scholarly journals Ectopic Endometrium: The Pathologist’s Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (20) ◽  
pp. 10974
Author(s):  
Alessandra Camboni ◽  
Etienne Marbaix
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Historical Perspective ◽  
Pathogenic Mechanism ◽  
Gynecological Malignancies ◽  
Benign Nature ◽  
Reported Data ◽  
Remarkable Progress ◽  
Ectopic Endometrium

Endometriosis and adenomyosis are two frequent diseases closely linked, characterized by ectopic endometrium. Despite their benign nature, endometriosis and adenomyosis impair women’s quality of life by causing pain and infertility and an increase in the incidence of gynecological malignancies has been reported. Since the first description of ectopic endometrium in 1860, different attempts have been made to describe, classify and understand the origin of these diseases. Several theories have been proposed to describe the pathogenic mechanism leading to the development of adenomyosis or endometriosis. However, all the hypotheses show some limitations in explaining all the different aspects and manifestations of these diseases. Despite the remarkable progress made over recent years, the pathogeneses of endometriosis and adenomyosis remain unclear. Moreover, because of the lack of standardized protocols and diagnostic criteria in pathology practice it is difficult to study and to classify these disorders. The goal of this review is to summarize the pathological aspects of adenomyosis and endometriosis, spanning a historical perspective to newly reported data.

scholarly journals Quality of life in young and middle age adult temporomandibular disorders patients and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Bozzetti Pigozzi ◽  
Duziene Denardini Pereira ◽  
Marcos Pascoal Pattussi ◽  
Carmen Moret-Tatay ◽  
Tatiana Quarti Irigaray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Group I ◽  
Axis I ◽  
Group Ii

Abstract Aims To compare the difference in the quality of life between temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients and non-TMD subjects diagnosed with the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) or the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Methods Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE) and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) databases were searched in studies published in English and Portuguese. The search was performed by two independent reviewers in duplicate. A manual search and the gray literature were also included. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies that used the RDC/TMD axis I and quality of life with standard questionnaires in young and middle-aged adult population (18–55 years). The data were analyzed quantitatively by combining the results in a meta-analysis using forest plots. The measure of effect used was the standardized mean difference (SMD) in depression levels. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The publication bias was assessed by funnel plots. The initial search included 806 articles without duplications. Results Twenty-four articles were included in the final systematic review. Of these, 9 were included in the meta-analysis, where it was shown a statistically significant in all axis I groups: (a) global TMD—groups I, II and III combined, N = 3829, SMD (95% CI) = 1.06 (0.65–1.51), p = 0.000; (b) group I—muscle disorders, N = 3,056, SMD (95% CI) = 0.82 (0.45–1.18), p = 0.000; (c) group II—disc displacements, N = 3,184, SMD (95% CI) = 0.59 (0.26–0.91), p = 0.000; and (d) group III—arthralgia/arthritis/arthrosis, N = 2781, SMD (95% CI) = 0.98 (0.59–1.36), p = 0.000. When compared to controls. Conclusions Quality of life is affected in all axis I TMD patients, especially in groups I and III with higher pain intensity and disability as compared to group II.

scholarly journals Association between sex differences on foot health related to the quality of life in a sample of sedentary people

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-155
Author(s):  
Daniel López-López ◽  
Jose María Cancela-Carral ◽  
Romeu Araujo ◽  
Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias ◽  
Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Physical Activity ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Metabolic Energy ◽  
Sitting Time ◽  
Foot Health ◽  
Sedentary Population ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Reported Data

SUMMARY Sedentary (sitting) time may produce many anatomical and physiological consequences which are supposedly associated with a decreased quality of life (QoL) related to foot health. Accordingly, this study aimed to analyze the QoL impact on the overall health and the foot health among male and female sedentary people. A total of 312 participants with an age mean of 39.81 ± 15.40 years completed all phases of the study. In addition, self-reported data were registered. The participants' sedentary lifestyle was determined using the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) physical activity questionnaire. Furthermore, the scores obtained from the Portuguese version of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire were registered. Sedentary people in the equivalent metabolic energy had 301.09 ± 72.22 (min/week). In the first section, values were higher for foot pain and foot function and lower for general foot health and footwear. In the second section, values were higher for general health and vigor and lower for physical activity and social capacity. The differences between the sex groups of the study were statistically significant for footwear (P = 0.008), physical activity (P= 0.002), social capacity (P = 0.001) and vigor (P = 0.001) showing a worst QoL related to foot health in favor of male subjects in comparison with females. The rest of the domains did not show any statistically significant difference (P ≥ .01). The sedentary population evidenced a negative impact on the QoL related to foot health. This problem may be associated with this lifestyle, especially for males.

