scholarly journals Assessment of Permian Zubers as the Host Rock for Deep Geological Disposal

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2239
Author(s):  
Leszek Lankof

Together with renewable energy sources, nuclear power represents an important contribution to a sustainable energy mix in many countries and has an important impact on sustainable development. Nuclear energy production is also a source of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) and spent nuclear fuel (SNF), which require special concern. Disposal in deep geological formations is one of the solutions for the long-term management of HLW and SNF. It requires the development of a concept ensuring long-term safe isolation of waste and its validation applying the safety case methodology, which is a formal compilation of evidence, analyses and arguments that quantify and justify a claim that the repository will be safe. The results of laboratory testing of a potential repository host rock are an important component of the evidence that helps in the safety assessment of the deep geological disposal concept. This paper presents results of research focused on the physical, geomechanical and sorption properties of the Brown and Red Zuber unit rocks from the Kłodawa Salt Mine in Poland, which together with rock salt are an important component of Polish salt domes. The Brown and Red Zubers are typical evaporite lithostratigraphic units for the Polish part of the Zechstein Basin. They consist of halite (15–85%) and water-insoluble minerals, such as anhydrite, clay minerals, carbonates, quartz and feldspar, which occurred in varying proportions in the tested samples. The properties of the zuber rocks have been compared with those of rock salt, which is considered a suitable host rock for deep geological disposal of radioactive waste.

Author(s):  
Stan Gordelier ◽  
Pa´l Kova´cs

The world is facing energy difficulties for the future, in terms of security of supply and climate change issues. Nuclear power is virtually carbon free and it contributes to energy security, being a quasi-domestic source. Whilst it cannot provide a complete answer to these challenges, it is certainly capable of providing a significant component of the answer. However, nuclear power remains controversial. In order to gain public acceptance, it is widely recognised that a number of key issues need to be addressed, amongst which is resolution of the high-level radioactive waste (HLW) (including spent fuel) disposal issue. This is an important issue for all countries with an existing nuclear programme, whether or not it is intended that nuclear power should be phased out or expanded — the waste already exists and must be managed in any event. It is equally important for countries planning a new nuclear power programme where none has previously existed. Since nuclear power was first developed over fifty years ago, HLW arisings have been stored as an interim measure. It is widely believed by experts (though not by many opponents of the nuclear industry, nor by the public) that deep geological disposal, after a reasonable cooling time in interim storage, is technically feasible and constitutes a safe option [1] at an acceptable cost. The total volume of HLW from nuclear reactors is relatively small. A key issue, however, is the time-scale for developing such a final disposal solution. Considerations of security and inter-generational equity suggest that geological disposal should be implemented as soon as possible irrespective of whether or not new arisings are created. The question of managing HLW is not necessarily related to the issue of building new nuclear power stations. However, many opponents argue that there has been insufficient demonstration of the long-term safety of deep geological disposal. The same opponents also argue that there should be a moratorium on building new nuclear power plants (NPPs) until the issue of long-term management of HLW is resolved. These arguments have a powerful influence on public opinion towards both the construction of a waste repository and the building of new NPPs. The intent of this paper (developed from the current OECD NEA study on “Timing of High Level Waste Disposal”) is to identify and discuss some of the factors influencing the timing of the implementation of a HLW disposal strategy and to demonstrate to decision makers how these factors are affecting country strategies, based on current experience. Determining an optimum timescale of HLW disposal may be affected by a wide range of factors. The study examines how social acceptability, technical soundness, environmental responsibility and economic feasibility impact on the timing of HLW disposal and can be balanced in a national radioactive waste management strategy taking the social, political and economic environment into account. There is clear evidence that significant fractions of the public still have serious misconceptions with respect to the issues surrounding nuclear waste. The nuclear industry, together with governments in those countries who would like a component of nuclear power in their energy mix, has a responsibility for and a significant challenge in presenting its case to the public.


