scholarly journals Immune and Inflammatory Cells in Thyroid Cancer Microenvironment

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (18) ◽  
pp. 4413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferrari ◽  
Fallahi ◽  
Galdiero ◽  
Ruffilli ◽  
Elia ◽  
...  

A hallmark of cancer is the ability of tumor cells to avoid immune destruction. Activated immune cells in tumor microenvironment (TME) secrete proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines which foster the proliferation of tumor cells. Specific antigens expressed by cancer cells are recognized by the main actors of immune response that are involved in their elimination (immunosurveillance). By the recruitment of immunosuppressive cells, decreasing the tumor immunogenicity, or through other immunosuppressive mechanisms, tumors can impair the host immune cells within the TME and escape their surveillance. Within the TME, cells of the innate (e.g., macrophages, mast cells, neutrophils) and the adaptive (e.g., lymphocytes) immune responses are interconnected with epithelial cancer cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells via cytokines, chemokines, and adipocytokines. The molecular pattern of cytokines and chemokines has a key role and could explain the involvement of the immune system in tumor initiation and progression. Thyroid cancer-related inflammation is an important target for diagnostic procedures and novel therapeutic strategies. Anticancer immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, unleashes the immune system and activates cytotoxic lymphocytes to kill cancer cells. A better knowledge of the molecular and immunological characteristics of TME will allow novel and more effective immunotherapeutic strategies in advanced thyroid cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 6492
Author(s):  
Paola Giussani ◽  
Alessandro Prinetti ◽  
Cristina Tringali

Immunotherapy is now considered an innovative and strong strategy to beat metastatic, drug-resistant, or relapsing tumours. It is based on the manipulation of several mechanisms involved in the complex interplay between cancer cells and immune system that culminates in a form of immune-tolerance of tumour cells, favouring their expansion. Current immunotherapies are devoted enforcing the immune response against cancer cells and are represented by approaches employing vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, interleukins, checkpoint inhibitors, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells. Despite the undoubted potency of these treatments in some malignancies, many issues are being investigated to amplify the potential of application and to avoid side effects. In this review, we discuss how sphingolipids are involved in interactions between cancer cells and the immune system and how knowledge in this topic could be employed to enhance the efficacy of different immunotherapy approaches. In particular, we explore the following aspects: how sphingolipids are pivotal components of plasma membranes and could modulate the functionality of surface receptors expressed also by immune cells and thus their functionality; how sphingolipids are related to the release of bioactive mediators, sphingosine 1-phosphate, and ceramide that could significantly affect lymphocyte egress and migration toward the tumour milieu, in addition regulating key pathways needed to activate immune cells; given the renowned capability of altering sphingolipid expression and metabolism shown by cancer cells, how it is possible to employ sphingolipids as antigen targets.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Franzolin ◽  
Luca Tamagnone

The inflammatory and immune response elicited by the growth of cancer cells is a major element conditioning the tumor microenvironment, impinging on disease progression and patients’ prognosis. Semaphorin receptors are widely expressed in inflammatory cells, and their ligands are provided by tumor cells, featuring an intense signaling cross-talk at local and systemic levels. Moreover, diverse semaphorins control both cells of the innate and the antigen-specific immunity. Notably, semaphorin signals acting as inhibitors of anti-cancer immune response are often dysregulated in human tumors, and may represent potential therapeutic targets. In this mini-review, we provide a survey of the best known semaphorin regulators of inflammatory and immune cells, and discuss their functional impact in the tumor microenvironment.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenfa Ng

