scholarly journals Checkpoints That Regulate Balanced Biosynthesis of Lipopolysaccharide and Its Essentiality in Escherichia coli

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 189
Author(s):  
Gracjana Klein ◽  
Alicja Wieczorek ◽  
Martyna Szuster and Satish Raina
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Small Rnas ◽  
Cell Envelope ◽  
Transcriptional Factor ◽  
Permeability Barrier ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Essential Components ◽  
Component Systems ◽  
Two Component Systems ◽  
Transport Complex

The outer membrane (OM) of Gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, is essential for their viability. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) constitutes the major component of OM, providing the permeability barrier, and a tight balance exists between LPS and phospholipids amounts as both of these essential components use a common metabolic precursor. Hence, checkpoints are in place, right from the regulation of the first committed step in LPS biosynthesis mediated by LpxC through its turnover by FtsH and HslUV proteases in coordination with LPS assembly factors LapB and LapC. After the synthesis of LPS on the inner leaflet of the inner membrane (IM), LPS is flipped by the IM-located essential ATP-dependent transporter to the periplasmic face of IM, where it is picked up by the LPS transport complex spanning all three components of the cell envelope for its delivery to OM. MsbA exerts its intrinsic hydrocarbon ruler function as another checkpoint to transport hexa-acylated LPS as compared to underacylated LPS. Additional checkpoints in LPS assembly are: LapB-assisted coupling of LPS synthesis and translocation; cardiolipin presence when LPS is underacylated; the recruitment of RfaH transcriptional factor ensuring the transcription of LPS core biosynthetic genes; and the regulated incorporation of non-stoichiometric modifications, controlled by the stress-responsive RpoE sigma factor, small RNAs and two-component systems.

scholarly journals Degradation of Components of the Lpt Transenvelope Machinery Reveals LPS-Dependent Lpt Complex Stability in Escherichia coli

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra M. Martorana ◽  
Elisabete C. C. M. Moura ◽  
Paola Sperandeo ◽  
Flavia Di Vincenzo ◽  
Xiaofei Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cell Envelope ◽  
Barrier Properties ◽  
Permeability Barrier ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Complex Stability ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Essential Proteins ◽  
Assembly Result ◽  
The Stability

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a peculiar component of the outer membrane (OM) of many Gram-negative bacteria that renders these bacteria highly impermeable to many toxic molecules, including antibiotics. LPS is assembled at the OM by a dedicated intermembrane transport system, the Lpt (LPS transport) machinery, composed of seven essential proteins located in the inner membrane (IM) (LptB2CFG), periplasm (LptA), and OM (LptDE). Defects in LPS transport compromise LPS insertion and assembly at the OM and result in an overall modification of the cell envelope and its permeability barrier properties. LptA is a key component of the Lpt machine. It connects the IM and OM sub-complexes by interacting with the IM protein LptC and the OM protein LptD, thus enabling the LPS transport across the periplasm. Defects in Lpt system assembly result in LptA degradation whose stability can be considered a marker of an improperly assembled Lpt system. Indeed, LptA recruitment by its IM and OM docking sites requires correct maturation of the LptB2CFG and LptDE sub-complexes, respectively. These quality control checkpoints are crucial to avoid LPS mistargeting. To further dissect the requirements for the complete Lpt transenvelope bridge assembly, we explored the importance of LPS presence by blocking its synthesis using an inhibitor compound. Here, we found that the interruption of LPS synthesis results in the degradation of both LptA and LptD, suggesting that, in the absence of the LPS substrate, the stability of the Lpt complex is compromised. Under these conditions, DegP, a major chaperone–protease in Escherichia coli, is responsible for LptD but not LptA degradation. Importantly, LptD and LptA stability is not affected by stressors disturbing the integrity of LPS or peptidoglycan layers, further supporting the notion that the LPS substrate is fundamental to keeping the Lpt transenvelope complex assembled and that LptA and LptD play a major role in the stability of the Lpt system.

scholarly journals Peptidoglycan Remodeling EnablesEscherichiacoliTo Survive Severe Outer Membrane Assembly Defect

mBio ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Niccolò Morè ◽  
Alessandra M. Martorana ◽  
Jacob Biboy ◽  
Christian Otten ◽  
Matthias Winkle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Outer Membrane ◽  
Bacterial Cell ◽  
Cell Envelope ◽  
Permeability Barrier ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cross Links ◽  
Peptidoglycan Layer

