scholarly journals IgGs-Abzymes from the Sera of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Recognize and Hydrolyze miRNAs

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 2812
Author(s):  
Evgeny A. Ermakov ◽  
Evelina M. Kabirova ◽  
Valentina N. Buneva ◽  
Georgy A. Nevinsky
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Basic Protein ◽  
Intrinsic Property ◽  
Relative Activity ◽  
Igg Antibodies ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Healthy Donors ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Hydrolysis Of

Autoantibodies-abzymes hydrolyzing DNA, myelin basic protein, and oligosaccharides have been revealed in the sera of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). In MS, specific microRNAs are found in blood and cerebrospinal fluid, which are characterized by increased expression. Autoantibodies, specifically hydrolyzing four different miRNAs, were first detected in the blood of schizophrenia patients. Here, we present the first evidence that 23 IgG antibodies of MS patients effectively recognize and hydrolyze four neuroregulatory miRNAs (miR-137, miR-9-5p, miR-219-2-3p, and miR-219-5p) and four immunoregulatory miRNAs (miR-21-3p, miR-146a-3p, miR-155-5p, and miR-326). Several known criteria were checked to show that the recognition and hydrolysis of miRNAs is an intrinsic property of MS IgGs. The hydrolysis of all miRNAs is mostly site-specific. The major and moderate sites of the hydrolysis of each miRNA for most of the IgG preparations coincided; however, some of them showed other specific sites of splitting. Several individual IgGs hydrolyzed some miRNAs almost nonspecifically at nearly all internucleoside bonds or demonstrated a combination of site-specific and nonspecific splitting. Maximum average relative activity (RA) was observed in the hydrolysis of miR-155-5p for IgGs of patients of two types of MS—clinically isolated syndrome and relapsing-remitting MS—but was also high for patients with primary progressive and secondary progressive MS. Differences between RAs of IgGs of four groups of MS patients and healthy donors were statistically significant (p < 0.015). There was a tendency of decreasing efficiency of hydrolysis of all eight miRNAs during remission compared with the exacerbation of the disease.

Spatiotemporal distribution of white matter lesions in relapsing–remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 1577-1584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Filli ◽  
Louis Hofstetter ◽  
Pascal Kuster ◽  
Stefan Traud ◽  
Nicole Mueller-Lenke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
White Matter ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Spatiotemporal Distribution ◽  
Centrum Semiovale ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Lateral Ventricles ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
T1 And T2

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. MS lesions show a typical distribution pattern and primarily affect the white matter (WM) in the periventricular zone and in the centrum semiovale. Objective: To track lesion development during disease progression, we compared the spatiotemporal distribution patterns of lesions in relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Methods: We used T1 and T2 weighted MR images of 209 RRMS and 62 SPMS patients acquired on two different 1.5 Tesla MR scanners in two clinical centers followed up for 25 (± 1.7) months. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal differences in lesion distribution between RRMS and SPMS patients were analyzed with lesion probability maps (LPMs) and permutation-based inference. Results: MS lesions clustered around the lateral ventricles and in the centrum semiovale. Cross-sectionally, compared to RRMS patients, the SPMS patients showed a significantly higher regional probability of T1 hypointense lesions ( p≤0.03) in the callosal body, the corticospinal tract, and other tracts adjacent to the lateral ventricles, but not of T2 lesions (peak probabilities were RRMS: T1 9%, T2 18%; SPMS: T1 21%, T2 27%). No longitudinal changes of regional T1 and T2 lesion volumes between baseline and follow-up scan were found. Conclusion: The results suggest a particular vulnerability to neurodegeneration during disease progression in a number of WM tracts.

scholarly journals HIV-Infected Patients: Cross Site-Specific Hydrolysis of H3 and H4 Histones and Myelin Basic Protein with Antibodies against These Three Proteins

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 316
Author(s):  
Svetlana V. Baranova ◽  
Pavel S. Dmitrenok ◽  
Valentina N. Buneva ◽  
Sergey E. Sedykh ◽  
Georgy A. Nevinsky
Keyword(s):  
Myelin Basic Protein ◽  
Intercellular Space ◽  
Basic Protein ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Cleavage Sites ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Protein Clusters ◽  
Negative Role ◽  
Toxic Responses ◽  
Hydrolysis Of

