scholarly journals Alternatives to Outdoor Daylight Illumination for Photodynamic Therapy—Use of Greenhouses and Artificial Light Sources

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catharina Lerche ◽  
Ida Heerfordt ◽  
Jakob Heydenreich ◽  
Hans Wulf
Keyword(s):  
Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Artificial Light ◽  
Light Sources

Use of photodynamic therapy for photodamage skin (review of literature)

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (7) ◽  
pp. 19-23
Author(s):  
S. I. Surkichin ◽  
N. V. Gryazeva ◽  
L. S. Kholupova ◽  
N. V. Bochkova
Keyword(s):  
Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Light Sources ◽  
Review Of Literature ◽  
Photosensitizing Agents ◽  
Selection Of

The article provides an overview of the use of photodynamic therapy for photodamage of the skin. The causes, pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of skin photodamage are considered. The definition, principle of action of photodynamic therapy, including the sources of light used, the classification of photosensitizers and their main characteristics are given. Analyzed studies that show the effectiveness and comparative evaluation in the selection of various light sources and photosensitizing agents for photodynamic therapy in patients with clinical manifestations of photodamage.

scholarly journals The Effect of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Using Chlorophyllin–Phycocyanin Mixture on Enterococcus faecalis: The Influence of Different Light Sources

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasim Chiniforush ◽  
Maryam Pourhajibagher ◽  
Steven Parker ◽  
Stefano Benedicenti ◽  
Abbas Bahador ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Diode Laser ◽  
Enterococcus Faecalis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Human Gingival Fibroblast ◽  
Light Sources ◽  
Gingival Fibroblast ◽  
Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Cell Viability Assay ◽  
Vitro Effect

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro effect of the chlorophyllin–phycocyanin mixture (Photoactive+) as a photosensitizer (PS) during antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) on the count of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) using different light sources. The antimicrobial effect of aPDT with chlorophyllin–phycocyanin mixture using different light sources including diode laser (λ = 660 nm), diode laser (λ = 635 nm), LED (λ = 450 ± 30 nm) alone or in combination was assessed using microbial cell viability assay against E. faecalis. In addition, the cell cytotoxicity of Photoactive+ was assessed on human gingival fibroblast (HuGu) cells by MTT assay; E. faecalis growth when treated by both red wavelengths (635 nm, 660 nm) and combination of LED (420–480 nm) and red wavelengths (635 nm, 660 nm), significantly reduced compared to the control group (p < 0.05). There was no significant reduction in the number of viable cells exposed to Photoactive+ compared to the control group (p < 0.05). This study shows that the application of chlorophyllin–phycocyanin mixture and irradiation with emission of red light achieved a better result for bacterial count reduction, compared to a control. This component can be applied safely due to very negligible cytotoxicity.

scholarly journals Response of Polycrystalline Solar Cell Outputs to Visible Spectrum and other Light Sources-a Case Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 4096
Author(s):  
Ayman Y. Al-Rawashdeh ◽  
Omar Albarbarawi ◽  
Ghazi Qaryouti
Keyword(s):  
Solar Cells ◽  
Visible Spectrum ◽  
Artificial Light ◽  
Light Sources ◽  
Variable Response ◽  
Artificial Illumination ◽  
Different Color ◽  
Color Filters ◽  
Sunlight Radiation

<p>In this case study, two polycrystalline solar modules were installed outdoors (irradiated by sunlight) and indoors (irradiated by artificial lights). The solar cells in both cases were installed using different color filters that allowed the passage of certain light frequencies. The amount of energy produced by each module were measured and compared to a reference module with no filter. The results indicated the variable response of polycrystalline solar cells to natural and artificial light sources, being more responsive in both cases to red band color as could be deduced from their % current outputs (72.5% sunlight radiation; 84.38% artificial light sources). Other colors, including yellow, green, orange and violet afforded acceptable outputs. The results indicated that electrical outputs of indoor solar cells decreased when colored filters were used, but red filter in general afforded the maximum outputs, for both the artificially radiated indoor and naturally radiated outdoor solar cells. The case study suggests the possible complementary advantage of using indoor mounted solar cells for the production of electricity during artificial illumination period of the day.</p>

scholarly journals Light Quality of Artificial Light Sources for Agriculture

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-145
Author(s):  
Hiroshi HAMAMOTO ◽  
Keisuke YAMAZAKI
Keyword(s):  
Light Quality ◽  
Artificial Light ◽  
Light Sources
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document