scholarly journals PARP Inhibitor Olaparib Causes No Potentiation of the Bleomycin Effect in VERO Cells, Even in the Presence of Pooled ATM, DNA-PK, and LigIV Inhibitors

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (21) ◽  
pp. 8288
Author(s):  
Valentina Perini ◽  
Michelle Schacke ◽  
Pablo Liddle ◽  
Salomé Vilchez-Larrea ◽  
Deborah J. Keszenman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Synthetic Lethality ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Vero Cells ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Parp Activation ◽  
Alternative Hypotheses

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)polymerase (PARP) synthesizes poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR), which is anchored to proteins. PAR facilitates multiprotein complexes’ assembly. Nuclear PAR affects chromatin’s structure and functions, including transcriptional regulation. In response to stress, particularly genotoxic stress, PARP activation facilitates DNA damage repair. The PARP inhibitor Olaparib (OLA) displays synthetic lethality with mutated homologous recombination proteins (BRCA-1/2), base excision repair proteins (XRCC1, Polβ), and canonical nonhomologous end joining (LigIV). However, the limits of synthetic lethality are not clear. On one hand, it is unknown whether any limiting factor of homologous recombination can be a synthetic PARP lethality partner. On the other hand, some BRCA-mutated patients are not responsive to OLA for still unknown reasons. In an effort to help delineate the boundaries of synthetic lethality, we have induced DNA damage in VERO cells with the radiomimetic chemotherapeutic agent bleomycin (BLEO). A VERO subpopulation was resistant to BLEO, BLEO + OLA, and BLEO + OLA + ATM inhibitor KU55933 + DNA-PK inhibitor KU-0060648 + LigIV inhibitor SCR7 pyrazine. Regarding the mechanism(s) behind the resistance and lack of synthetic lethality, some hypotheses have been discarded and alternative hypotheses are suggested.

scholarly journals BKM120 sensitizes glioblastoma to the PARP inhibitor rucaparib by suppressing homologous recombination repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaolu Zhang ◽  
Xin Peng ◽  
Xiaofei Li ◽  
Hongyan Liu ◽  
Baoquan Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Synthetic Lethality ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Xenograft Model ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Model Combination ◽  
Orthotopic Xenograft ◽  
Orthotopic Xenograft Model ◽  
Promising Therapeutic Approach

AbstractPARP inhibitors have been approved for the therapy of cancers with homologous recombination (HR) deficiency based on the concept of “synthetic lethality”. However, glioblastoma (GBM) patients have gained little benefit from PARP inhibitors due to a lack of BRCA mutations. Herein, we demonstrated that concurrent treatment with the PARP inhibitor rucaparib and the PI3K inhibitor BKM120 showed synergetic anticancer effects on GBM U251 and U87MG cells. Mechanistically, BKM120 decreased expression of HR molecules, including RAD51 and BRCA1/2, and reduced HR repair efficiency in GBM cells, therefore increasing levels of apoptosis induced by rucaparib. Furthermore, we discovered that the two compounds complemented each other in DNA damage response and drug accumulation. Notably, in the zebrafish U87MG-RFP orthotopic xenograft model, nude mouse U87MG subcutaneous xenograft model and U87MG-Luc orthotopic xenograft model, combination showed obviously increased antitumor efficacy compared to each monotherapy. Immunohistochemical analysis of tumor tissues indicated that the combination obviously reduced expression of HR repair molecules and increased the DNA damage biomarker γ-H2AX, consistent with the in vitro results. Collectively, our findings provide new insight into combined blockade of PI3K and PARP, which might represent a promising therapeutic approach for GBM.

Kinase Phosphorylation-based Mechanisms of PARP Inhibitor Resistance During Synthetic Lethal Oncotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-23
Author(s):  
Eriko Osaki ◽  
Shinya Mizuno
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Catalytic Domain ◽  
Synthetic Lethality ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Clinical Importance ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Driver Genes ◽  
Kinase Phosphorylation

