scholarly journals Eddy Covariance vs. Biometric Based Estimates of Net Primary Productivity of Pedunculate Oak (Quercus robur L.) Forest in Croatia during Ten Years

Forests ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mislav Anić ◽  
Maša Ostrogović Sever ◽  
Giorgio Alberti ◽  
Ivan Balenović ◽  
Elvis Paladinić ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eddy Covariance ◽  
Primary Productivity ◽  
Net Primary Productivity ◽  
Carbon Allocation ◽  
Carbon Sink ◽  
Global Radiation ◽  
Environmental Drivers ◽  
Poor Correlation ◽  
Pedunculate Oak ◽  
Annual Nee

We analysed 10 years (2008–2017) of continuous eddy covariance (EC) CO2 flux measurements of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) in a young pedunculate oak forest in Croatia. Measured NEE was gap-filled and partitioned into gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem reparation (RECO) using the online tool by Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry in Jena, Germany. Annual NEE, GPP, and RECO were correlated with main environmental drivers. Net primary productivity was estimated from EC (NPPEC), as a sum of −NEE and Rh obtained using a constant Rh:RECO ratio, and from independent periodic biometric measurements (NPPBM). For comparing the NPP at the seasonal level, we propose a simple model that aimed at accounting for late-summer and autumn carbon storage in the non-structural carbohydrate pool. Over the study period, Jastrebarsko forest acted as a carbon sink, with an average (±std. dev.) annual NEE of −319 (±94) gC m−2 year−1, GPP of 1594 (±109) gC m−2 year−1, and RECO of 1275 (±94) gC m−2 year−1. Annual NEE showed high inter-annual variability and poor correlation with annual average global radiation, air temperature, and total precipitation, but significant (R2 = 0.501, p = 0.02) correlation with the change in soil water content between May and September. Comparison of annual NPPEC and NPPBM showed a good overall agreement (R2 = 0.463, p = 0.03), although in all years NPPBM was lower than NPPEC, with averages of 680 (±88) gC m−2 year−1 and 819 (±89) gC m−2 year−1, respectively. Lower values of NPPBM indicate that fine roots and grasses contributions to NPP, which were not measured in the study period, could have an important contribution to the overall ecosystem NPP. At a seasonal level, two NPP estimates showed differences in their dynamic, but the application of the proposed model greatly improved the agreement in the second part of the growing season. Further research is needed on the respiration partitioning and mechanisms of carbon allocation.

scholarly journals Assessment of Impacts of Hurricane Katrina on Net Primary Productivity in Mississippi

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (14) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shrinidhi Ambinakudige ◽  
Sami Khanal
Keyword(s):  
Natural Disasters ◽  
Hurricane Katrina ◽  
Primary Productivity ◽  
Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Net Primary Productivity ◽  
Gulf Coast ◽  
Carbon Sink ◽  
Anthropogenic Activities ◽  
Remote Sensing Data ◽  
The United States

Abstract Southern forests contribute significantly to the carbon sink for the atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) associated with the anthropogenic activities in the United States. Natural disasters like hurricanes are constantly threatening these forests. Hurricane winds can have a destructive impact on natural vegetation and can adversely impact net primary productivity (NPP). Hurricane Katrina (23–30 August 2005), one of the most destructive natural disasters in history, has affected the ecological balance of the Gulf Coast. This study analyzed the impacts of different categories of sustained winds of Hurricane Katrina on NPP in Mississippi. The study used the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) model to estimate NPP by using remote sensing data. The results indicated that NPP decreased by 14% in the areas hard hit by category 3 winds and by 1% in the areas hit by category 2 winds. However, there was an overall increase in NPP, from 2005 to 2006 by 0.60 Tg of carbon, in Mississippi. The authors found that Pearl River, Stone, Hancock, Jackson, and Harrison counties in Mississippi faced significant depletion of NPP because of Hurricane Katrina.

scholarly journals Carbon dioxide fluxes over an ancient broadleaved deciduous woodland in southern England

