scholarly journals Clinical and Genetic Findings in Children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1, Legius Syndrome, and Other Related Neurocutaneous Disorders

Genes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Giugliano ◽  
Claudia Santoro ◽  
Annalaura Torella ◽  
Francesca Del Vecchio Blanco ◽  
Anna Grandone ◽  
...  

Pigmentary manifestations can represent an early clinical sign in children affected by Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), Legius syndrome, and other neurocutaneous disorders. The differential molecular diagnosis of these pathologies is a challenge that can now be met by combining next generation sequencing of target genes with concurrent second-level tests, such as multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and RNA analysis. We clinically and genetically investigated 281 patients, almost all pediatric cases, presenting with either NF1 (n = 150), only pigmentary features (café au lait macules with or without freckling; (n = 95), or clinical suspicion of other RASopathies or neurocutaneous disorders (n = 36). The causative variant was identified in 239 out of the 281 patients analyzed (85.1%), while 42 patients remained undiagnosed (14.9%). The NF1 and SPRED1 genes were mutated in 73.3% and 2.8% of cases, respectively. The remaining 8.9% carried mutations in different genes associated with other disorders. We achieved a molecular diagnosis in 69.5% of cases with only pigmentary manifestations, allowing a more appropriate clinical management of these patients. Our findings, together with the increasing availability and sharing of clinical and genetic data, will help to identify further novel genotype–phenotype associations that may have a positive impact on patient follow-up.

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ejerskov ◽  
M. Raundahl ◽  
P. A. Gregersen ◽  
M. M. Handrup

Abstract Background The mosaic form of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is called mosaic NF1 (MNF1). No specific MNF1 follow-up guidelines exist. It is debatable if patients with MNF1 should be clinically examined and undergo follow-up in accordance with the standard NF1 guidelines, as MNF1 patients more often may develop more benign phenotypes and thereby less disease-associated complications including cognitive impairment. We discussed the need for a specific MNF1 follow-up guideline with focus on frequency of plexiform neurofibromas and NF1-associated complications. Method A systematic retrospective data collection in a MNF1 cohort from one of two Danish national centers of NF1 Expertise was completed. Data collected included demographics, clinical features including NF1 diagnostic criteria and NF1-associated complications. Recent literature in the field was reviewed. Results We identified 17 patients with MNF1 with a median age of 37 years [4; 66]. Eleven (65%) were females. Five patients (30%) had a plexiform neurofibroma. The median age at detection of plexiform neurofibroma was 30 years [14; 60]. Nine (53%) had at least one NF1-related complication; scoliosis, hypertension, ADHD, learning disability, language delay, autism and delay in gross and fine motor function development. We reviewed nine articles. In total, 126 cases were described within three case-series. Nineteen (15%) had a plexiform neurofibroma and in total, 23 NF1-associated complications were reported including language delay, learning disability and skeletal abnormalities. Furthermore, from the literature it was evident that the diagnosing of MNF1 varies among physicians and across countries. Conclusion Patients with MNF1 present with plexiform neurofibromas and other NF1-related complications with a frequency requiring that follow-up of MNF1 patients should be in accordance with the standard NF1 guideline in both childhood and adulthood. Physicians should be aware of cognitive impairment as a complication to MNF1. To develop a specific MNF1 follow-up guideline, there is a need for an international consensus on the diagnostic criteria for MNF1 and a follow-up study conducted in a larger MNF1 cohort.


1994 ◽  
Vol 25 (06) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ch. Kuenzle ◽  
M. Weissert ◽  
E. Roulet ◽  
H. Bode ◽  
S. Schefer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqin Yang ◽  
Kaushal Desai ◽  
Neha Agrawal ◽  
Kirti Mirchandani ◽  
Sagnik Chatterjee ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-related plexiform neurofibromas (PN) can cause substantial morbidity by disfigurement and compression of vital structures. Real-world data on the burden and cost of disease among pediatric patients with NF1 and PN is limited. The objectives of this study were to describe the characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource use (HCRU), and costs of these patients.Results: A total of 383 patients were included in the retrospective analysis of patients aged ≤18 with at least 1 ICD-10-CM diagnosis code for both NF1 and PN enrolled in the MarketScan® Multistate Medicaid database from October 1, 2014 to December 31, 2017. The mean follow-up was 448 days. The mean age was 11.4 years and 52.0% of patients were male. Most patients were diagnosed by a specialist (63.5%). During the follow-up period, pain medications were used by 58.5% of patients, 25.1% were treated with chemotherapy, 7.1% received surgery for PN, 1.6% received MEK inhibitors, and 0.8% received radiation. Mean per patient per year inpatient, outpatient, emergency room, pharmacy, and other visits were 1.4, 17.3, 1.6, 13.6, and 25.8, respectively. Mean ±SD (median) total per patient per year healthcare costs (2018 USD) were $17,275 ±$61,903 ($2,889), with total medical costs of $14,628 ±$56,203 ($2,334) and pharmacy costs of $2,646 ±$13,303 ($26). Inpatient costs were the largest drivers of medical cost, with a mean per patient per year cost of $6,739.Conclusions: This study showed that many pediatric patients diagnosed with NF1 and PN were treated with supportive care only, highlighting a substantial unmet medical need. This study also highlights the considerable economic burden among patients with NF1 and PN.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilie Ejerskov ◽  
Maj Raundahl ◽  
Pernille Axel Gregersen ◽  
Mette Møller Handrup

