scholarly journals Long-Term Follow-Up of Spinal Stenosis Inpatients Treated with Integrative Korean Medicine Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Doori Kim ◽  
Joon-Shik Shin ◽  
Young-Joo Moon ◽  
Gwanghyun Ryu ◽  
Wonbin Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Functional Disability ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Korean Medicine ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

The present prospective observational study aimed to analyze the outcomes of inpatients who received integrative Korean medicine treatment in order to provide evidence on its effects on lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Patients with LSS who received inpatient treatment at four Korean medicine hospitals from January 2015 to December 2018 were followed up. Outcomes measured included the numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for back and leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Changes in outcomes at admission, discharge, and follow-up, as well as associated predictors that could account for the improvement in outcomes were analyzed. The NRS score for back pain, NRS score for leg pain, and ODI decreased by 2.20 points (95% confidence interval (CI), −2.41 to −1.99), 2.28 points (95% CI, −2.59 to −1.96), and 17.31 points (95% CI, −19.6 to −15.02), respectively, at long-term follow-up compared with at admission. Patients with LSS who received inpatient integrative Korean medicine treatment exhibited an improvement in pain and functional disability. Further studies are required to determine the effects of integrative Korean medicine treatment.

scholarly journals Improvement of Back and Leg Pain after Lumbar Spinal Decompression without Fusion

2018 ◽  
Vol 80 (02) ◽  
pp. 081-087
Author(s):  
Nicola Bongartz ◽  
Christian Blume ◽  
Hans Clusmann ◽  
Christian Müller ◽  
Matthias Geiger
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Clear Trend ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Background To evaluate whether decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis without fusion leads to sufficient improvement of back pain and leg pain and whether re-decompression alone is sufficient for recurrent lumbar spinal stenosis for patients without signs of instability. Material and Methods A successive series of 102 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (with and without previous lumbar surgery) were treated with decompression alone during a 3-year period. Data on pre- and postoperative back pain and leg pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] scale) were retrospectively collected from questionnaires with a return rate of 65% (n = 66). The complete cohort as well as patients with first-time surgery and re-decompression were analyzed separately. Patients were dichotomized to short-term follow-up (< 100 weeks) and long-term follow-up (> 100 weeks) postsurgery. Results Overall, both back pain (NRS 4.59 postoperative versus 7.89 preoperative; p < 0.0001) and leg pain (NRS 4.09 versus 6.75; p < 0.0001) improved postoperatively. The short-term follow-up subgroup (50%, n = 33) showed a significant reduction in back pain (NRS 4.0 versus 6.88; p < 0.0001) and leg pain (NRS 2.49 versus 6.91: p < 0.0001). Similar results could be observed for the long-term follow-up subgroup (50%, n = 33) with significantly less back pain (NRS 3.94 versus 7.0; p < 0.0001) and leg pain (visual analog scale 3.14 versus 5.39; p < 0.002) postoperatively. Patients with previous decompression surgery benefit significantly regarding back pain (NRS 4.82 versus 7.65; p < 0.0024), especially in the long-term follow-up subgroup (NRS 4.75 versus 7.67; p < 0.0148). There was also a clear trend in favor of leg pain in patients with previous surgery; however, it was not significant. Conclusions Decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis without fusion led to a significant and similar reduction of back pain and leg pain in a short-term and a long-term follow-up group. Patients without previous surgery benefited significantly better, whereas patients with previous decompression benefited regarding back pain, especially for long-term follow-up with a clear trend in favor of leg pain.

scholarly journals Medial closure supracondylar femoral osteotomy: an effective solution for long-term treatment of arthritic valgus knee?

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Mattia Uboldi ◽  
Martino Travi ◽  
Daniele Tradati ◽  
Alessio Maione ◽  
Andrea Fabio Manunta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Society Score ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
International Knee Documentation Committee ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Study Patient ◽  
Valgus Knee ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Purpose The aim of this work was to retrospectively analyze the clinical, subjective, and radiological results of medial closing-wedge distal femur osteotomy (MCW-DFO) for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) in valgus knee at medium- to long-term follow-up. Materials and methods A total of 57 patients (62 knees) treated with MCW-DFO between 1984 and 2018 were included in the study. Patient age at the time of the surgery ranged between 28 and 61 years (average: 48 years). All patients with a minimum follow-up of 4 years were contacted to request for them to undergo clinical, subjective, and radiological evaluation. Preoperative hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle (i.e., preoperative valgus malalignment) was 8.6° ± 2°. Patients were evaluated using the following scales: the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Knee Society Score (KSS), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Numeric Rating Scale 11 (NRS-11). Results Mean follow-up was 11.6 ± 4.9 years, and a total of 17 patients (20 knees) were available for the last examination. At maximum follow-up, 4 patients underwent conversion to a total knee replacement (20%); their survival rate was 100% at 10 years and 66.7% at 15 years, as estimated using the Kaplan–Meier curve. The subjective Knee Society Score improved on average from 37.7 ± 10 to 63.9 ± 15.4. The objective Knee Society Score improved on average from 42.2 ± 11.7 to 75 ± 22.5. The pain detected through the VAS and NRS-11 scales improved from 56.7 ± 12.9 to 42 ± 17.1 and from 5.8 ± 1.1 to 4.4 ± 1.7, respectively. Thirteen patients (70%) required hardware removal at an average time of 19 ± 4 months due to a local nuisance. Conclusions MCW-DFO can improve symptoms in patients with osteoarthritis in a valgus knee at medium- to long-term follow-up, reducing the progression of osteoarthritis in properly selected patients.

