scholarly journals Diagnostic Performance of Conventional X-ray for Detecting Foreign Bodies in the Upper Digestive Tract: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 790
Author(s):  
Ta-Wei Yang ◽  
Yi-Chung Yu ◽  
Yen-Yue Lin ◽  
Shih-Chang Hsu ◽  
Karen Chia-Wen Chu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Digestive Tract ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
X Rays ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Upper Digestive Tract

Foreign body (FB) ingestion is a common clinical problem in acute settings. Detecting FBs in the upper digestive tract is challenging. The conventional X-ray is usually the first-line imaging tool to detect FBs. However, its diagnostic performance is inconsistent in the literature. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of the conventional X-ray for detecting FBs in the upper digestive tract. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus until 1 August 2020. Prospective or retrospective studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of conventional X-rays for detecting FBs in the upper digestive tract in patients of all ages were included. The Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy-2 tool was used to review the quality of included studies. We used a bivariate random-effects model to calculate diagnostic accuracy parameters. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. We included 17 studies (n = 4809) in the meta-analysis. Of the 17 studies, most studies were rated as having a high risk of bias. Conventional X-rays had a pooled sensitivity of 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.36–0.77, I2 = 98.52) and a pooled specificity of 0.94 (95% CI = 0.87–0.98, I2 = 94.49) for detecting FBs in the upper digestive tract. The heterogeneity was considerable. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.91 (95% CI = 0.88–0.93). Deek’s funnel plot asymmetry test results revealed no significant publication bias (p = 0.41). The overall sensitivity and specificity of conventional X-rays were low and high, respectively, for detecting FBs in the upper digestive tract. Hence, conventional X-rays to exclude patients without upper FBs in the digestive tract are not recommended. Further imaging or endoscopic examinations should be performed for at-risk patients.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT Using 18F-FDG Labeled White Blood Cells in Infectious Diseases: A Systematic Review and a Bivariate Meta-Analysis

Diagnostics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Meyer ◽  
Nathalie Testart ◽  
Mario Jreige ◽  
Christel Kamani ◽  
Mohammed Moshebah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Blood Cells ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
White Blood Cells ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
18F Fdg

Background: Diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography using white blood cells labeled with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG-WBC PET or PET/CT) in patients with suspicious infectious diseases has been evaluated in several studies; however, there is no consensus about the diagnostic accuracy of this method. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out on this topic. Methods: A comprehensive computer literature search screening PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane library databases through March 2019 was performed. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR−), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 18F-FDG-WBC PET or PET/CT in patients with infectious diseases were calculated. Results: Eight studies on the use of 18F-FDG-WBC PET or PET/CT in suspicious infectious diseases were discussed in the systematic review. The meta-analysis of seven studies (236 patients) provided these pooled results on a per patient-based analysis: sensitivity was 86.3% [95% confidence interval (95%CI) 75–92.9%], specificity 92% (95%CI 79.8–97.1%), LR+ 6.6 (95%CI: 3.1–14.1), LR− 0.2 (95%CI: 0.12–0.33), DOR 43.5 (95%CI: 12.2–155). A statistically significant heterogeneity was not detected. Conclusions: Despite limited literature data, 18F-FDG-WBC PET or PET/CT demonstrated a good diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of infectious diseases; nevertheless, larger studies are needed.

scholarly journals Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of Protein C in adult patients with sepsis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e050754
Author(s):  
Vanessa Catenacci ◽  
Fatima Sheikh ◽  
Kush Patel ◽  
Alison Fox-Robichaud
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Prognostic Accuracy

IntroductionSepsis is a dysregulated host response to infection characterised by activation of proinflammatory and procoagulant mechanisms. Protein C (PC)’s activity as an anticoagulant and antiinflammatory molecule makes it an appealing target for sepsis biomarker studies. To date, there has been no systematic review of PC as a sepsis biomarker.ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic strength of PC as a biomarker for adult sepsis.Methods and analysisMedline, Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) will be searched from inception through 20 January 2021 for prospective observational studies that evaluate the use of PC as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker for adult sepsis. Title and abstract screening, full-text screening and data extraction will be conducted in duplicate. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies and Quality in Prognostic Studies tools. If sufficient data are available, a meta-analysis will be conducted. The standardised mean difference and 95% CI will be calculated for prognostic and diagnostic studies. If possible, a hierarchical summary receiver operator characteristic curve will be generated to assess overall prognostic and diagnostic biomarker accuracy. I2 statistics will be used to assess heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis will be performed by removing studies with a high risk of bias and re-examining the meta-analysis results.Ethics and disseminationGiven this is a systematic review and meta-analysis, there is no requirement for ethics approval. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and social media.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021229786.