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1595-1613 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. V. Thomas ◽  
Y. Malhi ◽  
K. M. Fenn ◽  
J. B. Fisher ◽  
M. D. Morecroft ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Primary Productivity ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Net Primary Productivity ◽  
Deciduous Forest ◽  
Carbon Sink ◽  
Ecosystem Respiration ◽  
Flux Chamber ◽  
Southern England ◽  
Temperate Deciduous

Abstract. We present results from a study of canopy-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide from 2007 to 2009 above a site in Wytham Woods, an ancient temperate broadleaved deciduous forest in southern England. Gap-filled net ecosystem exchange (NEE) data were partitioned into gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Re) and analysed on daily, monthly and annual timescales. Over the continuous 24 month study period annual GPP was estimated to be 21.1 Mg C ha−1 yr−1 and Re to be 19.8 Mg C ha−1 yr−1; net ecosystem productivity (NEP) was 1.2 Mg C ha−1 yr−1. These estimates were compared with independent bottom-up estimates derived from net primary productivity (NPP) and flux chamber measurements recorded at a plot within the flux footprint in 2008 (GPP = 26.5 ± 6.8 Mg C ha−1 yr−1, Re = 24.8 ± 6.8 Mg C ha−1 yr−1, biomass increment = ~1.7 Mg C ha−1 yr−1). Over the two years the difference in seasonal NEP was predominantly caused by changes in ecosystem respiration, whereas GPP remained similar for equivalent months in different years. Although solar radiation was the largest influence on daily values of CO2 fluxes (R2 = 0.53 for the summer months for a linear regression), variation in Re appeared to be driven by temperature. Our findings suggest that this ancient woodland site is currently a substantial sink for carbon, resulting from continued growth that is probably a legacy of past management practices abandoned over 40 years ago. Our GPP and Re values are generally higher than other broadleaved temperate deciduous woodlands and may represent the influence of the UK's maritime climate, or the particular species composition of this site. The carbon sink value of Wytham Woods supports the protection and management of temperate deciduous woodlands (including those managed for conservation rather than silvicultural objectives) as a strategy to mitigate atmospheric carbon dioxide increases.

Analysis of regional carbon allocation and carbon trading based on net primary productivity in China

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 101401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinyin Wu ◽  
Ping Wang ◽  
Xin Liu ◽  
Jiandong Chen ◽  
Malin Song
Keyword(s):  
Primary Productivity ◽  
Net Primary Productivity ◽  
Carbon Allocation ◽  
Carbon Trading

scholarly journals Above- and below-ground net primary productivity across ten Amazonian forests on contrasting soils

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 2759-2778 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. E. O. C. Aragão ◽  
Y. Malhi ◽  
D. B. Metcalfe ◽  
J. E. Silva-Espejo ◽  
E. Jiménez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Productivity ◽  
Net Primary Productivity ◽  
Soil Phosphorus ◽  
Clay Content ◽  
Nutrient Status ◽  
Major Elements ◽  
Environmental Drivers ◽  
Root Production ◽  
Below Ground ◽  
Amazonian Forests

Abstract. The net primary productivity (NPP) of tropical forests is one of the most important and least quantified components of the global carbon cycle. Most relevant studies have focused particularly on the quantification of the above-ground coarse wood productivity, and little is known about the carbon fluxes involved in other elements of the NPP, the partitioning of total NPP between its above- and below-ground components and the main environmental drivers of these patterns. In this study we quantify the above- and below-ground NPP of ten Amazonian forests to address two questions: (1) How do Amazonian forests allocate productivity among its above- and below-ground components? (2) How do soil and leaf nutrient status and soil texture affect the productivity of Amazonian forests? Using a standardized methodology to measure the major elements of productivity, we show that NPP varies between 9.3±1.3 Mg C ha−1 yr−1 (mean±standard error), at a white sand plot, and 17.0±1.4 Mg C ha−1 yr−1 at a very fertile Terra Preta site, with an overall average of 12.8±0.9 Mg C ha−1 yr−1. The studied forests allocate on average 64±3% and 36±3% of the total NPP to the above- and below-ground components, respectively. The ratio of above-ground and below-ground NPP is almost invariant with total NPP. Litterfall and fine root production both increase with total NPP, while stem production shows no overall trend. Total NPP tends to increase with soil phosphorus and leaf nitrogen status. However, allocation of NPP to below-ground shows no relationship to soil fertility, but appears to decrease with the increase of soil clay content.

