scholarly journals Joint Assessment of Equilibrium and Neuromotor Function: A Validation Study in Patients with Fibromyalgia

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1057
Author(s):  
Rafael Lomas-Vega ◽  
Daniel Rodríguez-Almagro ◽  
Ana Belén Peinado-Rubia ◽  
Noelia Zagalaz-Anula ◽  
Francisco Molina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Validation Study ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Nominal Group ◽  
Neuromotor Function ◽  
Joint Assessment

Objective: To develop and validate a tool for evaluating balance and neuromotor function in patients with fibromyalgia (FMS). Methods: Brainstorming, the nominal group technique, and pilot-testing were used to select a battery of 20 functional balance tests that were included in a screening tool. A total of 108 subjects (62 with fibromyalgia syndrome, 22 aged over 65 years, and 24 healthy subjects) participated in this validation study. Factor validity, internal consistency, the ability to discriminate between patients and healthy subjects, and concurrent validity with the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), and other tools for measuring balance, such as the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC-16), the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), and posturographic parameters, were evaluated. Results: The factorial analysis extracted four factors that explained 70% of the variance. The Alpha Cronbach value was 0.928. Concurrent validity of the screening tool with respect to other tools was high, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed an AUC value of 0.932 for discriminating between healthy and FMS subjects. Severe balance disorder related to head movements in FMS patients was found. Conclusion: The 20-item JAEN (Joint Assessment of Equilibrium and Neuro-motor Function) screening tool is a valid and reliable tool for assessing balance in patients with FMS.

Ricerca preliminare sulla valutazione Italiana dell'Internet Disorder Scale – Short Form (IDS9-SF)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Soraci
Keyword(s):  
Social Networks ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Validity Criterion ◽  
Preliminary Research ◽  
Nomological Validity ◽  
Italian Territory

The purpose of this study is to create a new tool capable of diagnosing the severity of internet addiction (IA) and is based on the nine IGD criteria. These same criteria were suggested by the APA in the last edition of the DSM-51. A sample was recruited with a method of convenience and 300+ participants were recruited through different forums and social networks. The construct validity of the IDS9SF test was achieved through factor analysis and nomological validity. The concurrent validity, criterion and reliability of the test itself have been thoroughly investigated through the most common and consolidated data analysis techniques, confirming that the same test has sufficient psychometric properties to be used also in the Italian territory. Furthermore it is necessary to remember that this preliminary research is only valid in the field of data and statistics with all the limitations of the case and cannot be used for a real clinical evaluation.

Validation Study for the Korean-Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents-Short Form (K-SIPA-SF)

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-357
Author(s):  
Kyong-Mee Chung ◽  
Seungmin Jung ◽  
Yoon Jung Yang
Keyword(s):  
Validation Study ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Stress Index

scholarly journals New screening tool for neonatal nutritional risk in China: a validation study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e042467
Author(s):  
Mei Zhou ◽  
Yuwei Li ◽  
Huaying Yin ◽  
Xianhong Zhang ◽  
Yan Hu
Keyword(s):  
Validation Study ◽  
Head Circumference ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Risk Level ◽  
Spearman Correlation ◽  
Nutrition Risk ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

ObjectiveA neonatal nutritional risk screening tool (NNRST) was developed by using Delphi and analytic hierarchy processes in China. We verified the accuracy of this tool and analysed whether it effectively screened neonates with nutritional risk.DesignProspective validation study.Setting and participantsIn total, 338 neonates who were admitted to the neonatal unit of Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from May–July 2016 completed the study. Nutritional risk screening and length and head circumference measurements were performed weekly. Weight was measured every morning, and other relevant clinical data were recorded during hospitalisation.Main outcome measuresWe evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, validity, reliability, and positive and negative predictive value of the screening tool. Various characteristics of neonates in different risk groups were analysed to determine the rationality of the nutritional risk classification.ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 85.11%, 91.07%, 60.61% and 97.43%, respectively. The criterion validity was texted by the Spearman correlation analysis (r=0.530) and independent samples non-parametric tests (p=0.000). The content validity (Spearman correlation coefficient) was 0.321–0.735. The inter-rater reliability (kappa value) was 0.890. Among the neonatal clinical indicators, gestational age, birth weight, length, admission head circumference, admission albumin, admission total proteins, discharge weight, discharge length and head circumference decreased with increasing nutrition risk level; the length of stay and the rate of parenteral nutrition support increased with increasing nutrition risk level. In the comparison of complications during hospitalisation, the incidence of necrotising enterocolitis and congenital gastrointestinal malformation increased with increasing nutrition risk level.ConclusionThe validation results for the NNRST are reliable. The tool can be used to preliminarily determine the degree of neonatal nutritional risk, but its predictive value needs to be determined in future large-sample studies.Trial registration numberChiCTR2000033743.

