scholarly journals Influence of Germline Genetics on Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Zhu ◽  
Tejendra Patel ◽  
Jordan A. Miller ◽  
Chad D. Torrice ◽  
Mehak Aggarwal ◽  
...  

Tacrolimus exhibits high inter-patient pharmacokinetics (PK) variability, as well as a narrow therapeutic index, and therefore requires therapeutic drug monitoring. Germline mutations in cytochrome P450 isoforms 4 and 5 genes (CYP3A4/5) and the ATP-binding cassette B1 gene (ABCB1) may contribute to interindividual tacrolimus PK variability, which may impact clinical outcomes among allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients. In this study, 252 adult patients who received tacrolimus for acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis after allogeneic HSCT were genotyped to evaluate if germline genetic variants associated with tacrolimus PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) variability. Significant associations were detected between germline variants in CYP3A4/5 and ABCB1 and PK endpoints (e.g., median steady-state tacrolimus concentrations and time to goal tacrolimus concentration). However, significant associations were not observed between CYP3A4/5 or ABCB1 germline variants and PD endpoints (e.g., aGVHD and treatment-emergent nephrotoxicity). Decreased age and CYP3A5*1/*1 genotype were independently associated with subtherapeutic tacrolimus trough concentrations while CYP3A5*1*3 or CYP3A5*3/*3 genotypes, myeloablative allogeneic HSCT conditioning regimen (MAC) and increased weight were independently associated with supratherapeutic tacrolimus trough concentrations. Future lines of prospective research inquiry are warranted to use both germline genetic and clinical data to develop precision dosing tools that will optimize both tacrolimus dosing and clinical outcomes among adult HSCT patients.

