scholarly journals Quantifying the Low Salinity Waterflooding Effect

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 1979
Author(s):  
Omar Chaabi ◽  
Mohammed Al Kobaisi ◽  
Mohamed Haroun

Low salinity waterflooding (LSW) has shown promising results in terms of increasing oil recovery at laboratory scale. In this work, we study the LSW effect, at laboratory scale, and provide a basis for quantifying the effect at field scale by extracting reliable relative permeability curves. These were achieved by experimental and numerical interpretation of laboratory core studies. Carbonate rock samples were used to conduct secondary and tertiary unsteady-state coreflooding experiments at reservoir conditions. A mathematical model was developed as a research tool to interpret and further validate the physical plausibility of the coreflooding experiments. At core scale and a typical field rate of ~1 ft/day, low salinity water (LS) resulted in not only ~20% higher oil recovery compared to formation water (FW) but also recovered oil sooner. LS water also showed capability of reducing the residual oil saturation when flooded in tertiary mode. The greater oil recovery caused by LSW can be attributed to altering the wettability of the rock to less oil-wet as confirmed by the numerically extracted relative permeability curves.

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad Waleed Al-Shalabi ◽  
Kamy Sepehrnoori ◽  
Gary Pope

Low salinity water injection (LSWI) is gaining popularity as an improved oil recovery technique in both secondary and tertiary injection modes. The objective of this paper is to investigate the main mechanisms behind the LSWI effect on oil recovery from carbonates through history-matching of a recently published coreflood. This paper includes a description of the seawater cycle match and two proposed methods to history-match the LSWI cycles using the UTCHEM simulator. The sensitivity of residual oil saturation, capillary pressure curve, and relative permeability parameters (endpoints and Corey’s exponents) on LSWI is evaluated in this work. Results showed that wettability alteration is still believed to be the main contributor to the LSWI effect on oil recovery in carbonates through successfully history matching both oil recovery and pressure drop data. Moreover, tuning residual oil saturation and relative permeability parameters including endpoints and exponents is essential for a good data match. Also, the incremental oil recovery obtained by LSWI is mainly controlled by oil relative permeability parameters rather than water relative permeability parameters. The findings of this paper help to gain more insight into this uncertain IOR technique and propose a mechanistic model for oil recovery predictions.


SPE Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (01) ◽  
pp. 481-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pål Østebø Andersen

Summary Many experimental studies have investigated smart water and low-salinity waterflooding and observed significant incremental oil recovery after changes in the injected-brine composition. The common approach to model such enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) mechanisms is by shifting the input relative permeability curves, particularly including a reduction of the residual oil saturation. Cores that originally display oil-wetness can retain much oil at the outlet of the flooded core because of the capillary pressure being zero at a high oil saturation. This end effect is difficult to overcome in highly permeable cores at typical laboratory rates. Injecting a brine that changes the wetting state to less-oil-wet conditions (represented by zero capillary pressure at a lower oil saturation) will lead to a release of oil previously trapped at the outlet. Although this is chemically induced incremental oil, it represents a reduction of remaining oil saturation, not necessarily of residual oil saturation. This paper illustrates the mentioned issues of interpreting the difference in remaining and residual oil saturation during chemical EOR and hence the evaluation of potential smart water effects. We present a mathematical model representing coreflooding that accounts for wettability changes caused by changes in the injected composition. For purpose of illustration, this is performed in terms of adsorption of a wettability-alteration (WA) component coupled to the shifting of relative permeability curves and capillary pressure curves. The model is parameterized in accordance with experimental data by matching brine-dependent saturation functions to experiments where wettability alteration takes place dynamically because of the changing of one chemical component. It is seen that several effects can give an apparent smart water effect without having any real reduction of the residual oil saturation, including changes in the mobility ratio, where the oil already flowing is pushed more efficiently, and the magnitude of capillary end effects can be reduced because of increased water-wetness or because of a reduction in water relative permeability giving a greater viscous drag on the oil.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julfree Sianturi ◽  
Bayu Setyo Handoko ◽  
Aditya Suardiputra ◽  
Radya Senoputra

