scholarly journals Comparison of Effectiveness Using Different Dual Bronchodilator Agents in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2649
Author(s):  
Shih-Lung Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Bronchodilator Agents ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Dose Combination ◽  
Long Acting

The effectiveness and safety of fixed dual long-acting bronchodilators for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients have been well established; however, there is a paucity of clinical effectiveness comparison in patients with COPD treatment. The aim of the current study was to compare the effectiveness of three once-daily dual bronchodilator agents in patients with COPD. Patients with diagnosed COPD and treated with a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) + long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) fixed-dose combination therapy (UME/VIL (umeclidinium and vilanterol inhalation powder), IND/GLY (indacaterol and glycopyrronium), and TIO/OLO (tiotropium and olodaterol)) were enrolled in this retrospective study over a period of 12 months. Effectiveness assessments were evaluated using a COPD assessment test (CAT) and lung function parameters. Besides, times for acute exacerbation were also assessed. The enrolled patients’ number was 177 in IND/GLY, 176 in UME/VIL and 183 in TIO/OLO. Lung function measurements with FEV1 had significantly improved for patients using TIO/OLO (98.7 mL) compared to those of IND/GLY (65.2 mL) and UME/VIL (64.4 mL) (p < 0.001). CAT scores were also significantly decreased in patients treated with TIO/OLO (CAT down 5.6) than those with IND/GLY (3.8) and UME/VIL (3.9) (p = 0.03). Acute exacerbation was also reduced in patients using TIO/OLO (4.9%) compared with those using IND/GLY (10.2%) and UME/VIL (11.9%) (p = 0.01). Significant improvement in pulmonary function, symptoms were demonstrated after 12 months of LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combination therapy with three different treatment options. TIO/OLO demonstrated higher therapeutic effects compared with UME/VIL or IND/GLY. Determining clinical relevance will require a well-designed randomized controlled trial.

scholarly journals Comparison of Effectiveness Using Different Dual Broncho- dilator Agents in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shih-Lung Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Acute Exacerbation ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Dose Combination ◽  
Long Acting

Abstract BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of fixed dual long-acting bronchodilators for chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD) patients has been well established; however, there is a paucity of clinical effectiveness comparison in patients with COPD treatment. The aim of the current study was to compare the efficacy of three once daily dual bronchodilator agents in patients with COPD.MethodsPatients with diagnosed COPD and treated with a long-acting beta agonist (LABA) + long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) fixed-dose combination therapy (UME/VIL [umeclidinium and vilanterol inhalation powder], IND/GLY [indacaterol and glycopyrronium], and TIO/OLO [tiotoprium and olodaterol]) were enrolled in this retrospective study over a period of 12 months. Effectiveness assessments were evaluated using a COPD assessment test (CAT) and lung function parameters. Besides, times for acute exacerbation were also assessed.ResultsThe enrolled patients’ number was 77 in IND/GLY, 76 in UME/VIL and 83 in TIO/OLO. Lung function measurements with FEV1 had significantly improved for patients using TIO/OLO (98.7 ml) compared to those of IND/GLY (65.2 ml) and UMEC/VIL (64.4 ml) (p<0.001). CAT scores were also significantly decreased in patients treated with TIO/OLO (CAT down 5.6) than those with IND/GLY (3.8) and UMEC/VIL (3.9) (p=0.03). Acute exacerbation was also reduced in patients using TIO/OLO (4.8%) compared with those using IND/GLY (10.4%) and UMEC/VIL (10.5%) (p=0.01).ConclusionSignificant improvement in pulmonary function, symptoms were demonstrated after 12 months of LABA+LAMA fixed-dose combination therapy with 3 different treatment options. TIO/OLO demonstrated higher therapeutic effects compared with UME/VIL or IND/GLY. Determining clinical relevance will require a well-designed randomized controlled trial.Key Words: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dual bronchodilator, LABA/LAMA

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Clinical Effectiveness of the Salmeterol/Fluticasone Fixed-Dose Combination Delivered via the Elpenhaler® Device in Greek Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Comorbidities: The AEOLOS Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1159
Author(s):  
Paschalis Steiropoulos ◽  
Stavros Tryfon ◽  
Christos Kyriakopoulos ◽  
Konstantinos Bartziokas ◽  
Konstantinos Kostikas
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Fixed Dose Combination ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Dose Combination ◽  
Dyspnea Score

Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is an inflammatory lung disease characterized by airflow limitation that is not completely reversible. The fixed-dose combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate (SFC) has been approved as a treatment for COPD patients with a history of recurrent exacerbations and significant symptoms despite regular bronchodilator therapy. In the present study, we evaluated the change in FEV1, mMRC dyspnea score and satisfaction in COPD patients with at least one comorbidity versus those without comorbidities treated with a fixed-dose SFC via the Elpenhaler® device for 12 months. Methods: A 12-month multicenter prospective, observational study (NCT02978703) was designed. Data were collected during the enrollment visit (V0) and six (V1) and twelve months (V2) after the initiation of treatment with Elpenhaler® SFC. The evaluation of the efficacy of the fixed-dose SFC was performed by assessing the change in lung function and dyspnea as expressed by FEV1 and the mMRC dyspnea scale score in COPD patients with and without comorbidities. Results: In total 1016 patients were enrolled, following usual daily clinical practice. A statistically significant improvement was observed in FEV1 in the total study population between visits V0, V1 and V2, with a change from the baseline at V1 0.15 ± 0.22 L and at V2 0.21 ± 0.25 L (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). This improvement was exhibited regardless of the COPD severity at the baseline, being more noticeable in GOLD 2020 groups B and C. Similarly, a significant improvement was observed in mMRC dyspnea scale values between successive visits (p < 0.0001). In patients without comorbidities, there was a significant improvement in FEV1 of 0.19 ± 0.24 L at V1 and 0.28 ± 0.27 L at V2 (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons), as well as in the mMRC dyspnea score (p < 0.0001). In patients with at least one comorbidity, a corresponding but smaller improvement in FEV1 was observed (0.11 ± 0.34 L at V1 and 0.20 ± 0.42 L at V2; p < 0.0001 for both comparisons and in the mMRC score (p < 0.0001). In the multiple linear regression analysis BMI, GOLD 2020 groups, mMRC and the presence of comorbidities at the baseline were significant factors for the change of FEV1 between V0 and V2. Conclusions: COPD patients treated for twelve months with SFC via the Elpenhaler® device showed significant improvement in lung function and dyspnea at 6 and 12 months, irrespective of the presence of comorbidities.

