scholarly journals Robust Design Optimization with Penalty Function for Electric Oil Pumps with BLDC Motors

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keun-Young Yoon ◽  
Soo-Whang Baek

In this paper, we propose and evaluate a robust design optimization (RDO) algorithm for the shape of a brushless DC (BLDC) motor used in an electric oil pump (EOP). The components of the EOP system and the control block diagram for driving the BLDC motor are described. Although the conventional deterministic design optimization (DDO) method derives an appropriate combination of design goals and target performance, DDO does not allow free searching of the entire design space because it is confined to preset experimental combinations of parameter levels. To solve this problem, we propose an efficient RDO method that improves the torque characteristics of BLDC motors by considering design variable uncertainties. The dimensions of the stator and the rotor were selected as the design variables for the optimal design and a penalty function was applied to address the disadvantages of the conventional Taguchi method. The optimal design results obtained through the proposed RDO algorithm were confirmed by finite element analysis, and the improvement in torque and output performance was confirmed through experimental dynamometer tests of a BLDC motor fabricated according to the optimization results.

Author(s):  
Soo-Whang Baek

In this paper, we propose and perform the robust design optimization (RDO) algorithm for the shape of the BLDC motor used in the electric oil pump. The proposed RDO algorithm improves the torque characteristics of the BLDC motor to improve the performance of the electric oil pump. The previous deterministic design optimization (DDO) method derives an appropriate combination of the design goal and the specific target performance. However, not only the target performance but also other performance constraints must be considered for RDO. To overcome these problems, we consider the penalty function. In conclusion, we can confirm the improvement of the torque characteristics of the BLDC motor used in the EOP by using the proposed RDO algorithm.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shujuan Wang ◽  
Qiuyang Li ◽  
Gordon J. Savage

This paper investigates the structural design optimization to cover both the reliability and robustness under uncertainty in design variables. The main objective is to improve the efficiency of the optimization process. To address this problem, a hybrid reliability-based robust design optimization (RRDO) method is proposed. Prior to the design optimization, the Sobol sensitivity analysis is used for selecting key design variables and providing response variance as well, resulting in significantly reduced computational complexity. The single-loop algorithm is employed to guarantee the structural reliability, allowing fast optimization process. In the case of robust design, the weighting factor balances the response performance and variance with respect to the uncertainty in design variables. The main contribution of this paper is that the proposed method applies the RRDO strategy with the usage of global approximation and the Sobol sensitivity analysis, leading to the reduced computational cost. A structural example is given to illustrate the performance of the proposed method.


2003 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles D. McAllister ◽  
Timothy W. Simpson

In this paper, we introduce a multidisciplinary robust design optimization formulation to evaluate uncertainty encountered in the design process. The formulation is a combination of the bi-level Collaborative Optimization framework and the multiobjective approach of the compromise Decision Support Problem. To demonstrate the proposed framework, the design of a combustion chamber of an internal combustion engine containing two subsystem analyses is presented. The results indicate that the proposed Collaborative Optimization framework for multidisciplinary robust design optimization effectively attains solutions that are robust to variations in design variables and environmental conditions.


Author(s):  
Charles D. McAllister ◽  
Timothy W. Simpson

Abstract In this paper, we introduce a multidisciplinary robust design optimization formulation to evaluate uncertainty encountered in the design process. The formulation is a combination of the bi-level Collaborative Optimization framework and the multiobjective approach of the compromise Decision Support Problem. To demonstrate the proposed approach, the design of a combustion chamber of an internal combustion engine containing two subsystem analyses is presented. The results indicate that the proposed Collaborative Optimization framework for multidisciplinary robust design optimization effectively attains solutions that are robust to variations in design variables and environmental conditions.


Author(s):  
Ikjin Lee ◽  
Kyung K. Choi ◽  
Liu Du

The objective of reliability-based robust design optimization (RBRDO) is to minimize the product quality loss function subject to probabilistic constraints. Since the quality loss function is usually expressed in terms of the first two statistical moments, mean and variance, many methods have been proposed to accurately and efficiently estimate the moments. Among the methods, the univariate dimension reduction method (DRM), performance moment integration (PMI), and percentile difference method (PDM) are recently proposed methods. In this paper, estimation of statistical moments and their sensitivities are carried out using DRM and compared with results obtained using PMI and PDM. In addition, PMI and DRM are also compared in terms of how accurately and efficiently they estimate the statistical moments and their sensitivities of a performance function. In this comparison, PDM is excluded since PDM could not even accurately estimate the statistical moments of the performance function. Also, robust design optimization using DRM is developed and then compared with the results of RBRDO using PMI and PDM. Several numerical examples are used for the two comparisons. The comparisons show that DRM is efficient when the number of design variables is small and PMI is efficient when the number of design variables is relatively large. For the inverse reliability analysis of reliability-based design, the enriched performance measure approach (PMA+) is used.


