scholarly journals The Environmental Efficiency Analysis Based on the Three-Step Method for Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (21) ◽  
pp. 7028
Author(s):  
Qingyou Yan ◽  
Fei Zhao ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Tomas Balezentis
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Cooperative Game ◽  
Environmental Efficiency ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Step Method ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Dea Model ◽  
The Status ◽  
Dea Models

This paper suggests that the efficiency of a system (decision-making unit) and its subsystem cannot be properly measured using a two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) model either in cooperative or non-cooperative evaluation. Indeed, the existing methods subjectively determine the status of the subsystems in the whole system. The two-stage DEA models, either cooperative game or non-cooperative game, are used to analyze the environmental efficiency. However, when the actual relationship between the two subsystems is inconsistent with the subjective relationship assumptions, the overall efficiency of the system and the efficiency of each subsystem will be biased. The conventional two-stage DEA models require predetermining the relationship between the subsystems within the system based on the subjective judgment of the decision-maker. Based on this, this paper proposes a three-step method to solve the two-stage DEA. First, the position relation among subsystems is determined according to the optimal weights through the model. According to the status relationship among subsystems, the decision units are grouped, and the two-stage DEA model of cooperative game or non-cooperative game is used to analyze the efficiency in each group. This method reduces the subjectivity of decision making and analyzes the efficiency of each decision unit applying the most appropriate two-stage DEA model to find the source of inefficiency. Finally, this paper verifies the rationality and validity of the method by analyzing the water use efficiency of industrial systems in China. It is found that most regions in China value economic development more than environmental protection (as evidenced by the DEA weights). What is more, the method proposed by the paper can be generalized for any two-stage DEA problem.

scholarly journals Designing an Intuitionistic Fuzzy Network Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Efficiency Evaluation of Decision-Making Units with Two-Stage Structures

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Nafiseh Javaherian ◽  
Ali Hamzehee ◽  
Hossein Sayyadi Tooranloo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis Model ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy ◽  
Dea Models ◽  
Decision Making Units

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a powerful tool for evaluating the efficiency of decision-making units for ranking and comparison purposes and to differentiate efficient and inefficient units. Classic DEA models are ill-suited for the problems where decision-making units consist of multiple stages with intermediate products and those where inputs and outputs are imprecise or nondeterministic, which is not uncommon in the real world. This paper presents a new DEA model for evaluating the efficiency of decision-making units with two-stage structures and triangular intuitionistic fuzzy data. The paper first introduces two-stage DEA models, then explains how these models can be modified with intuitionistic fuzzy coefficients, and finally describes how arithmetic operators for intuitionistic fuzzy numbers can be used for a conversion into crisp two-stage structures. In the end, the proposed method is used to solve an illustrative numerical example.

Double Frontier Two-Stage Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (01) ◽  
pp. 117-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Amirteimoori ◽  
Hossein Azizi ◽  
Sohrab Kordrostami
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Efficiency Analysis ◽  
Programming Approach ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Fuzzy Data ◽  
Insurance Company ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Dea Models ◽  
Fuzzy Dea

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a mathematical programming approach with widespread applications in productivity and efficiency analysis. Compared with traditional DEA models, two-stage DEA models show the performance of each process and make available more information for decision making. In an article by Kao and Liu, models were proposed for combining a two-stage process to achieve overall fuzzy efficiency measures. Their method follows the simple geometric average approach and uses the product of two efficiencies. The present article applies a different angle for efficiency analysis in the two-stage fuzzy DEA. We suggest that the overall efficiency score of a decision-making unit (DMU) is defined as total weight of stage efficiencies, not as the simple product of their efficiency. Moreover, the proposed fuzzy DEA models are different from the model by Kao and Liu for fuzzy data in that our models are linear without the need for additional changes in variables and use the same set of constraints to measure the efficiency of DMUs with fuzzy input and output data. While the models by Kao and Liu are a nonlinear optimization problem that need additional changes in variables, and use different sets of constraints to measure fuzzy efficiencies. Additionally, our proposed approach evaluates the performance of DMUs from both optimistic and pessimistic viewpoints. Finally, using the proposed approach, the Taiwanese non-life insurance company problem will be investigated.

