scholarly journals Stand Volume Growth Modeling with Mixed-Effects Models and Quantile Regressions for Major Forest Types in the Eastern Daxing’an Mountains, Northeast China

Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1111
Author(s):  
Tao Wang ◽  
Longfei Xie ◽  
Zheng Miao ◽  
Faris Rafi Almay Widagdo ◽  
Lihu Dong ◽  
...  

The relative growth rate (RGRnv) is the standardized measurement of forest growth, whereby excluding the size differences between individuals allows their performance to be compared equally. The RGRnv model was developed using the National Forest Inventory (NFI) data on the Daxing’an Mountains, in Northeast China, which contain Dahurian larch (Larix gmelinii Rupr.), white birch (Betula platyphylla Suk.), and mixed coniferous–broadleaf forests. Four predictor variables—i.e., quadratic mean diameter (Dq), stand basal area (G), average tree height (Ha), and altitude (A)—and four different methods—i.e., the nonlinear mixed-effects models (NLME), three nonlinear quantile regression (NQR3), five nonlinear quantile regression (NQR5), and nine nonlinear quantile regression (NQR9) models—were used in this study. All the models were validated using the leave-one-out method. The results showed that (1) the mixed coniferous–broadleaf forest presented the highest RGRnv; (2) the RGRnv was negatively correlated with the four predictors, and the heteroscedasticity reduced significantly after the weighting function was integrated into the models; and (3) the quantile regression models performed better than NLME, and NQR9 outperformed both NQR3 and NQR5. To make more accurate predictions, parameters of the adjusted mixed-effects and quantile regression models should be recalculated and localized using sampled RGRnv in each region and then applied to predict all the other RGRnv of plots. MAPE% indicates the mean absolute percentage error. The values were stable when the sample numbers were greater than or equal to six across the three forest types, which showed relatively accurate and lowest-cost prediction results.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashenafi A. Yirga ◽  
Sileshi F. Melesse ◽  
Henry G. Mwambi ◽  
Dawit G. Ayele

AbstractQuantile regression offers an invaluable tool to discern effects that would be missed by other conventional regression models, which are solely based on modeling conditional mean. Quantile regression for mixed-effects models has become practical for longitudinal data analysis due to the recent computational advances and the ready availability of efficient linear programming algorithms. Recently, quantile regression has also been extended to additive mixed-effects models, providing an efficient and flexible framework for nonparametric as well as parametric longitudinal forms of data analysis focused on features of the outcome beyond its central tendency. This study applies the additive quantile mixed model to analyze the longitudinal CD4 count of HIV-infected patients enrolled in a follow-up study at the Centre of the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa. The objective of the study is to justify how the procedure developed can obtain robust nonlinear and linear effects at different conditional distribution locations. With respect to time and baseline BMI effect, the study shows a significant nonlinear effect on CD4 count across all fitted quantiles. Furthermore, across all fitted quantiles, the effect of the parametric covariates of baseline viral load, place of residence, and the number of sexual partners was found to be major significant factors on the progression of patients’ CD4 count who had been initiated on the Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy study.


Corpora ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Th. Gries

Much statistical analysis of psycholinguistic data is now being done with so-called mixed-effects regression models. This development was spearheaded by a few highly influential introductory articles that (i) showed how these regression models are superior to what was the previous gold standard and, perhaps even more importantly, (ii) showed how these models are used practically. Corpus linguistics can benefit from mixed-effects/multi-level models for the same reason that psycholinguistics can – because, for example, speaker-specific and lexically specific idiosyncrasies can be accounted for elegantly; but, in fact, corpus linguistics needs them even more because (i) corpus-linguistic data are observational and, thus, usually unbalanced and messy/noisy, and (ii) most widely used corpora come with a hierarchical structure that corpus linguists routinely fail to consider. Unlike nearly all overviews of mixed-effects/multi-level modelling, this paper is specifically written for corpus linguists to get more of them to start using these techniques more. After a short methodological history, I provide a non-technical introduction to mixed-effects models and then discuss in detail one example – particle placement in English – to show how mixed-effects/multi-level modelling results can be obtained and how they are far superior to those of traditional regression modelling.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document