Histones play important roles in chromatin functioning and gene transcription, but in the intercellular space, they are harmful since they stimulate systemic inflammatory and toxic responses. Electrophoretically homogeneous IgGs against myelin basic protein (MBP), as well as H3 and H4 histones, were isolated from sera of HIV-infected patients. In contrast to known classical proteases, these IgGs split exclusively only histones and MBP but no other control proteins. Among 13 sites of hydrolysis of H3 by IgGs against H3 and 14 sites for anti-MBP IgGs, only two sites of the hydrolysis were the same. Between seven cleavage sites of H4 with IgGs against H4 and 9 sites of this histone hydrolysis by antibodies against MBP, only three sites were the same. The sites of hydrolysis of H3 (and H4) with abzymes against these histones and against MBP were different, but several expended protein clusters containing hydrolysis sites are partially overlapped. The existence of enzymatic cross-reactivity of abzymes against H3 and H4 and MBP represents a great menace to humans since due to cell apoptosis, histones constantly occur in human blood. They can hydrolyze MBP of the myelin sheath of axons and play a negative role in the pathogenesis of HIV-infected patients.

scholarly journals Kallikreins are associated with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and promote neurodegeneration

2008 ◽  
Vol 389 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isobel A. Scarisbrick ◽  
Rachel Linbo ◽  
Alexander G. Vandell ◽  
Mark Keegan ◽  
Sachiko I. Blaber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Serine Proteases ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Neurite Retraction ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Potential Activity

Abstract Tissue kallikrein KLK1 and the kallikrein-related peptidases KLK2–15 are a subfamily of serine proteases that have defined or proposed roles in a range of central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS pathologies. To further understand their potential activity in multiple sclerosis (MS), serum levels of KLK1, 6, 7, 8 and 10 were determined in 35 MS patients and 62 controls by quantitative fluorometric ELISA. Serum levels were then correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores determined at the time of serological sampling or at last clinical follow-up. Serum levels of KLK1 and KLK6 were elevated in MS patients (p≤0.027), with highest levels associated with secondary progressive disease. Elevated KLK1 correlated with higher EDSS scores at the time of serum draw and KLK6 with future EDSS worsening in relapsing remitting patients (p≤0.007). Supporting the concept that KLK1 and KLK6 promote degenerative events associated with progressive MS, exposure of murine cortical neurons to either kallikrein promoted rapid neurite retraction and neuron loss. These novel findings suggest that KLK1 and KLK6 may serve as serological markers of progressive MS and contribute directly to the development of neurological disability by promoting axonal injury and neuron cell death.

scholarly journals Evaluation the FLAIR Sensitivity and DWI Post-inject in Comparison with Delayed Enhancement T1w for Better Detection of Active MS Lesions

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Hoseinipourasl ◽  
M Zandkarimi ◽  
J Abdolmohammadi ◽  
K Sharifi ◽  
S Miraki
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Genetic Factors ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Blurred Vision ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Signal Suppression ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Loss Of Balance ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
With Memory

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, typically progressive and most common autoimmune disease which damaged the central nervous system. According to the reports in 2008, this disorder has affected 2 and 2.5 million people globally. While the reason is not clear, proposed causes for this include immunologic, environmental, infectious and genetic factors, and sexuality. MS can cause many symptoms, including blurred vision, loss of balance, poor coordination, slurred speech, tremors, numbness, extreme fatigue, problems with memory and concentration, paralysis, blindness, and more. There are four distinguished illness fields in MS: relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), primary–progressive MS (PPMS), secondary–progressive MS (SPMS), and progressive–relapsing. MRI is a great tool to identify the asymptomatic distribution of lesions in space and time.Materials and Methods: 32 patients with MS plaques were evaluated by FLAIR and DWI pre- and post-Gadolinium injection compared with 15minutes delay T1w SE.Results: FLAIR post-inject had significantly better detection of the number and signal intensity of active MS lesions. DWI and ADC images detected active plaques different from non-active lesions without contrast.Conclusion: The result of this study showed that FLAIR post-inject had the highest sensitivity in detection of active MS lesions due to the CSF signal suppression in FLAIR, thus offering enough TR time recovery in active enhanced plaques.

scholarly journals Should We Use Clinical Tools to Identify Disease Progression?

