scholarly journals Bariatric Procedures in Older Adults in the United States: Analysis of a Multicenter Database

Geriatrics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mendiratta ◽  
Dayama ◽  
Azhar ◽  
Prodhan ◽  
Wei
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facility ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Choice Of Procedure

Background: Bariatric procedures help reduce obesity-related comorbidities and thus improve survival. Clinical characteristics and outcomes after bariatric procedures in older adults were investigated. Methods: A multi-institutional Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried from years 2005 through 2012. Older adults >60 years of age with procedure codes for bariatric procedures and a diagnosis of obesity/morbid obesity were selected to compare clinical characteristics/outcomes between those undergoing closed versus open procedures and identify risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality and increased hospital length of stay (LOS). Results: Over the study period, 79,122 bariatric procedures were performed. Those undergoing open procedures compared to closed procedures had a higher in-hospital mortality (0.8% vs. 0.2%) and a longer hospital LOS (4.8 days vs. 2.2 days). Risk factors significantly associated with in-hospital mortality were open procedures, the Western region, and the Elixhauser comorbidity index. Risk factors associated with increased LOS were Medicaid insurance type, an open procedure, a higher Elixhauser comorbidity score, a required skilled nursing facility (SNF) discharge, and died in hospital. Conclusion: Closed bariatric procedures are increasingly being preferred in older adults, with a four-fold lower mortality compared to open procedures. Besides choice of procedure, the presence of specific comorbidities is associated with increased mortality in older adults.

scholarly journals 132 Physical Function Comparison of Acutely Unwell COVID-Negative Older Adults Pre-Pandemic and Through-Pandemic; “Covid-Protected”

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i12-i42
Author(s):  
S Ritchie ◽  
C Snape ◽  
N Triteos ◽  
R Vamadevan ◽  
L Olesk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Gait Speed ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Ethical Review ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Elderly Mobility

Abstract Introduction The risk of severe morbidity after COVID-19 infection is high in older adults (Lithander et al, 2020). Subsequent responsive UK Government guidance for older adults included self-isolation during the pandemic. It is therefore hypothesised that during the pandemic older adults are inadvertently deconditioned due to iatrogenic factors such as inactivity, social isolation, hospital-avoidance and malnutrition, and present with reduced resilience to illness and lower levels of function. The OPU continued to admit COVID-negative, or recently termed “COVID-protected”, patients throughout the pandemic. Data captured prior to, and during the COVID-19 pandemic has been compared to explore the implications on older adults, and elicit whether they are protected from the consequences of the pandemic? Method Demographic and physical function data (average 6 m gait-speed, Elderly Mobility Scale) were captured pre- and through-pandemic for all patients admitted to a COVID-negative OPU ward over a one month period. Ethical review was provided through local Trust governance process. Results Pre-pandemic 2019 (n = 67, mean(±SD) age 82.7(±8.2) years, 61%, hospital length-of-stay (LOS) 7.9(±7.3) days, hospital mortality-rate 7.2%) and through-pandemic 2020 (n = 73, 83.1(±8.3) years, 59%♀, LOS 9.0(±9.1) days, hospital mortality-rate 7.5%) data were captured during July 2019 and May 2020 respectively. There were no between-group differences in age [t(−.313) = 138, p = 0.755], gender [X2, 1 df, p = 0.782], LOS [t(0.78) = 134, p = 0.44], or hospital mortality-rate [X2 1 df, p = 0.96]. Through-pandemic patients had a significantly slower 6 m gait-speed (0.11(±0.05) m.s-1) than pre-pandemic (0.16(±0.24) m.s-1); [t(2.74) = 93, p = 0.007] and lower median (IQR) Elderly Mobility Scale (4(6 IQR) vs 9 (12 IQR) [u = 866, p = 0.015]). Conclusion Our data indicates this relatively short period of self-isolation might have significant implications on the physical function of older adults. The likely mechanism is iatrogenic deconditioning. Critical Public Health and policy responses are required to mitigate these unforeseen risks by deploying prehabilitative counter-measures and accurately targeted hospital and community rehabilitation.

