scholarly journals An Integrated Framework for Traceability and Impact Analysis in Requirements Verification of Cyber–Physical Systems

Electronics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 983
Author(s):  
Alachew Mengist ◽  
Lena Buffoni ◽  
Adrian Pop

In the field of model-based design of Cyber–Physical Systems (CPS), seamless traceability of the process, from requirements to models to simulation results, is becoming increasingly important. It can be used to support several activities such as variant handling, impact analysis, component reuse, software maintenance and evolution, verification, and validation. Despite the fact that the relevance of traceability in the model-based design of CPSs is well known, current tools that support traceability management are inadequate in practice. The lack of comprehensive whole-lifecycle systems engineering support in a single tool is one of the main causes of such ineffective traceability management, where traceability relationships between artifacts are still manually generated and maintained. This paper aims at presenting an approach and a prototype for automatically generating and maintaining the appropriate traceability links between heterogeneous artifacts ranging from requirement models, through design models, down to simulation and verification results throughout the product life cycle in model-based design of CPSs. A use case study is presented to validate and illustrate the proposed method and prototype.

Systems ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan Carter ◽  
Stephen Adams ◽  
Georgios Bakirtzis ◽  
Tim Sherburne ◽  
Peter Beling ◽  
...  

Despite “cyber” being in the name, cyber–physical systems possess unique characteristics that limit the applicability and suitability of traditional cybersecurity techniques and strategies. Furthermore, vulnerabilities to cyber–physical systems can have significant safety implications. The physical and cyber interactions inherent in these systems require that cyber vulnerabilities not only be defended against or prevented, but that the system also be resilient in the face of successful attacks. Given the complex nature of cyber–physical systems, the identification and evaluation of appropriate defense and resiliency strategies must be handled in a targeted and systematic manner. Specifically, what resiliency strategies are appropriate for a given system, where, and which should be implemented given time and/or budget constraints? This paper presents two methodologies: (1) the cyber security requirements methodology and (2) a systems-theoretic, model-based methodology for identifying and prioritizing appropriate resiliency strategies for implementation in a given system and mission. This methodology is demonstrated using a case study based on a hypothetical weapon system. An assessment and comparison of the results from the two methodologies suggest that the techniques presented in this paper can augment and enhance existing systems engineering approaches with model-based evidence.


2015 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Kliewe ◽  
Lydia Kaiser ◽  
Roman Dumitrescu ◽  
Jürgen Gausemeier

This paper will improve the system protection for Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) by the use of the specification technique CONSENS. Therefore an approach is demonstrated and validated. The possibilities how the system protection can be integrated in Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) and especially in CONSENS are shown and discussed. First results how the different views on the system can be used to identify components worth protecting of CPS are presented. The identified components are of crucial importance in order to ensure the protection of CPS.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 817-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Fitzgerald ◽  
Carl Gamble ◽  
Richard Payne ◽  
Peter Gorm Larsen ◽  
Stylianos Basagiannis ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Juho Makio ◽  
Elena Makio-Marusik ◽  
Eugeny Yablochnikov ◽  
Valery Arckhipov ◽  
Kirill Kipriianov

2017 ◽  
Vol 90 (8-9) ◽  
pp. 1191-1204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Wang ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Jinlong Lin ◽  
Chao-Hsien Chu

Procedia CIRP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 253-258
Author(s):  
Iris Gräßler ◽  
Dominik Wiechel ◽  
Daniel Roesmann ◽  
Henrik Thiele

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document