scholarly journals 3D Bone Biomimetic Scaffolds for Basic and Translational Studies with Mesenchymal Stem Cells

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 3150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Sobacchi ◽  
Marco Erreni ◽  
Dario Strina ◽  
Eleonora Palagano ◽  
Anna Villa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Bone Repair ◽  
3D Culture ◽  
Bioactive Molecules ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Great Effort ◽  
Biomimetic Scaffolds

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are recognized as an attractive tool owing to their self-renewal and differentiation capacity, and their ability to secrete bioactive molecules and to regulate the behavior of neighboring cells within different tissues. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that cells prefer three-dimensional (3D) to 2D culture conditions, at least because the former are closer to their natural environment. Thus, for in vitro studies and in vivo utilization, great effort is being dedicated to the optimization of MSC 3D culture systems in view of achieving the intended performance. This implies understanding cell–biomaterial interactions and manipulating the physicochemical characteristics of biomimetic scaffolds to elicit a specific cell behavior. In the bone field, biomimetic scaffolds can be used as 3D structures, where MSCs can be seeded, expanded, and then implanted in vivo for bone repair or bioactive molecules release. Actually, the union of MSCs and biomaterial has been greatly improving the field of tissue regeneration. Here, we will provide some examples of recent advances in basic as well as translational research about MSC-seeded scaffold systems. Overall, the proliferation of tools for a range of applications witnesses a fruitful collaboration among different branches of the scientific community.

Combined effects of multi-scale topographical cues on stable cell sheet formation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 2056-2067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sisi Li ◽  
Shreyas Kuddannaya ◽  
Yon Jin Chuah ◽  
Jingnan Bao ◽  
Yilei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Cell Sheet ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Combined Effects ◽  
Multi Scale ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Topographical Cues

To decipher specific cell responses to diverse and complex in vivo signals, it is essential to emulate specific surface chemicals, extra cellular matrix (ECM) components and topographical signals through reliable and easily reproducible in vitro systems.

scholarly journals Behavior of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Obtained From Dental Tissues: A Review of the Literature

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-40
Author(s):  
Mariné Ortiz-Magdaleno DDS, MSc, PhD ◽  
Ana Isabel Romo-Tobías DDS ◽  
Fernando Romo-Ramírez DDS, MSc ◽  
Diana María Escobar DDS, MSc, PhD ◽  
Héctor Flores-Reyes DDS, MSc, PhD ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Clinical Evidence ◽  
Periodontal Regeneration ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Key Factors ◽  
Dental Tissues

The success of tissue engineering in combination with tissue regeneration depends on the behavior and cellular activity in the biological processes developed within a structure that functions as a support, better known as scaffolds, or directly at the site of the injury. The cell-cell and cell-biomaterial interaction are key factors for the induction of a specific cell behavior, together with the bioactive factors that allow the formation of the desired tissue. Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC) can be isolated from the umbilical cord and bone marrow; however, the behavior of Dental Pulp Stem Cells (DPSC) has been shown to have a high potential for the formation of bone tissue, and these cells have even been able to induce the process of angiogenesis. Advances in periodontal regeneration, dentin-pulp complex, and craniofacial bone defects through the induction of MSC obtained from tooth structures in in vitro-in vivo studies have permitted the obtaining of clinical evidence of the achievements obtained to date.

scholarly journals Human Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Incorporated Silk Fibroin as a Potential Bio-Scaffold in Guiding Bone Regeneration

Polymers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Sartika ◽  
Chih-Hsin Wang ◽  
Ding-Han Wang ◽  
Juin-Hong Cherng ◽  
Shu-Jen Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Osteogenic Differentiation ◽  
Silk Fibroin ◽  
Bone Repair ◽  
Matrix Deposition ◽  
Calvarial Defects

Recently, stem cell-based bone tissue engineering (BTE) has been recognized as a preferable and clinically significant strategy for bone repair. In this study, a pure 3D silk fibroin (SF) scaffold was fabricated as a BTE material using a lyophilization method. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of the SF scaffold with and without seeded human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hASCs) in facilitating bone regeneration. The effectiveness of the SF-hASCs scaffold was evaluated based on physical characterization, biocompatibility, osteogenic differentiation in vitro, and bone regeneration in critical rat calvarial defects in vivo. The SF scaffold demonstrated superior biocompatibility and significantly promoted osteogenic differentiation of hASCs in vitro. At six and twelve weeks postimplantation, micro-CT showed no statistical difference in new bone formation amongst all groups. However, histological staining results revealed that the SF-hASCs scaffold exhibited a better bone extracellular matrix deposition in the defect regions compared to other groups. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed this result; expression of osteoblast-related genes (BMP-2, COL1a1, and OCN) with the SF-hASCs scaffold treatment was remarkably positive, indicating their ability to achieve effective bone remodeling. Thus, these findings demonstrate that SF can serve as a potential carrier for stem cells, to be used as an osteoconductive bioscaffold for BTE applications.

scholarly journals Amniotic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Can Enhance Angiogenic Capacity via MMPsIn VitroandIn Vivo