Background: Poly-(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) plays a central role in recovery from single-strand DNA (ssDNA) damage via base excision repair. When PARP activity is inhibited by a NAD+ mimetic analog, ssDNA is converted into a Double-Strand Break (DSB) during the S-phase in a cell cycle. However, the DSB site is repaired in a process of Homologous Recombination (HR) that is derived by genes such as BRCA1/2, PALB2, and RAD51. Under conditions of HR dysfunction, including mutations of BRCA1/2 (called BRCAness), PARP inhibitor (PARPi) induces “synthetic lethality” in BRCAness-specific cancer cells. Indeed, clinical trials using forms of PARPi that include olaparib, veliparib and rucaparib, have revealed that PARP inhibition produces a dramatic effect that actually arrests cancer progression. Its clinical efficiency is limited, however, due to the acquisition of PARPi resistance during long-term use of this inhibitor. Thus, it is important to elucidate the mechanisms of PARPi resistance. Methods: We searched the scientific literature published in PubMed, with a special focus on kinase phosphorylation that is involved in acquiring PARPi resistance. We also summarized the possible molecular events for recovering HR system, a key event for acquiring PARPi resistance. Results: CDK1 is a critical kinase for 5’-3’ DNA end resection, which is important for generating ssDNA for recruiting HR-priming factors. CDK12 is necessary for the transcription of HR-driver genes, such as BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51 and ATR via the phosphorylation of RNA Pol-II. PLK-1 participates in driving HR via the phosphorylation of RAD51. The PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling cascade is involved in BRCA1 induction via an ETS1 transcriptional pathway. Even under ATMdeficient conditions, the ATR-CHK1 axis compensates for loss in the DNA damage response, which results in HR recovery. The HGF receptor Met tyrosine kinase is responsible for promoting DNA repair by activating the PARP catalytic domain. Conclusion: These kinase-based signaling pathways are biologically important for understanding the compensatory system of HR, whereas inactivation of these kinases has shown promise for the release of PARPi resistance. Several lines of preclinical studies have demonstrated the potential use of kinase inhibitors to enhance PARPi sensitivity. We emphasize the clinical importance of chemical inhibitors as adjuvant drugs to block critical kinase activities and prevent the possible PARPi resistance.

Genomic profiling of biliary tract cancers to reveal clinically actionable genes and therapeutic biomarkers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16187-e16187
Author(s):  
Yang Shao ◽  
Qiuxiang Ou ◽  
Zhenhao Fang ◽  
Rui Liu ◽  
Hua Bao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Genomic Instability ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
State Transitions ◽  
Pathway Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Distal Cholangiocarcinoma ◽  
Tract Cancer

e16187 Background: Bile tract cancers are genetically and clinically heterogenous with a poor prognosis. Identifying novel biomarkers for targeted therapy is required to improve the clinical outcome of bile tract cancer patients. Methods: Tumor tissue samples of 482 Chinese biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients were genetically profiled using targeted next generation sequencing. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) was calculated by counting all nonsynonymous mutations per megabase of coding sequences. The R package ReactomePA was used in pathway enrichment analysis. Genomic instability was characterized by an in-house developed NGS-based Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) panel and a HRD score was an unweighted sum of loss of heterozygosity (LOH), telomeric allelic imbalance (TAI), and large-scale state transitions (LST) scores. Results: The BTC cohort consisted of 135 gallbladder cancer (GBC), 73 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), 18 distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA), 14 perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), while the remaining 242 BTC patients of no specific subtype information. Most frequently mutated genes included TP53 (56%), KRAS (25%), ARID1A (17%), SMAD4 (11%), and CDKN2A (10%) . A preliminary pathway analysis revealed that mutations of DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway genes were enriched in the cohort ( p< 1e-10), accounting for over 70% of the patients, particularly in homologous recombination repair (HRR), Fanconi anemia (FA), mismatch repair (MMR), and base excision repair (BER) genes. More specifically, approximately 50% of the cohort carried at least one mutation of the HRR genes (43%) or MMR genes (14%). Patients with impaired MMR had increased microsatellite instability status (MSI) comparing to those with wildtype MMR (33% vs. 3.1%, p< 0.0001), and patients harboring HRR mutations demonstrated elevated genomic instability than those without such mutations (median HRD: 18 vs.14, p < 0.05), indicative of potential response to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and other DNA-damage agents. Furthermore, high TMB was found to be highly correlated with DDR gene alterations ( p =0.004). In addition, we observed higher mutation frequencies of BRCA1/2 genes (including somatic and germline) in GBCs in contrast to other BTC subtypes. Conclusions: We herein reported the genomic features of 482 Chinese BTC samples and highlighted the role of DDR pathways including HRR and MMR. These findings could be useful to establish treatment and diagnostic strategies for BTC patients based on genetic information.

