scholarly journals Large Eddy Simulation of Hypersonic Turbulent Boundary Layers

Fluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 449
Author(s):  
Nadia Kianvashrad ◽  
Doyle Knight
Keyword(s):  
Static Pressure ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Hypersonic Vehicles ◽  
Total Enthalpy ◽  
Law Of The Wall ◽  
New Methods ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Turbulent Statistics ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Reynolds Average

The recent revival of interest in developing new hypersonic vehicles brings attention to the need for accurate prediction of hypersonic flows by computational methods. One of the challenges is prediction of aerothermodynamic loading over the surface of the vehicles. Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes (RANS) methods have not shown consistent accuracy in prediction of such flows. Therefore, new methods including Large Eddy Simulations (LES) should be investigated. In this paper, the LES method is used for prediction of the boundary layer over a flat plate. A new recycling-rescaling method is tested. The method uses total enthalpy and static pressure along with the velocity components to produce the best results for the Law of the Wall, turbulent statistics and turbulent Prandtl number.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Different Turbulence Models for Cavitational Flows around NACA0012 Hydrofoil

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 742
Author(s):  
Minsheng Zhao ◽  
Decheng Wan ◽  
Yangyang Gao
Keyword(s):  
Angle Of Attack ◽  
Large Angle ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Cloud Cavitation ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Shedding Frequency ◽  
Reynolds Average

The present work focuses on the comparison of the numerical simulation of sheet/cloud cavitation with the Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes and Large Eddy Simulation(RANS and LES) methods around NACA0012 hydrofoil in water flow. Three kinds of turbulence models—SST k-ω, modified SST k-ω, and Smagorinsky’s model—were used in this paper. The unstable sheet cavity and periodic shedding of the sheet/cloud cavitation were predicted, and the simulation results, namelycavitation shape, shedding frequency, and the lift and the drag coefficients of those three turbulence models, were analyzed and compared with each other. The numerical results above were basically in accordance with experimental ones. It was found that the modified SST k-ω and Smagorinsky turbulence models performed better in the aspects of cavitation shape, shedding frequency, and capturing the unsteady cavitation vortex cluster in the developing and shedding period of the cavitation at the cavitation number σ = 0.8. At a small angle of attack, the modified SST k-ω model was more accurate and practical than the other two models. However, at a large angle of attack, the Smagorinsky model of the LES method was able to give specific information in the cavitation flow field, which RANS method could not give. Further study showed that the vortex structure of the wing is the main cause of cavitation shedding.

Reynolds Averaged and Large Eddy Computations of Flow and Heat Transfer Under Round Jet Impingement

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thangam Natarajan ◽  
James Jewkes ◽  
Ramesh Narayanaswamy ◽  
Yongmann M. Chung ◽  
Anthony D. Lucey
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Jet Impingement ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Round Jet ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Impingement Heat Transfer ◽  
Turbulent Statistics ◽  
Large Eddy

The fluid dynamics and heat transfer characteristics of a turbulent round jet are modelled numerically using Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and Large Eddy Simulation (LES). Meshes with varying degrees of coarseness, with both radial and axial refinements are investigated. Discretization is carried out using the finite volume method. The jet configurations are chosen to enable validation against well-established experimental jet-impingement heat-transfer studies, particularly that of Cooper et al. [1]. The Reynolds number studied is 23000. The height of discharge from the impingement wall is fixed at twice the jet diameter. The work critically examines the effect of Reynolds number, standoff distance and helps to ascertain the relative merits of various turbulence models, by comparing turbulent statistics and the Nusselt number distributions. The present work is carried out as a preliminary validation, in a wider study intended to determine the thermofluidic behaviour of jets impinging upon an oscillating surface.

