scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Hydroxychloroquine for Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2503
Author(s):  
Adrian V. Hernandez ◽  
Mi T. Phan ◽  
Jonathon Rocco ◽  
Vinay Pasupuleti ◽  
Joshuan J. Barboza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Inverse Variance ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analyses

We systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine as treatment for hospitalized COVID-19. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating hydroxychloroquine as treatment for hospitalized COVID-19 patients were searched until 2nd of December 2020. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, need of mechanical ventilation, need of non-invasive ventilation, ICU admission and oxygen support at 14 and 30 days. Secondary outcomes were clinical recovery and worsening, discharge, radiological progression of pneumonia, virologic clearance, serious adverse events (SAE) and adverse events. Inverse variance random effects meta-analyses were performed. Thirteen RCTs (n=18,540) were included. Hydroxychloroquine total doses ranged between 2000 and 12,400 mg; treatment durations were from 5 to 16 days and follow up times between 5 and 30 days. Compared to controls, hydroxychloroquine non-significantly increased mortality at 14 days (RR 1.07, 95%CI 0.92–1.25) or 30 days (RR 1.08, 95%CI 1.00–1.16). Hydroxychloroquine did not affect other primary or secondary outcomes, except SAEs that were significantly higher than the control (RR 1.24, 95%CI 1.05–1.46). Eleven RCTs had high or some concerns of bias. Subgroup analyses were consistent with main analyses. Hydroxychloroquine was not efficacious for treating hospitalized COVID-19 patients and caused more severe adverse events. Hydroxychloroquine should not be recommended as treatment for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of biologics in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. s17-s31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassyano Januário Correr ◽  
Inajara Rotta ◽  
Thaís de Souza Teles ◽  
Rangel Ray Godoy ◽  
Bruno Salgado Riveros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Biological Agents ◽  
Severe Psoriasis ◽  
Biological Agent ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Serious Adverse Events

We conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials in moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with biological agents, with a follow-up of 10-14 weeks. Overall, 41 studies, with mean Jadad score of 4.4, and 15,586 patients were included. For the efficacy outcomes PASI 50, 75 and 90 our findings are not conclusive to point what biological agent has the greatest response in short term follow-up. There were no statistical differences between placebo and biologics for the occurrence of infections and serious adverse events. Ustekinumab 45mg showed lower withdrawal due to adverse events compared with the placebo. Based on data available up to now, it is not possible to determine which biological agent is the best for PASI 50, 75 or 90 after 10-14 weeks of treatment. At the same follow-up, overall safety seems to be the same for all biological agents and Ustekinumab 45mg the most well tolerated drug. To better understand efficacy and safety, indirect meta-analysis comparing drug-to-drug is required since randomized placebo-controlled trials may not be feasible.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of combined endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection and balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous occlusion (BRTOcc) of gastrorenal shunts in patients with bleeding gastric fundal varices

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fateh Bazerbachi ◽  
Akira Dobashi ◽  
Swarup Kumar ◽  
Sanjay Misra ◽  
Navtej S Buttar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Gastric Varices ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Cyanoacrylate Glue ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Gastroesophageal Varices ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Glue Embolization