Abstract Handil Field is a giant mature oil and gas field situated in Mahakam Delta, East Kalimantan Indonesia. Peripheral Low Salinity Water injection was performed since 1978 with an extraordinary result. The paper is intending to describe the success story of this secondary recovery by low salinity water injection application in the peripheral of Handil field main zone, which successfully increased the oil recovery and brought down the remaining oil saturation beyond the theoretical value of residual oil saturation number. Water producer wells were drilled to produce low salinity water from shallow reservoirs 400 - 1000 m depth then it was injected to main zone reservoirs where the main accumulation of oil situated. This low salinity water reacted positively with the rock properties and in-situ fluids which was described as wettability alteration in the reservoir. It is related to initial reservoir condition, connate water saturation, rock physics and connate water salinity. This peripheral scheme then observed having the sweeping effect on top of pressure maintenance due to long period of injection. The field production performance was indicating the important reduction of residual oil saturation in some reservoirs with continuous low salinity water injection. From static Oil in Place calculation, some reservoirs have high current oil recovery up to 80%. This was proved by in situ residual oil saturation measurement which was performed in 2007 and 2011. It was indicating the low residual saturation as low as 8% - 15%. This excellent result was embraced by a progressive development plan, where water flooding with pattern and chemical injection will be performed later on. The continuation of this peripheral injection is in an on-going development with patterns injection which is called water flooding development. An important oil recovery can be achieved with a simple scheme of low salinity injection, performed in a close network injection, where the water treatment is simple yet significant oil gain was recovered. This innovation technique brings more revenue with less investment compared to chemical EOR injection.


Author(s):  
Abdulrazag Zekri ◽  
Hildah Nantongo ◽  
Fathi Boukadi

AbstractWhile the “low salinity waterflooding” (LSWF) has been praised for enhancing oil recovery from different core rocks, the performance of the technique in different wettability environments remains unclear. The consensus is that LSWF does not work well in water-wet carbonate oil reservoirs. The main research objective was to determine the effect of LSWF on the displacement efficiency (DE) in different wettability environments. Carbonate core flooding experiments on rocks with different wettabilities were performed at in-situ reservoir conditions using seawater as a “base water”. Seawater was sequentially diluted 10 to 50 times and spiked 2 and 6 times with sulfate. Following sequential flooding with four different waters, the DEs were measured for different wettabilities. Five different sequential brine floodings were performed on carbonate rocks. Results indicated that optimum low salinity water is a function of system wettability. Seawater (≈ 50,000 ppm) is the optimum brine for oil-wet and intermediate-wettability systems. Sequential flooding consisting of seawater followed by diluted seawater in a water-wet system yielded the highest DE of 88%. Besides, low-salinity brine followed by sulfate performed better in a water-wet environment than in oil- and intermediate-wettability systems.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sianturi

Handil Field is a giant mature oil and gas field situated in Mahakam Delta, East Kalimantan Indonesia. Peripheral Low Salinity Water injection was performed since 1978 with extraordinary results. This paper describes the success story of this secondary recovery by low salinity water injection application in the peripheral of Handil field main zone, which successfully increased the oil recovery and brought down the remaining oil saturation beyond the theoretical value of residual oil saturation. Water producer wells were drilled to produce low salinity water from shallow reservoirs 400 - 1000 m depth then it was injected to main zone reservoirs where the main accumulation of oil is situated. This low salinity water reacted positively with the rock properties and in-situ fluids which is described as wettability alteration in the reservoir. It is related to initial reservoir condition, connate water saturation, rock physics and connate water salinity. This peripheral scheme then observed having the sweeping effect on top of pressure maintenance due to long period of injection. The field production performance was indicating the important reduction of residual oil saturation in some reservoirs with continuous low salinity water injection. From static Oil in Place calculation, some reservoirs have high current oil recovery up to 80%. This was proved by in situ residual oil saturation measurement which was performed in 2007 and 2011. It was indicating the low residual saturation as low as 8% - 15%. This excellent result was embraced by a progressive development plan, where water flooding with pattern and chemical injection will be performed later on. The continuation of this peripheral injection is in an on-going development with patterns injection which is called water flooding development. An important oil recovery can be achieved with a simple scheme of low salinity injection, performed in a close network injection, where the water treatment is simple yet significant oil gain was recovered. This innovation technique brings more revenue with less investment compared to chemical EOR injection.


SPE Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Yaoze Cheng ◽  
Yin Zhang ◽  
Abhijit Dandekar ◽  
Jiawei Li