NUMERICAL STUDY OF DETONATION PROPAGATION IN VISCOUS TURBULENT FLOW IN A DUCT

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. SABELNIKOV ◽  
◽  
V. V. VLASENKO ◽  
S. BAKHNE ◽  
S. S. MOLEV ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complex Geometry ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Detonation Waves ◽  
Detonation Propagation ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Detonation Structure ◽  
Classical Studies ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Physical Effects

Gasdynamics of detonation waves was widely studied within last hundred years - analytically, experimentally, and numerically. The majority of classical studies of the XX century were concentrated on inviscid aspects of detonation structure and propagation. There was a widespread opinion that detonation is such a fast phenomenon that viscous e¨ects should have insigni¦cant in§uence on its propagation. When the era of calculations based on the Reynolds-averaged Navier- Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation approaches came into effect, researchers pounced on practical problems with complex geometry and with the interaction of many physical effects. There is only a limited number of works studying the in§uence of viscosity on detonation propagation in supersonic §ows in ducts (i. e., in the presence of boundary layers).

Simulating flow separation from continuous surfaces: routes to overcoming the Reynolds number barrier

2009 ◽  
Vol 367 (1899) ◽  
pp. 2885-2903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Leschziner ◽  
Ning Li ◽  
Fabrizio Tessicini
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Major Elements ◽  
Wall Layer ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Rans Models ◽  
High Reynolds ◽  
Near Wall

This paper provides a discussion of several aspects of the construction of approaches that combine statistical (Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes, RANS) models with large eddy simulation (LES), with the objective of making LES an economically viable method for predicting complex, high Reynolds number turbulent flows. The first part provides a review of alternative approaches, highlighting their rationale and major elements. Next, two particular methods are introduced in greater detail: one based on coupling near-wall RANS models to the outer LES domain on a single contiguous mesh, and the other involving the application of the RANS and LES procedures on separate zones, the former confined to a thin near-wall layer. Examples for their performance are included for channel flow and, in the case of the zonal strategy, for three separated flows. Finally, a discussion of prospects is given, as viewed from the writer's perspective.

On LES Methods Applied to Seal Geometries

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Tyacke ◽  
Richard Jefferson-Loveday ◽  
Paul Tucker
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Error ◽  
Labyrinth Seal ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Final Solution ◽  
Complex Flow ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Rans Models ◽  
Flow Through

Nine Large Eddy Simulation (LES) methods are used to simulate flow through two labyrinth seal geometries and are compared with a wide range of Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) solutions. These involve one-equation, two-equation and Reynolds Stress RANS models. Also applied are linear and nonlinear pure LES models, hybrid RANS-Numerical-LES (RANS-NLES) and Numerical-LES (NLES). RANS is found to have a maximum error and a scatter of 20%. A similar level of scatter is also found among the same turbulence model implemented in different codes. In a design context, this makes RANS unusable as a final solution. Results show that LES and RANS-NLES is capable of accurately predicting flow behaviour of two seals with a scatter of less than 5%. The complex flow physics gives rise to both laminar and turbulent zones making most LES models inappropriate. Nonetheless, this is found to have minimal tangible results impact. In accord with experimental observations, the ability of LES to find multiple solutions due to solution non-uniqueness is also observed.

Hybrid Large Eddy Simulation/Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes Analysis of a Premixed Ethylene-Fueled Dual-Mode Scramjet Combustor

AIAA Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Tanner B. Nielsen ◽  
Jack R. Edwards ◽  
Harsha K. Chelliah ◽  
Damien Lieber ◽  
Clayton Geipel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Dual Mode ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Scramjet Combustor ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes

Low-Pressure Compressor Near-Stall Predictions Using Unsteady CFD Methods

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Vanpouille ◽  
Dimitrios Papadogiannis ◽  
Stéphane Hiernaux
Keyword(s):  
Low Pressure ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Phase Lag ◽  
Sliding Mesh ◽  
Tip Leakage ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Surge Margin ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Unsteady Rans ◽  
Pressure Compressor