scholarly journals Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Patients With Mild Leg Pain Levels Is Associated With Unsatisfactory Outcome

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822094251
Author(s):  
Freyr Gauti Sigmundsson ◽  
Anders Möller ◽  
Fredrik Strömqvist
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Successful Outcome ◽  
Neurogenic Claudication ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Outcome Of Surgery

Study Design: Prospective register cohort study. Objectives: The indication for surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is considered to be leg pain and neurogenic claudication (NC). Nevertheless, a significant part of patients operated for LSS have mild leg pain levels defined as leg pain ≤minimally important clinical difference (MICD). Information is lacking on how to inform these patients about the probable outcome of surgery. The objective was to report the outcome of surgery for LSS in patients with a mild preoperative level of leg pain. Methods: A total of 2559 patients operated upon for LSS with preoperative leg pain ≤3 NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) were evaluated for outcome at the 1-year follow-up. NRS for back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the EuroQol (EQ-5D) were used. Results: In the period 2007 to 2017, we identified 3239 patients (14%) who had mild leg pain (≤3 on the NRS). In this cohort, leg pain increased 0.40 (0.56-0.37) and back pain decreased 1.0 (0.95-1.2) at the 1-year follow up. ODI decreased 11.1 (10.2-11.4) and the EQ-5D increased 0.15 (0.17-0.14). A total of 31% reached successful outcome in terms of back pain, 43% in terms of ODI and 48% in terms of EQ-5D. 63% of the patients were satisfied with the outcome. Conclusion: A minority of patients with mild leg pain levels operated upon for LSS attain MICD for back pain, ODI, and EQ-5D. The results from this study can aid the surgeon in the shared decision-making process before surgery.

Interspinous process device versus conventional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year results of a randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Decompressive Surgery ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

OBJECTIVE Interspinous process distraction devices (IPDs) can be implanted to treat patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication (INC) due to lumbar spinal stenosis. Short-term results provided evidence that the outcomes of IPD implantation were comparable to those of decompressive surgery, although the reoperation rate was higher in patients who received an IPD. This study focuses on the long-term results. METHODS Patients with INC and spinal stenosis at 1 or 2 levels randomly underwent either decompression or IPD implantation. Patients were blinded to the allocated treatment. The primary outcome was the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) score at 5-year follow-up. Repeated measurement analysis was applied to compare outcomes over time. RESULTS In total, 159 patients were included and randomly underwent treatment: 80 patients were randomly assigned to undergo IPD implantation, and 79 underwent spinal bony decompression. At 5 years, the success rates in terms of ZCQ score were similar (68% of patients who underwent IPD implantation had a successful recovery vs 56% of those who underwent bony decompression, p = 0.422). The reoperation rate at 2 years after surgery was substantial in the IPD group (29%), but no reoperations were performed thereafter. Long-term visual analog scale score for back pain was lower in the IPD group than the bony decompression group (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS IPD implantation is a more expensive alternative to decompressive surgery for INC but has comparable functional outcome during follow-up. The risk of reoperation due to absence of recovery is substantial in the first 2 years after IPD implantation, but if surgery is successful this positive effect remains throughout long-term follow-up. The IPD group had less back pain during long-term follow-up, but the clinical relevance of this finding is debatable.

LONG-TERM RESULTS OF MICROSURGICAL TREATMENT OF LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS BY UNILATERAL LAMINOTOMY FOR BILATERAL DECOMPRESSION

Neurosurgery ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1264-1270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus F. Oertel ◽  
Yu-Mi Ryang ◽  
Marcus C. Korinth ◽  
Joachim M. Gilsbach ◽  
Veit Rohde
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Spinal Instability ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Abstract OBJECTIVE Laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy are the standard procedures for decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). With the aim of less invasiveness and better preservation of spinal stability, the technique of unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) was developed. However, limited follow-up data exist to determine the efficiency and outcome of ULBD. Therefore, the authors present their 10-year experience with ULBD and postoperative long-term results. METHODS One hundred thirty-three consecutive patients (73 men and 60 women; mean age, 63 yr) meeting clinical and radiographic criteria for LSS who underwent first-time ULBD between 1994 and 1999 entered the study. The study parameters were set to ensure a follow-up period of at least 4 years. All patients were available for short-term follow-up re-evaluation within 3 months, and 102 (77%) of the 133 patients were available for long-term examination after a mean duration of 5.6 years. The scale of Finneson and Cooper was used for evaluation of the clinical results. RESULTS One hundred thirty patients (97.7%) improved immediately after surgery. Ninety-four (92.2%) of the 102 patients available for long-term follow-up examination remained improved, and 85.3% had an excellent-to-fair operative result. The incidence of complications was 9.8%. Resurgery for complication was necessary in three patients, for restenosis in seven patients, and for spinal instability in two patients, accounting for a reoperation rate of 11.8%. CONCLUSION ULBD allows achievement of good and long-lasting operative results in patients with LSS. Postoperative deterioration, recurrences, and spinal instability are infrequent. For the authors, ULBD is the preferred technique to treat symptomatic LSS.