scholarly journals Screening for gastric cancer: East and West, features of diagnostic criteria

2020 ◽  
pp. 73-78
Author(s):  
A. A. Avanesyan ◽  
O. V. Chukina ◽  
Yu. V. Kokovina ◽  
T. M. Chirkina ◽  
I. G. Bakulin
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Cause Of Death ◽  
Tumor Development ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
The West ◽  
Systematic Screening ◽  
Diagnosis Of Cancer

Gastric cancer is the leading cause of death among all cancer deaths. Identification of risk groups and special carcinogens will prevent the development of the tumor or detect it in the early stages, which will significantly increase the quality of life of patients with high risks of developing gastric cancer. For the timely detection of tumor development, it is optimal to use systematic screening. Undoubtedly, the approaches to the diagnosis of cancer have significant differences in the countries of the West and the East.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema and quality of life: A qualitative analysis over years of survivorship

2019 ◽  
pp. 174239531987279
Author(s):  
Allison B Anbari ◽  
Ausanee Wanchai ◽  
Jane M Armer
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Breast Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Data Saturation ◽  
Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema ◽  
Reported Data ◽  
The Impact

Objectives The study purpose was to examine perspectives of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) regarding their quality of life over seven years. Method Data were collected over seven years using the Lymphedema and Breast Cancer Questionnaire (LBCQ). Participants with BCRL answered open-ended questions corresponding to changes in mood and lifestyle from post-op through annual interviews and surveys. Self-reported data from 97 participants with BCRL were analyzed using in vivo coding and template-style content analysis to elicit the impact of BCRL on quality of life domains. Results Data saturation was achieved as participants neared 30 to 36 months post- breast cancer diagnosis. Three major themes were identified related to BCRL’s impact on: physical function; daily living and social function; and psychological function. Discussion Findings suggest that BCRL impacts quality of life not only soon after diagnosis, but also throughout survivorship years. Healthcare providers should develop programs to enhance quality of life for survivors with BCRL.

Characterization of Sepsis and Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 938-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Feng ◽  
Yu-Hang Ai ◽  
Hua Gong ◽  
Long Wu ◽  
Mei-Lin Ai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

Background: Sepsis and sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) are common intensive care unit (ICU) diseases; the morbidity and mortality are high. The present study analyzed the sensitivity of different diagnostic criteria of sepsis 1.0 and 3.0, epidemiological characteristics of sepsis and SAE, and explored its risk factors for death, short-term, and long-term prognosis. Methods: The retrospective study included patients in ICU from January 2015 to June 2016. After excluding 58 patients, 175 were assigned to either an SAE or a non-SAE group (patients with sepsis but no encephalopathy). The sensitivity of the diagnostic criteria was compared between sepsis 1.0 and 3.0, respectively. Between-group differences in baseline data, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (APACHE II score), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA score), etiological data, biochemical indicators, and 28-day and 180-day mortality rates were analyzed. Survival outcomes and long-term prognosis were observed, and risk factors for death were analyzed through 180-day follow-up. Results: The sensitivity did not differ significantly between the diagnostic criteria of sepsis 1.0 and 3.0 ( P = .286). The 42.3% incidence of SAE presented a significantly high APACHE II and SOFA scores as well as 28-day mortality and 180-day mortality (all P < .001). The incidence of death was 37.1%. The multivariate stepwise regression analysis demonstrated that the risk of death in SAE group was significantly higher than the non-SAE group ( P < .001). Sepsis-associated encephalopathy is a risk factor for sepsis-related death (relative risk [RR] = 2.868; 95% confidence interval: 1.730-4.754; P < .001). Although males showed a significantly high rate of 28-day and 180-day mortality ( P = .035 and .045), it was not an independent risk factor for sepsis-related death ( P = .072). The long-term prognosis of patients with sepsis was poor with decreased quality of life. No significant difference was observed in prognosis between the SAE and non-SAE groups ( P > .05). Conclusion: Both diagnostic criteria cause misdiagnosis, and the sensitivity did not differ significantly. The incidence of SAE was high, and 28-day and 180-day mortality rates were significantly higher than those without SAE. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy is a risk factor for poor outcome. The overall long-term prognosis of patients with sepsis was poor, and the quality of life decreased.