scholarly journals New Bone Marrow Failure Genes: DNAJC21 and ERCC6L2

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. SCI-22-SCI-22
Author(s):  
Inderjeet Dokal
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Bone Marrow Failure ◽  
Retinal Dystrophy ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Biallelic Mutations

A significant number of cases with bone marrow failure present with one or more extra-hematopoietic abnormality. This suggests a constitutional or genetic basis, and yet many of them remain uncharacterized. Through exome sequencing, we have recently identified two sub groups of these cases, one defined by germline biallelic mutations in DNAJC21 (DNAJ homolog subfamily C member 21) and the other in ERCC6L2 (excision repair cross complementing 6 like-2). Patients with DNAJC21 mutations are characterized by global bone marrow failure in early childhood. They can also have a variable number of extra-hematopoietic abnormalities such as short stature and retinal dystrophy. The encoded protein associates with ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and plays a highly conserved role in the maturation of the 60S ribosomal subunit. Lymphoblastoid patient cells exhibit increased sensitivity to the transcriptional inhibitor actinomycin D and reduced levels of rRNA. Characterisation of mutations has revealed impairment in interactions with cofactors (PA2G4, HSPA8 and ZNF622) involved in 60S maturation. DNAJC21 deficiency results in cytoplasmic accumulation of the 60S nuclear export factor PA2G4, aberrant ribosome profiles and increased cell death. Collectively these findings demonstrate that biallelic mutations in DNAJC21 cause disease due to defects in early nuclear rRNA biogenesis and late cytoplasmic maturation of the 60S subunit. Patients harbouring biallelic ERCC6L 2 mutations are characterized by bone marrow failure (in childhood or early adulthood) and one or more extra-hematopoietic abnormality such as microcephaly. Knockdown of ERCC6L2 in human cells significantly reduces their viability upon exposure to the DNA damaging agent irofulven but not etoposide and camptothecin suggesting a role in nucleotide excision repair. ERCC6L2 knockdown cells and patient cells harbouring biallelic ERCC6L2 mutations also display H2AX phosphorylation that significantly increases upon genotoxic stress, suggesting an early DNA damage response. ERCC6L2 is seen to translocate to mitochondria as well as the nucleus in response to DNA damage and its knockdown induces intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). Treatment with the ROS scavenger, N-acetyl-cysteine, attenuates the irofulven-induced cytotoxicity in ERCC6L2 knockdown cells and abolishes its traffic to mitochondria and nucleus in response to this DNA damaging agent. Collectively, these observations suggest that ERCC6L2has a pivotal rolein DNA repair and mitochondrial function. In conclusion, ERCC6L2 and DNAJC21 have an important role in maintaining genomic stability and ribosome biogenesis, respectively. They bring into focus new biological connections/pathways whose constitutional disruption is associated with defective hematopoiesis since patients harbouring germline biallelic mutations in these genes uniformly have bone marrow failure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals PARP1-dependent recruitment of the FBXL10-RNF68-RNF2 ubiquitin ligase to sites of DNA damage controls H2A.Z loading

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gergely Rona ◽  
Domenico Roberti ◽  
Yandong Yin ◽  
Julia K Pagan ◽  
Harrison Homer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Homologous Recombination Repair ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase Complex ◽  
Recombination Repair

The mammalian FBXL10-RNF68-RNF2 ubiquitin ligase complex (FRRUC) mono-ubiquitylates H2A at Lys119 to repress transcription in unstressed cells. We found that the FRRUC is rapidly and transiently recruited to sites of DNA damage in a PARP1- and TIMELESS-dependent manner to promote mono-ubiquitylation of H2A at Lys119, a local decrease of H2A levels, and an increase of H2A.Z incorporation. Both the FRRUC and H2A.Z promote transcriptional repression, double strand break signaling, and homologous recombination repair (HRR). All these events require both the presence and activity of the FRRUC. Moreover, the FRRUC and its activity are required for the proper recruitment of BMI1-RNF2 and MEL18-RNF2, two other ubiquitin ligases that mono-ubiquitylate Lys119 in H2A upon genotoxic stress. Notably, whereas H2A.Z is not required for H2A mono-ubiquitylation, impairment of the latter results in the inhibition of H2A.Z incorporation. We propose that the recruitment of the FRRUC represents an early and critical regulatory step in HRR.