scholarly journals Partitioning of canopy and soil CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes in a pine forests at the dry timberline

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafat Qubaja ◽  
Feyodor Tatarinov ◽  
Eyal Rotenberg ◽  
Dan Yakir
Keyword(s):  
Soil Respiration ◽  
Primary Productivity ◽  
Net Primary Productivity ◽  
Carbon Allocation ◽  
Ecosystem Respiration ◽  
Pine Forest ◽  
Carbon Accumulation ◽  
Dry Forest ◽  
Co2 Uptake ◽  
The Mean

Abstract. Partitioning carbon fluxes is key to understanding the process underlying ecosystem response to change. This study used soil and canopy fluxes with stable isotopes (13C) and radiocarbon (14C) measurements of a 50-year-old dry (i.e., 287 mm of annual precipitation) pine forest to partition the ecosystem’s CO2 flux into gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Re) and soil respiration flux into autotrophic (Rsa), heterotrophic (Rh), and inorganic (Ri) components. On an annual scale, GPP and Re were 655 and 488 g C m−2, respectively, with a net primary productivity (NPP) of 276 g C m−2 and carbon-use efficiency (CUE = NPP / GPP) of 0.42. Soil respiration (Rs) made up 60 % of the total ecosystem respiration and was comprised of 24 ± 4 %, 23 ± 4 %, and 13 ± 1 % Rsa, Rh, and Ri, respectively. The contribution of root and microbial respiration to Re increased during high productivity periods, and inorganic sources were more significant components when soil water content was low. Compared to the mean values for 2001–2006 at the same site; (Grünzweig et al., 2009), annual Rs decreased by 27 % to the mean 2016 rates of 0.8 ± 0.1 µmol m−2 s−1). This was associated with decrease in the respiration Q10 values across the same observation by 36 % and 9 % in the wet and dry periods, respectively. Low rates of soil carbon loss combined with relatively high below ground carbon allocation (i.e., 40 % of canopy CO2 uptake) help explain the high soil organic carbon accumulation and the relatively high ecosystem CUE of the dry forest. This was indicative of the higher resilience of the pine forest to climate change and the significant potential for carbon sequestration in these regions.

scholarly journals The greenhouse gas balance of European grasslands

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 5997-6050 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Ciais ◽  
J. F. Soussana ◽  
N. Vuichard ◽  
S. Luyssaert ◽  
A. Don ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Eddy Covariance ◽  
Net Primary Productivity ◽  
Carbon Sink ◽  
Management Practice ◽  
Carbon Sinks ◽  
Forage Production ◽  
Greenhouse Gas Balance ◽  
Ch4 And N2o ◽  
Gas Balance

Abstract. The long-term carbon balance (NBP) of grasslands is estimated by combining scarce multi-year eddy-covariance observations at ecosystem observation sites where information on carbon inputs and harvesting removals is available. Following accounting for carbon leached to rivers, we estimated grasslands to be net carbon sinks of 74±10 g C m−2 yr−1. Uncertainties arise from the small number of sites and the short measurement period. Only 11 sites, out of a total of 20 grassland sites in Europe where eddy covariance systems are installed, were set-up for estimating NBP. These 11 selected sites are representative of intensive management practice and we lack information on disturbance history, such as plowing. This suggests that the grassland NBP estimate is likely biased towards overestimating the sink, compared to the European average. Direct measurements of Net Primary Productivity (NPP) are not possible in grasslands given permanent biomass removal by grazing and mowing, uncertainties in rhizodeposition and production of volatile organic carbon compounds lost to the atmosphere. Therefore, the grassland process-based ecosystem model PASIM was used to estimate the spatial-temporal distribution of NPP, providing a European average value of 750±150 g C across extensively grazed, intensively grazed pastures, and forage production systems. In Europe the NPP of grasslands seems higher than that of croplands and forests. The carbon sequestration efficiency of grasslands, defined as the ratio of NBP to NPP, amounts to 0.09±0.10. Therefore, per unit of carbon input, grasslands sequester 3–4 times more carbon in the soil than forests do, making them a good candidate for managing onsite carbon sinks. When using the 100 yr greenhouse warming potential for CH4 and N2O, their emissions due to management of grasslands together offset roughly 70–80% of the carbon sink. Uncertainties on the European grassland greenhouse gas balance, including CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes are likely to be reduced in the near future, with data being collected from more sites, and improved up-scaling methods.

