  
Lin Zhao ◽  
Li-Feng Yu ◽  
Min-Jie Wei
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Viral Oncogene ◽  
Viral Oncogene Homolog

Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide and 30% of patients with CRC experience metastasis. Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have a 5-year overall survival rate of &lt;10%. V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) and V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten ratsarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations are mostly studied in mCRC, as clinical trials found that first-line chemotherapy with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agent confers limited efficacy for mCRC. Treatment decisions for early-stage mCRC do not consider BRAF or KRAS mutations, given the dramatically poor prognosis conferred by these mutations in clinical trials. Thus, it is necessary to identify patients with mCRC harboring BRAF or KRAS mutations to formulate rational therapeutic strategies to improve prognosis and survival. BRAF and KRAS mutations occur in ∼10% and ∼44% of patients with mCRC, respectively. Although the survival rate of patients with mCRC has improved in recent years, the response and prognosis of patients with the aforementioned mutations are still poor. There is a substantial unmet need for prospective personalized therapies for patients with BRAF- or KRAS-mutant mCRC. In this review, we focus on BRAF and KRAS mutations to understand the mechanisms underlying resistance and improving the response rate, outcomes, and prognosis of patients with mCRC bearing these mutations and to discuss prospective personalized therapies for BRAF- and KRAS-mutant mCRC.

BRAF and KRAS mutations as additional risk factors in the context of clinical parameters of patients with colorectal cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3522-3522
Author(s):  
Vlad Calin Popovici ◽  
Eva Budinska ◽  
Arnaud Roth ◽  
Fred Bosman ◽  
Sabine Tejpar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Tumor Site ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
P Values ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Survival After Relapse

3522 Background: The BRAF and KRAS mutations have been proposed as prognostic markers in colorectal cancer (CRC). Of them, only the BRAF V600E mutation has been validated as prognostic for overall survival and survival after relapse, while the value of KRAS mutation is still unclear. Methods: In a cohort of 1423 stage II-III patients from the PETACC-3 clinical trial, the prognostic value of the BRAF and KRAS mutations was retrospectively assessed in all possible stratifications defined by the 5 factors (T and N stage, tumor site and grade, and microsatellite instability status), by log rank test for overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and survival after relapse (SAR). The presence of interactions was tested by Wald test. The significance level was set to 0.01 for Bonferroni-adjusted p-values (P*), and a second level for a trend towards statistical significance was set at 0.05 for unadjusted p-values (P). Results: BRAF mutation was a marker of poor OS only in microsatellite stable (MSS) and left-sided tumors, with no prognostic value in microsatellite instable (MSI-H) or right-sided tumors. In MSS/left-sided tumors, BRAF mutation represents a marker of higher risk than previously reported: OS HR=6.4 [95% CI: 3.6-11.5], P* < 0.0001. For SAR, BRAF was prognostic in more stratifications, with higher risk in MSS/left-sided tumors (HR=3.9 [95% CI: 2.1-7.2], P* = 0.0002) than in MSS/right-sided (HR=2.3 [95% CI: 1.2-4.4], P=0.01). A novel observation was that BRAF mutation was prognostic also for RFS, but only in MSS/left-sided tumors (HR=3.6 [95% CI:2-6.3], P*=0.0005]). Additionally, heterogeneity in OS and RFS among BRAF mutants was observed. In general, KRAS mutation did not reach the significance level required, but showed a trend to become a prognostic marker for RFS in MSS tumors with early lymph node involvement (N1) (HR=1.6 [95% CI:1.1-2.2], P=0.01). Conclusions: The prognostic utility of the BRAF and KRAS mutations has to be interpreted in the context of other factors. For the BRAF mutation, a clear interaction with MSI status and tumor site was observed, with BRAF mutation indicating a much higher risk in MSS/left-sided tumors than previously considered.

