scholarly journals Targeting DNA Damage Response in Prostate and Breast Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (21) ◽  
pp. 8273
Author(s):  
Antje M. Wengner ◽  
Arne Scholz ◽  
Bernard Haendler
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Steroid Hormone ◽  
Steroid Hormone Receptors ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Parp 1

Steroid hormone signaling induces vast gene expression programs which necessitate the local formation of transcription factories at regulatory regions and large-scale alterations of the genome architecture to allow communication among distantly related cis-acting regions. This involves major stress at the genomic DNA level. Transcriptionally active regions are generally instable and prone to breakage due to the torsional stress and local depletion of nucleosomes that make DNA more accessible to damaging agents. A dedicated DNA damage response (DDR) is therefore essential to maintain genome integrity at these exposed regions. The DDR is a complex network involving DNA damage sensor proteins, such as the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1), the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs), the ataxia–telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) kinase and the ATM and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase, as central regulators. The tight interplay between the DDR and steroid hormone receptors has been unraveled recently. Several DNA repair factors interact with the androgen and estrogen receptors and support their transcriptional functions. Conversely, both receptors directly control the expression of agents involved in the DDR. Impaired DDR is also exploited by tumors to acquire advantageous mutations. Cancer cells often harbor germline or somatic alterations in DDR genes, and their association with disease outcome and treatment response led to intensive efforts towards identifying selective inhibitors targeting the major players in this process. The PARP-1 inhibitors are now approved for ovarian, breast, and prostate cancer with specific genomic alterations. Additional DDR-targeting agents are being evaluated in clinical studies either as single agents or in combination with treatments eliciting DNA damage (e.g., radiation therapy, including targeted radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) or addressing targets involved in maintenance of genome integrity. Recent preclinical and clinical findings made in addressing DNA repair dysfunction in hormone-dependent and -independent prostate and breast tumors are presented. Importantly, the combination of anti-hormonal therapy with DDR inhibition or with radiation has the potential to enhance efficacy but still needs further investigation.

scholarly journals The Nexus of Endocrine Signaling and Cancer: How Steroid Hormones Influence Genomic Stability

Endocrinology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 162 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinjini Ganguly ◽  
Divya Naik ◽  
Andrew Muskara ◽  
Omar Y Mian
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Steroid Hormones ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Steroid Hormone ◽  
Genomic Stability ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Steroid Hormone Receptors ◽  
Sex Steroid ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Endocrine-driven malignancies, including breast and prostate cancer, are among the most common human cancers. The relationship between sex steroid hormones (eg, androgen, estrogen, and progesterone), their cognate receptors, and genomic stability lie at the center of endocrine-driven cancer development, progression, and therapeutic resistance. A variety of direct and indirect mechanisms have been described that link steroid hormone signaling to the loss of genomic integrity that drives early carcinogenesis. These effects are often enriched within endocrine receptor cistromes, accounting for the high proportion of mutations and rearrangements in the region of hormone response elements. In other cases, the effects are generalized and rely on a complex array of genetic, epigenetic, and metabolic interactions. Both androgen and estrogen receptors directly modulate the DNA damage response by trans-activating DNA damage response genes and redirecting the cellular repair machinery in the wake of genotoxic stress. Here we review the key mechanistic underpinnings of the relationship between sex steroid hormone receptors and genomic stability. In addition, we summarize emerging research in this area and discuss important implications for cancer prevention and treatment.

scholarly journals Bromodomain proteins: protectors against endogenous DNA damage and facilitators of genome integrity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seo Yun Lee ◽  
Jae Jin Kim ◽  
Kyle M. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Stress Responses ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Cancer Development ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Major Contributor ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Bromodomain Proteins

AbstractEndogenous DNA damage is a major contributor to mutations, which are drivers of cancer development. Bromodomain (BRD) proteins are well-established participants in chromatin-based DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, which maintain genome integrity from cell-intrinsic and extrinsic DNA-damaging sources. BRD proteins are most well-studied as regulators of transcription, but emerging evidence has revealed their importance in other DNA-templated processes, including DNA repair and replication. How BRD proteins mechanistically protect cells from endogenous DNA damage through their participation in these pathways remains an active area of investigation. Here, we review several recent studies establishing BRD proteins as key influencers of endogenous DNA damage, including DNA–RNA hybrid (R-loops) formation during transcription and participation in replication stress responses. As endogenous DNA damage is known to contribute to several human diseases, including neurodegeneration, immunodeficiencies, cancer, and aging, the ability of BRD proteins to suppress DNA damage and mutations is likely to provide new insights into the involvement of BRD proteins in these diseases. Although many studies have focused on BRD proteins in transcription, evidence indicates that BRD proteins have emergent functions in DNA repair and genome stability and are participants in the etiology and treatment of diseases involving endogenous DNA damage.

