scholarly journals Alternative Procedure to Individual Nasal Pressure Titration for Sleep Apnea

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1453
Author(s):  
Ramon Farré ◽  
David Gozal ◽  
Josep M. Montserrat

In the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), the current standard of “CPAP titration” in the laboratory or at home is a resource demanding and costly approach that, in developed economies, markedly augments healthcare costs and in low resource economies precludes access to care altogether. Here, we discuss that current guidelines for titration of CPAP could be obviated by taking a different route that in many ways is similar to the institution of treatment in many other medical conditions. To this effect, we present novel population based data from 16,780 patients, showing that after individualized and labor-intensive and expensive CPAP titration, 86.4% of OSA patients are treated with nasal pressure settings within the range of 9 ± 2 cmH2O, and review the literature to justify the potential adoption of a standard therapeutic CPAP setting as the initial intervention which would be subsequently followed by any necessary adjustments in only a minority of patients who would not derive the necessary benefit from such standardized intervention. Assuming an 80–85% success rate as derived from our analyses, our personal view if extensively adopted could radically reduce healthcare costs and enable markedly improve access to diagnostics.

SLEEP ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. A158-A158
Author(s):  
Y Li ◽  
AN Vgontzas ◽  
J Fernandez-Mendoza ◽  
F He ◽  
J Gaines ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 163-168
Author(s):  
En‐Ting Chang ◽  
Shih‐Fen Chen ◽  
Jen‐Huai Chiang ◽  
Ling‐Yi Wang ◽  
Chung‐Y Hsu ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e89656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Jen Tien ◽  
Chien-Wen Chou ◽  
Shang-Yu Lee ◽  
Nai-Cheng Yeh ◽  
Chwen-Yi Yang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Je-Ming Hu ◽  
Chin-Sheng Lin ◽  
Sy-Jou Chen ◽  
Chao-Yang Chen ◽  
Cheng-Li Lin ◽  
...  

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amal M Osman ◽  
Benjamin K Tong ◽  
Shane A Landry ◽  
Bradley A Edwards ◽  
Simon A Joosten ◽  
...  

Abstract Study Objectives Quantification of upper airway collapsibility in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) could help inform targeted therapy decisions. However, current techniques are clinically impractical. The primary aim of this study was to assess if a simple, novel technique could be implemented as part of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration study to assess pharyngeal collapsibility. Methods A total of 35 participants (15 female) with OSA (mean ± SD apnea–hypopnea index = 35 ± 19 events/h) were studied. Participants first completed a simple clinical intervention during a routine CPAP titration, where CPAP was transiently turned off from the therapeutic pressure for ≤5 breaths/efforts on ≥5 occasions during stable non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) sleep for quantitative assessment of airflow responses (%peak inspiratory flow [PIF] from preceding 5 breaths). Participants then underwent an overnight physiology study to determine the pharyngeal critical closing pressure (Pcrit) and repeat transient drops to zero CPAP to assess airflow response reproducibility. Results Mean PIF of breaths 3–5 during zero CPAP on the simple clinical intervention versus the physiology night were similar (34 ± 29% vs. 28 ± 30% on therapeutic CPAP, p = 0.2; range 0%–90% vs. 0%–95%). Pcrit was −1.0 ± 2.5 cmH2O (range −6 to 5 cmH2O). Mean PIF during zero CPAP on the simple clinical intervention and the physiology night correlated with Pcrit (r = −0.7 and −0.9, respectively, p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated significant diagnostic utility for the simple intervention to predict Pcrit < −2 and < 0 cmH2O (AUC = 0.81 and 0.92), respectively. Conclusions A simple CPAP intervention can successfully discriminate between patients with and without mild to moderately collapsible pharyngeal airways. This scalable approach may help select individuals most likely to respond to non-CPAP therapies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
pp. 1671-1677
Author(s):  
Ying-Ying Wu ◽  
En-Ting Chang ◽  
Yu-Cih Yang ◽  
Shih-Fen Chen ◽  
Chung-Y Hsu ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 955-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzu-Chieh Chou ◽  
Wen-Miin Liang ◽  
Chang-Bi Wang ◽  
Trong-Neng Wu ◽  
Liang-Wen Hang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document