The immune checkpoint plays an important role in keeping immune cells in check for protecting tissues and organs from attack by the body’s own immune system. Similar concepts also apply in how cancer cells managed to fool immune cells through the surface display of particular antigens that mimic those exhibited by normal body cells. Specifically, cancer cells display antigens that bind to receptors on immune cells that subsequently prevent an attack on the cancer cells. Such binding between cancer antigens and immune cell receptors can be prevented through the use of checkpoint inhibitors antibodies specific for particular receptors on immune cells; thereby, unleashing immune cells to mount an immune response against cancer cells. While demonstrating good remissions in many patients where tumours shrunk substantially after administration of checkpoint inhibitors, cases exist where an overactivated immune system cause harm to organs and tissues culminating in multiple organ failure. Analysis of such toxicity effects of checkpoint inhibitors revealed that generic nature of targeted immune receptor plays a pivotal role in determining extent of side effects. Specifically, if the target immune receptor participates in checkpoints that prevent immune cells from attacking host cells, unleashing such receptors in cancer therapy may have untoward effects on patient’s health. Hence, the goal should be the selection of immune cell receptor specific to cancer cell antigens and which does not bind antigens or ligands displayed by the body’s cells. Such receptors would provide ideal targets for the development of checkpoint inhibitor antibodies for unleashing immune cells against cancer cells. To search for non-generic receptors that bind cancer cell antigens only, a combined computational and experimental approach could be used where ensemble of surface antigens on cancer cells and available receptors on immune cells could be profiled by biochemical assays. Downstream purification of ligands and receptors would provide for both structural elucidation and amino acid sequencing useful for bioinformatic search of homologous sequences. Knowledge of the antigens’ and receptors’ structures and amino acid sequence would subsequently serve as inputs to computational algorithms that models molecular docking events between receptor and antigen. This paves the way for heterologous expression of putative ligand and receptor in cell lines cultured in co-culture format for assessing binding between ligand and receptor, and more importantly, its physiological effects. Ability of immune receptor to bind to ligands on normal cells could also be assessed. Similar co-culture studies could be conducted with cancer cells and different immune cell types to check for reproducibility of observed effect in cell lines. Finally, antibodies could be raised for candidate receptors whose inhibition would not result in systemic attack of immune cells on host cells.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenfa Ng

The immune checkpoint plays an important role in keeping immune cells in check for protecting tissues and organs from attack by the body’s own immune system. Similar concepts also apply in how cancer cells managed to fool immune cells through the surface display of particular antigens that mimic those exhibited by normal body cells. Specifically, cancer cells display antigens that bind to receptors on immune cells that subsequently prevent an attack on the cancer cells. Such binding between cancer antigens and immune cell receptors can be prevented through the use of checkpoint inhibitors antibodies specific for particular receptors on immune cells; thereby, unleashing immune cells to mount an immune response against cancer cells. While demonstrating good remissions in many patients where tumours shrunk substantially after administration of checkpoint inhibitors, cases exist where an overactivated immune system cause harm to organs and tissues culminating in multiple organ failure. Analysis of such toxicity effects of checkpoint inhibitors revealed that generic nature of targeted immune receptor plays a pivotal role in determining extent of side effects. Specifically, if the target immune receptor participates in checkpoints that prevent immune cells from attacking host cells, unleashing such receptors in cancer therapy may have untoward effects on patient’s health. Hence, the goal should be the selection of immune cell receptor specific to cancer cell antigens and which does not bind antigens or ligands displayed by the body’s cells. Such receptors would provide ideal targets for the development of checkpoint inhibitor antibodies for unleashing immune cells against cancer cells. To search for non-generic receptors that bind cancer cell antigens only, a combined computational and experimental approach could be used where ensemble of surface antigens on cancer cells and available receptors on immune cells could be profiled by biochemical assays. Downstream purification of ligands and receptors would provide for both structural elucidation and amino acid sequencing useful for bioinformatic search of homologous sequences. Knowledge of the antigens’ and receptors’ structures and amino acid sequence would subsequently serve as inputs to computational algorithms that models molecular docking events between receptor and antigen. This paves the way for heterologous expression of putative ligand and receptor in cell lines cultured in co-culture format for assessing binding between ligand and receptor, and more importantly, its physiological effects. Ability of immune receptor to bind to ligands on normal cells could also be assessed. Similar co-culture studies could be conducted with cancer cells and different immune cell types to check for reproducibility of observed effect in cell lines. Finally, antibodies could be raised for candidate receptors whose inhibition would not result in systemic attack of immune cells on host cells.


