scholarly journals Both Intrinsically Disordered Regions and Structural Domains Evolve Rapidly in Immune-Related Mammalian Proteins

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 3860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiichi Homma ◽  
Hiroto Anbo ◽  
Tamotsu Noguchi ◽  
Satoshi Fukuchi
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rapid Evolution ◽  
Extracellular Proteins ◽  
Evolution Rate ◽  
Structural Domains ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Eukaryotic Proteins ◽  
Related Proteins ◽  
Disordered Regions

Eukaryotic proteins consist of structural domains (SDs) and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), i.e., regions that by themselves do not assume unique three-dimensional structures. IDRs are generally subject to less constraint and evolve more rapidly than SDs. Proteins with a lower number of protein-to-protein interactions (PPIs) are also less constrained and tend to evolve fast. Extracellular proteins of mammals, especially immune-related extracellular proteins, on average have relatively high evolution rates. This article aims to examine if a high evolution rate in IDRs or that in SDs accounts for the rapid evolution of extracellular proteins. To this end, we classified eukaryotic proteins based on their cellular localizations and analyzed them. Moreover, we divided proteins into SDs and IDRs and calculated the respective evolution rate. Fractional IDR content is positively correlated with evolution rate. For their fractional IDR content, immune-related extracellular proteins show an aberrantly high evolution rate. IDRs evolve more rapidly than SDs in most subcellular localizations. In extracellular proteins, however, the difference is diminished. For immune-related proteins in mammals in particular, the evolution rates in SDs come close to those in IDRs. Thus high evolution rates in both IDRs and SDs account for the rapid evolution of immune-related proteins.

scholarly journals Glutamate promotes SSB protein–protein Interactions via intrinsically disordered regions

2017 ◽  
Vol 429 (18) ◽  
pp. 2790-2801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander G. Kozlov ◽  
Min Kyung Shinn ◽  
Elizabeth A. Weiland ◽  
Timothy M. Lohman
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Disordered Regions

Affinity versus specificity in coupled binding and folding reactions

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Gianni ◽  
Per Jemth
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Protein ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Interaction Interface ◽  
Disordered Regions

Abstract Intrinsically disordered protein regions may fold upon binding to an interaction partner. It is often argued that such coupled binding and folding enables the combination of high specificity with low affinity. The basic tenet is that an unfavorable folding equilibrium will make the overall binding weaker while maintaining the interaction interface. While theoretically solid, we argue that this concept may be misleading for intrinsically disordered proteins. In fact, experimental evidence suggests that interactions of disordered regions usually involve extended conformations. In such cases, the disordered region is exceptionally unlikely to fold into a bound conformation in the absence of its binding partner. Instead, these disordered regions can bind to their partners in multiple different conformations and then fold into the native bound complex, thus, if anything, increasing the affinity through folding. We concede that (de)stabilization of native structural elements such as helices will modulate affinity, but this could work both ways, decreasing or increasing the stability of the complex. Moreover, experimental data show that intrinsically disordered binding regions display a range of affinities and specificities dictated by the particular side chains and length of the disordered region and not necessarily by the fact that they are disordered. We find it more likely that intrinsically disordered regions are common in protein–protein interactions because they increase the repertoire of binding partners, providing an accessible route to evolve interactions rather than providing a stability–affinity trade-off.

scholarly journals Proteome-scale amino-acid resolution footprinting of protein-binding sites in the intrinsically disordered regions of the human proteome

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Benz ◽  
Muhammad Ali ◽  
Izabella Krystkowiak ◽  
Leandro Simonetti ◽  
Ahmed Sayadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Human Proteome ◽  
Cell Physiology ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Linear Motif ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Disordered Regions