scholarly journals A rapid screening tool for psychological distress in children 3–6years old: results of a validation study

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Marquer ◽  
Caroline Barry ◽  
Yoram Mouchenik ◽  
Sarah Hustache ◽  
Douma M Djibo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Validation Study ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Rapid Screening

Concurrent validity of a WAIS—R seven-subtest short form in patients with brain impairment.

1996 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant L. Iverson ◽  
Bill Myers ◽  
Michelle L. Bengston ◽  
Russell L. Adams
Keyword(s):  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Short Form

scholarly journals Criterion validity and reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire – Hungarian short form against the RM42 accelerometer

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pongrác Ács ◽  
Réka Veress ◽  
Paulo Rocha ◽  
Tamás Dóczi ◽  
Bence László Raposa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
International Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Sitting Time ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Activity Questionnaire

Abstract Background Physical inactivity is a global phenomenon in European welfare countries. Proper monitoring is essential to measure the physical activity level of the population. Methods In the Hungarian cohort of the European Physical Activity and Sport Monitoring System (EUPASMOS) project, our participants (N = 598) completed sociodemographic questions and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire – short form (IPAQ-SF) survey. The validity and reliability of the subjective measurement tool were examined, IPAQ-SF outcomes were contrasted against triaxial RM42 accelerometer wore for 7 consecutive days. Results The IPAQ-SF showed moderate internal consistency (Cronbach Alpha = 0.647). The concurrent validity of the IPAQ-SF to triaxial accelerometer indicated a significant weak-to-moderate correlation (R = 0.111–0.338, p = 0.042; p < 0.001). The test-retest reliability showed a significant correlation between two measurements (R = 0.788–0.981, p < 0.001). Conclusion The Hungarian version of the IPAQ-SF had excellent test-retest reliability, but low-to-fair concurrent validity for moderate and vigorous physical activity, walking and sitting time, as compared to the objective criterion measure among Hungarian adults.

Hostility, Impulsivity, and Behavior Inhibition Among Women with PMDD

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 205-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju-Yu Yen ◽  
Cheng-Chung Chen ◽  
Shun-Jen Chang ◽  
Chih-Hung Ko ◽  
Cheng-Sheng Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Impairment ◽  
Behavioral Inhibition ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Dysfunctional Impulsivity ◽  
Behavior Inhibition System ◽  
And Behavior ◽  
Behavior Inhibition

AbstractIntroductionThis study aimed to compare hostility, impulsivity, and behavior inhibition between women with and without premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) during both luteal and follicular phases and to examine whether these variables contribute to irritability and daily functional impairment of PMDD.MethodsPMDD was screened via the Premenstrual Symptoms Screening Tool. A diagnosis of PMDD was confirmed by psychiatric interviewing without 2-month prospective confirmation. Sixty women in the PMDD group and 60 women in the control group completed the Chinese Version of the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory-Short Form, Dickman's Impulsivity Inventory, and the Behavior Inhibition System Scale during the luteal and follicular phases.ResultsWe found that the PMDD group had significantly higher levels of hostility, dysfunctional impulsivity, and behavioral inhibition than the control group in both luteal and follicular phases. The PMDD group also had more premenstrual aggravation on total hostility, hostility affect, and suppressive hostility than the control group. Higher hostility, dysfunctional impulsivity, and behavior inhibition were associated with more severe irritability and functional impairment of PMDD.DiscussionHostility, impulsivity, and behavior inhibition might contribute to irritability and functional impairment in women with PMDD.ConclusionAssessment and interventions based on these factors should be provided for women with PMDD, especially in the luteal phase.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document