scholarly journals Determining the Interruptible Load with Strategic Behavior in a Competitive Electricity Market

Energies ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 257-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Yoo ◽  
Hyeongon Park ◽  
Jae-Kun Lyu ◽  
Jong-Keun Park
Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (14) ◽  
pp. 2820
Author(s):  
Ruhang Xu ◽  
Zhilin Liu ◽  
Zhuangzhuang Yu

While variable renewable energy (VRE) has been developed for decades, VRE market participation is developing relatively slowly, despite the potential economic efficiency it may bring. This paper tries to specify the efficiency of VRE in a deregulated pool-based electricity market. Based on standard pool-based market design, this paper built a direct current optimal power flow (DC-OPF) based simplified 2-settlement spot electricity market model conjugating electricity and ancillary service clearing. To address the outcomes of the imperfect market in the real world, this paper studied the consequences brought by agents’ learning and strategic behaviors. Simulations under different ancillary service levels and reliability cost levels are carried out. The results show that VRE may be unprofitable in the market, especially when learning and strategic behavior is considered. Learning and strategic market behavior will also hamper the role of VRE as a “better” energy source. This paper shows and proves a locational marginal price (LMP) disadvantage phenomenon, which will lead to low profitability of VRE. Three major suggestions are given based on the results.


2017 ◽  
Vol 261 (2) ◽  
pp. 755-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Moiseeva ◽  
Sonja Wogrin ◽  
Mohammad Reza Hesamzadeh

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (7) ◽  
pp. 1921-1957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichiro Ito ◽  
Mar Reguant

We develop a framework to characterize strategic behavior in sequential markets under imperfect competition and restricted entry in arbitrage. Our theory predicts that these two elements can generate a systematic price premium. We test the model predictions using microdata from the Iberian electricity market. We show that the observed price differences and firm behavior are consistent with the model. Finally, we quantify the welfare effects of arbitrage using a structural model. In the presence of market power, we show that full arbitrage is not necessarily welfare-enhancing, reducing consumer costs but increasing deadweight loss. (JEL D42, D43, L12, L13, L94, Q41)


Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (24) ◽  
pp. 4813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaber Valinejad ◽  
Mousa Marzband ◽  
Michael Elsdon ◽  
Ameena Saad Al-Sumaiti ◽  
Taghi Barforoushi

According to the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme, energy system planners are encouraged to consider the effects of greenhouse gases such as CO 2 in their short-term and long-term planning. A decrease in the carbon emissions produced by the power plant will result in a tax decrease. In view of this, the Dynamic carbon-constrained Equilibrium programming equilibrium constraints (DCC-EPEC) Framework is suggested to explore the effects of distinct market models on generation development planning (GEP) on electricity markets over a multi-period horizon. The investment incentives included in our model are the firm contract and capacity payment. The investment issue, which is regarded as a set of dominant producers in the oligopolistic market, is developed as an EPEC optimization problem to reduce carbon emissions. In the suggested DCC-EPEC model, the sum of the carbon emission tax and true social welfare are assumed as the objective function. Investment decisions and the strategic behavior of producers are included at the first level so as to maximize the overall profit of the investor over the scheduling period. The second-level issue is market-clearing, which is resolved by an independent system operator (ISO) to maximize social welfare. A real power network, as a case study, is provided to assess the suggested carbon-constrained EPEC framework. Simulations indicate that firm contracts and capacity payments can initiate the capacity expansion of different technologies to improve the long-term stability of the electricity market.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document