scholarly journals Anti-DFS70 Antibodies for Differentiating Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease in Patients with Positive ANA Tests: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1592
Author(s):  
Chiao-Feng Cheng ◽  
Ming-Chieh Shih ◽  
Ting-Yuan Lan ◽  
Ko-Jen Li
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Rheumatic Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Test Accuracy ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Bivariate Model ◽  
Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease ◽  
Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease ◽  
Test Result

Anti-DFS70 antibodies have been proposed as a marker to exclude systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD). We conducted this systematic diagnostic test accuracy review and meta-analysis to determine the performance of anti-DFS70 antibodies in patients with a positive anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) test result to exclude SARD. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Library up to 22 February 2021, and included studies examining the diagnostic accuracy of anti-DFS70 antibodies in patients with a positive ANA test result. The results were pooled using a hierarchical bivariate model and plotted in summary receiver operating characteristic curves. R software and Stata Statistical Software were used for the statistical analysis. Eight studies with 4168 patients were included. The summary sensitivity was 0.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.12–0.28) and the specificity was 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.88–0.96). The area under the curve was 0.69 (95% confidence interval: 0.64–0.72). The meta-regression analysis showed that targeting only ANA-associated rheumatic disease was associated with higher specificity. In addition, the studies with a non-SARD prevalence of <80% and using a chemiluminescence assay were associated with higher specificity. Anti-DFS70 antibodies have high specificity for the exclusion of SARD among patients presenting with a positive ANA test, but the sensitivity is low.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Test Accuracy of the 4AT for Delirium Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (20) ◽  
pp. 7515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunhye Jeong ◽  
Jinkyung Park ◽  
Juneyoung Lee
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diagnostic Test ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Test Accuracy ◽  
Test Accuracy ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Bivariate Model ◽  
Data Synthesis

Under-recognition of delirium is an international problem. For the early detection of delirium, a feasible and valid screening tool for healthcare professionals is needed. This study aimed to present a scientific reason for using the 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT) through a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the diagnostic test accuracy. We systematically searched articles in the EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases and selected relevant articles on the basis of the predefined inclusion criteria. The quality of the included articles was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. We estimated the pooled values of diagnostic test accuracy by employing the bivariate model and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model in data synthesis. A total of 3729 patients of 13 studies were included in the analysis. The pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity of the 4AT were 81.5% (95% confidence interval: 70.7%, 89.0%) and 87.5% (79.5%, 92.7%), respectively. Given the 4AT’s evidence of accuracy and practicality, we suggest healthcare professionals to utilize this tool for routine screening of delirium. However, for detecting delirium in the dementia population, further work is required to evaluate the 4AT with other cut-off points or scoring methods in order for it to be more sensitive and specific.

scholarly journals Performance of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy with few studies or sparse data

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 1896-1911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yemisi Takwoingi ◽  
Boliang Guo ◽  
Richard D Riley ◽  
Jonathan J Deeks
Keyword(s):  
Hierarchical Models ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sparse Data ◽  
Parameter Estimates ◽  
Test Accuracy ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Bivariate Model ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Meta Analyses

Hierarchical models such as the bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) models are recommended for meta-analysis of test accuracy studies. These models are challenging to fit when there are few studies and/or sparse data (for example zero cells in contingency tables due to studies reporting 100% sensitivity or specificity); the models may not converge, or give unreliable parameter estimates. Using simulation, we investigated the performance of seven hierarchical models incorporating increasing simplifications in scenarios designed to replicate realistic situations for meta-analysis of test accuracy studies. Performance of the models was assessed in terms of estimability (percentage of meta-analyses that successfully converged and percentage where the between study correlation was estimable), bias, mean square error and coverage of the 95% confidence intervals. Our results indicate that simpler hierarchical models are valid in situations with few studies or sparse data. For synthesis of sensitivity and specificity, univariate random effects logistic regression models are appropriate when a bivariate model cannot be fitted. Alternatively, an HSROC model that assumes a symmetric SROC curve (by excluding the shape parameter) can be used if the HSROC model is the chosen meta-analytic approach. In the absence of heterogeneity, fixed effect equivalent of the models can be applied.

scholarly journals The value of ultrasound in diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum in emergent or critical conditions: A meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libing Jiang ◽  
Jing Wu ◽  
Xia Feng
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Abdominal Ultrasound ◽  
Critical Conditions ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic

Background: Hollow organs perforation is a life-threatening condition. Early diagnosis and emergent intervention are important. Bedside ultrasound may be an alternative diagnostic tool for this condition. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the diagnostic value of ultrasound of pneumoperitoneum in emergent or critical conditions through meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for potential studies. Then, two reviewers performed the processes of study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment independently. Finally, diagnostic indexes were analyzed with STATA 12.0 software (Serial No. 40120519635). Results: A total of five studies with moderate to high quality were eligible for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio and their 95% confidence interval were 0.91 (95% confidence interval = 0.86–0.94), 0.96 (95% confidence interval = 0.75–0.99), 22.05 (95% confidence interval = 3.10–156.96), and 0.10 (95% confidence interval = 0.07–0.15), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.92 (95% confidence interval = 0.90–0.94). Conclusion: Abdominal ultrasound is a useful alternative tool in diagnosing of pneumoperitoneum. However, due to limited evidence, it is not yet indicated for routine clinical use.

scholarly journals A Systematic and Meta-Analysis Review on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Antibodies in the Serological Diagnosis of COVID-19.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Vengesai ◽  
Herald Midzi ◽  
Maritha Kasambala ◽  
Hamlet Mutandadzi ◽  
Tariro L. Mduluza-Jok ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Test Accuracy ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Serological Tests ◽  
Bivariate Model ◽  
Prevalence Studies

Abstract Background: Serological testing based on different antibody types are an alternative method being used to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 and has the potential of having higher diagnostic accuracy compared to the current gold standard RT-PCR. Therefore, the objective of this review was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of IgG and IgM based Point-of-care (POC) lateral flow immunoassays (LFIA), chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (CLIA), fluorescence enzyme-linked immunoassay (FIA) and ELISA systems that detect SARS-CoV-2 antigens.Method: A systematic literature search was carried out in PubMed, Medline complete and MedRxiv. Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 were eligible. Study selection and data-extraction were done by two authors independently. QUADAS-2 checklist tool was used to assess the quality of the studies. The bivariate model and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve model were performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the serological tests. Subgroup meta-analysis analyses was performed to explore the heterogeneity. Results: The pooled sensitivity for IgG, IgM and IgG-IgM based LFIA tests were 0.5856, 0.4637 and 0.6886 respectively compared to RT-PCR method. The pooled sensitivity for IgG and IgM based CLIA tests were 0.9311 and 0.8516 respectively compared to RT-PCR. The pooled sensitivity the IgG, IgM and IgG-IgM based ELISA tests were 0.8292, 0.8388 and 0.8531 respectively compared to RT-PCR. All tests displayed high specificities ranging from 0.9693 to 0.9991. Among the evaluated tests, IgG based CLIA expressed the highest sensitivity signifying its accurate detection of the largest proportion of infections identified by RT-PCR. ELISA and CLIA tests performed better in terms of sensitivity compared to LFIA. IgG based tests performed better compared to IgM ones expect for the ELISA. Conclusions: We report that IgG-IgM based ELISA tests have the best overall diagnostic test accuracy. Moreover, irrespective of the method, a combined IgG/IgM test seems to be a better choice in terms of sensitivity than measuring either antibody type independently. Given the poor performances of the current LFIA devices there is need for more research on the development of highly sensitivity and specific POC LFIA that are adequate for most individual patient applications and attractive for large sero-prevalence studies.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO Registration Number is: CRD42020179112

scholarly journals A systematic and meta-analysis review on the diagnostic accuracy of antibodies in the serological diagnosis of COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Vengesai ◽  
Herald Midzi ◽  
Maritha Kasambala ◽  
Hamlet Mutandadzi ◽  
Tariro L. Mduluza-Jokonya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Test Accuracy ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Serological Tests ◽  
Bivariate Model ◽  
Prevalence Studies