scholarly journals DNA Damage Response in Multiple Myeloma: The Role of the Tumor Microenvironment

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 504
Author(s):  
Takayuki Saitoh ◽  
Tsukasa Oda
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Genetic Instability ◽  
Dna Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Repair Mechanisms

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy characterized by genomic instability. MM cells present various forms of genetic instability, including chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability, and base-pair alterations, as well as changes in chromosome number. The tumor microenvironment and an abnormal DNA repair function affect genetic instability in this disease. In addition, states of the tumor microenvironment itself, such as inflammation and hypoxia, influence the DNA damage response, which includes DNA repair mechanisms, cell cycle checkpoints, and apoptotic pathways. Unrepaired DNA damage in tumor cells has been shown to exacerbate genomic instability and aberrant features that enable MM progression and drug resistance. This review provides an overview of the DNA repair pathways, with a special focus on their function in MM, and discusses the role of the tumor microenvironment in governing DNA repair mechanisms.

scholarly journals Harnessing the Nucleolar DNA Damage Response in Cancer Therapy

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1156
Author(s):  
Jiachen Xuan ◽  
Kezia Gitareja ◽  
Natalie Brajanovski ◽  
Elaine Sanij
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Cancer Therapy ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Rrna Genes ◽  
Rrna Synthesis ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Clinical Investigations ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Synthesis And Processing

The nucleoli are subdomains of the nucleus that form around actively transcribed ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes. They serve as the site of rRNA synthesis and processing, and ribosome assembly. There are 400–600 copies of rRNA genes (rDNA) in human cells and their highly repetitive and transcribed nature poses a challenge for DNA repair and replication machineries. It is only in the last 7 years that the DNA damage response and processes of DNA repair at the rDNA repeats have been recognized to be unique and distinct from the classic response to DNA damage in the nucleoplasm. In the last decade, the nucleolus has also emerged as a central hub for coordinating responses to stress via sequestering tumor suppressors, DNA repair and cell cycle factors until they are required for their functional role in the nucleoplasm. In this review, we focus on features of the rDNA repeats that make them highly vulnerable to DNA damage and the mechanisms by which rDNA damage is repaired. We highlight the molecular consequences of rDNA damage including activation of the nucleolar DNA damage response, which is emerging as a unique response that can be exploited in anti-cancer therapy. In this review, we focus on CX-5461, a novel inhibitor of Pol I transcription that induces the nucleolar DNA damage response and is showing increasing promise in clinical investigations.

scholarly journals Profilin-1; a novel regulator of DNA damage response and repair machinery in keratinocytes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Jin Lee ◽  
Min-Ji Yoon ◽  
Dong Hyun Kim ◽  
Tae Uk Kim ◽  
Youn-Jung Kang
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Pten Loss ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Specific Regulation

AbstractProfilin-1 (PFN1) regulates actin polymerization and cytoskeletal growth. Despite the essential roles of PFN1 in cell integration, its subcellular function in keratinocyte has not been elucidated yet. Here we characterize the specific regulation of PFN1 in DNA damage response and repair machinery. PFN1 depletion accelerated DNA damage-mediated apoptosis exhibiting PTEN loss of function instigated by increased phosphorylated inactivation followed by high levels of AKT activation. PFN1 changed its predominant cytoplasmic localization to the nucleus upon DNA damage and subsequently restored the cytoplasmic compartment during the recovery time. Even though γH2AX was recruited at the sites of DNA double strand breaks in response to DNA damage, PFN1-deficient cells failed to recruit DNA repair factors, whereas control cells exhibited significant increases of these genes. Additionally, PFN1 depletion resulted in disruption of PTEN-AKT cascade upon DNA damage and CHK1-mediated cell cycle arrest was not recovered even after the recovery time exhibiting γH2AX accumulation. This might suggest PFN1 roles in regulating DNA damage response and repair machinery to protect cells from DNA damage. Future studies addressing the crosstalk and regulation of PTEN-related DNA damage sensing and repair pathway choice by PFN1 may further aid to identify new mechanistic insights for various DNA repair disorders.