scholarly journals Comparative diagnostic accuracy of EUS needles in solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (06) ◽  
pp. E853-E862
Author(s):  
Samuel Han ◽  
Furqan Bhullar ◽  
Omar Alaber ◽  
Ayesha Kamal ◽  
Puanani Hopson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Pancreatic Masses ◽  
Quantitative Synthesis ◽  
Made In

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue sampling is the standard of care for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions. While many two-way comparisons between needle types have been made in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it is unclear which size and type of needle offers the best probability of diagnosis. We therefore performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare different sized and shaped needles to rank the diagnostic performance of each needle. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases through August, 2020 for RCTs that compared the diagnostic accuracy of EUS fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and biopsy (FNB) needles in solid pancreatic masses. Using a random-effects NMA under the frequentist framework, RCTs were analyzed to identify the best needle type and sampling technique. Performance scores (P-scores) were used to rank the different needles based on pooled diagnostic accuracy. The NMA model was used to calculate pairwise relative risk (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals. Results Review of 2577 studies yielded 29 RCTs for quantitative synthesis, comparing 13 different needle types. All 22G FNB needles had an RR > 1 compared to the reference 22G FNA (Cook) needle. The highest P-scores were seen with the 22G Medtronic FNB needle (0.9279), followed by the 22G Olympus FNB needle (0.8962) and the 22G Boston Scientific FNB needle (0.8739). Diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different between needles with or without suction. Conclusions In comparison to FNA needles, FNB needles offer the highest diagnostic performance in sampling pancreatic masses, particularly with 22G FNB needles.

scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography for pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e033084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Rong Ni ◽  
Pei-Jing Yan ◽  
Shi-Dong Liu ◽  
Yuan Hu ◽  
Ke-Hu Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Transthoracic Echocardiography ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Time Interval

ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH).DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources and eligibility criteriaEmbase, Cochrane Library for clinical trials, PubMed and Web of Science were used to search studies from inception to 19 June, 2019. Studies using both TTE and right heart catheterisation (RHC) to diagnose PH were included.Main resultsA total of 27 studies involving 4386 subjects were considered as eligible for analysis. TTE had a pooled sensitivity of 85%, a pooled specificity of 74%, a pooled positive likelihood ratio of 3.2, a pooled negative likelihood ratio of 0.20, a pooled diagnostic OR of 16 and finally an area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88. The subgroup with the shortest time interval between TTE and RHC had the best diagnostic effect, with sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of 88%, 90% and 0.94, respectively. TTE had lower sensitivity (81%), specificity (61%) and AUC (0.73) in the subgroup of patients with definite lung diseases. Subgroup analysis also showed that different thresholds of TTE resulted in a different diagnostic performance in the diagnosis of PH.ConclusionTTE has a clinical value in diagnosing PH, although it cannot yet replace RHC considered as the gold standard. The accuracy of TTE may be improved by shortening the time interval between TTE and RHC and by developing an appropriate threshold. TTE may not be suitable to assess pulmonary arterial pressure in patients with pulmonary diseases.PROSPERO registration numberPROSPERO CRD42019123289.

scholarly journals Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detecting extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (1104) ◽  
pp. 20190480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Chen-Lu Liu ◽  
Qian Chen ◽  
Sheng-Chao Shao ◽  
Shuang-Qing Chen
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Extracapsular Extension ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Enhanced Mri

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for detecting extracapsular extension (ECE) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Methods and materials: We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library up to December 2018. We included studies that used mpMRI to differentiate ECE from organ-confined PCa with a combination of T2 weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. All studies included had pathological diagnosis with radical prostatectomy. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of included studies by using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. We calculated pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic odds ratios and receiver operating characteristic curve for mpMRI from 2 × 2 tables. Results: A total of 17 studies that comprised 3374 participants were included. The pooled data showed a sensitivity of 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.43, 0.66]) and specificity of 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.82, 0.91) for extracapsular extension detection in PCa. Conclusion: First, our meta-analysis shows moderate sensitivity and high specificity for mpMRI to differentiate ECE from organ-confined prostate cancer before surgery. Second, our meta-analysis shows that mpMRI had no significant differences in performance compared with the former meta-analysis with use of T2WI alone or with additional functional MRI. Advances in knowledge: It is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of mpMRI in combination of TWI, diffusion-weightedimaging and dynamiccontrast-enhanced-MRI for extracapsular extension detection.