Abstract Background Endoscopic cyanoacrylate (glue) injection of fundal varices may result in life-threatening embolic adverse events through spontaneous gastrorenal shunts (GRSs). Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous occlusion (BRTOcc) of GRSs during cyanoacrylate injection may prevent serious systemic glue embolization through the shunt. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combined endoscopic–interventional radiologic (BRTOcc) approach for the treatment of bleeding fundal varices. Methods We retrospectively analysed the data of patients who underwent the combined procedure for acutely bleeding fundal varices between January 2010 and April 2018. Data were extracted for patient demographics, clinical and endoscopic findings, technical details, and adverse events of the endoscopic–BRTOcc approach and patient outcomes. Results We identified 30 patients (13 [43.3%] women; median age 58 [range, 25–92] years) with gastroesophageal varices type 2 (53.3%, 16/30) and isolated gastric varices type 1 (46.7%, 14/30) per Sarin classification, and median clinical and endoscopic follow-up of 151 (range, 4–2,513) days and 98 (range, 3–2,373) days, respectively. The median volume of octyl-cyanoacrylate: Lipiodol injected was 7 (range, 4–22) mL. Procedure-related adverse events occurred in three (10.0%) patients, including transient fever, non-life-threatening pulmonary glue embolism, and an injection-site ulcer bleed. Complete gastric variceal obturation was achieved in 18 of 21 patients (85.7%) at endoscopic follow-up. Delayed variceal rebleeding was confirmed in one patient (3.3%) and suspected in two patients (6.7%). Although no procedure-related deaths occurred, the overall mortality rate was 46.7%, primarily from liver-disease progression and co-morbidities. Conclusion The combined endoscopic–BRTOcc procedure is a relatively safe and effective technique for bleeding fundal varices, with a high rate of variceal obturation and a low rate of serious adverse events.

Abstract 15821: Safety and Efficacy of Non-invasive Ventilation During Exercise Training in Patients With Acute Heart Failure. A Randomized Prospective Controlled Study

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayron F Oliveira ◽  
Rita L Santos ◽  
Vanessa M Mendez ◽  
Priscila A Sperandio ◽  
Iracema I Umeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Exercise Training ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation

Background: Exercise training (ET) is well established to improve functional capacity and quality of life in patients (pts) with chronic heart failure. However, the ET benefits in acute heart failure (AHF) are unknown. Purpose: We aimed to study the safety and efficacy of ET alone or combined with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) compared to standard medical treatment in hospitalized pts with AHF. Methods: Twenty-nine pts with AHF (68% ischemic), 56±7 years, left ventricle ejection fraction of 25±5%, NTproBNP of 2456±730, 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD = 225±39meters) were randomized into 3 groups: ET + NIV with sub therapeutic positive airway pressure (PAP) (ET,n=9), ET + NIV set to 14 of inspiratory and 8 cmH2O of expiratory PAP, respectively (EV,n=11) and standard treatment (CO,n=9). The ET and EV groups performed a daily session of unloaded exercise on cycle ergometer for 20 min or tolerance limit, for 8 consecutives days. In EV and ET, oxygen pulse saturation (SpO2), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), blood pressure (BP), blood lactate were measured at baseline (D1), during exercise, and at day 10 (D10). Serious adverse events (death or worsening heart failure) were also assessed on D10. Results: Length of hospital stay was shorter in EV group (17±10 days) compared to ET (23±8 days) and CO (39±15 days) (p<0,05). There were more serious adverse events in CO (66,6%) compared to both EV and ET (15%). Dobutamine use at D10 was less frequent in EV (18,2%) and ET (22,2%) groups than in CO (33,3%) (p<0.05). There was a marked improvement in Δ6MWD between D1 and D10 in EV (Δ127±72 meters), though increase in Δ6MWD was also seen in ET (Δ72±26 meters) and CO (Δ41±19meters), p<0,05. The EV group also showed higher endurance and lower peak HR at end-exercise than ET at D10 (128±10 vs. 92±8 min and 73±12 vs. 104±25 bpm, respectively; p<0,05). There was a similar reduction in NTproBNP levels but no differences were found in BP, SpO2, RR and blood lactate. Conclusion: Aerobic exercise in AHF was safe, reduced length of hospital stay and need for inotropics at D10. NIV + ET increased exercise endurance with lower cardiovascular stress.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (11) ◽  
pp. E1474-E1482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. McCarty ◽  
Rajat Garg ◽  
Christopher C. Thompson ◽  
Tarun Rustagi
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Outlet Obstruction ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Outlet Obstruction ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel endoscopic procedure designed to facilitate sustained luminal patency in patients with gastric outlet obstruction. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-GE for treatment of gastric outlet obstruction. Methods Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were performed through April 2019. Patients with benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction were included. Measured outcomes included: immediate technical and clinical success as well as rate of serious adverse events (AEs). Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran Q test and I 2 statistics. Publication bias was ascertained by funnel plot and Egger regression testing. Results A total of five studies (n = 199 patients; 45.73 % male) were included in this study. Four retrospective studies and one prospective study were analyzed. Mean age of patients that underwent the EUS-GE procedure was 64.52 ± 1.37 years with a pooled mean follow-up period of 4.32 ± 1.65 months. In 21 % of patients (n = 43), gastric outlet obstruction was due to benign causes. Immediate technical success was 92.90 % (95 % CI; 88.26 – 95.79; I2 = 0.00 %) and reported in all studies. The clinical success rate of EUS-GE was 90.11 % (95 % CI; 84.64 – 93.44; I2 = 0.00 %). Serious AEs occurred in 5.61 % (95 % CI; 2.87 – 10.67; I2 = 1.67 %) of cases and were related to peritonitis, perforation, bleeding, and abdominal pain. Re-intervention rate was 11.43 % (95 % CI; 7.29 – 17.46; I2 = 17.38 %). Conclusions EUS-GE appears to provide an effective and safe minimally invasive alternative for treatment of benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of the TCM Qi-Supplementing Therapy in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-qian Yang ◽  
Ling Liu ◽  
Wen-yu Yang ◽  
Huan-huan Dong ◽  
Yi-ran Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Myasthenia Gravis ◽  
Relapse Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Effective Rate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Total Response ◽  
Total Response Rate