scholarly journals 900 Depleting non-canonical, cell-intrinsic PD-L1 signals induces synthetic lethality to small molecule DNA damage response inhibitors in an immune independent and dependent manner

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A944-A944
Author(s):  
Anand Kornepati ◽  
Clare Murray ◽  
Barbara Avalos ◽  
Cody Rogers ◽  
Kavya Ramkumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Small Molecule ◽  
Treatment Resistance ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Response Biomarker

BackgroundTumor surface-expressed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) suppresses immunity when it engages programmed death-1 (PD-1) on anti-tumor immune cells in canonical PD-L1/PD-1.1 Non-canonical, tumour-intrinsic PD-L1 signals can mediate treatment resistance2–6 but mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Targeting non-canonical, cell-intrinsic PD-L1 signals, especially modulation of the DNA damage response (DDR), remains largely untapped.MethodsWe made PD-L1 knockout (PD-L1 KO) murine transplantable and human cell lines representing melanoma, bladder, and breast histologies. We used biochemical, genetic, and cell-biology techniques for mechanistic insights into tumor-intrinsic PD-L1 control of specific DDR and DNA repair pathways. We generated a novel inducible melanoma GEMM lacking PD-L1 only in melanocytes to corroborate DDR alterations observed in PD-L1 KO of established tumors.ResultsGenetic tumor PD-L1 depletion destabilized Chk2 and impaired ATM/Chk2, but not ATR/Chk1 DDR. PD-L1KO increased DNA damage (γH2AX) and impaired homologous recombination DNA repair (p-RPA32, BRCA1, RAD51 nuclear foci) and function (DR-GFP reporter). PD-L1 KO cells were significantly more sensitive versus controls to DDR inhibitors (DDRi) against ATR, Chk1, and PARP but not ATM in multiple human and mouse tumor models in vitro and in vivo in NSG mice. PD-1 independent, intracellular, not surface PD-L1 stabilized Chk2 protein with minimal Chek2 mRNA effect. Mechanistically, PD-L1 could directly complex with Chk2, protecting it from PIRH2-mediated polyubiquitination. PD-L1 N-terminal domains Ig-V and Ig-C but not the PD-L1 C-terminal tail co-IP’d with Chk2 and restored Chk1 inhibitor (Chk1i) treatment resistance. Tumor PD-L1 expression correlated with Chk1i sensitivity in 44 primary human small cell lung cancer cell lines, implicating tumor-intrinsic PD-L1 as a DDRi response biomarker. In WT mice, genetic PD-L1 depletion but not surface PD-L1 blockade with αPD-L1, sensitized immunotherapy-resistant, BRCA1-WT 4T1 tumors to PARP inhibitor (PARPi). PARPi effects were reduced on PD-L1 KO tumors in RAG2KO mice indicating immune-dependent DDRi efficacy. Tumor PD-L1 depletion, likely due to impaired DDR, enhanced PARPi induced tumor-intrinsic STING activation (e.g., p-TBK1, CCL5) suggesting potential to augment immunotherapies.ConclusionsWe challenge the prevailing surface PD-L1 paradigm and establish a novel mechanism for cell-intrinsic PD-L1 control of the DDR and gene product expression. We identify therapeutic vulnerabilities from tumor PD-L1 depletion utilizing small molecule DDRi currently being tested in clinical trials. Data could explain αPD-L1/DDRi treatment resistance. Intracellular PD-L1 could be a pharmacologically targetable treatment target and/or response biomarker for selective DDRi alone plus other immunotherapies.ReferencesTopalian SL, Taube JM, Anders RA, Pardoll DM. Mechanism-driven biomarkers to guide immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 16:275–287, doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.36 (2016).Clark CA, et al. Tumor-intrinsic PD-L1 signals regulate cell growth, pathogenesis and autophagy in ovarian cancer and melanoma. Canres 0258.2016 (2016).Gupta HB et al. Tumor cell-intrinsic PD-L1 promotes tumor-initiating cell generation and functions in melanoma and ovarian cancer. 1, 16030 (2016).Zhu H, et al. BET bromodomain inhibition promotes anti-tumor immunity by suppressing PD-L1 expression. Cell Rep 16:2829–2837, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.032 (2016)Wu B, et al. Adipose PD-L1 modulates PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade immunotherapy efficacy in breast cancer. Oncoimmunology 7:e1500107, doi:10.1080/2162402X.2018.1500107 (2018)Liang J, et al. Verteporfin inhibits PD-L1 through autophagy and the STAT1-IRF1-TRIM28 signaling axis, exerting antitumor efficacy. Cancer Immunol Res 8:952–965, doi:10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-19-0159 (2020)

scholarly journals APE2 Is a General Regulator of the ATR-Chk1 DNA Damage Response Pathway to Maintain Genome Integrity in Pancreatic Cancer Cells