scholarly journals Above- and below-ground net primary productivity across ten Amazonian forests on contrasting soils

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 2441-2488 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. E. O. C. Aragão ◽  
Y. Malhi ◽  
D. B. Metcalfe ◽  
J. E. Silva-Espejo ◽  
E. Jiménez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Productivity ◽  
Net Primary Productivity ◽  
Soil Phosphorus ◽  
Clay Content ◽  
Nutrient Status ◽  
Major Elements ◽  
Environmental Drivers ◽  
Root Production ◽  
Below Ground ◽  
Amazonian Forests

Abstract. The net primary productivity (NPP) of tropical forests is one of the most important and least quantified components of the global carbon cycle. Most relevant studies have focused particularly on the quantification of the above-ground coarse wood productivity, and little is known about the carbon fluxes involved in other elements of the NPP, the partitioning of total NPP between its above- and below-ground components and the main environmental drivers of these patterns. In this study we quantify the above- and below-ground NPP of ten Amazonian forests to address two questions: (1) How do Amazonian forests allocate productivity among its above- and below-ground components? (2) How do soil and leaf nutrient status and soil texture affect the productivity of Amazonian forests? Using a standardized methodology to measure the major elements of productivity, we show that NPP varies between 9.3±1.3 Mg C ha−1 yr−1 (mean±standard error), at a white sand plot, and 17.0±1.4 Mg C ha−1 yr−1 at a very fertile Terra Preta site, with an overall average of 12.8±0.9 Mg C ha−1 yr−1. The studied forests allocate on average 64±3% and 36±3% of the total NPP to the above- and below-ground components, respectively. The ratio of above-ground and below-ground NPP is almost invariant with total NPP. Litterfall and fine root production both increase with total NPP, while stem production shows no overall trend. Total NPP tends to increase with soil phosphorus and leaf nitrogen status. However, allocation of NPP to below-ground shows no relationship to soil fertility, but appears to decrease with the increase of soil clay content.

scholarly journals Productivity, biodiversity, and pathogens influence the global hunter-gatherer population density

2017 ◽  
Vol 115 (6) ◽  
pp. 1232-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miikka Tallavaara ◽  
Jussi T. Eronen ◽  
Miska Luoto
Keyword(s):  
Population Density ◽  
Primary Productivity ◽  
Human Population ◽  
Temperate Forest ◽  
Net Primary Productivity ◽  
Environmental Drivers ◽  
Ecological Research ◽  
High Productivity ◽  
The Core ◽  
Global Population

The environmental drivers of species distributions and abundances are at the core of ecological research. However, the effects of these drivers on human abundance are not well-known. Here, we report how net primary productivity, biodiversity, and pathogen stress affect human population density using global ethnographic hunter-gatherer data. Our results show that productivity has significant effects on population density globally. The most important direct drivers, however, depend on environmental conditions: biodiversity influences population density exclusively in low-productivity regions, whereas pathogen stress does so in high-productivity regions. Our results also indicate that subtropical and temperate forest biomes provide the highest carrying capacity for hunter-gatherer populations. These findings document that environmental factors play a key role in shaping global population density patterns of preagricultural humans.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document