Abstract Surge margin is critical for the safety of aeronautical compressors, hence predicting it early in the design process using CFD is mandatory. However, close to surge, steady-state Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations are proven inadequate. Unsteady techniques such as Unsteady RANS (URANS) and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) can provide more reliable predictions. Nevertheless, the accuracy of such methods are dependent on the method used to handle the rotor/stator interfaces. The most precise method, the sliding mesh, requires simulating the full annulus or a periodic sector, which can be very costly. Other techniques to reduce the domain exist, such as the phase-lagged approach or geometric blade scaling, but introduce restrictive assumptions on the flow at near-stall conditions. The objective of this paper is to investigate the near-stall flow of a low-pressure compressor using unsteady methods of varying fidelity: URANS with the phase lag assumption, URANS on a periodic sector and a high-fidelity LES on a smaller periodic sector achieved using geometric blade scaling. Results are compared to experimental measurements. An overall good agreement is found. Results show that the tip leakage vortex is not the origin of the stall on the studied configuration and a hub corner separation is initiated. LES further validates the (U)RANS flow predictions and brings additional insight on unsteady flow separations.

Simulation of Vortex Instability in a Pipe Trifurcation

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Ruprecht ◽  
Ralf Neubauer ◽  
Thomas Helmrich
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Model Test ◽  
Reasonable Agreement ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Extended Version ◽  
Vortex Instability ◽  
Flow Phenomenon ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy

The vortex instability in a spherical pipe trifurcation is investigated by applying a Very Large Eddy Simulation (VLES). For this approach an new adaptive turbulence model based on an extended version of the k-ε model is used. Applying a classical Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes-Simulation with the standard k-ε model is not able to forecast the vortex instability. However the prescribed VLES method is capable to predict this flow phenomenon. The obtained results show a reasonable agreement with measurements in a model test.

Large Eddy Simulation of Cross Flow in Pipe Junction

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiajun Chen ◽  
Yue Sun ◽  
Hang Zhang ◽  
Dakui Feng ◽  
Zhiguo Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Stokes Equations ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Exciting Force ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Pipe Network ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy

Mixing in pipe junctions can play an important role in exciting force and distribution of flow in pipe network. This paper investigated the cross pipe junction and proposed an improved plan, Y-shaped pipe junction. The numerical study of a three-dimensional pipe junction was performed for calculation and improved understanding of flow feature in pipe. The filtered Navier–Stokes equations were used to perform the large-eddy simulation of the unsteady incompressible flow in pipe. From the analysis of these results, it clearly appears that the vortex strength and velocity non-uniformity of centerline, can be reduced by Y-shaped junction. The Y-shaped junction not only has better flow characteristic, but also reduces head loss and exciting force. The results of the three-dimensional improvement analysis of junction can be used in the design of pipe network for industry.

Large eddy simulation investigation of the canonical shock–turbulence interaction

2018 ◽  
Vol 858 ◽  
pp. 500-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. O. Braun ◽  
D. I. Pullin ◽  
D. I. Meiron
Keyword(s):  
Nonlinear Effects ◽  
Streamwise Velocity ◽  
Inertial Range ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Weakly Compressible ◽  
Turbulent Statistics ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Reynolds Number Effects ◽  
Fully Developed Turbulent Flow ◽  
Mach Numbers

High resolution large eddy simulations (LES) are performed to study the interaction of a stationary shock with fully developed turbulent flow. Turbulent statistics downstream of the interaction are provided for a range of weakly compressible upstream turbulent Mach numbers $M_{t}=0.03{-}0.18$, shock Mach numbers $M_{s}=1.2{-}3.0$ and Taylor-based Reynolds numbers $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}}=20{-}2500$. The LES displays minimal Reynolds number effects once an inertial range has developed for $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}}>100$. The inertial range scales of the turbulence are shown to quickly return to isotropy, and downstream of sufficiently strong shocks this process generates a net transfer of energy from transverse into streamwise velocity fluctuations. The streamwise shock displacements are shown to approximately follow a $k^{-11/3}$ decay with wavenumber as predicted by linear analysis. In conjunction with other statistics this suggests that the instantaneous interaction of the shock with the upstream turbulence proceeds in an approximately linear manner, but nonlinear effects immediately downstream of the shock significantly modify the flow even at the lowest considered turbulent Mach numbers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document