Background. The Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Qi-supplementing therapy has been used widely for treating myasthenia gravis (MG) in China. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Qi-supplementing therapy as an adjunctive therapy in MG patients. Methods. Seven electronic databases were searched through June 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the add-on effect of Qi-supplementing therapy in MG patients were included. The outcome measures were the total effective rate, relapse rate, and adverse events. Results. Twenty-three RCTs involving 1,691 MG patients were included. The included studies were of low-to-moderate quality. Meta-analysis showed that Qi-supplementing therapy combined with Western medicine (WM) significantly improved the total response rate and reduced the relapse risk during 6–24 months of follow-up. Subgroup analysis showed that Qi-supplementing therapy only affected the total response rate within the first 6 months of treatment. Moreover, the rate of adverse events was lower with the addition of Qi-supplementing therapy to WM than with WM only. Conclusions. Short-term Qi-supplementing therapy combined with WM appears to be superior to WM for improving the total response rate and reducing the relapse rate. However, more high-quality RCTs are warranted owing to methodological flaws of previous trials.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of colchicine in COVID-19: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

RMD Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. e001746
Author(s):  
Kedar Gautambhai Mehta ◽  
Tejas Patel ◽  
Paragkumar D Chavda ◽  
Parvati Patel
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Ventilatory Support ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Randomised Controlled

BackgroundColchicine, an anti-inflammatory drug is prescribed nowadays for COVID-19. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated efficacy and safety of colchicine in patients with COVID-19.MethodsWe searched databases for randomised controlled studies evaluating efficacy and/or safety of colchicine as compared with supportive care in patients with COVID-19. The efficacy outcomes were mortality, ventilatory support, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and length of hospital stay. The safety outcomes were adverse events, serious adverse events and diarrhoea. A meta-analytical summary was estimated using random effects model through Mantle-Hanzle method. An I2 test was used to assess heterogeneity. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess quality of evidence for each outcome.ResultsOut of 69 full texts assessed, 6 studies (16148 patients with COVID-19) were included in meta-analysis. Patients receiving colchicine did not show significant reduction in mortality (risk difference, RD −0.00 (95% CI −0.01 to 0.01), I2=15%), ventilatory support (risk ratio, RR 0.67 (95% CI 0.38 to 1.21), I2=47%), ICU admission (RR 0.49 (95% CI 0.19 to 1.25), I2=34%), length of hospital stay (mean difference: −1.17 (95% CI −3.02 to 0.67), I2=77%) and serious adverse events (RD −0.01 (95% CI −0.02 to 0.00), I2=28%) than those who received supportive care only. Patients receiving colchicine had higher rates of adverse events (RR 1.58 (95% CI 1.07 to 2.33), I2=81%) and diarrhoea (RR 1.93 (95% CI 1.62 to 2.29), I2=0%) than supportive care treated patients. The GRADE quality of evidence was moderate for most outcomes.ConclusionThe moderate quality evidence suggests no benefit of addition of colchicine to the standard care regimen in patients with COVID-19.