Author(s):  
Gang Li ◽  
Ye Liu ◽  
Gang Zhao ◽  
Yan Zeng

There are inherently various uncertainties in practical engineering, and reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) and robust design optimization (RDO) are two well-established methodologies when considering the uncertainties. Naturally, reliability-based robust design optimization (RBRDO) is a methodology developed recently by combining RBDO and RDO, in which the tolerances of random design variables are always assumed as constants. However, the tolerance of random design variables is a key factor for the objective robustness and manufacturing cost, and the tolerance allocation is the core problem in mechanical manufacturing. Inspired by the cost–tolerance relationship in mechanical manufacturing, this paper presents an integrated framework to simultaneously find the optimal design variable and the corresponding tolerance in the multi-objective RBRDO, with the trade-off between objective robustness and manufacturing cost. The failure mechanism of the constraint handling strategy of the constrained reference vector-guided evolutionary algorithm (C-RVEA) is discussed to solve the multi-objective optimization formulation. Then the robust repair operator and reliability-based repair operator are proposed to transform unfeasible solutions to the feasible ones under reliability constraints. Numerical results reveal that the proposed repair algorithm is effective. By solving the integrated multi-objective optimization problem, the Pareto front with the compromised solutions between the objective robustness and manufacturing cost could be obtained, from which decision makers can select the satisfying solution conveniently according to the preferred requirements.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 2900
Author(s):  
Jin-Cheol Park ◽  
Soo-Hwan Park ◽  
Jae-Hyun Kim ◽  
Soo-Gyung Lee ◽  
Geun-Ho Lee ◽  
...  

Static eccentricity (SE) is frequently generated by manufacturing processes. As the nonuniformity of the air-gap length is caused by the SE, the torque ripple and cogging torque increase in the motor. This study analyzes the distorted back electromotive force (EMF) and cogging torque due to SE. Further, a motor design considering SE is performed for stable back EMF and low cogging torque. First, the SE was diagnosed and analyzed using the back EMF and cogging torque measured from the test results of the base model. In addition, the rotor position was calculated using the unbalanced back EMF due to the SE. The calculated rotor position is used when analyzing phenomena due to SE and applied to robust design. Subsequently, robust design optimization was performed to improve the unbalanced back EMF and cogging torque due to SE. Using finite element analysis (FEA) considering SE, the shape of the stator was designed based on the base model. The estimated rotor position from the base model was applied to the optimum model to confirm its robustness from SE’s effects. Finally, the base and optimum models were compared through the test results.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (19) ◽  
pp. 6236
Author(s):  
Jinhwan Park ◽  
Donghyeon Yoo ◽  
Jaemin Moon ◽  
Janghyeok Yoon ◽  
Jungtae Park ◽  
...  

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are increasingly employed in electric vehicles (EVs) owing to their advantages, such as low weight, and high energy and power densities. However, the uncertainty encountered in the manufacturing of LIB cells increases the failure rate and causes cell-to-cell variations, thereby degrading the battery capacity and lifetime. In this study, the reliability and robustness of LIB cells were improved using the design of experiments (DOE), and the reliability-based robust design optimization (RBRDO) approaches. First, design factors sensitive to the energy density and power density were selected as design variables through sensitivity analysis using the DOE. RBRDO was performed to maximize the energy density while reducing the failure rate and cell-to-cell variations. To verify the superiority of the reliability and robustness offered by RBRDO, the obtained results were compared with those from conventional deterministic design optimization (DDO), and reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). RBRDO increased the mean of the energy density by 33.5% compared to the initial value and reduced the failure rate by 98.9%, due to improved reliability, compared to DDO. Moreover, RBRDO reduced the standard deviation in the energy density (i.e., cell-to-cell variations) by 30.0% due to the improved robustness compared to RBDO.


2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanfu Tang ◽  
Jianqiao Chen ◽  
Junhong Wei

In practical applications, there may exist a disparity between real values and optimal results due to uncertainties. This kind of disparity may cause violations of some probabilistic constraints in a reliability based design optimization (RBDO) problem. It is important to ensure that the probabilistic constraints at the optimum in a RBDO problem are insensitive to the variations of design variables. In this paper, we propose a novel concept and procedure for reliability based robust design in the context of random uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty. The epistemic uncertainty of design variables is first described by an info gap model, and then the reliability-based robust design optimization (RBRDO) is formulated. To reduce the computational burden in solving RBRDO problems, a sequential algorithm using shifting factors is developed. The algorithm consists of a sequence of cycles and each cycle contains a deterministic optimization followed by an inverse robustness and reliability evaluation. The optimal result based on the proposed model satisfies certain reliability requirement and has the feasible robustness to the epistemic uncertainty of design variables. Two examples are presented to demonstrate the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document