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Jiang ◽  
Jie Ma ◽  
Yi Liang ◽  
Yuming Niu ◽  
Ning Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Umbilical Vein ◽  
3D Culture ◽  
Positive Staining ◽  
Vascular Networks ◽  
Amniotic Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
3D Culture Model

The aim of this study was to evaluate the angiogenic capacity and proteolytic mechanism of coculture using human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells (hAMSCs) with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs)in vivoandin vitroby comparing to those of coculture using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells with HUVEC. For thein vivoexperiment, cells (HUVEC-monoculture, HUVEC-hAMSC coculture, and HUVEC-BMMSC coculture) were seeded in fibrin gels and injected subcutaneously in nude mice. The samples were collected on days 7 and 14 and histologically analyzed by H&E and CD31 staining. CD31-positive staining percentage and vessel-like structure (VLS) density were evaluated as quantitative parameters for angiogenesis. The increases of CD31-positive staining area and VLS density in both HUVEC-hAMSC group and HUVEC-BMMSC group were found between two time points, while obvious decline of those was observed in HUVEC-only group. For thein vitroexperiment, we utilized the same 3D culture model to investigate the proteolytic mechanism related to capillary formation. Intensive vascular networks formed by HUVECs were associated with hAMSCs or BMMSCs and related to MMP2 and MMP9. In conclusion, hAMSCs shared similar capacity and proteolytic mechanism with BMMSCs on neovascularization.

Chondrogenic Ability of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Alginate and Collagen Sponge

2011 ◽  
Vol 474-476 ◽  
pp. 1935-1938
Author(s):  
Jiang Wu ◽  
Guang Hui Wang ◽  
Hong Zhang ◽  
Yu Ping Wu ◽  
Yang Cheng Lv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
3D Culture ◽  
Collagen Sponge ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Cartilage Defects ◽  
Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells

In the present study, we have demonstrated that alginate and collagen sponge can act as scaffolds in order to support 3-dimensional structure for the differentiated bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) during chondrogenesis in vitro and in vivo. The chondrogenic induced BMSCs were well distributed and differentiation in scaffolds system before implantation, then they produced sufficient ECM in the implants to form chondroid aggregates in vivo. In our opinion, well-differentiated BMSCs is a crucial feature of cartilage repair and only can be achieved in scaffold matrix. Furthermore, when dealing with cartilage defects, alginate seem to be superior to collagen sponge, and the combinational strategy of pre-induced BMSCs combined with alginate 3D-culture might be useful in improving conventional autologous cells transplantation or free-cells scaffolds.

scholarly journals A comparative in vitro and in vivo study of osteogenicity by using two biomaterials and two human mesenchymal stem cell subtypes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucile Fievet ◽  
Nicolas Serratrice ◽  
Benedicte Brulin ◽  
Laurent Giraudo ◽  
Julie Veran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Bone Repair ◽  
Transcript Level ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell ◽  
In Vivo Experiments

Bone repair induced by stem cells and biomaterials may represent an alternative to autologous bone grafting. Here, we compared the efficiency of two biomaterials - biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) and bioactive glass (BG) - when loaded with either adult bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) or newborn nasal ecto-mesenchymal stem cells (NE-MSCs), the latter being collected for further repair of lip cleft-associated bone loss. Both cell types display the typical stem cell surface markers CD73+/CD90+/CD105+/nestin, and exhibit the MSC-associated osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic multipotency. NE-MSCs produce less collagen and alkaline phosphatase than BM-MSCs. At the transcript level, NE-MSCs express more abundantly three genes coding for bone sialoprotein, osteocalcin and osteopontin, while BM-MSCs produce extra copies of RUNX2. BM-MSCs and NE-MSCs adhere and survive on BCP and BG. In vivo experiments reveal that bone formation is only observed with BM-MSCs transplanted on BCP biomaterial.

scholarly journals Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Bone Regenerative Medicine: What Is the Evidence?

2017 ◽  
Vol 204 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Oryan ◽  
Amir Kamali ◽  
Ali Moshiri ◽  
Mohamadreza Baghaban Eslaminejad
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Regenerative Medicine ◽  
Bone Repair ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Time Of Application

Healing and regeneration of bone injuries, particularly those that are associated with large bone defects, are a complicated process. There is growing interest in the application of osteoinductive and osteogenic growth factors and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in order to significantly improve bone repair and regeneration. MSCs are multipotent stromal stem cells that can be harvested from many different sources and differentiated into a variety of cell types, such as preosteogenic chondroblasts and osteoblasts. The effectiveness of MSC therapy is dependent on several factors, including the differentiating state of the MSCs at the time of application, the method of their delivery, the concentration of MSCs per injection, the vehicle used, and the nature and extent of injury, for example. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, together with genetic engineering and gene therapy, are advanced options that may have the potential to improve the outcome of cell therapy. Although several in vitro and in vivo investigations have suggested the potential roles of MSCs in bone repair and regeneration, the mechanism of MSC therapy in bone repair has not been fully elucidated, the efficacy of MSC therapy has not been strongly proven in clinical trials, and several controversies exist, making it difficult to draw conclusions from the results. In this review, we update the recent advances in the mechanisms of MSC action and the delivery approaches in bone regenerative medicine. We will also review the most recent clinical trials to find out how MSCs may be beneficial for treating bone defects.

