scholarly journals Regional Differences in Gene Expression of Proliferating Human Choroidal Endothelial Cells

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-100
Author(s):  
Andrew C. Browning ◽  
Eugene P. Halligan ◽  
Elizabeth A. Stewart ◽  
Daniel C. Swan ◽  
Simon J. Cockell ◽  
...  

Choroidal diseases including inflammation and neovascularization seem to have predilection for different vascular beds. In order to improve our understanding of human macular choroidal angiogenic diseases, we investigate the differences in gene expression between matched human macular and peripheral inner choroidal endothelial cells (CEC) and matched human macular inner and outer CEC. The gene expression profiles of matched, unpassaged human macular and peripheral inner CEC and matched human unpassaged macular inner and outer CEC were conducted using Affymetrix GeneChip arrays. Selected differences in gene expression were validated by real-time-PCR and immunohistochemistry. No differences in probeset expression were demonstrated between inner CECs compared with peripheral inner CECs. In comparison, there was a difference of 1.6% of probesets when matched, unpassaged proliferating human macular inner CEC and macular outer CEC from the same donors were compared. Macular inner CECs demonstrated up-regulation of probesets involved in nervous system development, growth factors, PLVAP, and collagen XVI, while macular outer CECs demonstrated up-regulation of probesets involved in immune function and intracellular signalling. There was a marked homogeneity of human macular and peripheral inner CECs. This suggests that gene expression differences in inner CECs are not responsible for the site specific selectivity of choroidal neovascularisation. Variability was noted, however, in the gene expression of matched macular inner and outer CECs. This could be explained by the differences in the roles and microenvironments of the inner and outer choroid.

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. e12450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingming Liu ◽  
Wenbao Lu ◽  
Qunxing Hou ◽  
Bing Wang ◽  
Youming Sheng ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 157-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengda Sun ◽  
Devon A. Lawson ◽  
Elizabeth Sinclair ◽  
Chih-Yang Wang ◽  
Ming-Derg Lai ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hélène Riquier ◽  
Anne-Catherine Wera ◽  
Anne-Catherine Heuskin ◽  
Olivier Feron ◽  
Stéphane Lucas ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (487) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Hupe ◽  
Minerva Xueting Li ◽  
Susanne Kneitz ◽  
Daria Davydova ◽  
Chika Yokota ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 490-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Hafner ◽  
Gerd Schmitz ◽  
Stefanie Meyer ◽  
Frauke Bataille ◽  
Peter Hau ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Eph receptors and their ligands, the ephrins, represent a large class of cell–cell communication molecules with well-defined developmental functions. Their role in healthy adult tissues and in human disease is still largely unknown, although diverse roles in carcinogenesis have been postulated. Methods: We established a set of fluorescent PCR probes and primers for the definition of individual gene expression profiles of 12 different Eph receptors and 8 ephrins in 13 different healthy tissues. The mRNA expression profiles were studied in human lung, colorectal, kidney, liver, and brain cancers. Results: The family of Eph receptors/ephrins was widely expressed in adult tissues with organ-site-specific patterns: EphB6 was highest in the thymus, compatible with an involvement in T-cell maturation. Brain and testis shared a unique pattern with EphA6, EphA8, and EphB1 being the most prominent. EphA7 had a high abundance in the kidney vasculature. Ephrin-A3 was up-regulated 26-fold in lung cancer, and EphB2 was up-regulated 9-fold in hepatocellular carcinoma. EphA8 was down-regulated in colon cancer, and EphA1/EphA8 was down-regulated in glioblastomas. Conclusion: Eph/Ephrin genes are widely expressed in all adult organs with certain organ-site-specific patterns. Because their function in adult tissues remains unknown, further analysis of their role in disease may disclose new insights beyond their well-defined meaning in development.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 2781-2788 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHAO HU ◽  
YIN-YING DONG ◽  
YE-HAO DONG ◽  
JIE-FENG CUI ◽  
JI-CAN DAI

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document