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hernan Inojosa ◽  
Undine Proschmann ◽  
Katja Akgün ◽  
Tjalf Ziemssen
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Clinical Markers ◽  
Disability Progression ◽  
Neurofilament Light Chain ◽  
Neurofilament Light ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Clinical Tools

The presence of disability progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) is an important hallmark for MS patients in the course of their disease. The transition from relapsing remitting (RRMS) to secondary progressive forms of the disease (SPMS) represents a significant change in their quality of life and perception of the disease. It could also be a therapeutic key for opportunities, where approaches different from those in the initial phases of the disease can be adopted. The characterization of structural biomarkers (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging or neurofilament light chain) has been proposed to differentiate between both phenotypes. However, there is no definite threshold between them. Whether the risk of clinical progression can be predicted by structural markers at early disease phases is still a focus of clinical research. However, several theories and pathological evidence suggest that both disease phenotypes are part of a continuum with common pathophysiological mechanisms. In this case, the clinical evaluation of the patients would play a preponderant role above destruction biomarkers for the early identification of disability progression and SPMS. For this purpose, the use of clinical tools beyond the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) should be considered. Besides established functional tests such as the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), patient's neurological history or digital resources may help neurologists in the decision-taking. In this article, we discuss arguments for the use of clinical markers in the detection of secondary progressive MS and the characterization of progressive disease activity.

scholarly journals Onset of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis is not influenced by current relapsing multiple sclerosis therapies

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 205521731878334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Coret ◽  
Francisco C Pérez-Miralles ◽  
Francisco Gascón ◽  
Carmen Alcalá ◽  
Arantxa Navarré ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Disease Modifying Therapies ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis Patients ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Background Disease-modifying therapies are thought to reduce the conversion rate to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Objective To explore the rate, chronology, and contributing factors of conversion to the progressive phase in treated relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Methods Our study included 204 patients treated for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis between 1995 and 2002, prospectively followed to date. Kaplan–Meier analysis was applied to estimate the time until secondary progressive multiple sclerosis conversion, and multivariate survival analysis with a Cox regression model was used to analyse prognostic factors. Results Relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients were continuously treated for 13 years (SD 4.5); 36.3% converted to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis at a mean age of 42.6 years (SD 10.6), a mean time of 8.2 years (SD 5.2) and an estimated mean time of 17.2 years (range 17.1–18.1). A multifocal relapse, age older than 34 years at disease onset and treatment failure independently predicted conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis but did not influence the time to reach an Expanded Disability Status Scale of 6.0. Conclusions The favourable influence of disease-modifying therapies on long-term disability in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis is well established. However, the time to progression onset and the subsequent clinical course in treated patients seem similar to those previously reported in natural history studies. More studies are needed to clarify the effect of disease-modifying therapies once the progressive phase has been reached.

Multiple sclerosis

2019 ◽  
pp. 417-436
Author(s):  
Manoj Sivan ◽  
Margaret Phillips ◽  
Ian Baguley ◽  
Melissa Nott
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Young Adult ◽  
Adult Life ◽  
Rehabilitation Medicine ◽  
Younger Adults ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Criteria For Diagnosis ◽  
The Impact

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the commonest of the demyelinating CNS conditions and is the most frequent condition causing neurological disability in younger adults. It causes a combination of physical and cognitive disabilities, which, when combined with starting in young adult life and with an uncertain rate of progression, make it both challenging and responsive to rehabilitation. It is important to understand the criteria for diagnosis both to be able to discuss prognosis with patients and because symptoms may become apparent later which affect the diagnosis. It is more likely that rehabilitation medicine clinicians will see those with primary or secondary progressive MS than relapsing–remitting MS because the impact of disability tends to be greater and the current benefits from disease-modifying therapies less in progressive MS.

scholarly journals Extreme Diversity of IgGs Against Histones, DNA, and Myelin Basic Protein in the Cerebrospinal Fluid and Blood of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina A. Kostrikina ◽  
Valentina N. Buneva ◽  
Enrico Granieri ◽  
Georgy A. Nevinsky
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Myelin Basic Protein ◽  
Basic Protein ◽  
Relative Concentration ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Hydrolysis Of ◽  
Hydrolysis Of Dna

It was recently shown that IgGs from sera of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients are active in the hydrolysis of DNA and myelin basic protein (MBP). We first analyzed the relative concentration of antibodies against five histones (H1, H2a, H2b, H3, and H4) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum of patients with MS. The relative concentrations of blood and CSF IgGs against histones and their activity in the hydrolysis of five histones varied greatly from patient to patient. However, all 28 IgG preparations were hydrolyzed from one to five histones. Relative activities and correlation coefficients among the activities of IgGs from serum and CSF in the hydrolysis of five histones (H1, H2a, H2b, H3, and H4), DNA, and MBP were calculated. It was shown that auto-IgGs from CSF and sera of MS patients are extremely heterogeneous in their affinity to histones, MBP, and DNA. The heterogeneity of IgG-abzymes hydrolyzing DNA, MBP, and histones from CSF and sera was also demonstrated using their isoelectrofocusing. The isofocusing profiles DNase, MBP-, and histone-hydrolyzing activities of IgGs may be very different for various individuals, but the total IgG subfractions with all their activities are distributed from pH 3 to 10.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document