scholarly journals Coherent Vortical Structures and Their Relation to Hot/Cold Spots in a Thermal Turbulent Channel Flow

Fluids ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Channel Flow ◽  
Turbulent Channel Flow ◽  
Vortical Structures ◽  
Cold Spots

Coherent structures near the wall in a turbulent channel flow

1997 ◽  
Vol 332 ◽  
pp. 185-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Jeong ◽  
F. Hussain ◽  
W. Schoppa ◽  
J. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Channel Flow ◽  
Coherent Structures ◽  
Turbulent Channel Flow ◽  
Normal Velocity ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Hairpin Vortices ◽  
Vortical Structures ◽  
Instantaneous Flow Field ◽  
Strong Shear ◽  
Low Speed Streaks

Coherent structures (CS) near the wall (i.e.y+ ≤ 60) in a numerically simulated turbulent channel flow are educed using a conditional sampling scheme which extracts the entire extent of dominant vortical structures. Such structures are detected from the instantaneous flow field using our newly developed vortex definition (Jeong & Hussain 1995) - a region of negativeλ2, the second largest eigenvalue of the tensorSikSkj+ ΩikΩkj- which accurately captures the structure details (unlike velocity-, vorticity- or pressure-based eduction). Extensive testing has shown thatλ2correctly captures vortical structures, even in the presence of the strong shear occurring near the wall of a boundary layer. We have shown that the dominant near-wall educed (i.e. ensemble averaged after proper alignment) CS are highly elongated quasi-streamwise vortices; the CS are inclined 9° in the vertical (x, y)-plane and tilted ±4° in the horizontal (x, z)-plane. The vortices of alternating sign overlap inxas a staggered array; there is no indication near the wall of hairpin vortices, not only in the educed data but also in instantaneous fields. Our model of the CS array reproduces nearly all experimentally observed events reported in the literature, such as VITA, Reynolds stress distribution, wall pressure variation, elongated low-speed streaks, spanwise shear, etc. In particular, a phase difference (in space) between streamwise and normal velocity fluctuations created by CS advection causes Q4 ('sweep’) events to dominate Q2 ('ejection’) and also creates counter-gradient Reynolds stresses (such as Ql and Q3 events) above and below the CS. We also show that these effects are adequately modelled by half of a Batchelor's dipole embedded in (and decoupled from) a background shearU(y). The CS tilting (in the (x, z)-plane) is found to be responsible for sustaining CS through redistribution of streamwise turbulent kinetic energy to normal and spanwise components via coherent pressure-strain effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document