2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S157-S157
Author(s):  
D R Broadwater ◽  
G Williams ◽  
L Messersmith ◽  
R Brady

Abstract Introduction/Objective Drugs targeting the programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint is an important type of novel immunotherapy. These checkpoint inhibitors are being used in a wide variety of cancers, including colorectal carcinoma (CRC). PD-L1 expression on tumor cells in CRC is predictive of good response to checkpoint inhibitor therapies. PD-L1 expression on tumor infiltrating immune cells (TIIC) is increasingly observed and independently portends good prognosis. The relationship between PD-L1 positivity in TIIC and tumor cells is not well established. In this study, the relationship and correlation of PD-L1 positivity in TIIC and tumor cells were retrospectively reviewed. Methods 197 sections of CRC from 33 cases (mean of 6 sections/case) with heterogeneous expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells were stained for PD-L1 with immunohistochemistry. None of the patients had received neo-adjuvant therapy. The presence of tumor cells and immune cells with positive PD-L1 expression was noted for each section. Results Immune cells were positive in 79% of the sections examined. TIIC were positive in 56% of the sections examined. A Cohen’s correlation study showed correlation between tumor cells and TIIC in 77% of the cases (k=0.51, moderate agreement). There was at least one section with PD-L1 positive TIIC in 97% of cases. Conclusion This study shows that PD-L1 is expressed in TIIC in the vast majority of CRC cases designated PD-L1 positive and that PD-L1 is positive in TIIC at a higher rate than in tumor cells. The moderate correlation is interesting, perhaps suggesting that if TIIC are noted to be positive for PD-L1 and tumor cells are not, additional sections of tumor should be stained.


Author(s):  
Jin G. Jung ◽  
Anne Le

AbstractThe tumor microenvironment (TME) is a complex biological structure surrounding tumor cells and includes blood vessels, immune cells, fibroblasts, adipocytes, and extracellular matrix (ECM) [1, 2]. These heterogeneous surrounding structures provide nutrients, metabolites, and signaling molecules to provide a cancer-friendly environment. The metabolic interplay between immune cells and cancer cells in the TME is a key feature not only for understanding tumor biology but also for discovering cancer cells’ vulnerability. As cancer immunotherapy to treat cancer patients and the use of metabolomics technologies become more and more common [3], the importance of the interplay between cancer cells and immune cells in the TME is emerging with respect to not only cell-to-cell interactions but also metabolic pathways. This interaction between immune cells and cancer cells is a complex and dynamic process in which immune cells act as a determinant factor of cancer cells’ fate and vice versa. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the metabolic interplay between immune cells and cancer cells and discuss the therapeutic opportunities as a result of this interplay in order to define targets for cancer treatment. It is important to understand and identify therapeutic targets that interrupt this cancerpromoting relationship between cancer cells and the surrounding immune cells, allowing for maximum efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors as well as other genetic and cellular therapies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. FDD23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shilina Roman ◽  
Sanne Holt ◽  
Julia Schueler

Immuno-oncology (IO) therapy is an exciting emerging pillar of cancer treatment that embraces the concept of modulating the immune system to recognize tumor cells and target them for destruction by either harnessing the effects of the immune system or preventing the evasion of tumor cells from therapeutic targeting. However, our immune system is constantly in a delicate balance between under-performing immune cells failing to manage pathogens, infections or cancer and over-performing immune cells potentially causing autoimmune disorders or cytokine release storms. Over the last 30 years, IO has progressed considerably with approvals for the use of various IO therapeutics including vaccines, cytokines, tumor-directed monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors as well as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) and T-cell receptor (TCR) engineered T-cell therapies.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debika Bhattacharya ◽  
Nabiha Yusuf

Breast cancer remains a major cause of death in women in the developed world. As Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are widely expressed on tumor cells and play important roles in the initiation and progression of cancer, they may thus serve as important targets and have an effective perspective on breast cancer treatment. Expression of TLRs on breast cancer cells and mononuclear inflammatory cells can promote inflammation and cell survival in the tumor microenvironment. Inflammation and cancer are related. It is well known that persistent inflammatory conditions can induce cancer formation, due to production of cytokines and chemokines, which play a crucial role in promoting angiogenesis, metastasis, and subversion of adaptive immunity. TLR signaling in tumor cells can mediate tumor cell immune escape and tumor progression, and it is regarded as one of the mechanisms for chronic inflammation in tumorigenesis and progression. This paper delineates the expression of various TLRs in promotion of inflammation and development of mammary tumors. Understanding the mechanisms through which TLRs on breast cancer cells and inflammatory cells regulate growth, survival, and metastatic progression can make them potential targets for breast cancer therapy.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 690
Author(s):  
Mary Poupot

The immune system is a smart way to fight cancer, with its precise targeting of cancer cells sparing healthy cells [...]