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela P. Campbell ◽  
Katherine A. Guthrie ◽  
Janet A. Englund ◽  
Robert M. Farney ◽  
Elisa L. Minerich ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4126-4126
Author(s):  
Ellen C Christianson ◽  
Barb Trotz ◽  
Qing Cao ◽  
Emily Lipsitz ◽  
Brenda Weigel ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4126 Background: Childhood myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a rare, heterogeneous disorder that is clinically distinct from adult MDS. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is the treatment of choice, but there is no consensus regarding patient, disease, or treatment-related factors that predict outcomes after HSCT. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 37 consecutive pediatric patients who received allogeneic HSCT for MDS at the University of Minnesota Amplatz Children's Hospital between 1990 and 2010. The median age at transplant was 11 years (range 1–21 years). Twenty patients had primary (de novo) MDS and 17 had secondary MDS (4 treatment-related, 8 with preceeding idiopathic aplastic anemia, 3 with Schwachman Diamond syndrome, and 2 familial). Those with Fanconi Anemia were excluded. Cytogenetics at diagnosis included monosomy 7 (n=21), trisomy 8 (n=7), normal/other (n=8). Thirty-one had refractory cytopenia (RC) and 6 had refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) according to the modified WHO MDS classification. Patients were scored according to the International Prognostic Scoring System as low risk (n=1), intermediate-1 (Int-1; n=15), intermediate-2 (Int-2; n=21), or high risk MDS (n=0). Six patients received pre HSCT chemotherapy. Immediately prior to transplant, 27 had <5% bone marrow (BM) blasts and 10 had ≥ 5% blasts. Time from diagnosis to transplant was <140 days in 18 patients and ≥140 days in 19. Donor sources included umbilical cord blood (UCB; n=9), HLA-matched related donor (MRD; n=15), HLA-matched unrelated donor (MURD; n=7), and HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (MMURD; n=6). All patients received myeloablative conditioning prior to transplant (Cy/TBI n=35, Bu based n=2). The majority (70%) received cyclosporin based GVHD prophylaxis. Results: Neutrophil engraftment occurred in 89% (95%CI 77–97%) of patients at a median of 23 days (range 12–40). Patients transplanted after year 1999 were more likely to engraft (RR 2.27; 95% CI 1.06–4.88, p=.04). Overall survival (OS) was 70% (95%CI 53–82%) and 53% (95% CI 36–68%) at 1 and 3 years. In multivariate analysis (MVA), OS at 1 year was increased in patients who did not receive pre HSCT chemotherapy (RR of death 0.04; 95% CI 0–0.50, p=.01) and decreased in those with an IPSS score of Int-2 (RR of death 11.96; 95%CI 1.29–110.74, p=.03). Disease free survival (DFS) was 62% (95%CI 44–75%) and 48% (95% CI 31–63%) at 1 and 3 years. In MVA, factors associated with improved DFS at 3 years include having secondary MDS (RR of death or relapse 0.13; 95% CI 0.02–0.69 p=.02), undergoing HSCT after 1999 (RR 0.06; 95% CI 0.01–0.70, p=.02), not receiving pre HSCT chemotherapy (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01–0.36, p<.01), and a short interval (<140 days) from diagnosis to transplant (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.05–0.85, p=.03). Those with an IPSS score of Int-2 had a significantly lower DFS (RR 3.96; 95% CI 1.12–14.00, p=.03). WHO classification, cytogenetics and pre HSCT blast percentage had no significant impact on either OS or DFS. The relapse rate at 2 years was 20% (95% CI 733%). Factors associated with decreased relapse include having secondary MDS (RR 0.04; 95% CI 0.01–0.21, p<.01) and not receiving pre HSCT chemotherapy (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.05–0.85, p=0.03). Treatment-related mortality (TRM) was 25% (95%CI 11–39%) at 1 year. The risk of TRM was increased in patients with a pre HSCT blast count ≥ 5% (RR 6.65; 95% CI 1.60–27.67, p= 0.01) and was decreased in patients who did not receive pre HSCT chemotherapy (RR 0.07; 95% CI 0.01–0.69, P=.02). At 100 days the cumulative incidence of grades II-IV and III-IV acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) was 41% (95% CI 24–57%) and 16% (95% CI 5–28%), respectively. The incidence of chronic GVHD at one year was 19% (95% CI 6–32%). Conclusions: Our results suggest that in order to achieve optimal outcomes, children with MDS should be referred for allogeneic HSCT soon after diagnosis and that unlike in adult MDS, pre HSCT chemotherapy does not appear to improve outcomes. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2114-2114
Author(s):  
Jennifer Cuellar-Rodriguez ◽  
Alexandra F Freeman ◽  
Juan Gea-Banacloche ◽  
Helen Su ◽  
Jennifer K. Grossman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background DOCK8 deficiency— a combined immunodeficiency characterized by recurrent sinopulmonary infections and severe cutaneous DNA viral infections, eczema, food and drug allergies, and increased risk of viral driven malignancies— results from homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in the dedicator of cytokinesis 8 protein. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents a potential curative therapy for DOCK8 deficiency. Methods We treated 4 patients with DOCK8 deficiency with allogeneic HSCT using a reduced toxicity, myeloablative-conditioning regimen consisting of busulfan 3.2 mg/kg/day IV for 4 days and fludarabine 40 mg/m2/day for 4 days. Two patients received matched related donor allogeneic HSCT, and 2 received 10/10 HLA matched unrelated donor allogeneic HSCT. All patients received tacrolimus, and short methotrexate on days 1,3, 6, and 11, for graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Indication for transplant was severe recurrent infections with end organ damage in three patients, and a refractory EBV-virus driven lymphoma at the time of unrelated donor PBSC transplant in the fourth patient. Results The ages of the patients at the time of transplant were 27, 25, 18, and 16. The median follow-up for patients was 7 months (range 5-18 months). All 4 patients engrafted at a median of 12 days, and all 4 had complete reconstitution of the CD3/CD4 and CD3/CD8 compartments with donor cells. Clinical correction of the DOCK8 clinical phenotype occurred within 3-6 months of engraftment and correlated with lymphocyte reconstitution. Mucositis was the major side effect of the transplant-conditioning regimen. All had transient worsening of their pre-transplant infections 1-3 months post-transplant. In the patient with an EBV-virus driven lymphoma that had been refractory to chemotherapy, there was complete resolution of the disease on PET scanning at 100 days post-transplant. One patient, who received unrelated donor bone marrow cells, had skin GVHD that responded to a short course of steroids. There was no chronic GVHD. Conclusions Allogeneic HSCT in DOCK8 deficiency results in reconstitution of the deficient lymphocyte compartments that are present pre-transplant and complete reversal of the infection susceptibility phenotype. There was minimal regimen-related toxicity, and the incidence of GVHD was low despite complete donor chimerism. With genetic testing for DOCK8 deficiency now more widely available, we anticipate that earlier diagnosis will enable patients to be transplanted earlier in their clinical course, before significant organ damage or the development of viral-driven malignancies Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 558-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Bryk ◽  
Susannah Koontz ◽  
JoAl Mayor ◽  
Jeffrey Betcher ◽  
Rebecca Tombleson ◽  
...  

Background Current workforce shortages within the hematopoietic stem cell transplant field necessitate capitalizing on the role of oncology-trained pharmacists. Working within an agreed-upon protocol, pharmacists are able to expand patient care delivery through optimal medication therapy management. Methods An electronic survey was developed by the Advocacy & Policy Working Committee of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Pharmacy Special Interest Group and distributed to pharmacists involved in the care of hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. The primary objective was to assess the current state of collaborative practice agreements in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant setting. Results Forty-eight responses representing 41 institutions were returned. Respondents were mostly female (67%) and practiced in the adult setting (83%). Reponses represented a range of practice experience in hematopoietic stem cell transplant with the majority of the hematopoietic stem cell transplant positions (83%) funded by the department of pharmacy at an academic medical center. Of the 48 responses, 22 (46%) respondents reported having collaborative practice agreements in place; 10 (21%) respondents did not currently have collaborative practice agreements, but were planning to implement them; and 16 (33%) respondents did not have collaborative practice agreements at their institution. Clinical activities performed under a collaborative practice agreement included medication selection and dosing modifications, therapeutic drug monitoring, supportive care management, and management of comorbid conditions and chronic diseases. The most commonly cited barrier to establishing collaborative practice agreements was the inability to secure reimbursement for services provided. No respondents reported a negative impact on job satisfaction. Conclusions The results of this survey provide the pharmacy community with a robust understanding of the current landscape of hematopoietic stem cell transplant pharmacy collaborative practice agreements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document