Impact of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism on Postoperative Morbidity, Mortality, and Resource Utilization after Hepatectomy

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (12) ◽  
pp. 1216-1223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy E. Newhook ◽  
Damien J. Lapar ◽  
Dustin M. Walters ◽  
Shruti Gupta ◽  
Joshua S. Jolissaint ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
The United States ◽  
Albumin Level ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Resource Usage ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
The Impact

The impact of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hepatectomy on patient morbidity, mortality, and resource usage remains poorly defined. Better understanding of thromboembolic complications is needed to improve perioperative management and overall outcomes. About 3973 patients underwent hepatectomy within NSQIP between 2005 and 2008. Patient characteristics, operative features, and postoperative correlates of VTE were compared with identify risk factors for VTE and to assess its overall impact on postoperative outcomes. Overall incidence of postoperative VTE was 2.4 per cent. Risk factors for postoperative VTE included older age, male gender, compromised functional status, degree of intraoperative blood transfusion, preoperative albumin level (all P < 0.05), and extent of hepatectomy ( P = 0.004). Importantly, major postoperative complications, including acute renal failure, pneumonia, sepsis, septic shock, reintubation, prolonged ventilation, cardiac arrest, and reoperation were all associated with higher rates of VTE (all P < 0.05). Operative mortality was increased among patients with VTE (6.5% vs 2.4%, P = 0.03), and patients with VTE had a 2-fold increase in hospital length of stay (12.0 vs 6.0 days, P < 0.001). Postoperative VTE remains a significant source of morbidity, mortality, and increased resource usage after hepatectomy in the United States. Routine aggressive VTE prophylaxis measures are imperative to avoid development of VTE among patients requiring hepatectomy.

scholarly journals Interim Analysis of Risk Factors for Severe Outcomes among a Cohort of Hospitalized Adults Identified through the U.S. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network (COVID-NET)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Kim ◽  
Shikha Garg ◽  
Alissa O'Halloran ◽  
Michael Whitaker ◽  
Huong Pham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Surveillance Network ◽  
Adjusted Risk ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Male Sex ◽  
Race Ethnicity

Background: As of May 15, 2020, the United States has reported the greatest number of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases and deaths globally. Objective: To describe risk factors for severe outcomes among adults hospitalized with COVID-19. Design: Cohort study of patients identified through the Coronavirus Disease 2019-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network. Setting: 154 acute care hospitals in 74 counties in 13 states. Patients: 2491 patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 during March 1-May 2, 2020. Measurements: Age, sex, race/ethnicity, and underlying medical conditions. Results: Ninety-two percent of patients had at least 1 underlying condition; 32% required intensive care unit (ICU) admission; 19% invasive mechanical ventilation; 15% vasopressors; and 17% died during hospitalization. Independent factors associated with ICU admission included ages 50-64, 65-74, 75-84 and 85+ years versus 18-39 years (adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 1.53, 1.65, 1.84 and 1.43, respectively); male sex (aRR 1.34); obesity (aRR 1.31); immunosuppression (aRR 1.29); and diabetes (aRR 1.13). Independent factors associated with in-hospital mortality included ages 50-64, 65-74, 75-84 and 85+ years versus 18-39 years (aRR 3.11, 5.77, 7.67 and 10.98, respectively); male sex (aRR 1.30); immunosuppression (aRR 1.39); renal disease (aRR 1.33); chronic lung disease (aRR 1.31); cardiovascular disease (aRR 1.28); neurologic disorders (aRR 1.25); and diabetes (aRR 1.19). Race/ethnicity was not associated with either ICU admission or death. Limitation: Data were limited to patients who were discharged or died in-hospital and had complete chart abstractions; patients who were still hospitalized or did not have accessible medical records were excluded. Conclusion: In-hospital mortality for COVID-19 increased markedly with increasing age. These data help to characterize persons at highest risk for severe COVID-19-associated outcomes and define target groups for prevention and treatment strategies.

Prevalence and Inpatient Hospital Outcomes of Malignancy-Related Ascites in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-53
Author(s):  
Venkataraghavan Ramamoorthy ◽  
Muni Rubens ◽  
Anshul Saxena ◽  
Chintan Bhatt ◽  
Sankalp Das ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
National Database ◽  
Hospital Outcomes ◽  
Inpatient Hospital ◽  
Male Sex

