scholarly journals Hierarchical Geographic Object-Based Vegetation Type Extraction Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data

Forests ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1271
Author(s):  
Xuegang Mao ◽  
Yueqing Deng ◽  
Liang Zhu ◽  
Yao Yao

Providing vegetation type information with accurate surface distribution is one of the important tasks of remote sensing of the ecological environment. Many studies have explored ecosystem structure information at specific spatial scales based on specific remote sensing data, but it is still rare to extract vegetation information at various landscape levels from a variety of remote sensing data. Based on Gaofen-1 satellite (GF-1) Wide-Field-View (WFV) data (16 m), Ziyuan-3 satellite (ZY-3) and airborne LiDAR data, this study comparatively analyzed the four levels of vegetation information by using the geographic object-based image analysis method (GEOBIA) on the typical natural secondary forest in Northeast China. The four levels of vegetation information include vegetation/non-vegetation (L1), vegetation type (L2), forest type (L3) and canopy and canopy gap (L4). The results showed that vegetation height and density provided by airborne LiDAR data could extract vegetation features and categories more effectively than the spectral information provided by GF-1 and ZY-3 images. Only 0.5 m LiDAR data can extract four levels of vegetation information (L1–L4); and from L1 to L4, the total accuracy of the classification decreased orderly 98%, 93%, 80% and 69%. Comparing with 2.1 m ZY-3, the total classification accuracy of L1, L2 and L3 extracted by 2.1 m LiDAR data increased by 3%, 17% and 43%, respectively. At the vegetation/non-vegetation level, the spatial resolution of data plays a leading role, and the data types used at the vegetation type and forest type level become the main influencing factors. This study will provide reference for data selection and mapping strategies for hierarchical multi-scale vegetation type extraction.

Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 692
Author(s):  
MD Abdul Mueed Choudhury ◽  
Ernesto Marcheggiani ◽  
Andrea Galli ◽  
Giuseppe Modica ◽  
Ben Somers

Currently, the worsening impacts of urbanizations have been impelled to the importance of monitoring and management of existing urban trees, securing sustainable use of the available green spaces. Urban tree species identification and evaluation of their roles in atmospheric Carbon Stock (CS) are still among the prime concerns for city planners regarding initiating a convenient and easily adaptive urban green planning and management system. A detailed methodology on the urban tree carbon stock calibration and mapping was conducted in the urban area of Brussels, Belgium. A comparative analysis of the mapping outcomes was assessed to define the convenience and efficiency of two different remote sensing data sources, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and WorldView-3 (WV-3), in a unique urban area. The mapping results were validated against field estimated carbon stocks. At the initial stage, dominant tree species were identified and classified using the high-resolution WorldView3 image, leading to the final carbon stock mapping based on the dominant species. An object-based image analysis approach was employed to attain an overall accuracy (OA) of 71% during the classification of the dominant species. The field estimations of carbon stock for each plot were done utilizing an allometric model based on the field tree dendrometric data. Later based on the correlation among the field data and the variables (i.e., Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, NDVI and Crown Height Model, CHM) extracted from the available remote sensing data, the carbon stock mapping and validation had been done in a GIS environment. The calibrated NDVI and CHM had been used to compute possible carbon stock in either case of the WV-3 image and LiDAR data, respectively. A comparative discussion has been introduced to bring out the issues, especially for the developing countries, where WV-3 data could be a better solution over the hardly available LiDAR data. This study could assist city planners in understanding and deciding the applicability of remote sensing data sources based on their availability and the level of expediency, ensuring a sustainable urban green management system.


Drones ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Rodríguez-Puerta ◽  
Rafael Alonso Ponce ◽  
Fernando Pérez-Rodríguez ◽  
Beatriz Águeda ◽  
Saray Martín-García ◽  
...  

Controlling vegetation fuels around human settlements is a crucial strategy for reducing fire severity in forests, buildings and infrastructure, as well as protecting human lives. Each country has its own regulations in this respect, but they all have in common that by reducing fuel load, we in turn reduce the intensity and severity of the fire. The use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV)-acquired data combined with other passive and active remote sensing data has the greatest performance to planning Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) fuelbreak through machine learning algorithms. Nine remote sensing data sources (active and passive) and four supervised classification algorithms (Random Forest, Linear and Radial Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Networks) were tested to classify five fuel-area types. We used very high-density Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data acquired by UAV (154 returns·m−2 and ortho-mosaic of 5-cm pixel), multispectral data from the satellites Pleiades-1B and Sentinel-2, and low-density LiDAR data acquired by Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) (0.5 returns·m−2, ortho-mosaic of 25 cm pixels). Through the Variable Selection Using Random Forest (VSURF) procedure, a pre-selection of final variables was carried out to train the model. The four algorithms were compared, and it was concluded that the differences among them in overall accuracy (OA) on training datasets were negligible. Although the highest accuracy in the training step was obtained in SVML (OA=94.46%) and in testing in ANN (OA=91.91%), Random Forest was considered to be the most reliable algorithm, since it produced more consistent predictions due to the smaller differences between training and testing performance. Using a combination of Sentinel-2 and the two LiDAR data (UAV and ALS), Random Forest obtained an OA of 90.66% in training and of 91.80% in testing datasets. The differences in accuracy between the data sources used are much greater than between algorithms. LiDAR growth metrics calculated using point clouds in different dates and multispectral information from different seasons of the year are the most important variables in the classification. Our results support the essential role of UAVs in fuelbreak planning and management and thus, in the prevention of forest fires.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document