scholarly journals Open Lift, Drill, Fill and Fix (LDFF) for Talar OCDs: 2 to 4 Year Results in 16 Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0001
Author(s):  
Nienke Altink ◽  
Kaj Lambers ◽  
Jari Dahmen ◽  
Jari Dahmen ◽  
Gino Kerkhoffs
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Bone Ingrowth ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
One Year ◽  
Pain At Rest ◽  
Clinical And Radiological Results

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the mid to long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of an open fixation technique for large primary talar osteochondral defects (OCD): Lift, Drill, Fill and Fix (LDFF). Methods: Nineteen patients underwent an open LDFF surgery. Mean follow-up was 35 months (SD 3.6). Pre-and postoperative clinical assessment included the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and a numeric rating scale (NRS) on pain at rest and during weight-bearing. Remodeling and bone ingrowth were analyzed on CT at one year post-operatively. Results: 15 out of 19 patients showed remodeling and bone ingrowth after the open LDFF procedure. Patients who did not show remodeling and bone ingrowth were treated by means of an OATS procedure. In the remaining 15 patients available at mid to long-term follow-up, LDFF led to a significant improvement of all FAOS subscales; FAOS-pain improved from 65 to 74 (p=0.014), FAOS-symptoms improved from 60 to 80 (p=0.005), FAOS-ADL improved from 80 to 85 (p=001), FAOS-sport improved from 38 to 61 (p=0.017) and FAOS-QoL improved from 38 to 64 (p=0.025). The NRS of pain at rest significantly improved from 3.2 to 1.2 (p=0.009), and pain during walking significantly improved from 6.5 to 1.6 (p<0.001). No complications occurred. Conclusion: Open LDFF of a talar OCDs show promising mid to long-term clinical and radiological results. A longer follow-up period with more study power is a subsequent necessary step in order to draw firmer conclusions about the longevity of this present procedure.

scholarly journals Long term follow up in lumbar spinal stenosis

Spinal Cord ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Scholz ◽  
Raimund Firsching ◽  
W R Lanksch
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

scholarly journals The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after the Use of a Versatile Dynamic Hybrid Stabilization Device in Lumbar Stenosis: Results of a 5–8-Year Follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro Dobran ◽  
Davide Nasi ◽  
Domenico Paolo Esposito ◽  
Maurizio Gladi ◽  
Massimo Scerrati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Hybrid Fixation ◽  
Hybrid Stabilization ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

<sec><title>Study Design</title><p>Retrospective study with long-term follow-up.</p></sec><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>To evaluate the long-term incidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and clinical outcomes in a consecutive series of patients who underwent spinal decompression associated with dynamic or hybrid stabilization with a Flex+TM stabilization system (SpineVision, Antony, France) for lumbar spinal stenosis.</p></sec><sec><title>Overview of Literature</title><p>The incidence of ASD and clinical outcomes following dynamic or hybrid stabilization with the Flex+TM system used for lumbar spinal stenosis have not been well investigated.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>Twenty-one patients with lumbar stenosis and probable post-decompressive spinal instability underwent decompressive laminectomy followed by spinal stabilization using the Flex+TM stabilization system. The indication for a mono-level dynamic stabilization was a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrating evidence of severe disc disease associated with severe spinal stenosis. The hybrid stabilization (rigid-dynamic) system was used for multilevel laminectomies with associated initial degenerative scoliosis, first-grade spondylolisthesis, or rostral pathology.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>The improvement in Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores at follow-up were statistically significant (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.0001 and <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.0001, respectively). At the 5–8-year follow-up, clinical examination, MRI, and X-ray findings showed an ASD complication with pain and disability in one of 21 patients. The clinical outcomes were similar in patients treated with dynamic or hybrid fixation.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Patients treated with laminectomy and Flex+TM stabilization presented a satisfactory clinical outcome after 5–8 years of follow-up, and ASD incidence in our series was 4.76% (one patient out of 21). We are aware that this is a small series, but our long-term follow-up may be sufficient to contribute to the expanding body of literature on the development of symptomatic ASD associated with dynamic or hybrid fixation.</p></sec>

scholarly journals Coflex interspinous process dynamic stabilization for lumbar spinal stenosis: Long-term follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 462-468
Author(s):  
Ming-Rui Du ◽  
Fei-Long Wei ◽  
Kai-Long Zhu ◽  
Ruo-Min Song ◽  
Yu Huan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Dynamic Stabilization ◽  
Process Dynamic ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Lumbar Spinal
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document