Abstract BackgroundThe mosaic form of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is called mosaic NF1 (MNF1). No specific MNF1 follow-up guidelines exist. It is debatable if patients with MNF1 should be clinically examined and undergo follow-up in accordance with the standard NF1 guidelines, as MNF1 patients more often may develop more benign phenotypes and thereby less disease-associated complications including cognitive impairment. We discussed the need for a specific MNF1 follow-up guideline with focus on frequency of plexiform neurofibromas and NF1-associated complications.MethodA systematic retrospective data collection in a MNF1 cohort from one of two Danish national centers of NF1 Expertise was completed. Data collected included demographics, clinical features including NF1 diagnostic criteria and NF1-associated complications. Recent literature in the field was reviewed.ResultsWe identified 17 patients with MNF1 with a median age of 37 years [4; 66]. Eleven (65%) were females. Five patients (30%) had a plexiform neurofibroma. The median age at detection of plexiform neurofibroma was 30 years [14; 60]. Nine (53%) had at least one NF1-related complication; scoliosis, hypertension, ADHD, learning disability, language delay, autism and delay in gross and fine motor function development. We reviewed nine articles. In total, 126 cases were described within three case-series. Nineteen (15%) had a plexiform neurofibroma and in total, 23 NF1-associated complications were reported including language delay, learning disability and skeletal abnormalities. Furthermore, from the literature it was evident that the diagnosing of MNF1 varies among physicians and across countries. ConclusionPatients with MNF1 present with plexiform neurofibromas and other NF1-related complications with a frequency requiring that follow-up of MNF1 patients should be in accordance with the standard NF1 guideline in both childhood and adulthood. Physicians should be aware of cognitive impairment as a complication to MNF1. To develop a specific MNF1 follow-up guideline, there is a need for an international consensus on the diagnostic criteria for MNF1 and a follow-up study conducted in a larger MNF1 cohort.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi176-vi176
Author(s):  
Ina Ly ◽  
Raquel Thalheimer ◽  
Wenli Cai ◽  
Miriam Bredella ◽  
Vanessa Merker ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Neurofibromas affect 40–50% of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients and can cause significant morbidity and mortality. They grow more rapidly during childhood and adolescence but studies in adults are limited by their retrospective nature and follow-up time < 3 years. The long-term natural history of neurofibromas remains unknown. No guidelines exist on the need and frequency of surveillance imaging for patients. Whole-body MRI (WBMRI) can detect whole-body tumor burden, including internal neurofibromas. METHODS 17 adult NF1 patients who underwent WBMRI between 2007–2010 (Scan 1) underwent repeat WBMRI between 2018–2019 (Scan 2). Internal neurofibromas were segmented on short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences and tumor volume was calculated using a computerized volumetry and three-dimensional segmentation software. Circumscribed tumors were defined as discrete; invasive tumors or those involving multiple nerves were defined as plexiform. Tumor growth and shrinkage were defined as volume change ≥ 20% over the entire study period. RESULTS Median patient age was 43 years during Scan 1 and 53 years during Scan 2. Median time between Scan 1 and 2 was 9 years. A total of 140 neurofibromas were assessed. 24% of tumors grew by a median 63% (6.8% per year). 54% of tumors spontaneously decreased in volume by a median 60% (7% per year) without treatment. On a per-patient basis, 18% of patients had overall tumor growth and 41% overall tumor shrinkage. 8 new tumors developed in 7 patients. 16 tumors resolved entirely without medical or surgical intervention. Growth behavior did not correlate with discrete or plexiform morphology. CONCLUSION A subset of internal neurofibromas in adult NF1 patients grow significantly over a long-term period, suggesting that continued monitoring of these patients may be warranted. Surprisingly, more than half of neurofibromas shrink spontaneously without intervention. Continued patient enrollment and correlation of imaging findings with functional outcomes are underway.


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 379-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Lara-Corrales ◽  
Mitra Moazzami ◽  
Maria Teresa García-Romero ◽  
Elena Pope ◽  
Patricia Parkin ◽  
...  

Background: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a neurocutaneous disorder caused by loss-of-function mutation in the NF1 gene. Segmental or mosaic NF1 (MNF) is an uncommon presentation of the NF1 result of postzygotic mutations that present with subtle localised clinical findings. Objectives: Our study’s objectives were to describe the clinical characteristics of children with MNF. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of children diagnosed with MNF at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada, from January 1992 to September 2012. Data were abstracted from health records and analysed using a standardised data collection form approved by our hospital Research Ethics Board. Results: We identified 60 patients with MNF; 32 of 60 (53.3%) were female. Mean ± SD age at first assessment was 10.6 ± 4.6 years. The most common initial physical manifestation in 39 of 60 (65.0%) patients was localised pigmentary changes only, followed by plexiform neurofibromas only in 10 of 60 (16.7%) and neurofibromas only in 9 of 60 (15.0%). Unilateral findings were seen in 46 of 60 (76.7%) patients. Most common associations identified included learning disabilities (7/60; 12%) and bony abnormalities (6/60; 10.0%). Conclusions: MNF is an underrecognised condition with potential implications for patients. Children mostly present with pigmentary anomalies only. Most patients do not develop associated findings or complications before adulthood, but long-term follow-up will help determine outcomes and possible associations. Recognition and confirmation of the diagnosis is important to provide follow-up and genetic counselling to patients.


2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siân Griffiths ◽  
Peter Thompson ◽  
Ian Frayling ◽  
Meena Upadhyaya

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
Srinivas Nallanchakrava ◽  
ManojKumar Mallela ◽  
VShiva Kumar Jeenepalli ◽  
HM Niharika

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document