scholarly journals Cross-sectional comparison of health-related quality of life and other features in people with and without objective and subjective binge eating using a general population sample

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e024227
Author(s):  
Natalie Li ◽  
Deborah Mitchison ◽  
Stephen Touyz ◽  
Phillipa Hay
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Mental Health ◽  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Binge Eating ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Population Sample ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

ObjectivesEvidence suggests that while objective binge eating (OBE) and subjective binge eating (SBE) differ in the amount of food consumed, both are associated with impairment in people with eating disorders. However, only OBE is accounted for in the diagnostic criteria of eating disorders. This study compared the sociodemographic profile and burden of OBE versus SBE at a population level.DesignPopulation-based survey.ParticipantsA representative sample of 3028 men and women. Participants were categorised into four groups based on their reporting of binge eating in the past 3 months: non-binge eating group (no OBE or SBE), OBE group, SBE group and OSBE group (both OBE and SBE).Outcome measuresDemographics (age, genderand body mass index, BMI), binge eating, distress, weight/shape overvaluation and health-related quality of life. Groups were compared on sociodemographic information, overvaluation and health-related quality of life. The OBE and SBE groups were also compared on the distress related to binge eating.ResultsNo differences were found between the SBE group and OBE group in age, gender, BMI, mental health-related quality of life and overvaluation (all p>0.05). However, differences were found in the OSBE participants, namely that they were younger, had a higher mean BMI, lower mental health-related quality of life and higher overvaluation of weight/shape than the non-binge-eating participants (all p<0.001). Proportions of participants who reported distress related to binge eating in the OBE and SBE groups also did not differ (p=0.678).ConclusionThere is little difference in the demographic profile or burden of people who engage in OBE versus SBE, supporting the proposed inclusion of SBE in the diagnostic criteria for eating disorders in International Classification of Diseases-11. People who experience both OBE and SBE may experience a relatively higher eating disorder severity and impairment.

Quality of Life in Women After Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecological Malignancies

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margherita Dessole ◽  
Marco Petrillo ◽  
Alessandro Lucidi ◽  
Angelica Naldini ◽  
Martina Rossi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pelvic Exenteration ◽  
Gynecological Malignancies

scholarly journals The influence of heel height related on quality of life on the foot in a sample of women

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 324-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel López-López ◽  
Javier Marañon-Medina ◽  
Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias ◽  
César Calvo-Lobo ◽  
David Rodríguez-Sanz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Daily Basis ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Foot Health ◽  
Heel Height ◽  
Health Domains ◽  
Reported Data

SUMMARY Many women have worn high-heel shoes (HHS) at some point in their lives and many wear them on a daily basis, with higher prevalence between 39% and 78% observed in institutional and clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the scores obtained with regard to foot health and health in general in a sample of women that use HHS as opposed to a sample of women without HHS with normalized reference values. A sample of 120 participants with a mean age of 41.94 ± 13.912 came to a health center where self-reported data were registered. The subjects with and without HHS were determined and the scores obtained were compared in the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ). This questionnaire is made of 13 questions that assess 4 health domains of the feet, namely pain, function, general health and footwear. The women in the HHS group showed a worse quality of life related to health in general and to foot health specifically. Differences between the two groups were evaluated by means of a t-test for independent samples, showing statistical significance (P<0.01). Women with HHS present a negative impact on the quality of life related to foot health.

Quality of life impairments associated with diagnostic criteria for traumatic grief

2000 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 857-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. K. SILVERMAN ◽  
S. C. JACOBS ◽  
S. V. KASL ◽  
M. K. SHEAR ◽  
P. K. MACIEJEWSKI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Traumatic Grief
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document