Specific protein-protein interactions are central to all processes that underlie cell physiology. Numerous studies using a wide range of experimental approaches have identified tens of thousands of human protein-protein interactions. However, many interactions remain to be discovered, and low affinity, conditional and cell type-specific interactions are likely to be disproportionately under-represented. Moreover, for most known protein-protein interactions the binding regions remain uncharacterized. We previously developed proteomic peptide phage display (ProP-PD), a method for simultaneous proteome-scale identification of short linear motif (SLiM)-mediated interactions and footprinting of the binding region with amino acid resolution. Here, we describe the second-generation human disorderome (HD2), an optimized ProP-PD library that tiles all disordered regions of the human proteome and allows the screening of ~1,000,000 overlapping peptides in a single binding assay. We define guidelines for how to process, filter and rank the results and provide PepTools, a toolkit for annotation and analysis of identified hits. We uncovered 2,161 interaction pairs for 35 known SLiM-binding domains and confirmed a subset of 38 interactions by biophysical or cell-based assays. Finally, we show how the amino acid resolution binding site information can be used to pinpoint functionally important disease mutations and phosphorylation events in intrinsically disordered regions of the human proteome. The HD2 ProP-PD library paired with PepTools represents a powerful pipeline for unbiased proteome-wide discovery of SLiM-based interactions.

scholarly journals Why do eukaryotic proteins contain more intrinsically disordered regions?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Basile ◽  
Marco Salvatore ◽  
Claudio Bassot ◽  
Arne Elofsson
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Intrinsic Disorder ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Eukaryotic Proteins ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Disordered Regions

AbstractIntrinsic disorder is much more abundant in eukaryotic than in prokaryotic proteins. However, the reason behind this is unclear. It has been proposed that the disordered regions are functionally important for regulation in eukaryotes, but it has also been proposed that the difference is a result of lower selective pressure in eukaryotes. Almost all studies intrinsic disorder is predicted from the amino acid sequence of a protein. Therefore, there should exist an underlying difference in the amino acid distributions between eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteins causing the predicted difference in intrinsic disorder. To obtain a better understanding of why eukaryotic proteins contain more intrinsically disordered regions we compare proteins from complete eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteomes.Here, we show that the difference in intrinsic disorder origin from differences in the linker regions. Eukaryotic proteins have more extended linker regions and, in particular, the eukaryotic linker regions are more disordered. The average eukaryotic protein is about 500 residues long; it contains 250 residues in linker regions, of which 80 are disordered. In comparison, prokaryotic proteins are about 350 residues long and only have 100-110 residues in linker regions, and less than 10 of these are intrinsically disordered.Further, we show that there is no systematic increase in the frequency of disorder-promoting residues in eukaryotic linker regions. Instead, the difference in frequency of only three amino acids seems to lie behind the difference. The most significant difference is that eukaryotic linkers contain about 9% serine, while prokaryotic linkers have roughly 6.5%. Eukaryotic linkers also contain about 2% more proline and 2-3% fewer isoleucine residues. The reason why primarily these amino acids vary in frequency is not apparent, but it cannot be excluded that the difference is serine is related to the increased need for regulation through phosphorylation and that the proline difference is related to increase of eukaryotic specific repeats.

scholarly journals Functional Segments on Intrinsically Disordered Regions in Disease-Related Proteins

Biomolecules ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroto Anbo ◽  
Masaya Sato ◽  
Atsushi Okoshi ◽  
Satoshi Fukuchi
Keyword(s):  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction Networks ◽  
Digestive System Diseases ◽  
To Come ◽  
Related Proteins ◽  
Disordered Regions

One of the unique characteristics of intrinsically disordered proteins (IPDs) is the existence of functional segments in intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). A typical function of these segments is binding to partner molecules, such as proteins and DNAs. These segments play important roles in signaling pathways and transcriptional regulation. We conducted bioinformatics analysis to search these functional segments based on IDR predictions and database annotations. We found more than a thousand potential functional IDR segments in disease-related proteins. Large fractions of proteins related to cancers, congenital disorders, digestive system diseases, and reproductive system diseases have these functional IDRs. Some proteins in nervous system diseases have long functional segments in IDRs. The detailed analysis of some of these regions showed that the functional segments are located on experimentally verified IDRs. The proteins with functional IDR segments generally tend to come and go between the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Proteins involved in multiple diseases tend to have more protein-protein interactors, suggesting that hub proteins in the protein-protein interaction networks can have multiple impacts on human diseases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document