ABSTRACTGram-negative bacteria have a tripartite cell envelope with the cytoplasmic membrane (CM), a stress-bearing peptidoglycan (PG) layer, and the asymmetric outer membrane (OM) containing lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the outer leaflet. Cells must tightly coordinate the growth of their complex envelope to maintain cellular integrity and OM permeability barrier function. The biogenesis of PG and LPS relies on specialized macromolecular complexes that span the entire envelope. In this work, we show thatEscherichia colicells are capable of avoiding lysis when the transport of LPS to the OM is compromised, by utilizing LD-transpeptidases (LDTs) to generate 3-3 cross-links in the PG. This PG remodeling program relies mainly on the activities of the stress response LDT, LdtD, together with the major PG synthase PBP1B, its cognate activator LpoB, and the carboxypeptidase PBP6a. Our data support a model according to which these proteins cooperate to strengthen the PG in response to defective OM synthesis.IMPORTANCEIn Gram-negative bacteria, the outer membrane protects the cell against many toxic molecules, and the peptidoglycan layer provides protection against osmotic challenges, allowing bacterial cells to survive in changing environments. Maintaining cell envelope integrity is therefore a question of life or death for a bacterial cell. Here we show thatEscherichia colicells activate the LD-transpeptidase LdtD to introduce 3-3 cross-links in the peptidoglycan layer when the integrity of the outer membrane is compromised, and this response is required to avoid cell lysis. This peptidoglycan remodeling program is a strategy to increase the overall robustness of the bacterial cell envelope in response to defects in the outer membrane.

Interaction of Gram-Negative Bacteria with the Lysosomal Fraction of Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes II. Changes in the Cell Envelope of Escherichia coli

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-318
Author(s):  
D. Friedberg ◽  
I. Friedberg ◽  
M. Shilo
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes ◽  
Cytoplasmic Membrane ◽  
Morphological Changes ◽  
Cell Envelope ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Intact Cells ◽  
Lysosomal Fraction ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Absorbing Material

Interaction of lysosomal fraction with Escherichia coli caused damage to the cell envelope of these intact cells and to the cytoplasmic membrane of E. coli spheroplasts. The damage to the cytoplasmic membrane was manifested in the release of 260-nm absorbing material and β-galactosidase from the spheroplasts, and by increased permeability of cryptic cells to O -nitrophenyl-β- d -galactopyranoside; damage to the cell wall was measured by release of alkaline phosphatase. Microscope observation showed morphological changes in the cell envelope.

scholarly journals Elucidation of Regulatory Modes for Five Two-Component Systems in Escherichia coli Reveals Novel Relationships

mSystems ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kumari Sonal Choudhary ◽  
Julia A. Kleinmanns ◽  
Katherine Decker ◽  
Anand V. Sastry ◽  
Ye Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Content Type ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Component Systems ◽  
Two Component ◽  
Two Component Systems

ABSTRACT Escherichia coli uses two-component systems (TCSs) to respond to environmental signals. TCSs affect gene expression and are parts of E. coli’s global transcriptional regulatory network (TRN). Here, we identified the regulons of five TCSs in E. coli MG1655: BaeSR and CpxAR, which were stimulated by ethanol stress; KdpDE and PhoRB, induced by limiting potassium and phosphate, respectively; and ZraSR, stimulated by zinc. We analyzed RNA-seq data using independent component analysis (ICA). ChIP-exo data were used to validate condition-specific target gene binding sites. Based on these data, we do the following: (i) identify the target genes for each TCS; (ii) show how the target genes are transcribed in response to stimulus; and (iii) reveal novel relationships between TCSs, which indicate noncognate inducers for various response regulators, such as BaeR to iron starvation, CpxR to phosphate limitation, and PhoB and ZraR to cell envelope stress. Our understanding of the TRN in E. coli is thus notably expanded. IMPORTANCE E. coli is a common commensal microbe found in the human gut microenvironment; however, some strains cause diseases like diarrhea, urinary tract infections, and meningitis. E. coli’s two-component systems (TCSs) modulate target gene expression, especially related to virulence, pathogenesis, and antimicrobial peptides, in response to environmental stimuli. Thus, it is of utmost importance to understand the transcriptional regulation of TCSs to infer bacterial environmental adaptation and disease pathogenicity. Utilizing a combinatorial approach integrating RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), independent component analysis, chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with exonuclease treatment (ChIP-exo), and data mining, we suggest five different modes of TCS transcriptional regulation. Our data further highlight noncognate inducers of TCSs, which emphasizes the cross-regulatory nature of TCSs in E. coli and suggests that TCSs may have a role beyond their cognate functionalities. In summary, these results can lead to an understanding of the metabolic capabilities of bacteria and correctly predict complex phenotype under diverse conditions, especially when further incorporated with genome-scale metabolic models.

