scholarly journals Cap-Independent mRNA Translation in Germ Cells

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett D. Keiper

Cellular mRNAs in plants and animals have a 5′-cap structure that is accepted as the recognition point to initiate translation by ribosomes. Consequently, it was long assumed that the translation initiation apparatus was built solely for a cap-dependent (CD) mechanism. Exceptions that emerged invoke structural damage (proteolytic cleavage) to eukaryotic initiation factor 4 (eIF4) factors that disable cap recognition. The residual eIF4 complex is thought to be crippled, but capable of cap-independent (CI) translation to recruit viral or death-associated mRNAs begrudgingly when cells are in great distress. However, situations where CI translation coexists with CD translation are now known. In such cases, CI translation is still a minor mechanism in the major background of CD synthesis. In this review, I propose that germ cells do not fit this mold. Using observations from various animal models of oogenesis and spermatogenesis, I suggest that CI translation is a robust partner to CD translation to carry out the translational control that is so prevalent in germ cell development. Evidence suggests that CI translation provides surveillance of germ cell homeostasis, while CD translation governs the regulated protein synthesis that ushers these meiotic cells through the remarkable steps in sperm/oocyte differentiation.

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Friday ◽  
Brett D. Keiper

Ultimately, the production of new proteins in undetermined cells pushes them to new fates. Other proteins hold a stem cell in a mode of self-renewal. In germ cells, these decision-making proteins are produced largely from translational control of preexisting mRNAs. To date, all of the regulation has been attributed to RNA binding proteins (RBPs) that repress mRNAs in many models of germ cell development (Drosophila, mouse,C. elegans, andXenopus). In this review, we focus on the selective, positive function of translation initiation factors eIF4E and eIF4G, which recruit mRNAs to ribosomes upon derepression. Evidence now shows that the two events are not separate but rather are coordinated through composite complexes of repressors and germ cell isoforms of eIF4 factors. Strikingly, the initiation factor isoforms are themselves mRNA selective. The mRNP complexes of translation factors and RBPs are built on specific populations of mRNAs to prime them for subsequent translation initiation. Simple rearrangement of the partners causes a dormant mRNP to become synthetically active in germ cells when and where they are required to support gametogenesis.


2003 ◽  
Vol 84 (12) ◽  
pp. 3263-3274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Idoia Burgui ◽  
Tomás Aragón ◽  
Juan Ortín ◽  
Amelia Nieto

