scholarly journals Comparing Apples to Apples: Why the Net Energy Analysis Community Needs to Adopt the Life-Cycle Analysis Framework

Energies ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 917 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Murphy ◽  
Michael Carbajales-Dale ◽  
Devin Moeller
2007 ◽  
Vol 1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyung Chul Kim ◽  
V. Fthenakis ◽  
S. Gualtero ◽  
R. van der Meulen ◽  
H. C. Kim

AbstractLife cycle analysis becomes especially important for characterizing new material forms in new energy generation technologies intended to replace or improve the current infrastructure of energy production. We propose a comparative life-cycle analysis framework for investigating the effect of introducing nanotechnology in the life cycle of new photovoltaics, which focuses on the differences between the new technologies and the ones that they may replace. The following parameters are investigated within this framework: methods of synthesizing nanoparticles, physicochemical specifications of the precursors, material utilization rates, deposition rates, energy-conversion efficiencies, and lifetime expectancy of the final product. We introduce the application of this framework in comparing nano-structured cadmium telluride and silicon films with their nano- and amorphous- structured equivalents.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piyumali Mewanthika Jayasundara ◽  
Thisara Kaveendra Jayasinghe ◽  
Mahinsasa Rathnayake

Abstract The life cycle stage of paddy rice cultivation can be excluded with a zero-inventory allocation rule for the life cycle scenario of bioethanol production from unutilized rice straw, i.e., rice straw with no applied valorization in current practice. Accordingly, this study evaluates the life cycle net energy analysis and greenhouse gas (GHG) assessment for a scaled-up bioethanol production plant using unutilized rice straw as the feedstock. The process simulation technique is integrated to model a scaled-up production plant to produce bioethanol at 99.7 vol% purity from unutilized rice straw, and the simulation results are retrieved to calculate inventory data for life cycle assessment (LCA). The simulated mass flow and energy flow results are comparable with that of real plants, reported in the published literature, which validates the process simulations in this study. Inclusive of energy generation using the waste flows in the process (i.e., wastewater and solid residues), the life cycle net energy analysis results show a net energy gain of 7,804.0 MJ/m3 of bioethanol with a net renewable energy gain of 38,230.9 MJ/m3 of bioethanol that corresponds to a net energy ratio of 1.20 and renewability factor of 5.49. The life cycle GHG assessment exhibits a net global warming potential of 584.8 kg CO2 eq./m3 of bioethanol. The effect of system boundary expansion up to the end-of-life stage as gasohol (E10), the sensitivity of the key process parameters, and the economic benefit via valorization of unutilized rice straw are further analyzed and discussed.


Energy Policy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 350-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Jones ◽  
Paul Gilbert ◽  
Marco Raugei ◽  
Sarah Mander ◽  
Enrica Leccisi

Energy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. 659-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Raugei ◽  
Enrica Leccisi ◽  
Vasilis Fthenakis ◽  
Rodrigo Escobar Moragas ◽  
Yeliz Simsek

2021 ◽  
Vol 271 ◽  
pp. 02012
Author(s):  
Wang Qiang ◽  
Jiang Li ◽  
Wang Yunlong ◽  
Wang Guotian ◽  
Zhang peng

In this paper, energy consumption models of retreaded engineering tires were constructed based on life cycle analysis, theoretical calculation model, and energy consumption method during the four stages of retreaded engineering tires, i.e., production, transportation, usage, and recycling stage. The energy substitute model and energy evaluation index during the recycling stage, which involves one of five classical retreaded engineering tire recycling methods, i.e., secondary retreading, mechanical smash, low-temperature smash, combustion decomposition, and combustion power generation, were presented. Life cycle energy analysis of retreaded engineering tires was conducted, and the energy consumption during the different life cycle stages was quantitatively analyzed, thus obtaining the energy restoration rate of the five classical recycling stages of retreaded engineering tires. Energy consumption analysis and energy evaluation at different stages were performed. Main conclusions indicate that the energy consumption during the production stage is the highest, and energy consumption during the transportation stage is the lowest. The energy recycling result of the secondary retreading or combustion decomposition of retreaded engineering tires is obtained.


2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 318-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirotsugu KAMAHARA ◽  
Shun YAMAGUCHI ◽  
Ryuichi TACHIBANA ◽  
Naohiro GOTO ◽  
Koichi FUJIE

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document