Objective: Malignancy-related ascites (MRA) is the terminal stage of many advanced cancers, and the treatment is mainly palliative. This study looked for epidemiology and inpatient hospital outcomes of patients with MRA in the United States using a national database. Methods: The current study was a cross-sectional analysis of 2015 National Inpatient Sample data and consisted of patients ≥18 years with MRA. Descriptive statistics were used for understanding demographics, clinical characteristics, and MRA hospitalization costs. Multivariate regression models were used to identify predictors of length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Results: There were 123 410 MRA hospitalizations in 2015. The median length of stay was 4.7 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.5-8.6 days), median cost of hospitalization was US$43 543 (IQR: US$23 485-US$82 248), and in-hospital mortality rate was 8.8% (n = 10 855). Multivariate analyses showed that male sex, black race, and admission to medium and large hospitals were associated with increased hospital length of stay. Factors associated with higher in-hospital mortality rates included male sex; Asian or Pacific Islander race; beneficiaries of private insurance, Medicaid, and self-pay; patients residing in large central and small metro counties; nonelective admission type; and rural and urban nonteaching hospitals. Conclusions: Our study showed that many demographic, socioeconomic, health care, and geographic factors were associated with hospital length of stay and in-hospital mortality and may suggest disparities in quality of care. These factors could be targeted for preventing unplanned hospitalization, decreasing hospital length of stay, and lowering in-hospital mortality for this population.

scholarly journals Analysis of risk factors for unplanned reoperation following primary repair of gastrointestinal disorders in neonates

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Cui ◽  
Rong Cao ◽  
Jia Li ◽  
Ling-mei Deng
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Gastrointestinal Disorders ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Link Type

Abstract Background The aim of our study was to identify the factors associated with unplanned reoperations among neonates who had undergone primary repair of gastrointestinal disorders. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted for neonates who underwent primary gastrointestinal surgery between July 2018 and September 2020. The neonates were divided into two cohort, depending on whether they had an unplanned reoperation. The primary outcome was the occurrence of unplanned reoperation. The risk factors that associated the occurrence of unplanned reoperation were examined. Main results Two hundred ninety-six neonates fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The incidence of unplanned reoperation was 9.8%. Analyses of all patients with respect of developing unplanned reoperation showed that the length of operative time was an independent risk factor [Odds Ratio 1.02; 95% confidence interval 1.00, 1.04; p = 0.03]. Patients with unplanned reoperation had a longer postoperative hospital length-of-stay [19.9 ± 14.7 vs. 44.1 ± 32.1 days; p<0.01]. Conclusion The current study is the first analysis of risk factors associated with an unplanned reoperation in neonates undergoing primary repair of gastrointestinal disorders. The length of operative time is the only risk factor for an unplanned reoperation, and the unplanned reoperation can directly prolong the postoperative hospital length-of-stay. Trial registration This study was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx with No. ChiCTR2000040260.

scholarly journals Clinical characteristics, risk factors, prognosis and immune status of secondary infection of sepsis: a retrospective observational study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Chen ◽  
Yanyan Hu ◽  
Jin Zhang ◽  
Yue Shen ◽  
Junling Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Immune Status ◽  
Secondary Infection ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Infection Group ◽  
Hla Dr

Abstract Background: Secondary infection in hospital was found to have a higher incidence in septic patients and affect clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics, risk factors, prognosis and immune status of secondary infection of sepsis. Methods: A four-year retrospective study was carried out in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, enrolling septic patients admitted between 2014 January and 2018 January. Data were acquired from medical records. The flow cytometry was performed to measure the CD14+ monocyte human leukocyte antigen-D related (HLA-DR) expression. Serum cytokines levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. Results: A total of 297 septic patients were enrolled, 92 of whom developed 150 cases of secondary infections. Respiratory tract was the most common site of secondary infection (n = 84, 56%) and Acinetobacter baumanii the most commonly isolated pathogen (n = 38, 32%). Urinary and deep venous catheterization increased the risk of developing secondary infection. Lower HLA-DR expression and elevated IL-10 level were found in secondary infection group. The expected prolonged in-hospital length of stay owing to secondary infection was 4.63 days. Secondary infection was also associated with higher in-hospital, 30-day and 90-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Log-rank test revealed secondary infection group had a worse survival between day 15 and day 90. Conclusions: Urinary and deep venous catheter indwelling increased the risk of developing secondary infection. Secondary infection influenced outcomes of septic patients and prolonged in-hospital length of stay. Immunosuppression led to a higher tendency to developing secondary infection. Keywords: Sepsis, Secondary infection, Immunosuppression, HLA-DR, Cytokine

scholarly journals Rate of Antibiotic Use and Associated Risk Factors in COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alysa J. Martin ◽  
Stephanie Shulder ◽  
David Dobrzynski ◽  
Katelyn Quartuccio ◽  
Kelly E. Pillinger
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Associated Risk Factors