scholarly journals Vascular Stem Cells in Vascular Remodeling and Diseases

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Anna Meiliana ◽  
Andi Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Blood Vessels ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Tissue Expansion ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Vascular Stem Cells

BACKGROUND: Blood vessels are a source of stem and progenitor cells, which likely contribute to a variety of vascular processes and diseases. Emerging concepts in this field could influence therapeutic approaches to diseases of blood vessels such as atherosclerosis.CONTENT: Vascular Stem Cells (VSCs) field is only beginning to emerge, and thus, many issues regarding VSCs’s identity and function remain poorly understood. In fact, even after decades of intensive research, Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC), which is suggested to be VSCs, is still having many outstanding issues of its own. And, on top of this, likewise decades-long intensive pericyte research has not been able resolve the identity issue. While favors Adventitial Progenitor Cells (APCs) over pericytes as the likely VSC candidate, it should be pointed out that currently the opposite view (i.e., pericytes as VSCs) is more prevalent, and many excellent reviews, including a recent one, have discussed this issue extensively.SUMMARY: It has been postulated that, within the vasculature, APCs could differentiate into pericytes (CD34- CD31- CD140b+ SMA-), endothelial cells (CD34+ CD31+ CD140b- SMA-), and smooth muscle cells (SMCs) (CD34- CD31- CD140b- SMA+); and during tissue expansion or repair, APCs could also differentiate into tissue-specific cell types (e.g., muscle and fat) Thus, in vitro, APCs fulfill all criteria for being VSCs. Meanwhile, in vivo evidence is still limited and will require further investigation.KEYWORDS: vascular stem cells, VSC, mesenchymal stem cells, MSC, endothelial progenitor cells, EPC, adventitial progenitor cells, APC

Autologous transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells into the portal vein of the miniature pig; a preliminary experiment for NOTES approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (9) ◽  
pp. 350-355
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Liver Parenchyma ◽  
Miniature Pig ◽  
Hepatic Diseases ◽  
Study Results

Introduction: There is evidence that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) could trans-differentiate into the liver cells in vitro and in vivo and thus may be used as an unfailing source for stem cell therapy of liver disease. Combination of MSCs (with or without their differentiation in vitro) and minimally invasive procedures as laparoscopy or Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) represents a chance for many patients waiting for liver transplantation in vain. Methods: Over 30 millions of autologous MSCs at passage 3 were transplanted via the portal vein in an eight months old miniature pig. The deposition of transplanted cells in liver parenchyma was evaluated histologically and the trans-differential potential of CM-DiI labeled cells was assessed by expression of pig albumin using immunofluorescence. Results: Three weeks after transplantation we detected the labeled cells (solitary, small clusters) in all 10 samples (2 samples from each lobe) but no diffuse distribution in the samples. The localization of CM-DiI+ cells was predominantly observed around the portal triads. We also detected the localization of albumin signal in CM-DiI labeled cells. Conclusion: The study results showed that the autologous MSCs (without additional hepatic differentiation in vitro) transplantation through the portal vein led to successful infiltration of intact miniature pig liver parenchyma with detectable in vivo trans-differentiation. NOTES as well as other newly developed surgical approaches in combination with cell therapy seem to be very promising for the treatment of hepatic diseases in near future.

Regeneration of Bone Defects Using Bioactive Glass Combined with Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. An experimental in vivo study

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 1983-1987
Author(s):  
Cristian Trambitas ◽  
Anca Maria Pop ◽  
Alina Dia Trambitas Miron ◽  
Dorin Constantin Dorobantu ◽  
Flaviu Tabaran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Bioactive Glass ◽  
Bone Repair ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Calvarial Bone ◽  
Specific Protocol ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Male Wistar Rats

Large bone defects are a medical concern as these are often unable to heal spontaneously, based on the host bone repair mechanisms. In their treatment, bone tissue engineering techniques represent a promising approach by providing a guide for osseous regeneration. As bioactive glasses proved to have osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties, the aim of our study was to evaluate by histologic examination, the differences in the healing of critical-sized calvarial bone defects filled with bioactive glass combined with adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells, compared to negative controls. We used 16 male Wistar rats subjected to a specific protocol based on which 2 calvarial bone defects were created in each animal, one was filled with Bon Alive S53P4 bioactive glass and adipose-derived stem cells and the other one was considered control. At intervals of one week during the following month, the animals were euthanized and the specimens from bone defects were histologically examined and compared. The results showed that this biomaterial was biocompatible and the first signs of osseous healing appeared in the third week. Bone Alive S53P4 bioactive glass could be an excellent bone substitute, reducing the need of bone grafts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document