scholarly journals A randomized controlled trial of long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting β2 agonist fixed-dose combinations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masato Muraki ◽  
Yuki Kunita ◽  
Ken Shirahase ◽  
Ryo Yamazaki ◽  
Soichiro Hanada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Questionnaire Survey ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Muscarinic Antagonist ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Β2 Agonist

Abstract Background In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, combination treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long-acting β2 agonist (LABA) increases forced expiratory volume in one second and reduces symptoms compared to monotherapy. In Japan, three different once-daily fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) have been prescribed since 2015, although a direct comparison of these FDCs has never been performed. The objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness, preference, and safety of three LAMA/LABA FDCs—glycopyrronium/indacaterol (Gly/Ind), umeclidinium/vilanterol (Ume/Vil), and tiotropium/olodaterol (Tio/Olo)—in patients with COPD. Methods We enrolled 75 COPD outpatients (male:female ratio, 69:6; 77.4 ± 6.9 years). A prospective, randomized, crossover study was conducted on three groups using three FDCs: Gly/Ind; Ume/Vil; and Tio/Olo. Each medication was administered for 4 weeks before crossover (total 12 weeks). After each FDC administration, a respiratory function test and questionnaire survey were conducted. A comparative questionnaire survey of all three LAMA/LABA FDCs was conducted after 12 weeks (following administration of final FDC). Results No significant differences in COPD Assessment Test or modified Medical Research Council dyspnea questionnaire were reported in the surveys completed after each FDC administration; no significant differences in spirometric items were observed. In the final comparative questionnaire survey, patients reported better actual feeling of being able to inhale following Gly/Ind administration compared with Tio/Olo, although no significant differences in adverse events or other evaluations were reported. Conclusions The three LAMA/LABA FDCs administered to COPD patients show similar effects and safety, although some minor individual preference was reported. Trial registration This study retrospectively registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (number UMIN000041342, registered on August 6, 2020).

scholarly journals Inhaled glucocorticosteroids in treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-261
Author(s):  
Anna G. Romanovskikh ◽  
Yu. G. Belotserkovskaya ◽  
I. P. Smirnov
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Β2 Agonists

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an urgent problem of modern healthcare. One of the most frequent approaches to the therapy of the COPD remains the appointment of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) in fixed-dose combinations. At the same time, the role and place of fixed-dose combinations (ICS/LABA) in COPD therapy is currently being actively discussed. The presented article describes the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combinations (ICS/LABA) in COPD patients, modern approaches to the appointment of ICS/LABA.

scholarly journals Effectiveness and tolerability of formoterol plus glycopyrronium combination in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: FINE registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 1519
Author(s):  
Bharat Gopal ◽  
K. S. Satish ◽  
Samir Garde ◽  
Niranjan Kumar Sit ◽  
Dipali Kamdar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Term Therapy ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Dry Powder ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Post Marketing Surveillance ◽  
Long Acting

Background: Long-term therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is progressing fast. Dual bronchodilation with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) fixed dose combinations (FDC) have been available over the past few years. To evaluate the real-world tolerability and effectiveness of formoterol plus glycopyrronium FDC inhaler, a post-marketing surveillance study was conducted in Indian population.Methods: This was an open-label, observational registry in which COPD patients, who were prescribed forglyn (a brand of FDC of glycopyrronium 25 mcg and formoterol fumarate dihydrate 6 mcg dry powder inhalation). The effectiveness, safety and tolerability of this LAMA/LABA combination were evaluated for 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The safety and tolerability was assessed based on the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Effectiveness was evaluated based on change in total symptom score from baseline to end of 12 weeks. The forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was performed at baseline and end of 12 weeks.Results: Total COPD patients enrolled were 605, of which 78.5% were males and 21.5% were females. Patients showing improvement of symptoms at week 4 were 587 (97.02%).Overall, at the end of 8 week and 12 week 98.34 % and 99.49% patients showed improvement in the total symptoms respectively. About 0.49% did not show any improvement. AEs were reported in 64 (10.64%) patients with no serious AEs. Mean FEV1 of 476 patients before treatment was 1.53±0.68 L at baseline which changed to 1.85±4.74 L at the end of 12 weeks, with was statistically significant (p<0.05).Conclusions: In real-life clinical practice in India, formoterol and glycopyrronium FDC dry powder inhaler was well tolerated in COPD patients, and can be regarded as an effective option for maintenance treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document