AbstractBackgroundLiterature suggests that antibiotic prescribing in COVID-19 patients is high, despite low rates of confirmed bacterial infection. There are little data on what drives prescribing habits.ObjectiveThis study sought to determine antibiotic prescribing rates and risk factors for antibiotic prescribing in hospitalized patients. It was the first study to assess risk factors for receiving more than one course of antibiotics.MethodsThis was a retrospective, multi-center, observational study. Patients admitted from March 1, 2020 to May 31, 2020 and treated for PCR-confirmed COVID-19 were included. The primary endpoint was the rate of antibiotic use during hospitalization. Secondary endpoints included risk factors associated with antibiotic use, risk factors associated with receiving more than one antibiotic course, and rate of microbiologically confirmed infections.ResultsA total of 208 encounters (198 patients) were included in the final analysis. Eighty-three percent of patients received at least one course of antibiotics, despite low rates of microbiologically confirmed infection (12%). Almost one-third of patients (30%) received more than one course of antibiotics. Risk factors identified for both antibiotic prescribing and receiving more than one course of antibiotics were more serious illness, increased hospital length of stay, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and acute respiratory distress syndrome.Conclusion and relevanceThere were high rates of antibiotic prescribing with low rates of bacterial co-infection. Many patients received more than one course of antibiotics during hospitalization. This study highlights the need for increased antibiotic stewardship practices in COVID-19 patients.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients by Risk Factors: Results from a United States Hospital Claims Database

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Mallow ◽  
Kathy W. Belk ◽  
Michael Topmiller ◽  
Edmond A. Hooker
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Improve Risk Stratification ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Secondary Objective

Background/Objective: The primary objective was to quantify the role of the number of Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) risk factors on in-hospital mortality. The secondary objective was to assess the associated hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) bed utilization, and ICU LOS with the number of CDC risk factors. Methods: A retrospective cohort study consisting of all hospitalizations with a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis discharged between March 15, 2020 and April 30, 2020 was conducted. Data was obtained from 276 acute care hospitals across the United States. Cohorts were identified based upon the number of the CDC COVID-19 risk factors. Multivariable regression modeling was performed to assess outcomes and utilization. The odds ratio (OR) and incidence rate ratio (IRR) were reported. Results: Compared with patients with no CDC risk factors, patients with risk factors were significantly more likely to die during the hospitalization: One risk factor (OR 2.08, 95% CI, 1.60–2.70; P < 0.001), two risk factors (OR 2.63, 95% CI, 2.00–3.47; P < 0.001), and three or more risk factors (OR 3.49, 95% CI, 2.53–4.80; P < 0.001). The presence of CDC risk factors was associated with increased ICU utilization, longer ICU LOS, and longer hospital LOS compared to those with no risk factors. Patients with hypertension (OR 0.77, 95% CI, 0.70–0.86; P < 0.001) and those administered statins were less likely to die (OR 0.54, 95% CI, 0.49–0.60; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Quantifying the role of CDC risk factors upon admission may improve risk stratification and identification of patients who may require closer monitoring and more intensive treatment.

scholarly journals Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (02) ◽  
pp. 132-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyam Batra ◽  
Purva Mathur ◽  
Mahesh C. Misra
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Resistance Pattern ◽  
Pathogenic Potential ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Venous Catheterization ◽  
Potential Pathogen ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia earlier had limited pathogenic potential, but now with growing degree of immunosuppression in general population, it is being recognized as an important nosocomial pathogen. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective 7 years study was carried out to determine the clinical characteristics of all patients with Stenotrophomonas infections, antibiotic resistance pattern, and risk factors associated with hospital mortality. All patients with Stenotrophomonas culture positivity were identified and their medical records were reviewed. Risk factor associated with hospital mortality was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 123 samples obtained from 88 patients were culture positive. Most patients presented with bacteremia (45, 51%) followed by pneumonia (37, 42%) and skin and soft tissue infections (6, 7%). About 23 of 88 Stenotrophomonas infected patients had co-infection. Percentage resistance to cotrimoxazole; 8 (5.4%) was lower than that for levofloxacin; 18 (12%). Twenty-eight patients died during hospital stay. Intensive Care Unit admission (P = 0.0002), mechanical ventilation (P = 0.0004), central venous catheterization (P = 0.0227), urethral catheterization (P = 0.0484), and previous antibiotic intake (P = 0.0026) were independent risk factors associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that Stenotrophomonas can cause various infections irrespective of patient’s immune status and irrespective of potential source. Thus, Stenotrophomonas should be thought of as potential pathogen and its isolation should be looked with clinical suspicion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document