scholarly journals Dual frontiers data envelopment analysis: multiple ranking approaches from optimistic and pessimistic perspectives

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Maraee Aldamak
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Efficiency Score ◽  
The Body ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Free Disposal Hull ◽  
Dea Model ◽  
Ranking Models ◽  
Input And Output ◽  
Dea Models

The field of data envelopment analysis (DEA) has evolved rapidly since its introduction to decision-making science 40 years ago. DEA has since attracted the attention of many researchers because of its unique characteristic to measure the efficiency of multiple-input and multiple-output decision-making units (DMUs) without assigning prior weight to the input and output, unlike most available decision analysis tools. The body of research has resulted in a huge amount of literature and diverse DEA models with very many different approaches. DEA classifies all units under assessment into two groups: efficient with a 100% efficiency score and inefficient with a less than 100% efficiency score. This ability is considered both a strength and a weakness of the standard DEA model because, although it allows DEA to evaluate the efficiency of any dataset, it lacks the power to rank all DMUs, by giving full efficiency scores to many efficient units. This issue has attracted many researchers to investigate the weak discrimination power of classical DEA models, resulting in a subfield of research that focuses on DEA ranking. This thesis focuses on the development of the conventional DEA model, and an attempt has been made to study models that are considered as improved models, or approaches that bring a better ranking field, that may bring more accurate evaluation than the original DEA. After studying DEA ranking models, the thesis presents various models under the optimistic and pessimistic DEA ranking approaches. The first and fundamental contribution are the optimistic and pessimistic free disposal hull (FDH) models. In this study, authentic optimistic and pessimistic DEA models without convexity are developed from both input and output orientation. Further into the research investigation, extended models have been proposed, by combining the conventional and FDH ranking models with other different approaches in the literature. Chapter 4 of this thesis presents three extended FDH models: an FDH slack-based model, an FDH superefficiency model, and a dual frontier without infeasibility super-efficiency FDH model. Chapter 5 shows the development of extended models when virtual DMUs are considered. Improved virtual DMU models and improved FDH virtual DMU models are proposed in order to develop the DEA ranking ability from both optimistic and pessimistic approaches. The final model is an optimistic and pessimistic forecasting approach using regression analysis. The forecasting model can be used by decision makers to determine the resources needed for future planning to build an efficient new unit with reference to the current DMU set.

scholarly journals Dual frontiers data envelopment analysis: multiple ranking approaches from optimistic and pessimistic perspectives

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Maraee Aldamak
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Efficiency Score ◽  
The Body ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Free Disposal Hull ◽  
Dea Model ◽  
Ranking Models ◽  
Input And Output ◽  
Dea Models

The field of data envelopment analysis (DEA) has evolved rapidly since its introduction to decision-making science 40 years ago. DEA has since attracted the attention of many researchers because of its unique characteristic to measure the efficiency of multiple-input and multiple-output decision-making units (DMUs) without assigning prior weight to the input and output, unlike most available decision analysis tools. The body of research has resulted in a huge amount of literature and diverse DEA models with very many different approaches. DEA classifies all units under assessment into two groups: efficient with a 100% efficiency score and inefficient with a less than 100% efficiency score. This ability is considered both a strength and a weakness of the standard DEA model because, although it allows DEA to evaluate the efficiency of any dataset, it lacks the power to rank all DMUs, by giving full efficiency scores to many efficient units. This issue has attracted many researchers to investigate the weak discrimination power of classical DEA models, resulting in a subfield of research that focuses on DEA ranking. This thesis focuses on the development of the conventional DEA model, and an attempt has been made to study models that are considered as improved models, or approaches that bring a better ranking field, that may bring more accurate evaluation than the original DEA. After studying DEA ranking models, the thesis presents various models under the optimistic and pessimistic DEA ranking approaches. The first and fundamental contribution are the optimistic and pessimistic free disposal hull (FDH) models. In this study, authentic optimistic and pessimistic DEA models without convexity are developed from both input and output orientation. Further into the research investigation, extended models have been proposed, by combining the conventional and FDH ranking models with other different approaches in the literature. Chapter 4 of this thesis presents three extended FDH models: an FDH slack-based model, an FDH superefficiency model, and a dual frontier without infeasibility super-efficiency FDH model. Chapter 5 shows the development of extended models when virtual DMUs are considered. Improved virtual DMU models and improved FDH virtual DMU models are proposed in order to develop the DEA ranking ability from both optimistic and pessimistic approaches. The final model is an optimistic and pessimistic forecasting approach using regression analysis. The forecasting model can be used by decision makers to determine the resources needed for future planning to build an efficient new unit with reference to the current DMU set.