2007 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 875-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Wanner

Radioactive waste arises mainly from the generation of nuclear power but also from the use of radioactive materials in medicine, industry, and research. It occurs in a variety of forms and may range from slightly to highly radioactive. It is a worldwide consensus that radioactive waste should be disposed of in a permanent way which ensures protection of humans and the environment. This objective may be achieved by isolating radioactive waste in a disposal system which is located, designed, constructed, operated, and closed such that any potential hazard to human health is kept acceptably low, now and in the future.For highly radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel, which are the waste types representing the highest potential danger to human health, an effective isolation from the biosphere is considered to be achievable by deep geological disposal. Disposal concepts rely on the passive safety functions of a series of engineered and natural barriers. Since total isolation over extended timescales is not possible, radionuclides will eventually be released from the waste matrix and migrate through the engineered and natural barriers. The assessment of their mobility in these environments is essential for the safety demonstration of such a repository. The solubility of many radionuclides is limited and may contribute significantly to retention. Reliable predictions of solubility limitations are therefore important.Predictions of maximum solubilities are always subject to uncertainties. Complete sets of thermodynamic and equilibrium data are required for a reliable assessment of the chemical behavior of the radionuclides. Gaps in the thermodynamic databases may lead to erroneous predictions. Missing data and insufficient knowledge of the solubility-limiting processes increase the uncertainties and require pessimistic assumptions in the safety analysis; however, these are usually not detrimental to safety owing to the robustness of the multi-barrier approach.


Author(s):  
Hiroyoshi Ueda ◽  
Satoru Suzuki ◽  
Katsuhiko Ishiguro ◽  
Kiyoshi Oyamada ◽  
Shoko Yashio ◽  
...  

NUMO (Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan) has the responsibility for implementing deep geological disposal of high-level (HLW) and transuranic (TRU) radioactive waste from the Japanese nuclear programme. A formal Requirements Management System (RMS) is planned to efficiently and effectively support the computerised implementation of the management strategy and the methodology required to drive the step-wise siting processes, and the following repository operational phase. The RMS will help in the comprehensive management of the decision-making processes in the geological disposal project, in change management as the disposal system is optimised, in driving projects such as the R&D programme efficiently, and in maintaining structured records regarding past decisions, all of which lead to soundness of the project in terms of long-term continuity. The system is planned to have information handling and management functions using a database that includes the decisions/requirements in the programme under consideration, the way in which these are structured in terms of the decision-making process and other associated information. A two-year development programme is underway to develop and enhance an existing trial RMS to a practical system. Functions for change management, history management and association with the external timeline management system are being implemented in the system development work. The database format is being improved to accommodate the requirements management data relating to the facility design and to safety assessment of the deep geological repository. This paper will present an outline of the development work with examples to demonstrate the system’s practicality. In parallel with the system/database developments, a case research of the use of requirements management in radioactive waste disposal projects was undertaken to identify key issues in the development of an RMS for radioactive waste disposal and specify a number of use cases to guide the overall development of the system. The findings of the case research will also be shown in the paper to provide general information on the application of an RMS in a radioactive waste disposal programme, the difficulties of successful implementation and suggestions on how these difficulties can be overcome.


MRS Advances ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (61) ◽  
pp. 4075-4080
Author(s):  
Fredrik Vahlund

ABSTRACTSince 1988 the Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. operates a repository for low- and intermediate-level short-lived radioactive waste, SFR, in Forsmark, Sweden. Due to decommissioning of the nuclear power plants additional storage capacity is needed. In December 2014, an application to extend the repository was therefore submitted. One key component of this application was an assessment of post-closure safety of the extended SFR. For this safety assessment, a methodology based on that developed by SKB for the spent nuclear fuel repository was used and the impact of the degradation of repository components, the evolution of the surface system and changes of future climate on the radiological safety of the repository was assessed over a period of 100,000 years. The central conclusion of the SR-PSU safety assessment is that the extended SFR repository meets requirements on protection of human health and of the environment that have been established by the Swedish radiation safety authority for the final disposal of radioactive waste. Furthermore, the design of the repository was shown suitable for the waste selected and the applied methodology suitable for the safety assessment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 1581-1589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Povilas Poskas ◽  
Asta Narkuniene ◽  
Dalia Grigaliuniene