Evaluation of BRAF mutation as a powerful prognostic factor in advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 413-413
Author(s):  
T. Yokota ◽  
T. Ura ◽  
N. Shibata ◽  
D. Takahari ◽  
K. Shitara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Kras Mutation ◽  
Clinicopathological Features ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Braf Mutant

413 Background: Alterations in the RAS/RAF/ERK signaling pathways frequently occur in colorectal cancer (CRC). KRAS mutations preclude responsiveness to EGFR-targeted therapies for CRC patients. However, prognostic significance of KRAS mutation is still controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate clinicopathological features of KRAS mutation in codon 12 and 13 as well as of BRAF mutation, and to validate prognostic impact of KRAS/BRAF mutation in advanced and recurrent CRC. Methods: The population consisted of 230 unselected patients who had undergone first-line chemotherapy for advanced and recurrent CRC between November 2002 and June 2010. Cycleave PCR was performed to detect a point mutation at codon 12, 13 or 61 in KRAS, and the V600E mutation in BRAF. Prognostic factors associated with survival were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic and/or Cox proportional hazards analyses. Results: KRAS mutations were present in 34.8% (n= 80) of patients, including 23.5% (n = 54) in codon 12, 11.3% (n = 26) in codon 13, and 0% in codon 61. 6.5% (n = 15) of patients had BRAF mutation. None of the CRC patients carried both KRAS and BRAF mutations. The primary tumor lesions were located on the right side of the colon in 60% of the BRAF mutant patients (p=0.0371). Furthermore, BRAF mutant was significantly associated with the pathological subtypes of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma/mucinous carcinoma (p<0.0001) and peritoneal metastasis (p=0.0059). The median overall survival for BRAF mutant and KRAS 13 mutant patients was 11.0 and 27.7 months, respectively, which was significantly worse than that for KRAS wild-type (wt)/BRAF wt (40.6 months) (BRAF; HR=3.89, 95% CI 1.83-8.24, p<0.001, KRAS13; HR=2.03, 95% CI 1.10-3.74, p=0.024). After adjustment for significant features by multivariate Cox regression analysis, BRAF mutation was associated with poor overall survival (HR, 3.70, 95% CI, 1.48-9.28; p=0.005), together with performance status 2. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis shows that clinicopathological features of CRC patients with BRAF mutations seem to be distinct from those with wild type BRAF. BRAF mutation is one of the most powerful prognostic factors in advanced and recurrent CRC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Relationship between oncogenic mutations (RAS, BRAF and PIK3CA) and tumor location and prognosis in colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15109-e15109
Author(s):  
Daisuke Inagaki ◽  
Manabu Shiozawa ◽  
Tetta Satoyoshi ◽  
Yosuke Atsumi ◽  
Masaaki Murakawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Pik3ca Mutation ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Oncogenic Mutation

e15109 Background: Several studies have reported that right-sided colon cancers (RCC) and left-sided colorectal cancers (LCRC) differ in several factors including genetic features. We investigated the difference in clinicopathological characteristics and oncogenic mutation status between patients with RCC and LCRC in all stages and assessed outcome. Methods: This study was a prospective, observational study. Patients were recruited from November 2014 to February 2016. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were collected and DNA wes extracted from tissue sections from 227 cases. There was no double cancer. Mutations in KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA were detected by next-generation DNA sequencer. Tumors from cecum to transverse colon were defined as RCC, and tumors from descending colon to rectum were defined as LCRC. The median follow-up period was 521 days. Results: KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations were present in 95 patient (41.9%), 7 patients (3.1%), 10 patients (4.4%) and 23 patients (10.1%) respectively, and there was no HRAS mutation in all patients. RCC was 68 patients and LCRC was 159 patients. Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and mutinous adenocarcinoma were significantly more frequent in RCC compared to LCRC (P = 0.031). KRAS mutations were detected in 37 patients with RCC (54.4%) and in 58 patients with LCRC (36.5%). BRAF mutations were detected in 7 patient with RCC (10.3%) and in 3 patients with LCRC (1.9%). KRAS and BRAF mutation in RCC were significantly more frequent than in LCRC (P = 0.012 and P = 0.005, respectively). The incidence of NRAS and PIK3CA mutation was no difference between two groups. In all patients, overall survival was evaluated. On univariate Cox regression analysis, BRAF mutation was associated with significantly poorer overall survival than BRAF wild type (HR = 4.831, P = 0.013). Other oncogenic mutation status and tumor location weren’t associated with overall survival. Conclusions: KRAS and BRAF mutation were more frequent in the patients with RCC compared to those with LCRC in all stages. This study suggested BRAF mutation correlated with poor outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer.