scholarly journals A Range Adjusted Measure of Super-Efficiency in Integer-Valued Data Envelopment Analysis with Undesirable Outputs

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 378-398
Author(s):  
Chunhua Chen ◽  
Haohua Liu ◽  
Lijun Tang ◽  
Jianwei Ren
Keyword(s):  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Transportation Systems ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Undesirable Outputs ◽  
Super Efficiency ◽  
Dea Model ◽  
Dea Models ◽  
Analysis Models ◽  
Transport Accidents

Abstract DEA (data envelopment analysis) models can be divided into two groups: Radial DEA and non-radial DEA, and the latter has higher discriminatory power than the former. The range adjusted measure (RAM) is an effective and widely used non-radial DEA approach. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no literature on the integer-valued super-efficiency RAM-DEA model, especially when undesirable outputs are included. We first propose an integer-valued RAM-DEA model with undesirable outputs and then extend this model to an integer-valued super-efficiency RAM-DEA model with undesirable outputs. Compared with other DEA models, the two novel models have many advantages: 1) They are non-oriented and non-radial DEA models, which enable decision makers to simultaneously and non-proportionally improve inputs and outputs; 2) They can handle integer-valued variables and undesirable outputs, so the results obtained are more reliable; 3) The results can be easily obtained as it is based on linear programming; 4) The integer-valued super-efficiency RAM-DEA model with undesirable outputs can be used to accurately rank efficient DMUs. The proposed models are applied to evaluate the efficiency of China’s regional transportation systems (RTSs) considering the number of transport accidents (an undesirable output). The results help decision makers improve the performance of inefficient RTSs and analyze the strengths of efficient RTSs.

Evaluating two-stage holistic production systems using novel CSDEA approach

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dujun Zhai ◽  
Minyue Jin ◽  
Jennifer Shang ◽  
Chenfeng Ji
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Production Process ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Collective Decision ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Decision Strategies ◽  
Content Type

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to apply data envelopment analysis (DEA) techniques to the collective decision-making environment to appraise two-stage production process under different decision preferences. Design/methodology/approach The authors propose a novel multi-criteria group decision-making approach that uses consensus-strategic data envelopment analysis (CSDEA) to appraise two-stage production process under two different decision strategies, which are efficiency- and fairness-based group decision preferences. Findings The authors find that the proposed CSDEA model evaluates the performance of the decision-making units (DMUs) not by diminishing other competitors but rather based on group interests of the entire decision set. Originality/value The authors extend Li’s two-stage model to cases that consider both intermediate inputs and outputs. The authors address the issue of incorporating collective managerial strategy into multi-criteria group decision-making and propose a novel CSDEA model that considers not only the individual-level performance of a DMU but also the group-level or collective decision strategies.

scholarly journals Alternative Secondary Goals in Multiplicative Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Chao Lu ◽  
Haifang Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Relative Efficiency ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Nonparametric Method ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Dea Model ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
China Construction Bank ◽  
Overall Efficiency ◽  
Decision Making Units

