scholarly journals Evaluation of the New Beckmann Coulter Analyzer DxH 900 Compared to Sysmex XN20: Analytical Performance and Flagging Efficiency

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1756
Author(s):  
Maite Serrando Querol ◽  
Javier Nieto-Moragas ◽  
Anna Marull Arnall ◽  
Meritxell Deulofeu Figueras ◽  
Orlando Jiménez-Romero

Efficiency and accuracy in automated hematology analyzers are very important for clinical laboratories. The purpose was to evaluate the flags and results reported by the newest Beckman Coulter analyzer DxH 900 compared to the Sysmex XN20 system. Samples were analyzed on the XN20 (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) and on the Beckman Coulter DxH 900 (Beckman Coulter, Miami, Florida, USA). Slide reviews were performed microscopically. Morphologic criteria were used to identify abnormal cells as recommended by International Consensus Group for Hematology (ICSH): blasts, immature granulocytes (IG%), abnormal lymphocytes (ALs) and plasma cells. Results: there was a strong correlation between the analyzers in almost all clinical parameters tested. Both DxH 900 and XN20 showed an excellent degree of association for the leukocyte differential compared to the reference method (manual microscopy). When it comes to IG%, XN20 showed a positive bias for higher results. Related to platelets, there are no differences between the two methods for PLT count. For mean platelet volume (MPV), DxH 900 provided 100% results of the samples analyzed while XN20 while in the XN20 analyzer, 16% of the results were missing. From our results we came to the conclusion that both analyzers, DxH 900 and XN20 were clinically accurate and efficient. Abnormal Lymphocyte detection highlighted the differences between the two technologies as only minimal agreement was obtained. DxH 900 demonstrated higher sensitivity in detecting IG with good correlation with microscopic review. The DxH 900 for platelet clumps identification provides an excellent flag (PLT Clumps) with the highest sensitivity observed in our evaluation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (9) ◽  
pp. 1489-1497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa K. Peterson ◽  
Anne E. Tebo ◽  
Mark H. Wener ◽  
Susan S. Copple ◽  
Marvin J. Fritzler

AbstractBackgroundThe indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using HEp-2 cell substrates is the preferred method by some for detecting antinuclear antibodies (ANA) as it demonstrates a number of characteristic staining patterns that reflect the cellular components bound as well as semi-quantitative results. Lack of harmonized nomenclature for HEp-2 IFA patterns, subjectivity in interpretation and variability in the number of patterns reported by different laboratories pose significant harmonization challenges. The main objectives of this study were to assess current practice in laboratory assessment of HEp-2 IFA, identify gaps and define strategies to improve reading, interpretation and reporting.MethodsWe developed and administered a 24-item survey based on four domains: educational and professional background of participants, current practice of HEp-2 IFA testing and training, gap assessment and the perceived value of International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody Patterns (ICAP) and other factors in HEp-2 IFA assessment. The Association of Medical Laboratory Immunologists (AMLI) and American Society for Clinical Pathology administered the survey from April 1 to June 30, 2018, to members involved in ANA testing. This report summarizes the survey results and discussion from a dry workshop held during the 2019 AMLI annual meeting.ResultsOne hundred and seventy-nine (n = 179) responses were obtained where a significant number were clinical laboratory scientists (46%), laboratory directors (24%), supervisors (13%) or others (17%). A majority of respondents agreed on the need to standardize nomenclature and reporting of HEp-2 IFA results. About 55% were aware of the ICAP initiative; however, among those aware, a significant majority thought its guidance on HEp-2 IFA nomenclature and reporting is of value to clinical laboratories. To improve ICAP awareness and further enhance HEp-2 IFA assessment, increased collaboration between ICAP and the clinical laboratory community was suggested with emphasis on education and availability of reference materials.ConclusionsBased on these suggestions, future efforts to optimize HEp-2 IFA reading, interpretation and reporting would benefit from more hands-on training of laboratory personnel as well as continuous collaboration between professional organizations, in vitro diagnostic manufacturers and clinical laboratories.


1976 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 202-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
D A Cotter ◽  
B H Sage

As part of the installation procedure of the LARC leukocyte differential classifier in a clinical laboratory, a 100-slide protocol is carried out to establish the performance of the classifier in the laboratory. The detailed make-up of this protocol and its relationship to key performance parameters for the leukocyte differential are described in detail. Data from the first ten of these protocols are presented which establish the (a) normal ranges, (b) reproducibility, (c) accuracy, (d) false-positive/false-negative rates for the detection of left shifts and (e) false-positive/false-negative rates for the detection of bloods with abnormal cells.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 1759-1770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Damoiseaux ◽  
Ingmar Heijnen ◽  
Christel Van Campenhout ◽  
Catharina Eriksson ◽  
Nicole Fabien ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Detection of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) is important for the diagnosis of the ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV). For AAV, especially ANCA directed against myeloperoxidase (MPO) and proteinase 3 (PR3) are most relevant. ANCA with less well-defined specificities may, however, also be detected in other inflammatory and non-inflammatory conditions. Methods: A questionnaire, initiated by the European Autoimmunity Standardisation Initiative (EASI), was used to gather information on methods and testing algorithms used for ANCA in clinical laboratories of 12 European countries (EASI survey). Results: Four hundred and twenty-nine responses were included in the EASI survey analysis which revealed differences within countries and between countries. Laboratories overall were poor in adherence to international consensus on ANCA testing. Substantial variation was observed with respect to the use of ANCA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) in the algorithm, application of distinct methods for MPO- and PR3-ANCA, the daily availability of new ANCA results, and interpretation of test results. Conclusions: Awareness of these differences may stimulate further harmonization and standardization of ANCA testing. This may be promoted by an update of the international ANCA consensus and the introduction of international standards.