Phase II trial of the PARP inhibitor, niraparib, in BRCA1-Associated Protein 1 (BAP1) and other DNA damage response (DDR) pathway deficient neoplasms including cholangiocarcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS354-TPS354
Author(s):  
Thomas J. George ◽  
David L. DeRemer ◽  
Ji-Hyun Lee ◽  
Stephen Staal ◽  
Merry Jennifer Markham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Synthetic Lethality ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Mutant Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Damage Response

TPS354 Background: BRCA1-Associated Protein 1 (BAP1) is a critical regulator of the cell cycle, cellular differentiation, cell death, and DNA damage response. It also acts as a tumor suppressor. Preclinical models demonstrate significant synthetic lethality in BAP1 mutant cell lines and patient xenografts when treated with PARP inhibitors, independent of underlying BRCA status, suggesting this mutation confers a BRCA-like phenotype. BAP1 is mutated, leading to a loss of functional protein, in up to 30% of cholangiocarcinomas as well as several other solid tumors. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, single arm multicenter study aims to exploit the concept of synthetic lethality with the use of the PARP inhibitor niraparib in pts with metastatic relapsed or refractory solid tumors. Eligible pts with measurable metastatic and incurable solid tumors are assigned to one of two cohorts: Cohort A (histology-specific): tumors harboring suspected BAP1 mutations including cholangiocarcinoma, uveal melanoma, mesothelioma or clear cell renal cell carcinoma with tissue available for BAP1 mutational assessment via NGS or Cohort B (histology-agnostic): tumors with known DNA damage response (DDR) mutations (Table) confirmed by CLIA-approved NGS. Other key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, adequate cardiac, renal, hepatic function and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Pts with known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations or prior PARPi exposure are excluded. Pts receive niraparib 200-300mg daily (depending on weight and/or platelet count) continuously. Primary endpoint is objective response rate with secondary endpoints of PFS, OS, toxicity and exploratory biomarker determinations. Radiographic response by RECIST criteria is measured every 8 weeks while on treatment. Cohort A has fully enrolled. Cohort B enrollment continues to a maximum of 47 total evaluable subjects with expansion cohorts allowable for histologic or molecular subtypes meeting pre-specified responses. NCT03207347 Clinical trial information: NCT03207347. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals WIP1 Promotes Homologous Recombination and Modulates Sensitivity to PARP Inhibitors

Cells ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamila Burdova ◽  
Radka Storchova ◽  
Matous Palek ◽  
Libor Macurek
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Lesion ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
G2 Cells

Genotoxic stress triggers a combined action of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Protein phosphatase 2C delta (referred to as WIP1) is involved in timely inactivation of DNA damage response by suppressing function of p53 and other targets at chromatin. Here we show that WIP1 promotes DNA repair through homologous recombination. Loss or inhibition of WIP1 delayed disappearance of the ionizing radiation-induced 53BP1 foci in S/G2 cells and promoted cell death. We identify breast cancer associated protein 1 (BRCA1) as interactor and substrate of WIP1 and demonstrate that WIP1 activity is needed for correct dynamics of BRCA1 recruitment to chromatin flanking the DNA lesion. In addition, WIP1 dephosphorylates 53BP1 at Threonine 543 that was previously implicated in mediating interaction with RIF1. Finally, we report that inhibition of WIP1 allowed accumulation of DNA damage in S/G2 cells and increased sensitivity of cancer cells to a poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib. We propose that inhibition of WIP1 may increase sensitivity of BRCA1-proficient cancer cells to olaparib.

scholarly journals Synergistic targeting and resistance to PARP inhibition in DNA damage repair-deficient pancreatic cancer

Gut ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2019-319970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann Gout ◽  
Lukas Perkhofer ◽  
Mareen Morawe ◽  
Frank Arnold ◽  
Michaela Ihle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Synthetic Lethality ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Copy Number Variations ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Fork Stalling