Summary Shallow reservoirs on the Alaska North Slope (ANS), such as Ugnu and West Sak-Schrader Bluff, hold approximately 12 to 17 × 109 barrels of viscous oil. Because of the proximity of these reservoirs to the permafrost, feasible nonthermal enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods are highly needed to exploit these oil resources. This study proposes three hybrid nonthermal EOR techniques, including high-salinity water (HSW) injection sequentially followed by low-salinity water (LSW) and low-salinity polymer (LSP) flooding (HSW-LSW-LSP), solvent-alternating-LSW flooding, and solvent-alternating-LSP flooding, to recover ANS viscous oils. The oil recovery performance of these hybrid EOR techniques has been evaluated by conducting coreflooding experiments. Additionally, constant composition expansion (CCE) tests, ζ potential determinations, and interfacial tension (IFT) measurements have been conducted to reveal the EOR mechanisms of the three proposed hybrid EOR techniques. Coreflooding experiments and IFT measurements have been conducted at reservoir conditions of 1,500 psi and 85°F, while CCE tests have been carried out at a reservoir temperature of 85°F. ζ potential determinations have been conducted at 14.7 psi and 77°F. The coreflooding experiment results have demonstrated that all of the three proposed hybrid EOR techniques could result in much better performance in reducing residual oil saturation than waterflooding and continuous solvent flooding in viscous oil reservoirs on ANS, implying better oil recovery potential. In particular, severe formation damage or blockage at the production end occurred when natural sand was used to prepare the sandpack column, indicating that the natural sand may have introduced some unknown constituents that may react with the injected solvent and polymer, resulting in a severe blocking issue. Our investigation on this is ongoing, and more detailed studies are being conducted in our laboratory. The CCE test results demonstrate that more solvent could be dissolved into the tested viscous oil with increasing pressure, simultaneously resulting in more oil swelling and viscosity reduction. At the desired reservoir conditions of 1,500 psi and 85°F, as much as 60 mol% of solvent could be dissolved into the ANS viscous oil, resulting in more than 31% oil swelling and 97% oil viscosity reduction. Thus, the obvious oil swelling and significant viscosity reduction resulting from solvent injection could lead to much better microscopic displacement efficiency during the solvent flooding. The ζ potential determination results illustrate that LSW resulted in more negative ζ potential than HSW on the interface between sand and water, indicating that lowering the salinity of injected brine could result in the sand surface being more water-wet, but adding polymer to the LSW could not further enhance the water wetness. The IFT measurement results show that the IFT between the tested ANS viscous oil and LSW is higher than that between the tested viscous oil and HSW, which conflicts with the commonly recognized IFT reduction effect by LSW flooding. Thus, the EOR theory of the LSW flooding in our proposed hybrid techniques may be attributed to low-salinity effects (LSEs) such as multi-ion exchange, expansion of electrical double layer, and salting-in effect, while water wetness enhancement may benefit the LSW flooding process to some extent. The LSP’s viscosity is much higher than the viscosities of LSW and solvent, so LSP injection could result in better mobility control in the tested viscous oil reservoirs, leading to improvement of macroscopic sweep efficiency. Combining these EOR theories, the proposed hybrid EOR techniques have the potential to significantly increase oil recovery in viscous oil reservoirs on ANS by maximizing the overall displacement efficiency.


SPE Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (06) ◽  
pp. 2874-2888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Al–Ibadi ◽  
Karl D. Stephen ◽  
Eric J. Mackay

Summary Low–salinity waterflooding (LSWF) is an emergent technology developed to increase oil recovery. Laboratory–scale testing of this process is common, but modeling at the production scale is less well–reported. Various descriptions of the functional relationship between salinity and relative permeability have been presented in the literature, with respect to the differences in the effective salinity range over which the mechanisms occur. In this paper, we focus on these properties and their impact on fractional flow of LSWF at the reservoir scale. We present numerical observations that characterize flow behavior accounting for dispersion. We analyzed linear and nonlinear functions relating salinity to relative permeability and various effective salinity ranges using a numerical simulator. We analyzed the effect of numerical and physical dispersion of salinity on the velocity of the waterflood fronts as an expansion of fractional–flow theory, which normally assumes shock–like behavior of water and concentration fronts. We observed that dispersion of the salinity profile affects the fractional–flow behavior depending on the effective salinity range. The simulator solution is equal to analytical predictions from fractional–flow analysis when the midpoint of the effective salinity range lies between the formation and injected salinities. However, retardation behavior similar to the effect of adsorption occurs when these midpoint concentrations are not coincidental. This alters the velocities of high– and low–salinity water fronts. We derived an extended form of the fractional–flow analysis to include the impact of salinity dispersion. A new factor quantifies a physical or numerical retardation that occurs. We can now modify the effects that dispersion has on the breakthrough times of high– and low–salinity water fronts during LSWF. This improves predictive ability and also reduces the requirement for full simulation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 887-888 ◽  
pp. 53-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Chao Jiang ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Kao Ping Song ◽  
En Gao Tang ◽  
Bin Huang

Different kinds of compound solutions were prepared by using different concentrations of hydrophobically associating polymers and sulfonate type surfactant. The static viscosity and interfacial tension of these solutions were measured. On the experimental conditions of the Suizhong 36-1 oilfield, the relative permeability curves of the water flooding and the surfactant/polymer combination flooding were measured through the constant speed unsteady method and the experimental data were processed through the way of J.B.N. The several existing kinds of viscosity processing methods of non-newtonian fluid were compared and analysed , and a new way is put forward . The results show that the relative permeability of the flooding phase is very low while displacing the heavy oil; the relative permeability of oil in combination flooding is higher than that in water flooding, the relative permeability of flooding phase in combination flooding is lower than that in water flooding and the residual oil saturation of combination flooding is lower than that of water flooding. Meanwhile, the concentrations of polymer and surfactant have a great influence on the surfactant/polymer combination relative permeability curves.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document