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3962-3962
Author(s):  
Binu Sasi ◽  
Zhijun Qiu ◽  
Shoulei Jiang ◽  
An-Ping Lin ◽  
Ricardo Aguiar

Antigen-specific T lymphocytes can recognize and eliminate aberrant cells. Cancer cells halt this process by hijacking a system of immune checkpoints, the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligands (PD-L1/2) pathway, which physiologically regulates the quantity and activity of T cells, establishing peripheral T cell tolerance and limiting tissue damage. PD-L1-expressing cancer cells interact with and inhibit PD-1 positive T cells, thus abrogating anti-cancer immunity, which can be restored by checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). Improved understanding of the regulation of PD-L1 expression will shed further light on how cancer cells escape immune surveillance, and it may help in the design of combinatorial therapeutic strategies that expand the activity of CPI. Oncogenes (e.g., MYC, STAT3, HIF1 and NF-KB) have been shown to directly induce PD-L1 transcription. In addition, pro-inflammatory cytokines, notably IFN-γ, via the JAK/STAT pathway, also increase PD-L1 expression, an intuitive counteracting regulatory axis that prevents unchecked inflammation and auto-immunity. The second messenger cyclic-AMP (cAMP) is a classical mediator of anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive inputs. However, its putative role in PD-L1 regulation is unknown. Addressing this knowledge gap is especially relevant because this signaling node can be modulated with a class of FDA-approved agents, the phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors. We have recently reviewed the pleiotropic roles that cAMP/PDE4 plays in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) biology (BloodPMID: 27756749). Thus, to examine if cAMP modulates PD-L1 expression, we first used DLBCL cell lines (n=10). Raising the levels of intracellular cAMP readily induced PD-L1 expression (measured by WB and FACS) in ABC-DLBCLs but not in GCB-DLBCLs. This cAMP-mediated induction of PD-L1 occurred also at RNA level; however, using reporter assays we found that the canonical cAMP-PKA-CREB pathway does not directly activate the PD-L1 promoter. The immune modulatory activity of cAMP is mediated, at least in part, by transcriptional activation/secretion of cytokines. Thus, we considered that cAMP induction of PD-L1 in DLBCL may be driven by an autocrine loop. In agreement with this idea, cAMP promoted JAK/STAT activation and culturing DLBCL cell lines in conditioned media (CM) from cAMP-high models induced PD-L1 expression. These assays pointed to secreted factor(s) as intermediaries in the cAMP/PD-L1 axis. Therefore, we screened a panel of 105 cytokines to identify those secreted by DLBCL cell lines following cAMP up-modulation - in most models, we detected a significant cAMP-driven increase in IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and IL-1α secretion. For validation, we focused on IL-10 because this was the most commonly cAMP-induced cytokine across the DLBCL models. We found that recombinant IL-10 induced PD-L1, albeit this induction was significantly less marked than that observed following an increase in intra-cellular cAMP. Concordantly, antibody-based blocking of the IL-10 signals, and pharmacologically inhibiting the JAK/STAT pathway, only partially abrogated the cAMP-mediated induction of PD-L1. We concluded that IL-10 and JAK/STAT signals relay part, but not all, of the cAMP effects on PD-L1 expression in DLBCL. Next, we utilized the Pde4b null mouse model to examine if these observations were present in an organismal level and in non-immortalized immune cells. In these assays, spleens of Pde4b WT, +/- and -/- mice (8-16 weeks old, male and female, n=8) were collected and analyzed by WB and FACS. Spleen cells from Pde4b deficient mice had markedly higher expression of PD-L1 (WB). By FACS, we found that the increase in PDL1 expression in Pde4b null mice derived from T cells, B cells, but from the smaller non-B/T cell population (CD19/CD3 negative). Finally, we found that the PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast used as a single agent in vitro robustly induced PD-L1 expression in DLBCL cell lines. In summary, we identified cAMP as an "actionable" novel regulator of PD-L1 expression in normal and malignant immune cells. Mechanistically, cAMP drives an autocrine loop enacted by cytokines and transduced in part by JAK/STAT. This finding supports the clinical testing of roflumilast to induce PD-L1 expression, a strategy that may improve the activity of checkpoint inhibitors in DLBCL and related tumor types. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document