Performance of Serum Glypican 3 in Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 0-10
Author(s):  
Dahai Xu ◽  
Chang Su ◽  
Liang Sun ◽  
Yuanyuan Gao ◽  
Youjun Li
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Positive Control ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Non Invasive

Introduction and aim. Serum glypican-3 (GPC3) has been explored as a non-invasive biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, controversy remains on its diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and metaanalysis to evaluate the differential diagnostic accuracy of serum GPC3 between HCC and liver cirrhosis (LC) cases. Material and methods. After the strict filtering and screening of studies from NCBI, PUBMED, Clinical Trials, Cochrane library, Embase, Prospero and Web of Science databases, 11 studies were selected. All studies provided the sensitivity and specificity of GPC3 and the alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in the HCC and LC diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were determined and compared between GPC3 and AFP, which was set as a positive control. Results. Pooled sensitivity (95% CI) and specificity (95% CI) were 0.55 (0.52-0.58) and 0.58 (0.54-0.61) for GPC3, 0.54 (0.51-0.57) and 0.83 (0.80-0.85) for AFP, and 0.85 (0.81-0.89) and 0.79 (0.73-0.84) for GPC3 + AFP, respectively. The AUCs of GPC3, AFP and GPC3 + AFP were 0.7793, 0.7867 and 0.9366, respectively. GPC3 had a nearly similar sensitivity as AFP, while the specificity and AUC of GPC3 was lower than that of AFP. The combination of GPC3 and AFP yielded a better sensitivity and AUC than GPC3 or AFP. Conclusion. Serum GPC3 is inferior to AFP in the differential diagnosis between HCC and LC. However, the combination of GPC3 and AFP exhibited a much better performance.

scholarly journals Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of circulating microRNAs for pancreatic cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Peng ◽  
Zhiqiang Li ◽  
Lihua Huang ◽  
Wenzhe Gao ◽  
Jiale Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Carbohydrate Antigen ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Circulating Mirnas ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Circulating Micrornas

Abstract Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is characterized by high malignancy and a poor prognosis. The detection of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) is a liquid biopsy diagnostic approaches. Numerous studies have suggested that some differentially expressed miRNAs may be promising diagnostic markers for PC, but the results have varied among studies. The present study was performed to summarize the diagnostic accuracy of circulating miRNAs, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and the combination of miRNAs and CA19-9.Methods: A literature search of online databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang was conducted. Relative data were extracted from eligible included studies, and a meta-analysis was performed.Results: A total of 46 studies involving 4,326 PC patients and 4,277 non-PC controls were included. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE) and AUC of the circulating miRNAs for differentiating PC patients from non-PC controls were 0.79 (0.77-0.81), 0.77 (0.75-0.79), and 0.85 (0.81-0.87), respectively. For CA19-9, the SEN, SPE and AUC were 0.78 (0.75-0.80), 0.90 (0.85-0.94) and 0.85 (0.82-0.88), respectively. The combination of miRNAs and CA19-9 greatly improved the SEN, SPE and AUC to 0.84 (0.80-0.87), 0.91 (0.89-0.93) and 0.94 (0.92-0.96), respectively. Moreover, circulating miRNAs also yielded an acceptable diagnostic accuracy for early-stage PC with a SEN of 0.79 (0.76-0.82), a SPE of 0.74 (0.68-0.79) and an AUC of 0.81 (0.77-0.84).Conclusions: Circulating miRNAs exhibited satisfactory diagnostic performance for PC and even early-stage PC. The combination of circulating miRNAs and the traditional marker CA19-9 can further improve the diagnostic accuracy, providing a novel strategy for PC diagnosis.

scholarly journals Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of nucleic acid amplification tests for abdominal tuberculosis: A protocol

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0243765
Author(s):  
Yanqin Shen ◽  
Likui Fang ◽  
Bo Ye ◽  
Guocan Yu
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis ◽  
Abdominal Tuberculosis ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests

Background Abdominal tuberculosis is a severe extrapulmonary tuberculosis, which can lead to serious complications. Early diagnosis and treatment are very important for the prognosis and the diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis is still difficult. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for abdominal tuberculosis using meta-analysis method. Methods We will search PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Wanfang database for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of NAATs for abdominal tuberculosis until May 2020. We will include a systematic review and meta-analysis that evaluated the accuracy of NAATs for abdominal tuberculosis. Any types of study design with full text will be sought and included. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Stata version 15.0 with the midas command packages will be used to carry out meta-analyses. Results The results will provide clinical evidence for diagnostic accuracy of NAATs for abdominal tuberculosis, and this systematic review and meta-analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. Conclusion This overview will provide evidence of NAATs for diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis. Systematic review registration INPLASY202060030.

scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of the Mini Nutritional Assessment – Short Form to identify malnutrition among older adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Anne Griffin ◽  
Sorcha McGarry ◽  
Caoimhe Moloney ◽  
Rose Galvin
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Nutrition Risk ◽  
Healthcare Settings

Malnutrition has many associated physiological and psychological consequences for older adults that can result in reduced quality of life, poor disease outcomes and more frequent and longer hospital stays. Early recognition of malnutrition allows for timely intervention and treatment. There are several screening tools for nutrition risk. The most common one for malnutrition developed and validated for older adults is the short-form of the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF). It can be completed in just a few minutes and applied in all health care settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis serves to synthesise the totality of evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of the MNA-SF tool compared with the full-form of the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-FF) in older adults for the diagnosis of malnutrition in healthcare settings. Systematic searches of five bibliographical databases will be performed and will include the Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Web of Science to identify all studies that validate the MNA-SF for malnutrition among older adults in healthcare settings. Risk of bias will be assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Pre-specified MNA-SF scores will be used to identify patients’ risk of malnutrition. Using data from 2x2 tables, studies will be pooled to generate summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity using a bivariate random effects model. The findings of this systematic review of diagnostic accuracy will provide evidence for healthcare professionals to make informed decisions regarding the optimum use of the MNA-SF as a nutrition risk screening tool to identify malnutrition among older people. Registration details: Prospero registration number CRD42019131847

scholarly journals Diagnostic Accuracy of COVID-19 Antibody Tests Authorized by FDA Philippines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 283-301
Author(s):  
Carmel Reina R. Chua ◽  
Esther Delle E. De los Santos ◽  
Karla Veronica H. Escasa ◽  
Richmond Louis G. Estolas ◽  
Junnealyn Feliciano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Serological Tests ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Antibody Tests

Introduction: Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) is a highly infectious disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) which has infected many people all over the world. One of the best ways to lessen its spread is through early detection and diagnosis. Various serological tests are now being used as a surveillance tool in the detection of antibodies as a response to SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and performance of the available COVID-19 antibody tests authorized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Philippines that make use of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (CLIA) and Lateral Flow Immunoassay (LFIA). Method: Complete published journal articles relevant to the diagnostic accuracy of the three antibody tests were collected using trusted medical journal search engines. The quality of journals was assessed using QUADAS-2 to determine the risk of bias and assess the applicability judgments of diagnostic accuracy studies. Forest plots were used to summarize the performance of LFIA, ELISA and CLIA according to their specificity and sensitivity in detecting various antibodies. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were also done using bivariate random-effects models with its log-likelihood, a corresponding chi-square test statistic, and area under the summary Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve to see the potential heterogeneity in the data and to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the COVID-19 antibody tests. Results: Bivariate random-effects model and areas under the sROC curve were used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of COVID-19 antibody tests. The pooled sensitivity in detecting IgG based on CLIA, ELISA, and LFIA were 81.7%, 58.7%, and 74.3% respectively, with an overall of 72.0%. For IgM detection, LFIA has a higher pooled sensitivity of 69.6% than CLIA with 61.0%. Overall, the pooled sensitivity is 68.5%. In IgA detection, only ELISA based test was included with a pooled sensitivity of 84.8%. Lastly, pooled sensitivities for combined antibodies based on ELISA and LFIA were 89.0% and 81.6% respectively, with an overall of 82.5%. On the other hand, all tests excluding ELISA-IgA displayed high pooled specificities with a range of 94.0% to 100.0%. Diagnostic accuracies of the test in detecting IgG, IgM, and combined antibodies were found out to be almost perfect based on the computed area under the sROC with values of 0.973, 0.953, and 0.966, respectively. Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, existing evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of antibody tests for COVID-19 were found to be characterized by high risks of bias, consistency in the heterogeneity of sensitivities, and consistency in the homogeneity of high specificities except in IgA detection using ELISA. The bivariate random-effects models showed that there are no significant differences in terms of sensitivity among CLIA, ELISA and LFIA in detecting IgG, IgM, and combined antibodies at a 95% confidence interval. Nonetheless, CLIA, ELISA and LFIA were found to have excellent diagnostic accuracies in the detection of IgG, IgM and combined antibodies as reflected by their AUC values. Doi: 10.28991/SciMedJ-2021-0304-1 Full Text: PDF

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document