scholarly journals Renal Tumors in Young Adults: Is Preoperative Computer Tomography Imaging Suggestive for the Nature of the Tumors?

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 380
Author(s):  
Andreea Zaharie ◽  
Sorana D. Bolboacă ◽  
Tudor Moisoiu ◽  
Dan Burghelea ◽  
Gheorghita Iacob ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Computer Tomography ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Tomography Imaging ◽  
Computer Tomography Imaging

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 2–3% of all adult malignant neoplasms and is even rarer in patients under 45 years old. Clear-cell carcinoma represents most of the pathological subtypes. Our study aimed to investigate the association between preoperative computer tomography imagistic evaluation and histopathological diagnosis of renal tumors in young adults. Patients younger than 45 years old with renal tumors who were referred for medical treatment at the Clinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation Cluj-Napoca from 2012 to 2019 were considered eligible for the study. Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed, and patients with complete data regarding preoperative diagnostic, histopathological evaluation, and follow-up data, regardless of gender, were included in the study. Sixteen patients younger than 45 years fulfilled all the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. With two exceptions, the evaluated patients were in a T1 and T2 stage, with no vascular invasion or of the adjacent organs. Two-thirds of our patients had a clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. None of our patients fitted in the low complexity surgery category of the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score and 37.5% of them benefited from partial nephrectomy. Half of the suppositions made based on imaging were concordant with the histopathology report. Fifteen of the patients showed no recurrence during the respective follow-up interval. Computer tomography imaging reports showed on our sample a higher concordance with the histopathological report in the more common subtypes (namely Renal Clear Cell RCC), with typical appearances.

Multiple Chromophobe and Clear Cell Renal Cancer in A Patient Affected by Birt-Hogg-Dubè Syndrome: A Case Report

2016 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-120
Author(s):  
Roberto Castellucci ◽  
Michele Marchioni ◽  
Sergio Valenti ◽  
Giuseppe Sortino ◽  
Giulio Borgonovo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Spontaneous Pneumothorax ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Kidney Tumors ◽  
Pulmonary Cysts

Objectives Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome (BHDS) is a rare autosomal dominant characterized by the presence of fibrofolliculomas and/or trichodiscomas, pulmonary cysts, spontaneous pneumothorax, and renal tumors. The syndrome is linked to mutations in the FLCN gene, which is preferentially expressed in the skin, kidney, and lung. The aim of our paper is to describe a case of multiple bilateral renal cancer in a patient affected by BHDS. Case Presentation Patient subjected to enucleoresection seven kidney tumors discovered right after ultrasound performed for other reasons. Definitive histologic examination were as follows: multifocal type chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and clear cell. After 1 month, the patient was readmitted for spontaneous pneumothorax. After about a year, the patient was again subjected to resection of multiple renal tumors left. Histological examination proved that it was multifocal renal cell carcinoma, clear cell varieties. The genome analysis highlighted positive for mutation c. 1379_1380 of FLCN gene, BHDS gene. Currently, the patient is under close follow-up. After 1 year, the chest computed tomography (CT) confirmed the presence of minute air bubbles scattered on both sides. Instead, the abdominal CT was positive for a small round lesion 6 mm exophytic. Conclusions The BHDS is a rare syndrome whose management is extremely complex both in terms of oncological and functional. Kidney tumors associated with BHDS usually have a favorable clinical course. Present evidence suggests a close follow-up of the carriers of the genetic mutation patients whether or not they have expressed the lesions of disease given the high rate of recurrence of renal lesions.

scholarly journals Implications of Programmed Death Ligand-1 Positivity in Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 6-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Chipollini ◽  
Mounsif Azizi ◽  
Charles C Peyton ◽  
Dominic H Tang ◽  
Jasreman Dhillon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Type I ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Programmed Death Ligand 1 ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Papillary Type

The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic value of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) positivity in a non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) cohort. PD-L1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens from 45 non-ccRCC patients with available tissue. PD-L1 positivity was defined as ?1% of staining. Histopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes were correlated to PD-L1 expression. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) stratified by PD-L1 status were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Median age was 58 years and median follow-up was 40 months. Non-ccRCC subtypes included sarcomatoid (n = 9), rhabdoid (n = 6), medullary (n = 2), Xp11.2 translocation (n = 2), collecting duct (n = 1), papillary type I (n = 11), and papillary type II (n = 14). PD-L1 positivity was noted in nine (20%) patients. PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with higher Fuhrman nuclear grade (P = 0.048) and perineural invasion (P = 0.043). Five-year CSS was 73.2 and 83% for PD-L1 positive and negative tumors, respectively (P = 0.47). Five-year RFS was 55.6 and 61.5% for PD-L1 positive and negative tumors, respectively (P = 0.58). PD-L1 was expressed in a fifth of non-ccRCC cases and was associated with adverse histopathologic features. Expression of biomarkers such PD-L1 may help better risk-stratify non-ccRCC patients to guide treatment decisions and follow-up strategies.