scholarly journals Efficacy and harms of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Piscoya ◽  
Luis Fernando Ng-Sueng ◽  
Angela Parra del Riego ◽  
Renato Cerna-Viacava ◽  
Vinay Pasupuleti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Improvement ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Meta Analyses

AbstractBackgroundWe evaluated the efficacy and safety of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19.MethodsSystematic review in five engines, pre-print webpages and RCT registries until May 22, 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating remdesivir on confirmed, COVID-19 adults with pneumonia and/or respiratory insufficiency. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, clinical improvement or recovery, need for invasive ventilation, and serious adverse events (SAE). Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, progression of pneumonia, and adverse events (AE). Inverse variance random effects meta-analyses were performed.ResultsTwo placebo-controlled RCTs (n=1300) and two case series (n=88) were included. All studies used remdesivir 200mg IV the first day and 100mg IV for 9 more days, and followed up until 28 days. Wang et al. RCT was stopped early due to AEs; ACTT-1 was preliminary reported at 15-day follow up. Time to clinical improvement was not decreased in Wang et al. RCT, but median time to recovery was decreased by 4 days in ACTT-1. Remdesivir did not decrease all-cause mortality (RR 0.71, 95%CI 0.39 to 1.28) and need for invasive ventilation at 14 days (RR 0.57, 95%CI 0.23 to 1.42), but had fewer SAEs (RR 0.77, 95%CI 0.63 to 0.94). AEs were similar between remdesivir and placebo arms. Risk of bias ranged from some concerns to high risk in RCTs.InterpretationThere is paucity of adequately powered and fully reported RCTs evaluating effects of remdesivir in adult, hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Remdesivir should not be recommended for the treatment of severe COVID-19.

scholarly journals The long-term efficacy and safety of combining ablation and left atrial appendage closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Li ◽  
Jin-Yu Sun ◽  
Li-Da Wu ◽  
Jian-feng Hao ◽  
Ru-Xing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Pericardial Effusion ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Combined Procedure ◽  
Term Efficacy ◽  
Device Embolization

Backgroud The long-term outcomes of this combined procedure remain elusive. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of combined procedure. Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched from the establishment of databases to 1 January 2021. Studies on the long-term (defined as a mean follow-up of approximately 12 months or longer) efficacy and safety outcomes of combined ablation and LAAC were included for meta-analysis. Results A total of 16 studies comprising 1,428 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled long term freedom rate from atrial arrhythmia was 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.71), long-term successful rate sealing of LAAC was 1.00 (95% CI, 1.00-1.00), and ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism during follow-up was 0.01 (95% CI, 0.00-0.02). Meanwhile, the rates of peri-procedural adverse events included phrenic nerve palsy, intracoronary air embolus, device embolization, peri-procedural death of 0.00 (95% CI, 0.00-0.00), procedure-related bleeding events of 0.03 (95% CI, 0.02-0.04), and pericardial effusion requiring or not requiring intervention of 0.00 (95% CI, 0.00-0.01). Moreover, the rates of long-term adverse events rate included device dislocation, intracranial bleeding, and pericardial effusion requiring or not requiring intervention, and all-cause mortality of 0.00 (95% CI, 0.00-0.00), device embolization of 0.01 (95% CI, 0.00-0.01), and other bleeding events of 0.01 (95% CI, 0.00-0.03). Conclusion This meta-analysis suggests that the strategy of combined atrial ablation and LAAC is effective and safe during long-term follow-up

