scholarly journals Study Protocol: Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Oxaliplatin, Cisplatin and Doxorubicin Applied as PIPAC in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases

Author(s):  
Manuela Robella ◽  
Paola Berchialla ◽  
Alice Borsano ◽  
Armando Cinquegrana ◽  
Alba Ilari Civit ◽  
...  

Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel laparoscopic intraperitoneal chemotherapy approach offered in selected patients affected by non-resectable peritoneal carcinomatosis. Drugs doses currently established for nebulization are very low: oxaliplatin (OXA) 120 mg/sm, cisplatin (CDDP) 10.5 mg/sm and doxorubicin (DXR) 2.1 mg/sm. A model-based approach for dose-escalation design in a single PIPAC procedure and subsequent dose escalation steps is planned. The starting dose of oxaliplatin is 100 mg/sm with a maximum estimated dose of 300 mg/sm; an escalation with overdose and under-dose control (for probability of toxicity less than 16% in case of under-dosing and probability of toxicity greater than 33% in case of overdosing) will be further applied. Cisplatin is used in association with doxorubicin: A two-dimensional dose-finding design is applied on the basis of the estimated dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at all combinations. The starting doses are 15 mg/sm for cisplatin and 3 mg/sm for doxorubicin. Safety is assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4.03). Secondary endpoints include radiological response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (version 1.1) and pharmacokinetic analyses. This phase I study can provide the scientific basis to maximize the optimal dose of cisplatin, doxorubicin and oxaliplatin applied as PIPAC.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 209-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Berenson ◽  
H. Yang ◽  
R. Swift ◽  
K. Sadler ◽  
R. Vescio ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Bortezomib (VELCADE®) is a proteasome inhibitor that has demonstrated durable responses as monotherapy for the treatment of pts with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. In vitro, bortezomib has been shown to restore melphalan sensitivity to melphalan-resistant cell lines (U266-LR7) and to synergize with melphalan in killing myeloma cells, thereby allowing the use of lower concentrations of melphalan (Ma et al, Clin Cancer Res.2003;9:1136). The objective of this dose-escalation phase I/II study was to determine an optimal dose of combination bortezomib + melphalan, starting with doses below those usually recommended for each agent for pts with refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma. Dose limiting toxicities, safety, tolerability, and activity were assesed in a dose-escalation study. Methods : Bortezomib 0.7 mg/m2 was administered by IV push on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 in combination with oral melphalan (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.25 mg/kg) on days 1–4 every 4 weeks for up to 8 cycles to 3-pt cohorts with active progressive disease. In the absence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), bortezomib was increased to 1.0 mg/m2 and melphalan co-administered using the original 5 escalating doses to subsequent cohorts. Results : Twenty six pts (50% male, median age 55 years, range 33–90 years) have been accrued to the study. The myeloma subtypes include IgG (16/26), IgA (4/26), IgM (2/26) and light chain only (4/26). The median ß2 microglobulin level was 5.0 mg/L (range 2.2–14 mg/L). In this heavily pretreated population (range 2–7 prior therapies), 12 patients received prior melphalan, 12 prior thalidomide, 7 prior CC-5013, 13 prior VAD, 2 prior bortezomib, and 8 prior autologous stem cell transplantation. Dose escalation has proceeded into the bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2 + melphalan 0.10 mg/kg cohort. Toxicities have been manageable. One DLT, grade 4 anemia, was observed at bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2 + melphalan 0.025 mg/kg, requiring expansion of that specific cohort. Grade 3 events were predominantly associated with myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) and were observed only among pts with baseline cytopenia. Among the 12 pts with baseline peripheral neuropathy (PN), symptoms worsened transiently in 1 pt, resolved in 1 pt, and remained stable in the other pts. Treatment-related PN (grade 1) developed de novo in 2 pts. Responses were observed in 67% (16/24 evaluable) of pts: 1 CR, 1 near CR, 6 PR, and 8 MR. The CR and near CR occurred in pts receiving bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2 in combination with melphalan .025 mg/kg. PR or better was independent of prior type of therapy and was also observed among pts who had previously received melphalan or bortezomib. Median time to progression was 1-18 mo. Six active pts out of 26 total pts remain progression-free for 2-8+ mo. Conclusion : Combination bortezomib plus oral melphalan is a promising regimen for the treatment of relapsed, refractory myeloma. The responses that were observed in pts who had previously received either drug serve as preliminary confirmation of preclinical evidence that the combination of low-dose bortezomib and melphalan has the capacity for chemosensitization and suggest possible synergy. Dose escalation with melphalan plus a fixed dose of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2 is continuing in order to explore the full potential of this combination.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3688-3688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asher Alban Chanan-Khan ◽  
Nikhil C. Munshi ◽  
Mohamad A. Hussein ◽  
Laurence Elias ◽  
Fabio Benedetti ◽  
...  

