scholarly journals Quantum Finite-Time Thermodynamics: Insight from a Single Qubit Engine

Entropy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roie Dann ◽  
Ronnie Kosloff ◽  
Peter Salamon

Incorporating time into thermodynamics allows for addressing the tradeoff between efficiency and power. A qubit engine serves as a toy model in order to study this tradeoff from first principles, based on the quantum theory of open systems. We study the quantum origin of irreversibility, originating from heat transport, quantum friction, and thermalization in the presence of external driving. We construct various finite-time engine cycles that are based on the Otto and Carnot templates. Our analysis highlights the role of coherence and the quantum origin of entropy production.

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. eaar5909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shujin Deng ◽  
Aurélia Chenu ◽  
Pengpeng Diao ◽  
Fang Li ◽  
Shi Yu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Richard Healey

The metaphor that fundamental physics is concerned to say what the natural world is like at the deepest level may be cashed out in terms of entities, properties, or laws. The role of quantum field theories in the Standard Model of high-energy physics suggests that fundamental entities, properties, and laws are to be sought in these theories. But the contextual ontology proposed in Chapter 12 would support no unified compositional structure for the world; a quantum state assignment specifies no physical property distribution sufficient even to determine all physical facts; and quantum theory posits no fundamental laws of time evolution, whether deterministic or stochastic. Quantum theory has made a revolutionary contribution to fundamental physics because its principles have permitted tremendous unification of science through the successful application of models constructed in conformity to them: but these models do not say what the world is like at the deepest level.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Riffet ◽  
Bernard Amadon ◽  
Nicolas Bruzy ◽  
Christophe Denoual

StandardView ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
Roy McKean
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 3467-3478
Author(s):  
J. I. Paez-Ornelas ◽  
H. N. Fernández-Escamilla ◽  
H. A. Borbón-Nuñez ◽  
H. Tiznado ◽  
Noboru Takeuchi ◽  
...  

Atomic description of ALD in systems that combine large surface area and high reactivity is key for selecting the right functional group to enhance the ligand-exchange reactions.


Author(s):  
T. N. Palmer

A new law of physics is proposed, defined on the cosmological scale but with significant implications for the microscale. Motivated by nonlinear dynamical systems theory and black-hole thermodynamics, the Invariant Set Postulate proposes that cosmological states of physical reality belong to a non-computable fractal state-space geometry I , invariant under the action of some subordinate deterministic causal dynamics D I . An exploratory analysis is made of a possible causal realistic framework for quantum physics based on key properties of I . For example, sparseness is used to relate generic counterfactual states to points p ∉ I of unreality, thus providing a geometric basis for the essential contextuality of quantum physics and the role of the abstract Hilbert Space in quantum theory. Also, self-similarity, described in a symbolic setting, provides a possible realistic perspective on the essential role of complex numbers and quaternions in quantum theory. A new interpretation is given to the standard ‘mysteries’ of quantum theory: superposition, measurement, non-locality, emergence of classicality and so on. It is proposed that heterogeneities in the fractal geometry of I are manifestations of the phenomenon of gravity. Since quantum theory is inherently blind to the existence of such state-space geometries, the analysis here suggests that attempts to formulate unified theories of physics within a conventional quantum-theoretic framework are misguided, and that a successful quantum theory of gravity should unify the causal non-Euclidean geometry of space–time with the atemporal fractal geometry of state space. The task is not to make sense of the quantum axioms by heaping more structure, more definitions, more science fiction imagery on top of them, but to throw them away wholesale and start afresh. We should be relentless in asking ourselves: From what deep physical principles might we derive this exquisite structure? These principles should be crisp, they should be compelling. They should stir the soul. Chris Fuchs ( Gilder 2008 , p. 335)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document