ObjectiveATM serine/threonine kinase (ATM) is the most frequently mutated DNA damage response gene, involved in homologous recombination (HR), in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).DesignCombinational synergy screening was performed to endeavour a genotype-tailored targeted therapy.ResultsSynergy was found on inhibition of PARP, ATR and DNA-PKcs (PAD) leading to synthetic lethality in ATM-deficient murine and human PDAC. Mechanistically, PAD-induced PARP trapping, replication fork stalling and mitosis defects leading to P53-mediated apoptosis. Most importantly, chemical inhibition of ATM sensitises human PDAC cells toward PAD with long-term tumour control in vivo. Finally, we anticipated and elucidated PARP inhibitor resistance within the ATM-null background via whole exome sequencing. Arising cells were aneuploid, underwent epithelial-mesenchymal-transition and acquired multidrug resistance (MDR) due to upregulation of drug transporters and a bypass within the DNA repair machinery. These functional observations were mirrored in copy number variations affecting a region on chromosome 5 comprising several of the upregulated MDR genes. Using these findings, we ultimately propose alternative strategies to overcome the resistance.ConclusionAnalysis of the molecular susceptibilities triggered by ATM deficiency in PDAC allow elaboration of an efficient mutation-specific combinational therapeutic approach that can be also implemented in a genotype-independent manner by ATM inhibition.

scholarly journals PARP Inhibitors as a Therapeutic Agent for Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Breast Cancers

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Man Keung ◽  
Yanyuan Wu ◽  
Jaydutt Vadgama
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Anticancer Agents ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Homologous Recombination Deficiency ◽  
Repair Pathways

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) play an important role in various cellular processes, such as replication, recombination, chromatin remodeling, and DNA repair. Emphasizing PARP’s role in facilitating DNA repair, the PARP pathway has been a target for cancer researchers in developing compounds which selectively target cancer cells and increase sensitivity of cancer cells to other anticancer agents, but which also leave normal cells unaffected. Since certain tumors (BRCA1/2 mutants) have deficient homologous recombination repair pathways, they depend on PARP-mediated base excision repair for survival. Thus, inhibition of PARP is a promising strategy to selectively kill cancer cells by inactivating complementary DNA repair pathways. Although PARP inhibitor therapy has predominantly targeted BRCA-mutated cancers, this review also highlights the growing conversation around PARP inhibitor treatment for non-BRCA-mutant tumors, those which exhibit BRCAness and homologous recombination deficiency. We provide an update on the field’s progress by considering PARP inhibitor mechanisms, predictive biomarkers, and clinical trials of PARP inhibitors in development. Bringing light to these findings would provide a basis for expanding the use of PARP inhibitors beyond BRCA-mutant breast tumors.

scholarly journals Dynamic Compartmentalization of Base Excision Repair Proteins in Response to Nuclear and Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 794-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyra M. Griffiths ◽  
Dan Swartzlander ◽  
Kellen L. Meadows ◽  
Keith D. Wilkinson ◽  
Anita H. Corbett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Oxidative Dna Damage ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Intracellular Localization ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress ◽  
Base Excision

ABSTRACT DNAs harbored in both nuclei and mitochondria of eukaryotic cells are subject to continuous oxidative damage resulting from normal metabolic activities or environmental insults. Oxidative DNA damage is primarily reversed by the base excision repair (BER) pathway, initiated by N-glycosylase apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) lyase proteins. To execute an appropriate repair response, BER components must be distributed to accommodate levels of genotoxic stress that may vary considerably between nuclei and mitochondria, depending on the growth state and stress environment of the cell. Numerous examples exist where cells respond to signals, resulting in relocalization of proteins involved in key biological transactions. To address whether such dynamic localization contributes to efficient organelle-specific DNA repair, we determined the intracellular localization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae N-glycosylase/AP lyases, Ntg1 and Ntg2, in response to nuclear and mitochondrial oxidative stress. Fluorescence microscopy revealed that Ntg1 is differentially localized to nuclei and mitochondria, likely in response to the oxidative DNA damage status of the organelle. Sumoylation is associated with targeting of Ntg1 to nuclei containing oxidative DNA damage. These studies demonstrate that trafficking of DNA repair proteins to organelles containing high levels of oxidative DNA damage may be a central point for regulating BER in response to oxidative stress.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document