Abstract Telomerase over-expression is the predominant mechanism by which cancer cells maintain adequate telomere length to achieve immortalization. Telomere length is often decreased and telomerase activity is often increased in MM. GRN163L is a 13-mer oligonucleotide that directly inhibits telomerase activity and has demonstrated anticancer effects in various preclinical models. We are conducting a phase I dose escalation study to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, tolerability, efficacy as well as pharmacokinetics of GRN163L in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Each treatment cycle consisted of 3 weekly 2 hr i.v. infusions of GRN163L. Dose escalation followed standard “3+3” dose finding rules. To date, 12 patients, median age 61 years, have been treated in 3 dose cohorts (3.2, 4.8 and 7.2 mg/kg). Patients had received a median of 4.0 prior treatment regimens. All patients had normal baseline neutrophil and 10 had normal baseline platelet counts. Patients completed a median of 2 cycles of GRN163L treatment, with one receiving 4 and another 6 cycles. GRN163L has been generally well-tolerated to date. One patient had Gr 3 anorexia however all other related or possibly related non-hematologic AEs to date were Gr 1 or 2. Treatment related events included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, aPTT prolongation, anemia, fatigue, nausea, anorexia, and dizziness. No dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred among patients in the first 2 cohorts. All patients exhibited transient dose-related aPTT prolongations, which resolved in parallel with decreasing GRN163L plasma levels. There were no bleeding episodes or clinical signs of complement activation. Two of the 5 patients in the 7.2 mg/kg cohort had transient prolongation of aPTT to > 3 fold of the upper limit of normal. One patient in the highest dose group had Gr 4 thrombocytopenia in Cycle 1, which constituted a DLT. Delayed (cycle 2 or later) Gr 3 or 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia was noted in 5 additional patients with no episodes of febrile neutropenia. Maximal post-infusion plasma concentrations (Cmax) of GRN163L have been linear with respect to dose. Mean (± SD) plasma concentration of GRN163L declined by 41.1 ±17.6 %, N=9, over the 2 hours following the first infusion, consistent with other previously reported studies. DLTs observed in this study were thrombocytopenia and aPTT prolongation. The MTD for continuous weekly dosing of GRN163L in this heavily pretreated, relapsed and refractory MM population appears to be ≥ 4.8 and < 7.2 mg/kg. The most marked hematologic toxicity was observed in two patients with prior autologous stem cell transplantation. Exploration of intermediate dose levels in this range is continuing. Additional studies exploring alternative dosing schedules will be initiated.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e050725
Author(s):  
Jeroen H A Creemers ◽  
Inka Pawlitzky ◽  
Konstantina Grosios ◽  
Uzi Gileadi ◽  
Mark R Middleton ◽  
...  

IntroductionThe undiminished need for more effective cancer treatments stimulates the development of novel cancer immunotherapy candidates. The archetypical cancer immunotherapy would induce robust, targeted and long-lasting immune responses while simultaneously circumventing immunosuppression in the tumour microenvironment. For this purpose, we developed a novel immunomodulatory nanomedicine: PRECIOUS-01. As a PLGA-based nanocarrier, PRECIOUS-01 encapsulates a tumour antigen (NY-ESO-1) and an invariant natural killer T cell activator to target and augment specific antitumour immune responses in patients with NY-ESO-1-expressing advanced cancers.Methods and analysisThis open-label, first-in-human, phase I dose-escalation trial investigates the safety, tolerability and immune-modulatory activity of increasing doses of PRECIOUS-01 administered intravenously in subjects with advanced NY-ESO-1-expressing solid tumours. A total of 15 subjects will receive three intravenous infusions of PRECIOUS-01 at a 3-weekly interval in three dose-finding cohorts. The trial follows a 3+3 design for the dose-escalation steps to establish a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Depending on the toxicity, the two highest dosing cohorts will be extended to delineate the immune-related parameters as a readout for pharmacodynamics. Subjects will be monitored for safety and the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities. If the MTD is not reached in the planned dose-escalation cohorts, the RP2D will be based on the observed safety and immune-modulatory activity as a pharmacodynamic parameter supporting the RP2D. The preliminary efficacy will be evaluated as an exploratory endpoint using the best overall response rate, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1.Ethics and disseminationThe Dutch competent authority (CCMO) reviewed the trial application and the medical research ethics committee (CMO Arnhem-Nijmegen) approved the trial under registration number NL72876.000.20. The results will be disseminated via (inter)national conferences and submitted for publication to a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNCT04751786.


2012 ◽  
Vol 224 (06) ◽  
pp. 398-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Witt ◽  
T. Milde ◽  
H. Deubzer ◽  
I. Oehme ◽  
R. Witt ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. e51039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Le Tourneau ◽  
Hui K. Gan ◽  
Albiruni R. A. Razak ◽  
Xavier Paoletti

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (suppl 5) ◽  
pp. v109.3-v109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Hickey ◽  
Horacio Soto ◽  
Janet Treger ◽  
Kate Erickson ◽  
Colin Malone ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document