It has previously been shown that influenza virus NS1 protein enhances the translation of viral but not cellular mRNAs. This enhancement occurs by increasing the rate of translation initiation and requires the 5′UTR sequence, common to all viral mRNAs. In agreement with these findings, we show here that viral mRNAs, but not cellular mRNAs, are associated with NS1 during virus infection. We have previously reported that NS1 interacts with the translation initiation factor eIF4GI, next to its poly(A)-binding protein 1 (PABP1)-interacting domain and that NS1 and eIF4GI are associated in influenza virus-infected cells. Here we show that NS1, although capable of binding poly(A), does not compete with PABP1 for association with eIF4GI and, furthermore, that NS1 and PABP1 interact both in vivo and in vitro in an RNA-independent manner. The interaction maps between residues 365 and 535 in PABP1 and between residues 1 and 81 in NS1. These mapping studies, together with those previously reported for NS1–eIF4GI and PABP1–eIF4GI interactions, imply that the binding of all three proteins would be compatible. Collectively, these and previously published data suggest that NS1 interactions with eIF4GI and PABP1, as well as with viral mRNAs, could promote the specific recruitment of 43S complexes to the viral mRNAs.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2432-2432
Author(s):  
Nirmalee Abayasekara ◽  
Michelle Levine ◽  
Niccolo Bolli ◽  
Hong Sun ◽  
Matthew Silver ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2432 NPM1, is a highly conserved, ubiquitous nucleolar phosphoprotein that belongs to the nucleoplasmin family of nuclear chaperones. NPM1−/− mice die at mid-gestation (E11.5) from anemia, underscoring the gene's role in embryonic development. NPM1 is one of the most frequently mutated genes in AML. Mutations in NPM1 are found in 50% of normal karyotype AML patients, and mutant NPM1 (NPMc+) is aberrantly located in the cytoplasm of leukemic blasts in about 35% of all AML patients. Furthermore, NPM1 maps to a region on chromosome 5q that is the target of deletions in both de novo and therapy-associated human MDS. NPM1 thus acts as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor in the hematological compartment, although the mechanism of its contribution to dysmyelopoiesis remains unknown. NPM-1+/− mice develop a hematological syndrome similar to that observed in human MDS, and develop AML over time. The NPM1 deficient model therefore provides a platform to interrogate the molecular basis of MDS. We identified nucleophosmin (NPM1) in a screen for protein binding partners of C/EBPα. C/EBPα is a single exon gene, but is expressed as two isoforms that arise by alternate translation start sites to yield a full length C/EBPα p42 and a truncated dominant negative C/EBPα p30 isoform. Translational control of isoform expression is orchestrated by a conserved upstream open reading frame (uORF) in the 5' untranslated region (5'UTR) and modulated by the translation initiation factors eIF4E and eIF2. We generated factor-dependent myeloid cell lines from the bone marrow of Npm1+/+ and Npm1+/− mice. These lines are IL-3-dependent and inducible toward neutrophil maturation with GM-CSF and/ or all- trans retinoic acid (ATRA). Neutrophils derived from MNPM1+/− cells display defective neutrophil-specific gene expression, including a cassette of C/EBPα-dependent genes. These observations led us to postulate that myeloid abnormalities in NPM1 deficiency reflect an aberrant NPM1-C/EBPα axis. We show that NPM1 haploinsufficiency upregulates eIF4E (eukaryotic initiation factor 4E) (but not eIF2), which binds the mRNA-Cap (m7-GTP) as part of the mRNA translation initiation complex, eIF4F. Increased eIF4E is observed in about 30% of all malignancies. Initial increased eIF4E levels in MNPM+/− cells likely reflect transcriptional activation by the oncoprotein c-Myc, protein levels of which are also elevated in MNPM1+/− cells. We propose that increased eIF4E then induces increased C/EBPαp30 translation. C/EBPαp30 is a dominant negative inhibitor of full length C/EBPαp42 activity and disrupts normal neutrophil development. Furthermore, we demonstrate that C/EBPαp30 but not C/EBPαp42, activates the eIF4E promoter. We propose a positive feedback loop, wherein increased C/EBPαp30 induced by eIF4E further increases the expression of eIF4E. Our data suggest that NPM1 deficiency modulates neutrophil-specific gene expression by altering C/EBPα. We propose an aberrant feed-forward mechanism that increases levels of both eIF4E and C/EBPαp30 and likely contributes to MDS associated with NPM1 deficiency. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (22) ◽  
pp. 8591
Author(s):  
Anne-Catherine Prats ◽  
Florian David ◽  
Leila H. Diallo ◽  
Emilie Roussel ◽  
Florence Tatin ◽  
...  

It was thought until the 1990s that the eukaryotic translation machinery was unable to translate a circular RNA. However internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) and m6A-induced ribosome engagement sites (MIRESs) were discovered, promoting 5′ end-independent translation initiation. Today a new family of so-called “noncoding” circular RNAs (circRNAs) has emerged, revealing the pivotal role of 5′ end-independent translation. CircRNAs have a strong impact on translational control via their sponge function, and form a new mRNA family as they are translated into proteins with pathophysiological roles. While there is no more doubt about translation of covalently closed circRNA, the linearity of canonical mRNA is only theoretical: it has been shown for more than thirty years that polysomes exhibit a circular form and mRNA functional circularization has been demonstrated in the 1990s by the interaction of initiation factor eIF4G with poly(A) binding protein. More recently, additional mechanisms of 3′–5′ interaction have been reported, including m6A modification. Functional circularization enhances translation via ribosome recycling and acceleration of the translation initiation rate. This update of covalently and noncovalently closed circular mRNA translation landscape shows that RNA with circular shape might be the rule for translation with an important impact on disease development and biotechnological applications.


Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 148 (3) ◽  
pp. 1007-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Cuesta ◽  
Alan G Hinnebusch ◽  
Mercedes Tamame

Abstract In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, expression of the transcriptional activator GCN4 increases at the translational level in response to starvation for an amino acid. The products of multiple GCD genes are required for efficient repression of GCN4 mRNA translation under nonstarvation conditions. The majority of the known GCD genes encode subunits of the general translation initiation factor eIF-2 or eIF-2B. To identify additional initiation factors in yeast, we characterized 65 spontaneously arising Gcd− mutants. In addition to the mutations that were complemented by known GCD genes or by GCN3, we isolated mutant alleles of two new genes named GCD14 and GCD15. Recessive mutations in these two genes led to highly unregulated GCN4 expression and to derepressed transcription of genes in the histidine biosynthetic pathway under GCN4 control. The derepression of GCN4 expression in gcd14 and gcd15 mutants occurred with little or no increase in GCN4 mRNA levels, and it was dependent on upstream open reading frames (uORFs) in GCN4 mRNA that regulate its translation. We conclude that GCD14 and GCD15 are required for repression of GCN4 mRNA translation by the uORFs under conditions of amino acid sufficiency. The gcd14 and gcd15 mutations confer a slow-growth phenotype on nutrient-rich medium, and gcd15 mutations are lethal when combined with a mutation in gcd13. Like other known GCD genes, GCD14 and GCD15 are therefore probably required for general translation initiation in addition to their roles in GCN4-specific translational control.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prakash Amruth Raj Chukka ◽  
Stacey D. Wetmore ◽  
Nehal Thakor

Translational control (TC) is one the crucial steps that dictate gene expression and alter the outcome of physiological process like programmed cell death, metabolism, and proliferation in a eukaryotic cell. TC occurs mainly at the translation initiation stage. The initiation factor eIF5B tightly regulates global translation initiation and facilitates the expression of a subset of proteins involved in proliferation, inhibition of apoptosis, and immunosuppression under stress conditions. eIF5B enhances the expression of these survival proteins to allow cancer cells to metastasize and resist chemotherapy. Using eIF5B as a biomarker or drug target could help with diagnosis and improved prognosis, respectively. To achieve these goals, it is crucial to understand the role of eIF5B in translational regulation. This review recapitulates eIF5B’s regulatory roles in the translation initiation of viral mRNA as well as the cellular mRNAs in cancer and stressed eukaryotic cells.


2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (19) ◽  
pp. 6440-6449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barsanjit Mazumder ◽  
Vasudevan Seshadri ◽  
Hiroaki Imataka ◽  
Nahum Sonenberg ◽  
Paul L. Fox

ABSTRACT Ceruloplasmin (Cp) is a glycoprotein secreted by the liver and monocytic cells and probably plays roles in inflammation and iron metabolism. We showed previously that gamma interferon (IFN-γ) induced Cp synthesis by human U937 monocytic cells but that the synthesis was subsequently halted by a transcript-specific translational silencing mechanism involving the binding of a cytosolic factor(s) to the Cp mRNA 3′ untranslated region (UTR). To investigate how protein interactions at the Cp 3′-UTR inhibit translation initiation at the distant 5′ end, we considered the “closed-loop” model of mRNA translation. In this model, the transcript termini are brought together by interactions of poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) with both the poly(A) tail and initiation factor eIF4G. The effect of these elements on Cp translational control was tested using chimeric reporter transcripts in rabbit reticulocyte lysates. The requirement for poly(A) was shown since the cytosolic inhibitor from IFN-γ-treated cells minimally inhibited the translation of a luciferase reporter upstream of the Cp 3′-UTR but almost completely blocked the translation of a transcript containing a poly(A) tail. Likewise, a requirement for poly(A) was shown for silencing of endogenous Cp mRNA. We considered the possibility that the cytosolic inhibitor blocked the interaction of PABP with the poly(A) tail or with eIF4G. We found that neither of these interactions were inhibited, as shown by immunoprecipitation of PABP followed by quantitation of the poly(A) tail by reverse transcription-PCR and of eIF4G by immunoblot analysis. We considered the alternate possibility that these interactions were required for translational silencing. When PABP was depleted from the reticulocyte lysate with anti-human PABP antibody, the cytosolic factor did not inhibit translation of the chimeric reporter, thus showing the requirement for PABP. Similarly, in lysates treated with anti-human eIF4G antibody, the cytosolic extract did not inhibit the translation of the chimeric reporter, thereby showing a requirement for eIF4G. These data show that translational silencing of Cp requires interactions of three essential elements of mRNA circularization, poly(A), PABP, and eIF4G. We suggest that Cp mRNA circularization brings the cytosolic Cp 3′-UTR-binding factor into the proximity of the translation initiation site, where it silences translation by an undetermined mechanism. These results suggest that in addition to its important function in increasing the efficiency of translation, transcript circularization may serve as an essential structural determinant for transcript-specific translational control.