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md Akram Hossain ◽  
Yunfeng Lin ◽  
Garrett Driscoll ◽  
Jia Li ◽  
Anne McMahon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Human Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cells ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Egg Extracts

The maintenance of genome integrity and fidelity is vital for the proper function and survival of all organisms. Recent studies have revealed that APE2 is required to activate an ATR-Chk1 DNA damage response (DDR) pathway in response to oxidative stress and a defined DNA single-strand break (SSB) in Xenopus laevis egg extracts. However, it remains unclear whether APE2 is a general regulator of the DDR pathway in mammalian cells. Here, we provide evidence using human pancreatic cancer cells that APE2 is essential for ATR DDR pathway activation in response to different stressful conditions including oxidative stress, DNA replication stress, and DNA double-strand breaks. Fluorescence microscopy analysis shows that APE2-knockdown (KD) leads to enhanced γH2AX foci and increased micronuclei formation. In addition, we identified a small molecule compound Celastrol as an APE2 inhibitor that specifically compromises the binding of APE2 but not RPA to ssDNA and 3′-5′ exonuclease activity of APE2 but not APE1. The impairment of ATR-Chk1 DDR pathway by Celastrol in Xenopus egg extracts and human pancreatic cancer cells highlights the physiological significance of Celastrol in the regulation of APE2 functionalities in genome integrity. Notably, cell viability assays demonstrate that APE2-KD or Celastrol sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells to chemotherapy drugs. Overall, we propose APE2 as a general regulator for the DDR pathway in genome integrity maintenance.

scholarly journals Mutant huntingtin impairs PNKP and ATXN3, disrupting DNA repair and transcription

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Gao ◽  
Anirban Chakraborty ◽  
Charlene Geater ◽  
Subrata Pradhan ◽  
Kara L Gordon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Functional Decline ◽  
Transcriptional Elongation ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Cyclic Amp Response Element ◽  
Atm Signaling

How huntingtin (HTT) triggers neurotoxicity in Huntington’s disease (HD) remains unclear. We report that HTT forms a transcription-coupled DNA repair (TCR) complex with RNA polymerase II subunit A (POLR2A), ataxin-3, the DNA repair enzyme polynucleotide-kinase-3'-phosphatase (PNKP), and cyclic AMP-response element-binding (CREB) protein (CBP). This complex senses and facilitates DNA damage repair during transcriptional elongation, but its functional integrity is impaired by mutant HTT. Abrogated PNKP activity results in persistent DNA break accumulation, preferentially in actively transcribed genes, and aberrant activation of DNA damage-response ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) signaling in HD transgenic mouse and cell models. A concomitant decrease in Ataxin-3 activity facilitates CBP ubiquitination and degradation, adversely impacting transcription and DNA repair. Increasing PNKP activity in mutant cells improves genome integrity and cell survival. These findings suggest a potential molecular mechanism of how mutant HTT activates DNA damage-response pro-degenerative pathways and impairs transcription, triggering neurotoxicity and functional decline in HD.

Endometrial DNA damage response is modulated in endometriosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kashmira Bane ◽  
Junita Desouza ◽  
Diksha Shetty ◽  
Prakash Choudhary ◽  
Shalaka Kadam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Nuclear Antigen ◽  
Dna Repair Genes ◽  
Eutopic Endometrium ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Repair Genes