scholarly journals Association between Altered Oncogenic Signaling Pathways and Overall Survival of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2308
Author(s):  
Yi-Hsuan Huang ◽  
Peng-Chan Lin ◽  
Wu-Chou Su ◽  
Ren-Hao Chan ◽  
Po-Chuan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Clinical Implications ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
The Impact

Systemic characterization of genomic alterations into signaling pathways helps to understand the molecular pathogenies of colorectal cancer; however, their clinical implications remain unclear. Here, 128 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving targeted next generation sequencing were retrospectively enrolled to analyze the impact of altered oncogenic pathways on clinical outcome. The datasets from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were used for validation. In 123 patients with non-MSI-high tumor, the most common mutated gene was TP53 (84.6%), followed by APC (78.0%), KRAS (49.6%), and SMAD4 (22.8%). When mutated genes were allocated into signaling pathways defined as The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer Analysis Project, alterations of cell cycle, Wnt, p53, RTK-RAS, PI3K, TGF-β, Notch, and Myc pathways were identified in 88%, 87%, 85%, 75%, 28%, 26%, 17%, and 10% of mCRC tissues, respectively. The survival analyses revealed that Myc and TGF-β pathway alterations were associated with a shorter overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.412; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.139–5.109; p = 0.018 and HR: 2.754; 95% CI: 1.044–7.265; p = 0.033, respectively). The negative prognostic impact of altered TGF-β pathway was maintained in patients receiving an anti-EGFR antibody. The OS of patients with mCRC carrying MYC and BRAF mutation was shorter than those with either MYC or BRAF mutation (HR: 4.981, 95% CI: 0.296–83.92; p = 0.02). These findings have clinical implications, such as prognosis prediction, treatment guidance, and molecular-targeted therapy development.

scholarly journals Multifunctional Imaging Signature for V-KI-RAS2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) Mutations in Colorectal Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 386-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Miles ◽  
B. Ganeshan ◽  
M. Rodriguez-Justo ◽  
V. J. Goh ◽  
Z. Ziauddin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Viral Oncogene ◽  
Viral Oncogene Homolog

scholarly journals A novel prognostic immunoscore based on The Cancer Genome Atlas to predict overall survival in colorectal cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuxiong Tang ◽  
Yufan Wu ◽  
Ding Sun ◽  
Xiaofeng Xue ◽  
Lei Qin
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is highly prevalent worldwide. The relationship between the infiltration of immunocytes in CRC and clinical outcome has been investigated in recent years. study aims to construct a new prognostic signature using an immunocyte panel. Our novel prognostic immunoscore included 13 types of immunocytes, which were identified by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)–Cox regression. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Kaplan–Meier survival estimates were applied to evaluate the prognostic ability. Compared with the signature based on a single immune marker (i.e., CD8 mRNA expression and CD8+ expressing T cells), the novel prognostic immunoscore possessed better specificity and sensitivity of prognosis (Area under the curves (AUCs) are 0.852, 0.856, and 0.774 for 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival times, respectively). Significant differences were identified between the high and low immunoscore groups in overall survival and disease-free survival in training and validation cohorts. Combining the immunoscore with clinical information may provide a more accurate prognosis for CRC. The immunoscore can identify patients with poor outcomes in the high Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) group, who may benefit the most from immunotherapy. The immunoscore was also closely related to two immune checkpoints (i.e., PD-L1 and PD-1, r = 0.3087 and r = 0.3341, respectively). Collectively, Our study demonstrates that the novel prognostic immunoscore reported here may be useful in distinguishing different prognoses and may improve the clinical management of patients with CRC.

scholarly journals Multiplex Picodroplet Digital PCR to Detect KRAS Mutations in Circulating DNA from the Plasma of Colorectal Cancer Patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 1722-1731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Taly ◽  
Deniz Pekin ◽  
Leonor Benhaim ◽  
Steve K Kotsopoulos ◽  
Delphine Le Corre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Digital Pcr ◽  
Blood Collection ◽  
Circulating Dna ◽  
Single Mutation ◽  
Plasma Samples ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Viral Oncogene ◽  
Viral Oncogene Homolog