scholarly journals Metastatic renal cell carcinoma of unknown primary site. Clinical follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-153
Author(s):  
N. A. Ognerubov ◽  
T. S. Antipova ◽  
G. E. Gumareva
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adrenal Gland ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Primary Site ◽  
The Right

Renal cell cancer metastases without evidence of a primary tumor are extremely rare. These variants are usually showed as a spontaneous description of single clinical cases. Aim.This contribution is a clinical follow-up of synchronous renal cell cancer metastases of unknown primary site. Results.A 52-year-old patient U. with a history of increased blood pressure, up to 170/100 mmHg for the last 5 years, who had undergone many instrumental examinations, including ultrasound examination, because of this disease. The computed tomography of the abdomen showed a 4975 mm heterogeneous tumor in the right adrenal gland in October 2017. The combined positron emission and X-ray computed tomography showed a 795441 mm mass in the right adrenal gland, associated with elevated fluorodeoxyglucose metabolic activity SUVmax 7.25. Focal accumulation of the radiopharmaceutical SUVmax 4.31 in a 171124 mm mass was detected in the space of bifurcation in the mediastinum. The lytic lesion (1015 mm) was found in right superior L3 articular process. The patient underwent retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy and thoracoscopic removal of mediastinal tumor in November 2017 because of the oligometastatic nature of the process. The histological study identified clear-cell carcinoma with areas of papillary structure in the right adrenal gland. The immunohistochemical study showed carcinoma cells intensively expressing CD10, and some other cells RCC. The immune phenotype of the tumor was identified as clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. The immunohistological and immunohistochemical analysis reviled the metastases of the same variant of renal cell carcinoma in one of 9 lymph nodes. The patient was treated with pazopanib. The primary renal tumor was not detected during the dynamic observation, including the application of annual combined positron emission and X-ray computed tomography. The patient is alive without disease progression with a follow-up of 32 months. Conclusion.Metastases of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, including adrenal gland, without evidence of a primary site are extremely rare. The main method of treatment is a combination of surgery and targeted therapy, providing long-term local control of the course of the disease.

scholarly journals Differential Diagnosis of Renal Tumors With Clear Cytoplasm: Clinical Relevance of Renal Tumor Subclassification in the Era of Targeted Therapies and Personalized Medicine

2013 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajen Goyal ◽  
Elizabeth Gersbach ◽  
Ximing J. Yang ◽  
Stephen M. Rohan
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Renal Tumor ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Immunohistochemical Stains

Context.—The World Health Organization classification of renal tumors synthesizes morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings to define more than 40 tumor types. Of these, clear cell (conventional) renal cell carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor in adults and—with the exception of some rare tumors—the most deadly. The diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma on morphologic grounds alone is generally straightforward, but challenging cases are not infrequent. A misdiagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma has clinical consequences, particularly in the current era of targeted therapies. Objective.—To highlight morphologic mimics of clear cell renal cell carcinoma and provide strategies to help differentiate clear cell renal cell carcinoma from other renal tumors and lesions. The role of the pathologist in guiding treatment for renal malignancies will be emphasized to stress the importance of proper tumor classification in patient management. Data Sources.—Published literature and personal experience. Conclusions.—In challenging cases, submission of additional tissue is often an inexpensive and effective way to facilitate a correct diagnosis. If immunohistochemical stains are to be used, it is best to use a panel of markers, as no one marker is specific for a given renal tumor subtype. Selection of limited markers, based on a specific differential diagnosis, can be as useful as a large panel in reaching a definitive diagnosis. For renal tumors, both the presence and absence of immunoreactivity and the pattern of labeling (membranous, cytoplasmic, diffuse, focal) are important when interpreting the results of immunohistochemical stains.

scholarly journals Comprehensive Immunoprofiles of Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moonsik Kim ◽  
Jin Woo Joo ◽  
Seok Joo Lee ◽  
Yoon Ah Cho ◽  
Cheol Keun Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Collecting Duct ◽  
Cathepsin K ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Duct Carcinoma ◽  
Epithelial Tumors ◽  
Papillary Type