AbstractIn Lithuania all the spent nuclear fuel (SNF) came from operation of the Ignalina nuclear power plant with two reactors of RBMK type (RBMK is a Russian acronym for 'Channelized Large Power Reactor' which is a water-cooled graphite-moderated reactor: RBMK-1500). Approximately 22,000 SNF assemblies are due for geological disposal in Lithuania. Currently it is envisaged that SNF will be stored in dry interim storage facilities (new and existing) for at least 50 y prior to possible deep geological disposal.The decision on the final SNF management option (disposal in a national repository, disposal in regional repositories, etc.) has not yet been made but some investigations of the possibilities to dispose of the SNF in Lithuania have been initiated. With the support of Swedish experts, analysis of possible geological formations for SNF disposal was performed and the existence of potentially suitable formations agreed. The geological formations prioritized as prospective include the crystalline rocks in southern Lithuania and two clayey formations: the Lower Triassic clay formation and the Lower Cambrian Baltic Group clay formation, with priority given to the Lower Triassic clay formation.This paper presents the main aspects of the research and other activities undertaken over the past decade in the field of SNF disposal: international cooperation; current status and plans for the Lithuanian national program; further investigations required; and competence developments.


2012 ◽  
Vol 76 (8) ◽  
pp. 2995-3001 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. M. Beattie ◽  
S. J. Williams

AbstractThe near field, together with the containment and isolation provided by the geosphere, contributes to the long-term safety provided by a geological disposal facility (GDF) after closure. The different engineered barriers can prevent or limit the release of radionuclides and their migration to the undisturbed host rock or geosphere and are expected to fulfil their post-closure safety functions for many thousands to hundreds of thousands of years. They will continue to contribute to containment after their eventual degradation when there would no longer be confidence that they would continue to fulfil all of their safety functions in their totality. By that time, significant radioactive decay will have occurred, substantially reducing the hazard associated with the wastes. Therefore, demonstration of long-term safety requires an understanding of the evolution of the engineered barriers and the consequences for the generic safety functions that the different barriers provide. This paper provides an overview of the research of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Radioactive Waste Management Directorate into the evolution of the near field of a GDF.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 237-238
Author(s):  
Michel Herm ◽  
Elke Bohnert ◽  
Luis Iglesias Pérez ◽  
Tobias König ◽  
Volker Metz ◽  
...  

Abstract. Disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in deep geological repositories is considered a preferential option for the management of such wastes in many countries with nuclear power plants. With the aim to permanently and safely isolate the radionuclide inventory from the biosphere for a sufficient time, a multibarrier system consisting of technical, geotechnical and geological barriers is interposed between the emplaced waste and the environment. In safety assessments for deep underground repositories, access of water, followed by failure of canisters and finally loss of the cladding integrity is considered in the long-term. Hence, evaluating the performance of SNF in deep geological disposal systems requires process understanding of SNF dissolution and rates as well as quantification of radionuclides release from SNF under reducing conditions of a breached container. In order to derive a radionuclide source term, the SNF dissolution and alteration processes can be assigned to two steps: (i) instantaneous release of radionuclides upon cladding failure from gap and grain boundaries and (ii) a long-term release that results from dissolution of the fuel grains itself (Ewing, 2015). In this context, research at KIT-INE has focused for more than 20 years on the behavior of SNF (irradiated UO2 and MOX fuels) under geochemical conditions (pH, redox and ionic strength) representative of various repository concepts, including the interaction of SNF with backfill material, such as bentonite as well as the influence of iron corrosion products, e.g. magnetite and radiolytic reactions on SNF dissolution mechanisms. Since 2001, KIT-INE has contributed with experimental and theoretical studies on the behavior of SNF under repository relevant conditions to six Euratom projects viz SFS (2001–2004), NF-PRO (2004–2006), MICADO (2006–2009), RECOSY (2007–2011), FIRST-Nuclides (2012–2014) and DISCO (2016–2021). Moreover, since 2007, overall 4 consecutive projects for the Belgian waste management organization, ONDRAF-NIRAS, were performed on the behavior of SNF under conditions representative of the Belgian “Supercontainer” concept. In this contribution, we summarize major achievements of theses research projects to understand and quantify the radionuclide release from dissolving SNF under repository conditions. In particular, the dependence of radionuclide release on the chemical composition of the aqueous and gaseous phase in the proximity of repositories in different types of host rock is discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 91-93
Author(s):  
Philip Kegler ◽  
Martina Klinkenberg ◽  
Felix Brandt ◽  
Guido Deissmann ◽  
Dirk Bosbach

