scholarly journals Robust Model Predicts Shoot Phenology of Fraser Fir under Extreme Conditions

Forests ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
Brent Crain ◽  
Pascal Nzokou ◽  
Jill O’Donnell ◽  
Beth Bishop ◽  
Bert Cregg
Keyword(s):  
Extreme Conditions ◽  
Fraser Fir ◽  
Robust Model ◽  
Shoot Phenology

38. The Attenuation of Hearing Protectors in Extreme Conditions

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Toppila ◽  
J. Starck ◽  
I. Pyykkö
Keyword(s):  
Extreme Conditions ◽  
Hearing Protectors

Development of the ChIMES Force Field for Reactive Molecular Systems: Carbon Monoxide at Extreme Conditions

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Lindsey ◽  
Nir Goldman ◽  
Laurence E. Fried ◽  
Sorin Bastea
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Monoxide ◽  
Molecular System ◽  
Interaction Model ◽  
System Size ◽  
Single Atom ◽  
Reactive System ◽  
Extreme Conditions ◽  
Ambient Conditions ◽  
Molecular Systems ◽  
Three Body

<p>The interatomic Chebyshev Interaction Model for Efficient Simulation (ChIMES) is based on linear combinations of Chebyshev polynomials describing explicit two- and three-body interactions. Recently, the ChIMES model has been developed and applied to a molten metallic system of a single atom type (carbon), as well as a non-reactive molecular system of two atom types at ambient conditions (water). Here, we continue application of ChIMES to increasingly complex problems through extension to a reactive system. Specifically, we develop a ChIMES model for carbon monoxide under extreme conditions, with built-in transferability to nearby state points. We demonstrate that the resulting model recovers much of the accuracy of DFT while exhibiting a 10<sup>4</sup>increase in efficiency, linear system size scalability and the ability to overcome the significant system size effects exhibited by DFT.</p>

Selection of children with ultra-severe traumatic brain injury for neurosurgical intervention

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 670-679
Author(s):  
Krista Greenan ◽  
Sandra L. Taylor ◽  
Daniel Fulkerson ◽  
Kiarash Shahlaie ◽  
Clayton Gerndt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Prediction Model ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Pupillary Response ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Robust Model ◽  
Gcs Score ◽  
Combined Data

OBJECTIVEA recent retrospective study of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in pediatric patients showed similar outcomes in those with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3 and those with a score of 4 and reported a favorable long-term outcome in 11.9% of patients. Using decision tree analysis, authors of that study provided criteria to identify patients with a potentially favorable outcome. The authors of the present study sought to validate the previously described decision tree and further inform understanding of the outcomes of children with a GCS score 3 or 4 by using data from multiple institutions and machine learning methods to identify important predictors of outcome.METHODSClinical, radiographic, and outcome data on pediatric TBI patients (age < 18 years) were prospectively collected as part of an institutional TBI registry. Patients with a GCS score of 3 or 4 were selected, and the previously published prediction model was evaluated using this data set. Next, a combined data set that included data from two institutions was used to create a new, more statistically robust model using binomial recursive partitioning to create a decision tree.RESULTSForty-five patients from the institutional TBI registry were included in the present study, as were 67 patients from the previously published data set, for a total of 112 patients in the combined analysis. The previously published prediction model for survival was externally validated and performed only modestly (AUC 0.68, 95% CI 0.47, 0.89). In the combined data set, pupillary response and age were the only predictors retained in the decision tree. Ninety-six percent of patients with bilaterally nonreactive pupils had a poor outcome. If the pupillary response was normal in at least one eye, the outcome subsequently depended on age: 72% of children between 5 months and 6 years old had a favorable outcome, whereas 100% of children younger than 5 months old and 77% of those older than 6 years had poor outcomes. The overall accuracy of the combined prediction model was 90.2% with a sensitivity of 68.4% and specificity of 93.6%.CONCLUSIONSA previously published survival model for severe TBI in children with a low GCS score was externally validated. With a larger data set, however, a simplified and more robust model was developed, and the variables most predictive of outcome were age and pupillary response.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document