2001 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 77-81
Author(s):  
Izumi Tsuda ◽  
Takayuki Takubo ◽  
Tomio Kamitani ◽  
Noriyuki Tatsumi

The newly developed QA-810V is an optional unit for the determination of five-part white blood cell differentials. It can be used together with the same manufacturer's haematology analyser which has been used in relatively small-sized laboratories. The present study evaluates the basic performance of the QA-810V and the MEK-8118 haematology analyser using routinely obtained blood specimens treated with ethylenedioaminetetraacetic acid-2K. In this evaluation, reproducibility was good and little carryover was found. Accurate measurements were possible for up to 24h of storage. Storage at 4°C yielded more stable measurements of complete blood counts and five-part differentials than storage at room temperature. A good correlation between findings with the MEK-8118 haematology analyser and those with the SE-9000 haematology analyser was found for complete blood counts. The leukocyte differential obtained with the QA-810V correlated well with eye counts, withr>0.9for percentages of neutrophils, lymphocytes and eosinophils. Scattergrams obtained with the QA-810V reflected the presence of abnormal cells. The performance of the QA-810V was excellent and it can improve the quality of testing in clinical laboratories.


Hematology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesus San Miguel

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is a unique cancer paradigm for investigating the mechanisms involved in the transition from a premalignant condition (monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance) into a malignant disease (MM). In the pathogenesis of myeloma, the dialogue between plasma cells and their microenvironment is as important as the genotypic characteristics of the tumor clone. MM is genetically highly complex, with almost all patients displaying cytogenetic abnormalities and frequent intraclonal heterogeneity that play a critical role in the outcome of the disease. In fact, it is likely that myeloma will soon no longer be considered as a single entity. This, along with the availability of an unexpected number of new treatment possibilities, has reinforced the need for better tools for prognosis and for monitoring treatment efficacy through minimal residual disease techniques. The outcome of MM patients has significantly improved in the last 2 decades, first through the introduction of high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation and, more recently, due to the use of proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib and carfilzomib) and immunomodulatory agents (thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide). Moreover, the need to reexamine the diagnostic criteria of early MM and the possibility of early intervention opens up new therapeutic avenues. New drugs are also emerging, including second- and third-generation proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulators, monoclonal antibodies, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and kinesin spindle protein inhibitors, among others. Our goal is to find a balance among efficacy, toxicity, and cost, with the ultimate aim of achieving a cure for this disease.


2012 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shashirekha Shetty ◽  
Marion Siady ◽  
Kalyan C. Mallempati ◽  
Andrew Wilson ◽  
Jeff Poarch ◽  
...  

Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1503
Author(s):  
Girolamo Giannotta ◽  
Nicola Giannotta

mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have hegemonized the world market, and their administration to the population promises to stop the pandemic. However, the waning of the humoral immune response, which does not seem to last so many months after the completion of the vaccination program, has led us to study the molecular immunological mechanisms of waning immunity in the case of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. We consulted the published scientific literature and from the few articles we found, we were convinced that there is an immunological memory problem after vaccination. Although mRNA vaccines have been demonstrated to induce antigen-specific memory B cells (MBCs) in the human population, there is no evidence that these vaccines induce the production of long-lived plasma cells (LLPCs), in a SARS-CoV-2 virus naïve population. This obstacle, in our point of view, is caused by the presence, in almost all subjects, of a cellular T and B cross-reactive memory produced during past exposures to the common cold coronaviruses. Due to this interference, it is difficult for a vaccination with the Spike protein alone, without adjuvants capable of prolonging the late phase of the generation of the immunological memory, to be able to determine the production of protective LLPCs. This would explain the possibility of previously and completely vaccinated subjects to become infected, already 4–6 months after the completion of the vaccination cycle.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuya Miyamoto ◽  
Kazuyuki Matsumoto ◽  
Hironari Kato ◽  
Ryuichi Yoshida ◽  
Yuzo Umeda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pancreatic juice cytology (PJC) is a tool for diagnosing malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN); however, the accuracy is insufficient using the conventional method. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) improves the cell recovery rate, and almost all cells can be evaluated. We evaluated the efficacy of PJC with LBC for malignant IPMN. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 90 patients with suspected malignant IPMN who underwent PJC before pancreatectomy. PJC with smear and LBC methods was conducted in 52 patients (between June 2003 to December 2011) and 38 patients (between January 2012 to December 2018). Based on the imaging studies, all of the patients were classified according to the international consensus guidelines for IPMN revised in 2017. Results Of the 90 patients, 43 (48%) had malignant IPMN (high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma), and the remaining patients had non-malignant IPMN (intermediate- or low-grade dysplasia). LBC increased the accuracy of PJC for the diagnosis of malignant IPMN (smear method: 56% [29/52] vs. LBC method: 76% [29/38]; P = 0.044). In a multivariate analysis, LBC was a significant factor influencing the accurate diagnosis of PJC (odds ratio: 3.52; P = 0.021). Furthermore, LBC increased the accuracy of PJC for malignant IPMN in patients with worrisome features (smear method: 66% [19/29] vs. LBC method: 93% [14/15]; P = 0.043). Conclusions LBC increases the accuracy of PJC for diagnosing malignant IPMN compared with the conventional smear method.


1984 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 769-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory A. Threatte ◽  
Clara Adrados ◽  
Shirley Ebbe ◽  
George Brecher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document