Abstract Background Serological testing based on different antibody types are an alternative method being used to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 and has the potential of having higher diagnostic accuracy compared to the current gold standard rRT-PCR. Therefore, the objective of this review was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of IgG and IgM based point-of-care (POC) lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (CLIA), fluorescence enzyme-linked immunoassay (FIA) and ELISA systems that detect SARS-CoV-2 antigens. Method A systematic literature search was carried out in PubMed, Medline complete and MedRxiv. Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 were eligible. Study selection and data-extraction were performed by two authors independently. QUADAS-2 checklist tool was used to assess the quality of the studies. The bivariate model and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve model were performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the serological tests. Subgroup meta-analysis was performed to explore the heterogeneity. Results The pooled sensitivity for IgG (n = 17), IgM (n = 16) and IgG-IgM (n = 24) based LFIA tests were 0.5856, 0.4637 and 0.6886, respectively compared to rRT-PCR method. The pooled sensitivity for IgG (n = 9) and IgM (n = 10) based CLIA tests were 0.9311 and 0.8516, respectively compared to rRT-PCR. The pooled sensitivity the IgG (n = 10), IgM (n = 11) and IgG-IgM (n = 5) based ELISA tests were 0.8292, 0.8388 and 0.8531 respectively compared to rRT-PCR. All tests displayed high specificities ranging from 0.9693 to 0.9991. Amongst the evaluated tests, IgG based CLIA expressed the highest sensitivity signifying its accurate detection of the largest proportion of infections identified by rRT-PCR. ELISA and CLIA tests performed better in terms of sensitivity compared to LFIA. IgG based tests performed better compared to IgM except for the ELISA. Conclusions We report that IgG-IgM based ELISA tests have the best overall diagnostic test accuracy. Moreover, irrespective of the method, a combined IgG/IgM test seems to be a better choice in terms of sensitivity than measuring either antibody type independently. Given the poor performances of the current LFIA devices, there is a need for more research on the development of highly sensitivity and specific POC LFIA that are adequate for most individual patient applications and attractive for large sero-prevalence studies. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020179112

scholarly journals Prognostic accuracy of shock index for severe postpartum hemorrhage in high-income country: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuto Makino ◽  
Kentaro Miyake ◽  
Asami Okada ◽  
Yumie Ikeda ◽  
Yohei Okada
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Postpartum Hemorrhage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
High Income ◽  
Test Accuracy ◽  
Shock Index ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Bivariate Model ◽  
Data Synthesis ◽  
Prognostic Accuracy

Background This review aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prognostic value of shock index for prediction of severe Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in high-income countries. Method We will perform a systematic review and meta-analysis for diagnostic test accuracy (DTA). We will search CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, and other sources and include all relevant reports on the prognostic accuracy of shock index for severe PPH. The target condition is defined as severe PPH required higher-level care. Two review authors will independently screen the study eligibility and extract data from included studies. Two authors will also assess study quality using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) tool. We will use the hierarchical models comprising both the bivariate model and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model for data synthesis if appropriate. We presented uncertainty of the accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

scholarly journals A systematic and meta-analysis review on the diagnostic accuracy of antibodies in the serological diagnosis of COVID-19.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Vengesai ◽  
Herald Midzi ◽  
Maritha Kasambala ◽  
Hamlet Mutandadzi ◽  
Tariro L. Mduluza-Jok ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Test Accuracy ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Serological Tests ◽  
Bivariate Model ◽  
Prevalence Studies

Abstract Background: Serological testing based on different antibody types are an alternative method being used to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 and has the potential of having higher diagnostic accuracy compared to the current gold standard rRT-PCR. Therefore, the objective of this review was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of IgG and IgM based point-of-care (POC) lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (CLIA), fluorescence enzyme-linked immunoassay (FIA) and ELISA systems that detect SARS-CoV-2 antigens.Method: A systematic literature search was carried out in PubMed, Medline complete and MedRxiv. Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 were eligible. Study selection and data-extraction were performed by two authors independently. QUADAS-2 checklist tool was used to assess the quality of the studies. The bivariate model and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve model were performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the serological tests. Subgroup meta-analysis analyses was performed to explore the heterogeneity. Results: The pooled sensitivity for IgG, IgM and IgG-IgM based LFIA tests were 0.5856, 0.4637 and 0.6886, respectively compared to rRT-PCR method. The pooled sensitivity for IgG and IgM based CLIA tests were 0.9311 and 0.8516, respectively compared to rRT-PCR. The pooled sensitivity the IgG, IgM and IgG-IgM based ELISA tests were 0.8292, 0.8388 and 0.8531 respectively compared to rRT-PCR. All tests displayed high specificities ranging from 0.9693 to 0.9991. Among the evaluated tests, IgG based CLIA expressed the highest sensitivity signifying its accurate detection of the largest proportion of infections identified by rRT-PCR. ELISA and CLIA tests performed better in terms of sensitivity compared to LFIA. IgG based tests performed better compared to IgM except for the ELISA. Conclusions: We report that IgG-IgM based ELISA tests have the best overall diagnostic test accuracy. Moreover, irrespective of the method, a combined IgG/IgM test seems to be a better choice in terms of sensitivity than measuring either antibody type independently. Given the poor performances of the current LFIA devices there is need for more research on the development of highly sensitivity and specific POC LFIA that are adequate for most individual patient applications and attractive for large sero-prevalence studies.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO Registration Number is: CRD42020179112

scholarly journals Impact of interstitial lung disease on mortality in ANCA-associated vasculitis: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 147997312199456
Author(s):  
Peining Zhou ◽  
Jing Ma ◽  
Guangfa Wang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Anca Associated Vasculitis ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Studies