Author(s):  
Anne-Catherine Prats ◽  
Florian David ◽  
Leila Diallo ◽  
Emilie Roussel ◽  
Florence Tatin ◽  
...  

It was thought until the 1990s that the eukaryotic translation machinery was unable to translate a circular RNA. However internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) and m6A-induced ribosome engagement sites (MIRESs) were discovered, promoting 5’end-independent translation initiation. Today a new family of so-called “non-coding” circular RNAs (circRNAs) has emerged, revealing the pivotal role of 5’end-independent translation. CircRNAs have a strong impact on translational control via their sponge function, and form a new mRNA family as they are translated into proteins with pathophysiological roles. While there is no more doubt about translation of covalently closed circRNA, the linearity of canonical mRNA is only theoretical: it has been shown for more than thirty years that polysomes exhibit a circular form and mRNA functional circularization has been demonstrated in the 1990s by the interaction of initiation factor eIF4G with poly(A) binding protein. More recently, additional mechanisms of 3’-5’ interaction have been reported, including m6A modification. Functional circularization enhances translation via ribosome recycling and acceleration of the translation initiation rate. This update of covalently and non-covalently circular mRNA translation landscape shows that RNA circular shape might be the rule for translation with an important impact on disease development and biotechnological applications.


2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (23) ◽  
pp. 10556-10565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri V. Svitkin ◽  
Barbara Herdy ◽  
Mauro Costa-Mattioli ◽  
Anne-Claude Gingras ◽  
Brian Raught ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Translation of m7G-capped cellular mRNAs is initiated by recruitment of ribosomes to the 5′ end of mRNAs via eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F), a heterotrimeric complex comprised of a cap-binding subunit (eIF4E) and an RNA helicase (eIF4A) bridged by a scaffolding molecule (eIF4G). Internal translation initiation bypasses the requirement for the cap and eIF4E and occurs on viral and cellular mRNAs containing internal ribosomal entry sites (IRESs). Here we demonstrate that eIF4E availability plays a critical role in the switch from cap-dependent to IRES-mediated translation in picornavirus-infected cells. When both capped and IRES-containing mRNAs are present (as in intact cells or in vitro translation extracts), a decrease in the amount of eIF4E associated with the eIF4F complex elicits a striking increase in IRES-mediated viral mRNA translation. This effect is not observed in translation extracts depleted of capped mRNAs, indicating that capped mRNAs compete with IRES-containing mRNAs for translation. These data explain numerous reported observations where viral mRNAs are preferentially translated during infection.


Author(s):  
Anne-Catherine Prats ◽  
Florian David ◽  
Leila Diallo ◽  
Emilie Roussel ◽  
Florence Tatin ◽  
...  

It was thought until the 1990s that the eukaryotic translation machinery was unable to translate a circular RNA. However internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) and m6A-induced ribosome engagement sites (MIRESs) were discovered, promoting 5’end-independent translation initiation. Today a new family of non-coding RNAs, circular RNAs (circRNAs), has emerged, revealing the pivotal role of 5’end-independent translation. CircRNAs have a strong impact on translational control via their sponge function, and form a new mRNA family as they are translated into proteins with pathophysiological roles. While there is no more doubt about translation of covalently closed circRNA, the linearity of canonical mRNA is only theoretical: it has been shown for more than thirty years that polysomes exhibit a circular form and mRNA functional circularization has been demonstrated in the 1990s by the interaction of initiation factor eIF4G with poly(A) binding protein. More recently, additional mechanisms of 3’-5’ interaction have been reported, including m6A modification. Functional circularization enhances translation via ribosome recycling and acceleration of the translation initiation rate. This update of covalently and non-covalently circular mRNA translation landscape shows that RNA circular shape is the rule for translation with an important impact on disease development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document