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a nonparametric method for evaluating the relative efficiency of a set of decision-making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs. As an extension of the DEA, a multiplicative two-stage DEA model has been widely used to measure the efficiencies of two-stage systems, where the first stage uses inputs to produce the outputs, and the second stage then uses the first-stage outputs as inputs to generate its own outputs. The main deficiency of the multiplicative two-stage DEA model is that the decomposition of the overall efficiency may not be unique because of the presence of alternate optima. To remove the problem of the flexible decomposition, in this paper, we maximize the sum of the two-stage efficiencies and simultaneously maximize the two-stage efficiencies as secondary goals in the multiplicative two-stage DEA model to select the decomposition of the overall efficiency from the flexible decompositions, respectively. The proposed models are applied to evaluate the performance of 10 branches of China Construction Bank, and the results are compared with the results of the existing models.

scholarly journals A full investigation of the directional congestion in data envelopment analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
somayeh khezri ◽  
Akram Dehnokhalaji ◽  
Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Input Output ◽  
Input And Output ◽  
Dea Models ◽  
Systems Of Inequalities ◽  
Full Investigation ◽  
Decision Making Units ◽  
Inputs And Outputs

One of interesting subjects in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is estimation of congestion of Decision Making Units (DMUs). Congestion is evidenced when decreases (increases) in some inputs re- sult in increases (decreases) in some outputs without worsening (im- proving) any other input/output. Most of the existing methods for measuring the congestion of DMUs utilize the traditional de nition of congestion and assume that inputs and outputs change with the same proportion. Therefore, the important question that arises is whether congestion will occur or not if the decision maker (DM) increases or de- creases the inputs dis-proportionally. This means that, the traditional de nition of congestion in DEA may be unable to measure the con- gestion of units with multiple inputs and outputs. This paper focuses on the directional congestion and proposes methods for recognizing the directional congestion using DEA models. To do this, we consider two di erent scenarios: (i) just the input direction is available. (ii) none of the input and output directions are available. For each scenario, we propose a method consists in systems of inequalities or linear pro- gramming problems for estimation of the directional congestion. The validity of the proposed methods are demonstrated utilizing two nu- merical examples.

scholarly journals Evaluating Environmental Efficiency of Turkish Cities by Data Envelopment Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-290 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Water Pollution ◽  
Air Pollution ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Empirical Study ◽  
Rapid Growth ◽  
Environmental Efficiency ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Dea Models ◽  
The City

<p>Turkey is a developing country and has achieved impressive economic development in recent years. But this rapid growth has brought in many environmental problems in Turkish cities, such as air pollution, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_pollution" title="Water pollution">water pollution</a> etc. In order to eliminate these problems, environmental performances of the city administrations must be evaluated. The objective of this empirical study is to evaluate the environmental efficiency of 81 Turkish provinces for the year 2010 by using by Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique. Efficient and inefficient units were determined in the system by four proposed DEA models. According to each model, the environmental efficiency maps of Turkey are constructed and the risky regions of the country are determined.&nbsp;</p>

scholarly journals Natural and Managerial Disposability Based DEA Model for China’s Regional Environmental Efficiency Assessment

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (18) ◽  
pp. 3436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyang Zhou ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Benjamin Lev ◽  
Lifang Quan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Energy Consumption ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Environmental Efficiency ◽  
Scale Efficiency ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Efficiency Assessment ◽  
Radial Model ◽  
Better Than

With the acceleration of industrialization, a large amount of energy consumption has brought tremendous pressure to the natural environment. In order to prevent environmental pollution and promote sustainable development, the environmental efficiency assessment as an effective way to provide decision-making basis has been given wide attention. This study measures the environmental efficiency of 30 provinces in China from 2006 to 2015 based on the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) environmental assessment radial model both under natural disposability and managerial disposability that considered the constant variable return to scale (RTS) and the damage to scale (DTS). In addition, the scale efficiency under the two kinds of disposability of China’s 30 provinces were also measured. We found that the environmental efficiencies of different provinces in China showed regional disparities. Provinces such as Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong had a good performance in unified environmental efficiency and scale efficiency both under natural disposability and managerial disposability. Generally speaking, the eastern regions always performed better than the central and western regions in unified environmental efficiency during the observed years. Therefore, policies should be established to distribute the resources in balance between the east, center, and west to further promote environmental efficiency.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document