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of rituximab in adult frequent-relapsing or steroid-dependent minimal change disease or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Xue ◽  
Bo Yang ◽  
Jing Xu ◽  
Chenchen Zhou ◽  
Liming Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis ◽  
Minimal Change Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Minimal Change ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Segmental Glomerulosclerosis ◽  
Steroid Dependent

Abstract Background The efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in adult frequent-relapsing (FR) or steroid-dependent (SD) nephrotic syndrome (NS), including minimal change disease (MCD) or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), are still inconclusive. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis registered in  PROSPERO (CRD42019148102) by pooling data of cohort studies or case series on adult patients with difficult-to-treat NS. Steroid-resistant NS was excluded. The primary outcomes were the complete remission (CR) rate and the relapse rate. Partial remission (PR) rate, no response (NR) rate and adverse events were the secondary outcomes. A random-effects model was performed for all the outcomes. Results We included 21 studies involving 382 adult MCD/FSGS subjects with a median follow-up duration from 12 to 43 months. RTX treatment induced a pooled 84.2% CR rate [95% confidence interval (CI): 67.7–96.3%], while MCD patients had a high 91.6% CR rate and FSGS patients a moderate 43% CR rate. However, 27.4% (95% CI 20.7–34.5%) of the patients relapsed during the follow-up. The pooled PR and NR rates were 5.8% (95% CI 1.2–12.5%) and 5.2% (95% CI 0.0–15.0%), respectively. RTX was associated with trivial adverse events and good tolerance. Conclusions In summary, by pooling results of current pilot studies, RTX may be an effective and relatively safe alternative for most adult FR or SD MCD/FSGS to displace calcineurin inhibitors or prednisone in the hierarchy of treatment. More clinical trials comparing RTX with other immunosuppressants and concerning the long-term adverse events are needed.

Efficacy and safety of pharmacological cachexia interventions: systematic review and network meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002601
Author(s):  
Manit Saeteaw ◽  
Phitjira Sanguanboonyaphong ◽  
Jukapun Yoodee ◽  
Kaitlyn Craft ◽  
Ratree Sawangjit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Total Body Weight ◽  
Megestrol Acetate ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Significant Difference

AimsRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated benefits of pharmacological interventions for cachexia in improving weight and appetite. However, comparative efficacy and safety are not available. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for cachexia.MethodsPubMed, EmBase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for RCTs until October 2019. Key outcomes were total body weight (TBW) improvement, appetite (APP) score and serious adverse events. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. NMA was performed to estimate weight gain and APP score increase at 8 weeks, presented as mean difference (MD) or standardised MD with 95% CI.Results80 RCTs (10 579 patients) with 12 treatments were included. Majority is patients with cancer (7220). Compared with placebo, corticosteroids, high-dose megestrol acetate combination (Megace_H_Com) (≥400 mg/day), medroxyprogesterone, high-dose megestrol acetate (Megace_H) (≥400 mg/day), ghrelin mimetic and androgen analogues (Androgen) were significantly associated with MD of TBW of 6.45 (95% CI 2.45 to 10.45), 4.29 (95% CI 2.23 to 6.35), 3.18 (95% CI 0.94 to 5.41), 2.66 (95% CI 1.47 to 3.85), 1.73 (95% CI 0.27 to 3.20) and 1.50 (95% CI 0.56 to 2.44) kg. For appetite improvement, Megace_H_Com, Megace_H and Androgen significantly improved standardised APP score, compared with placebo. There is no significant difference in serious adverse events from all interventions compared with placebo.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that several pharmacological interventions have potential to offer benefits in treatment of cachexia especially Megace_H and short-term use corticosteroids. Nonetheless, high-quality comparative studies to compare safety and efficacy are warranted for better management of cachexia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document