Several retrospectivee described the association of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). However, the relationship between the ILD and mortality in AAV patients have not been established so far. This study aims to estimate the relevance of AAV-associated-ILD (AAV-ILD) and mortality risk by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.A comprehensive systematic review was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses). PubMed, Embase.com and the Cochrane Library (Wiley) were searched for original observational studies. Summary estimates were derived with a random-effects model and reported as risk ratio (RR), tested for publication bias and heterogeneity. Ten retrospective cohort studies were included, comprising 526 AAV-ILD patients enrolled from 1974 to 2018. Meta-analysis yielded a pooled RR of 2.90 (95% confidence interval 1.77–4.74) for death among those with AAV-ILD compared to control group. UIP pattern was associated with an even poorer prognosis in comparison to non-UIP pattern (RR 4.36, 95% confidence interval 1.14–16.78). Sensitivity analysis suggested that the meta-RR result was not skewed by a single dominant study. ILD might be associated with a higher mortality risk in AAV patients.

scholarly journals Accuracy of angiopoietin-2 for predicting organ failure in patients with acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 030006052098670
Author(s):  
Yongcai Lv ◽  
Yanhua Yao ◽  
Qi Liu ◽  
Jingjing Lei
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Likelihood Ratios ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Angiopoietin 2

Objective Our aim was to assess the accuracy of angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) as a prognostic marker for acute pancreatitis (AP) with organ failure (OF). Methods We undertook a systematic search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Chinese Journals Full-text, Wanfang, China Biology Medicine disc, and Weipu databases to identify eligible cohort studies on the predictive value of Ang-2 for AP with OF. The main outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity. The effects were pooled using a bivariate mixed-effects model. Results Six articles with seven case-control studies (n = 650) were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for AP with OF were 0.93 (95%CI: 0.75–0.99), 0.85 (95%CI: 0.75–0.92), 6.40 (95%CI: 3.36–12.19), and 0.08 (95%CI: 0.02–0.36), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.92–0.96), and the diagnostic odds ratio was 83.18 (95%CI: 11.50–623.17). Subgroup analysis showed that admission time of AP onset (< or ≥24 hours) was a source of overall heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis supported this finding. Conclusion Ang-2 had high diagnostic accuracy for AP with OF; the best prediction of Ang-2 may be 24 to 72 hours after onset of AP.

scholarly journals Accuracy of Contrast Extravasation on Computed Tomography for Diagnosing Severe Pelvic Hemorrhage in Pelvic Trauma Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Sung Nam Moon ◽  
Jung-Soo Pyo ◽  
Wu Seong Kang
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Pelvic Trauma ◽  
Test Accuracy ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Positive Finding ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Contrast Extravasation ◽  
Pelvic Hemorrhage

Background and objective: The early detection of underlying hemorrhage of pelvic trauma has been a critical issue. The aim of this study was to systematically determine the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) for detecting severe pelvic hemorrhage. Materials and Methods: Relevant articles were obtained by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through 28 November 2020. Diagnostic test accuracy results were reviewed to obtain the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic curve of CT for the diagnosis in pelvic trauma patients. The positive finding on CT was defined as the contrast extravasation. As the reference standard, severe pelvic hemorrhage was defined as an identification of bleeding at angiography or by direct inspection using laparotomy that required hemostasis by angioembolization or surgery. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the CT modality that is divided by the number of detector rows. Result: Thirteen eligible studies (29 subsets) were included in the present meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity of CT was 0.786 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.574–0.909], and pooled specificity was 0.944 (95% CI, 0.900–0.970). Pooled sensitivity of the 1–4 detector row group and 16–64 detector row group was 0.487 (95% CI, 0.215–0.767) and 0.915 (95% CI, 0.848–0.953), respectively. Pooled specificity of the 1–4 and 16–64 detector row groups was 0.956 (95% CI, 0.876–0.985) and 0.906 (95% CI, 0.828–0.951), respectively. Conclusion: Multi-detector CT with 16 or more detector rows has acceptable high sensitivity and specificity. Extravasation on CT indicates severe hemorrhage in patients with pelvic trauma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document