scholarly journals Diagnosis of Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens of Pneumonia

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2287
Author(s):  
Maroun M. Sfeir
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Tests ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Accurate Diagnosis ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Severe Problem ◽  
Antibiotic Overuse ◽  
Molecular Tests ◽  
Hospital Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Pathogens ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia that are caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens represent a common and severe problem with increased mortality. Accurate diagnosis is essential to initiate appropriate antimicrobial therapy promptly while simultaneously avoiding antibiotic overuse and subsequent antibiotic resistance. Here, we discuss the main conventional phenotypic diagnostic tests and the advanced molecular tests that are currently available to diagnose the primary MDR pathogens and the resistance genes causing pneumonia.

scholarly journals In Vitro Activity of Doripenem, a Carbapenem for the Treatment of Challenging Infections Caused by Gram-Negative Bacteria, against Recent Clinical Isolates from the United States

2008 ◽  
Vol 52 (12) ◽  
pp. 4388-4399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris M. Pillar ◽  
Mohana K. Torres ◽  
Nina P. Brown ◽  
Dineshchandra Shah ◽  
Daniel F. Sahm
Keyword(s):  
The United States ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Hospital Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Abdominal Infections ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
Gram Positive Cocci

ABSTRACT Doripenem, a 1β-methylcarbapenem, is a broad-spectrum antibiotic approved for the treatment of complicated urinary tract and complicated intra-abdominal infections. An indication for hospital-acquired pneumonia including ventilator-associated pneumonia is pending. The current study examined the activity of doripenem against recent clinical isolates for the purposes of its ongoing clinical development and future longitudinal analysis. Doripenem and comparators were tested against 12,581 U.S. clinical isolates collected between 2005 and 2006 including isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. MICs (μg/ml) were established by broth microdilution. By MIC90, doripenem was comparable to imipenem and meropenem in activity against S. aureus (methicillin susceptible, 0.06; resistant, 8) and S. pneumoniae (penicillin susceptible, ≤0.015; resistant, 1). Against ceftazidime-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae, the MIC90 of doripenem (0.12) was comparable to that of meropenem (0.12) and superior to that of imipenem (2), though susceptibility of isolates exceeded 99% for all evaluated carbapenems. The activity of doripenem was not notably altered against ceftazidime-nonsusceptible or extended-spectrum β-lactamase screen-positive Enterobacteriaceae. Doripenem was the most potent carbapenem tested against P. aeruginosa (MIC90/% susceptibility [%S]: ceftazidime susceptible = 2/92%S, nonsusceptible = 16/61%S; imipenem susceptible = 1/98.5%S, nonsusceptible = 8/56%S). Against imipenem-susceptible Acinetobacter spp., doripenem (MIC90 = 2, 89.1%S) was twice as active by MIC90 as were imipenem and meropenem. Overall, doripenem potency was comparable to those of meropenem and imipenem against gram-positive cocci and doripenem was equal or superior in activity to meropenem and imipenem against Enterobacteriaceae, including β-lactam-nonsusceptible isolates. Doripenem was the most active carbapenem tested against P. aeruginosa regardless of β-lactam resistance.

scholarly journals Management of Health-Care Associated Pneumonia (HCAP)

2013 ◽  
pp. 87-90
Author(s):  
Alessia Rosato ◽  
Claudio Santini
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Treatment Approach ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Traditional Classification ◽  
Hospital Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Health Care Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Introduction The traditional classification of Pneumonia as either community acquired (CAP) or hospital acquired (HAP) reflects deep differences in the etiology, pathogenesis, approach and prognosis between the two entities. Health-Care Associated Pneumonia (HCAP) develops in a heterogeneous group of patients receiving invasive medical care or surgical procedures in an outpatient setting. For epidemiology and outcomes, HCAP closely resembles HAP and possibly requires an analogous therapeutic regimen effective against multidrug-resistant pathogens. Materials and methods We reviewed the pertinent literature and the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of HCAP to analyze the evidence for the recommended approach. Results Growing evidence seems to confirm the differences in epidemiology and outcome between HCAP and CAP but fails to confirm any real advantage in pursuing an aggressive treatment for all HCAP and CAP patients. Discussion Further investigations are needed to establish the optimal treatment approach according to the different categories of patients and the different illness severities. Keywords Health Care Associated Pneumonia (HCAP); Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP); Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP); Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pathogens

scholarly journals Incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia in tracheostomised and non tracheostomised patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 2754
Author(s):  
David D. M. Rosario ◽  
Anitha Sequeira
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Early Tracheostomy ◽  
Hospital Acquired Infection ◽  
Total Incidence ◽  
Hospital Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Background: Pneumonia is the most common hospital acquired infection in the intensive care unit. One of the causes for hospital acquired pneumonia is ventilator associated pneumonia. Tracheostomy is known to prevent occurrence of ventilator associated pneumonia as it decreases the respiratory dead space, assists in better clearance of secretions and prevents chances of aspiration. Generally, tracheostomy is done after 2 weeks of endotracheal intubation to prevent tracheal complications. The aim of this study is to identify the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia in tracheostomised and non tracheostomised patients and to see if early tracheostomy can prevent development of ventilator associated pneumonia.Methods: The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital during a period of four years. 100 patients who were on mechanical ventilation for more than 7 days where taken up for the study. APACHE 4 scoring system was used. The incidence of Ventilator associated pneumonia in tracheostomised and non tracheostomised patients was studied.Results: In our study the total incidence of VAP was 44 %. In our study out of the 42 patients who had undergone tracheostomy 13 (30.95%) patients had ventilator associated pneumonia. Among the non-tracheostomised patients 31 (53.44%) out of 58 patients developed ventilator associated pneumonia. In our study the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia was much lesser (12%) in patients who underwent tracheostomy in the period 7 to 10 days after mechanical ventilation, whereas in those who underwent tracheostomy after 11 days incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia was much higher.Conclusions: Our study showed that the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia was much higher among non tracheostomised patients compared to patients who underwent tracheostomy. Hence patients undergoing earlier tracheostomy had a clear advantage than those undergoing tracheostomy late or non tracheostomised patients in preventing ventilator associated pneumonia.

scholarly journals International ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 1700582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoni Torres ◽  
Michael S. Niederman ◽  
Jean Chastre ◽  
Santiago Ewig ◽  
Patricia Fernandez-Vandellos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Hospital Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Hospital Acquired

scholarly journals Executive Summary: Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society

2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 575-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre C. Kalil ◽  
Mark L. Metersky ◽  
Michael Klompas ◽  
John Muscedere ◽  
Daniel A. Sweeney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Executive Summary ◽  
Literature Reviews ◽  
Physician Judgment ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Hospital Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Abstract It is important to realize that guidelines cannot always account for individual variation among patients. They are not intended to supplant physician judgment with respect to particular patients or special clinical situations. IDSA considers adherence to these guidelines to be voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the physician in the light of each patient's individual circumstances. These guidelines are intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for patients at risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), including specialists in infectious diseases, pulmonary diseases, critical care, and surgeons, anesthesiologists, hospitalists, and any clinicians and healthcare providers caring for hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia. The panel's recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of HAP and VAP are based upon evidence derived from topic-specific systematic literature reviews.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document