scholarly journals How the assembly and protection of the bacterial cell envelope depend on cysteine residues

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (34) ◽  
pp. 11984-11994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-François Collet ◽  
Seung-Hyun Cho ◽  
Bogdan I. Iorga ◽  
Camille V. Goemans
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Cell Envelope ◽  
Multilayered Structure ◽  
Cysteine Residues ◽  
Permeability Barrier ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Amino Acid Residues ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Oxidative Inactivation ◽  
Peptidoglycan Cell Wall

The cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria is a multilayered structure essential for bacterial viability; the peptidoglycan cell wall provides shape and osmotic protection to the cell, and the outer membrane serves as a permeability barrier against noxious compounds in the external environment. Assembling the envelope properly and maintaining its integrity are matters of life and death for bacteria. Our understanding of the mechanisms of envelope assembly and maintenance has increased tremendously over the past two decades. Here, we review the major achievements made during this time, giving central stage to the amino acid cysteine, one of the least abundant amino acid residues in proteins, whose unique chemical and physical properties often critically support biological processes. First, we review how cysteines contribute to envelope homeostasis by forming stabilizing disulfides in crucial bacterial assembly factors (LptD, BamA, and FtsN) and stress sensors (RcsF and NlpE). Second, we highlight the emerging role of enzymes that use cysteine residues to catalyze reactions that are necessary for proper envelope assembly, and we also explain how these enzymes are protected from oxidative inactivation. Finally, we suggest future areas of investigation, including a discussion of how cysteine residues could contribute to envelope homeostasis by functioning as redox switches. By highlighting the redox pathways that are active in the envelope of Escherichia coli, we provide a timely overview of the assembly of a cellular compartment that is the hallmark of Gram-negative bacteria.

scholarly journals B1500, a small membrane protein, connects the two-component systems EvgS/EvgA and PhoQ/PhoP in Escherichia coli

2007 ◽  
Vol 104 (47) ◽  
pp. 18712-18717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Eguchi ◽  
J. Itou ◽  
M. Yamane ◽  
R. Demizu ◽  
F. Yamato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Membrane Protein ◽  
Component Systems ◽  
Two Component ◽  
Two Component Systems

scholarly journals Structural and functional insights into Escherichia coli α2-macroglobulin endopeptidase snap-trap inhibition

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (27) ◽  
pp. 8290-8295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Garcia-Ferrer ◽  
Pedro Arêde ◽  
Josué Gómez-Blanco ◽  
Daniel Luque ◽  
Stephane Duquerroy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cell Envelope ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Structural Rearrangement ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Human Gut ◽  
Bait Region ◽  
Α2 Macroglobulin ◽  
Thioester Bond ◽  
Peptidase Inhibitor

The survival of commensal bacteria requires them to evade host peptidases. Gram-negative bacteria from the human gut microbiome encode a relative of the human endopeptidase inhibitor, α2-macroglobulin (α2M). Escherichia coli α2M (ECAM) is a ∼180-kDa multidomain membrane-anchored pan-peptidase inhibitor, which is cleaved by host endopeptidases in an accessible bait region. Structural studies by electron microscopy and crystallography reveal that this cleavage causes major structural rearrangement of more than half the 13-domain structure from a native to a compact induced form. It also exposes a reactive thioester bond, which covalently traps the peptidase. Subsequently, peptidase-laden ECAM is shed from the membrane and may dimerize. Trapped peptidases are still active except against very large substrates, so inhibition potentially prevents damage of large cell envelope components, but not host digestion. Mechanistically, these results document a novel monomeric “snap trap.”

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document