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Is the DNA damage response (DDR) dysregulated in the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis? SUMMARY ANSWER Endometrial expression of genes involved in DDR is modulated in women with endometriosis, compared to those without the disease. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Ectopic endometriotic lesions are reported to harbour somatic mutations, thereby hinting at dysregulation of DDR and DNA repair pathways. However, it remains inconclusive whether the eutopic endometrium also manifests dysregulated DDR in endometriosis. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION For this case–control study conducted between 2015 and 2019, eutopic endometrial (E) samples (EE- from women with endometriosis, CE- from women without endometriosis) were collected in either mid-proliferative (EE-MP, n = 23; CE-MP, n = 17) or mid-secretory (EE-MS, n = 17; CE-MS, n = 9) phases of the menstrual cycle. This study compares: (i) DNA damage marker localization, (ii) expression of DDR genes and (iii) expression of DNA repair genes in eutopic endometrial samples from women with and without endometriosis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The study included (i) 40 women (aged 31.9 ± 0.81 years) with endometriosis and (ii) 26 control women (aged 31.4 ± 1.02 years) without endometriosis. Eutopic endometrial samples from the two groups were divided into different parts for histological analysis, immunohistochemistry, RNA extraction, protein extraction and comet assays. Eighty-four genes of relevance in the DNA damage signalling pathway were evaluated for their expression in eutopic endometrial samples, using RT2 Profiler PCR arrays. Validations of the expression of two GADD (Growth Arrest DNA Damage Inducible) proteins - GADD45A and GADD45G were carried out by immunoblotting. DNA damage was assessed by immunohistochemical localization of γ-H2AFX (a phosphorylated variant of histone H2AX) and 8-OHdG (8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine). RNA sequencing data from mid-proliferative (EE-MP, n = 4; CE-MP, n = 3) and mid-secretory phase (EE-MS and CE-MS, n = 4 each) endometrial samples were scanned to compare the expression status of all the genes implicated in human DNA repair. PCNA (Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen) expression was determined to assess endometrial proliferation. Residual DNA damage in primary endometrial cells was checked by comet assays. Public datasets were also scanned for the expression of DDR and DNA repair genes as our RNASeq data were limited by small sample size. All the comparisons were made between phase-matched endometrial samples from women with and without endometriosis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Endometrial expression of DDR genes and intensity of immunolocalized γ-H2AFX were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in EE, compared to CE samples. DDR proteins, especially those belonging to the GADD family, were found to be differentially abundant in EE, as compared to CE. These patterns were evident in both mid-proliferative and mid-secretory phases. Intriguingly, higher DDR was associated with increased cell proliferation in EE-MP, compared to CE-MP. Furthermore, among the differentially expressed transcripts (DETs) encoded by DNA repair genes, the majority showed up-regulation in EE-MP, compared to CE-MP. Interestingly, CE-MP and EE-MP had a comparable percentage (P > 0.05) of cells with residual DNA damage. However, unlike the mid-proliferative phase data, many DETs encoded by DNA repair genes were down-regulated in EE-MS, compared to CE-MS. An analysis of the phase-matched control and endometriosis samples included in the GSE51981 dataset available in the Gene Expression Omnibus database also revealed significant (P < 0.05) alterations in the expression of DDR and DNA repair genes in EE, compared to CE. LARGE-SCALE DATA N/A LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The study was conducted on a limited number of endometrial samples. Also, the study does not reveal the causes underlying dysregulated DDR in the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Alterations in the expression of DDR and DNA repair genes indirectly suggest that eutopic endometrium, as compared to its healthy counterpart, encounters DNA damage-inducing stimuli, either of higher strength or for longer duration in endometriosis. It will be worthwhile to identify the nature of such stimuli and also explore the role of higher genomic insults and dysregulated DDR/DNA repair in the origin and/or progression of endometriosis. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The study was supported by the Department of Biotechnology and Indian Council of Medical Research, Government of India. No conflict of interest is declared.

scholarly journals Interplay between Cellular Metabolism and the DNA Damage Response in Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amandine Moretton ◽  
Joanna I. Loizou
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Metabolic Regulation ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Cellular Metabolism ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Cancer Treatments ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Dynamic Interplay ◽  
Remarkable Progress

Metabolism is a fundamental cellular process that can become harmful for cells by leading to DNA damage, for instance by an increase in oxidative stress or through the generation of toxic byproducts. To deal with such insults, cells have evolved sophisticated DNA damage response (DDR) pathways that allow for the maintenance of genome integrity. Recent years have seen remarkable progress in our understanding of the diverse DDR mechanisms, and, through such work, it has emerged that cellular metabolic regulation not only generates DNA damage but also impacts on DNA repair. Cancer cells show an alteration of the DDR coupled with modifications in cellular metabolism, further emphasizing links between these two fundamental processes. Taken together, these compelling findings indicate that metabolic enzymes and metabolites represent a key group of factors within the DDR. Here, we will compile the current knowledge on the dynamic interplay between metabolic factors and the DDR, with a specific focus on cancer. We will also discuss how recently developed high-throughput technologies allow for the identification of novel crosstalk between the DDR and metabolism, which is of crucial importance to better design efficient cancer treatments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document