In recent years, renal epithelial tumors have been among the fastest reclassifying tumors, requiring updates to the tumor classification system. Nonetheless, immunohistochemistry (IHC) remains the most widely used tool for renal epithelial tumors. In this proposal, we aimed to create the most efficient IHC panel for categorizing the diverse subtypes of renal tumors, and to find out more specific immunohistochemical results in each subtype or each antibody. A total of 214 renal tumors were analyzed using 10 possible IHC markers to differentiate subtypes, including three major renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes, clear-cell type (50 cases), papillary type (50 cases), and chromophobe type (20 cases), and minor subtypes (MiT RCC, 13 cases; collecting duct carcinoma, 5 cases; and oncocytoma, 10 cases). A triple immunomarker (cytokeratin 7 (CK7)-carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX)- alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR)) panel is useful in particular high-grade clear-cell tumors. If IHC remains ambiguous, the use of an adjunctive panel can be suggested, including CD10, epithelial membrane antigen, cathepsin K, c-kit, hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-β, and E-cadherin. For an efficient immunohistochemical strategy for subtyping of RCC, we conclude that the CK7-CAIX-AMACR panel is the best primary choice for screening subtyping.

scholarly journals Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma from other Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes and Benign Oncocytoma Using Quantitative MDCT Enhancement Parameters

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (11) ◽  
pp. 569
Author(s):  
Claudia-Gabriela Moldovanu ◽  
Bianca Petresc ◽  
Andrei Lebovici ◽  
Attila Tamas-Szora ◽  
Mihai Suciu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
3D Analysis ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Enhancement Ratio ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Masses

Background and objectives: The use of non-invasive techniques to predict the histological type of renal masses can avoid a renal mass biopsy, thus being of great clinical interest. The aim of our study was to assess if quantitative multiphasic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) enhancement patterns of renal masses (malignant and benign) may be useful to enable lesion differentiation by their enhancement characteristics. Materials and Methods: A total of 154 renal tumors were retrospectively analyzed with a four-phase MDCT protocol. We studied attenuation values using the values within the most avidly enhancing portion of the tumor (2D analysis) and within the whole tumor volume (3D analysis). A region of interest (ROI) was also placed in the adjacent uninvolved renal cortex to calculate the relative tumor enhancement ratio. Results: Significant differences were noted in enhancement and de-enhancement (diminution of attenuation measurements between the postcontrast phases) values by histology. The highest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.976 (95% CI: 0.924–0.995) and 0.827 (95% CI: 0.752–0.887), respectively, were demonstrated between clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and papillary RCC (pRCC)/oncocytoma. The 3D analysis allowed the differentiation of ccRCC from chromophobe RCC (chrRCC) with a AUC of 0.643 (95% CI: 0.555–0.724). Wash-out values proved useful only for discrimination between ccRCC and oncocytoma (43.34 vs 64.10, p < 0.001). However, the relative tumor enhancement ratio (corticomedullary (CM) and nephrographic phases) proved useful for discrimination between ccRCC, pRCC, and chrRCC, with the values from the CM phase having higher AUCs of 0.973 (95% CI: 0.929–0.993) and 0.799 (95% CI: 0.721–0.864), respectively. Conclusions: Our observations point out that imaging features may contribute to providing prognostic information helpful in the management strategy of renal masses.

Decreased prolyl hydroxylase 3 mRNA expression in oncocytomas compared with clear cell renal cell carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 80-86
Author(s):  
Spyridon Kampantais ◽  
Ilias Kounatidis ◽  
Vasiliki Kotoula ◽  
Ioannis Vakalopoulos ◽  
Konstantinos Gkagkalidis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Prolyl Hydroxylase ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
Fresh Frozen

Introduction: Hypoxia inducible factors (HIF) and prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) enzymes play a central role in tumor progression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). However, there are currently no data regarding the behavior of this pathway (HIF/PHD) in a large number of benign renal tumors, the oncocytomas. The aim of the present study was to compare the expression levels of these factors between ccRCC and oncocytoma tumors. Material and methods: A total of 56 fresh frozen specimens from patients with ccRCC and 14 oncocytoma specimens were analyzed via reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction in order to assess the expression levels of HIF-1α, HIF-2α, PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3. The analysis involved both fresh frozen tumor samples as well as adjacent normal kidney tissues. Results: In ccRCC, HIF-1α and HIF-2α levels were upregulated in 65.5% and 71.4% of cases, respectively. PHD3 was downregulated only in 15.4% of the ccRCC cases, in contrast with oncocytoma cases, which exhibited low expression levels in the majority. The upregulation of PHD3 messenger RNA (mRNA) levels in ccRCC when compared with oncocytoma was statistically significant ( P<0.001). No other comparisons (HIF-1α, HIF-2α, PHD1, and PHD2) were significantly different. HIF-2α and PHD3 mRNA expression levels were negatively correlated with Fuhrman Grade ( P=0.029 and P=0.026, respectively) in ccRCC. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the HIF/PHD pathway was compared between ccRCC and a common benign tumor, identifying the upregulation of PHD3 as the possible underlying factor guiding the difference in the behavior of ccRCC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document