Abstract. In Germany it is planned to directly dispose spent nuclear fuel (SNF) from nuclear power plants together with other high-level radioactive wastes (HLW) from former SNF reprocessing (e.g., vitrified waste), in a deep geological repository for heat-generating wastes – the siting process for this repository was started in 2017 and is ongoing. Based on several decades of research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) it is generally accepted at the technical and scientific level that direct disposal of HLW and SNF in deep mined geological repositories is the safest and most sustainable option (CEC, 2011; IAEA, 2004). The current efforts to improve the performance and accident tolerance of fuels in nuclear power generation resulted in an increased utilization of a variety of new types of light-water reactor (LWR) fuels such as fuels doped with Cr, Al, and Si. This doping leads to a significant change of the microstructure of the fuel matrix. The corrosion behavior of these types of fuels under conditions relevant to deep geological disposal has hardly been studied so far; however, this is of crucial importance as the development of a robust safety case for deep geological disposal of SNF requires a solid understanding of its dissolution behavior over very long time scales (up to 1 million years). To fill this knowledge gap, additional systematic studies on modern doped UO2 fuels were needed. Corrosion experiments with SNF cannot entirely unravel all of the various concurring effects of the dissolution mechanism due to the chemical and structural complexity of SNF and its high beta and gamma radiation field during the first 1000 years; moreover, technical restrictions only allow a very limited number of experiments. Therefore, within the EU-DisCo project (https://www.disco-h2020.eu, last access: 11 October 2021), a very ambitious programme of corrosion studies on irradiated Cr and Al/Cr doped fuels was carried out, which was complemented by systematic single-effect dissolution studies (e.g., with respect to doping level, grain size and thermodynamic aspects) performed on carefully prepared and characterized, simplified UO2-based model materials. Here, we present recent results on the dissolution behavior of tailor-made UO2 model materials in accelerated static batch experiments using H2O2 as simulant for radiolytic oxidants, present in long-term disposal scenarios for SNF in failed container conditions due to the alpha irradiation of water. In these dissolution experiments pure UO2 reference pellets exhibiting different densities and grain sizes, as well as Cr-doped UO2 pellets with various Cr-doping levels, produced using different doping methods having different grain sizes, were used. In addition, Nd-doped and industrially produced Cr- and Cr/Nd-doped UO2 pellets were used to determine the influence of these parameters on the dissolution rates. The dissolution experiments were performed under strictly controlled conditions with respect to exclusion of oxygen, temperature control, and exclusion of light. This bottom-up approach was followed to understand how the addition of Cr-oxide into the fuel matrix affects SNF dissolution behavior under repository relevant conditions. The results of the dissolution experiments performed with real SNF and the model materials obtained by the DisCo partners build the basis for numerical simulations on the dissolution behavior of modern SNF. First results of the data evaluation indicate that the addition of dopants and the consequential modification of the fuel matrix does not lead to a significant change of the dissolution behavior of these fuels under repository relevant conditions compared to standard SNF (i.e. dissolution rates agree within an order of magnitude).


2006 ◽  
Vol 352 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 246-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ferry ◽  
C. Poinssot ◽  
C. Cappelaere ◽  
L. Desgranges ◽  
C. Jegou ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document