BACKGROUND Multiplex digital PCR (dPCR) enables noninvasive and sensitive detection of circulating tumor DNA with performance unachievable by current molecular-detection approaches. Furthermore, picodroplet dPCR facilitates simultaneous screening for multiple mutations from the same sample. METHODS We investigated the utility of multiplex dPCR to screen for the 7 most common mutations in codons 12 and 13 of the KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) oncogene from plasma samples of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Fifty plasma samples were tested from patients for whom the primary tumor biopsy tissue DNA had been characterized by quantitative PCR. RESULTS Tumor characterization revealed that 19 patient tumors had KRAS mutations. Multiplex dPCR analysis of the plasma DNA prepared from these samples identified 14 samples that matched the mutation identified in the tumor, 1 sample contained a different KRAS mutation, and 4 samples had no detectable mutation. Among the tumor samples that were wild type for KRAS, 2 KRAS mutations were identified in the corresponding plasma samples. Duplex dPCR (i.e., wild-type and single-mutation assay) was also used to analyze plasma samples from patients with KRAS-mutated tumors and 5 samples expected to contain the BRAF (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B) V600E mutation. The results for the duplex analysis matched those for the multiplex analysis for KRAS-mutated samples and, owing to its higher sensitivity, enabled detection of 2 additional samples with low levels of KRAS-mutated DNA. All 5 samples with BRAF mutations were detected. CONCLUSIONS This work demonstrates the clinical utility of multiplex dPCR to screen for multiple mutations simultaneously with a sensitivity sufficient to detect mutations in circulating DNA obtained by noninvasive blood collection.

scholarly journals Eps15 Homology Domain-Containing Protein 3 Hypermethylation as a Prognostic and Predictive Marker for Colorectal Cancer

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 453
Author(s):  
Yu-Han Wang ◽  
Shih-Ching Chang ◽  
Muhamad Ansar ◽  
Chin-Sheng Hung ◽  
Ruo-Kai Lin
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Uterine Cancer ◽  
Colonic Polyps ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Eps15 Homology Domain

Colorectal cancer (CRC) arises from chromosomal instability, resulting from aberrant hypermethylation in tumor suppressor genes. This study identified hypermethylated genes in CRC and investigated how they affect clinical outcomes. Methylation levels of specific genes were analyzed from The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset and 20 breast cancer, 16 esophageal cancer, 33 lung cancer, 15 uterine cancer, 504 CRC, and 9 colon polyp tissues and 102 CRC plasma samples from a Taiwanese cohort. In the Asian cohort, Eps15 homology domain-containing protein 3 (EHD3) had twofold higher methylation in 44.4% of patients with colonic polyps, 37.3% of plasma from CRC patients, and 72.6% of CRC tissues, which was connected to vascular invasion and high microsatellite instability. Furthermore, EHD3 hypermethylation was detected in other gastrointestinal cancers. In the Asian CRC cohort, low EHD3 mRNA expression was found in 45.1% of patients and was connected to lymph node metastasis. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards survival analysis revealed that hypermethylation in women and low mRNA expression were associated with overall survival. In the Western CRC cohort, EHD3 hypermethylation was also connected to overall survival and lower chemotherapy and antimetabolite response rates. In conclusion, EHD3 hypermethylation contributes to the development of CRC in both Asian and Western populations.

Identification of a lncRNA prognostic signature-related to stem cell index and its significance in colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Cheng Wang ◽  
Ya Liu ◽  
Fei-Wu Long ◽  
Liang-Ren Liu ◽  
Chuan-Wen Fan
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Markers ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Prognostic Signature ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Bioinformatic Approaches ◽  
Cell Phenotypes ◽  
The Relationship

Background: The relationship between long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and the mRNA stemness index (mRNAsi) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is still unclear. Materials & methods: The mRNAsi, mRNAsi-related lncRNAs and their clinical significance were analyzed by bioinformatic approaches in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-COREAD dataset. Results: mRNAsi was negatively related to pathological features but positively related to overall survival and recurrence-free survival in CRC. A five mRNAsi-related lncRNAs prognostic signature was further developed and showed independent prognostic factors related to overall survival in CRC patients, due to the five mRNAsi-related lncRNAs involved in several pathways of the cancer stem cells and malignant cancer cell phenotypes. Conclusion: The present study highlights the potential roles of mRNAsi-related lncRNAs as alternative prognostic markers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document