scholarly journals Benign Biliary Strictures: A Systematic Review on Endoscopic Treatment Options

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 221
Author(s):  
May Y.W. Wong ◽  
Payal Saxena ◽  
Arthur J. Kaffes

Benign biliary strictures can be difficult to manage. Untreated biliary strictures can lead to complications, such as chronic cholestasis, jaundice, recurrent sepsis, and secondary biliary cirrhosis, which can have severe ramifications. The management landscape is constantly evolving, with the development of modifiable self-expandable metal stents and biodegradable stents. This review critically appraises current endoscopic treatment strategies, in particular focusing on the shortfalls, such as stent migration and stricture recurrence. It also proposes a treatment algorithm based on aetiologias and the location of the strictures.

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (03) ◽  
pp. 291-299
Author(s):  
Adam Fang ◽  
Il Kyoon Kim ◽  
Ifechi Ukeh ◽  
Vahid Etezadi ◽  
Hyun S. Kim

AbstractBenign biliary strictures are often due to a variety of etiologies, most of which are iatrogenic. Clinical presentation can vary from asymptomatic disease with elevated liver enzymes to obstructive jaundice and recurrent cholangitis. Diagnostic imaging methods, such as ultrasound, multidetector computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging (cholangiopancreatography), are used to identify stricture location, extent, and possible source of biliary obstruction. The management of benign biliary strictures requires a multidisciplinary team approach and include endoscopic, percutaneous, and surgical interventions. Percutaneous biliary interventions provide an alternative diagnostic and therapeutic approach, especially in patients who are not amenable to endoscopic evaluation. This review provides an overview of benign biliary strictures and percutaneous management by interventional radiologists. Diagnostic evaluation with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and treatment options, including biliary drainage, balloon dilation, retrievable/biodegradable stents, and other innovative minimally invasive options, are discussed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shayan Irani ◽  
Todd H. Baron ◽  
Ali Akbar ◽  
Otto S. Lin ◽  
Michael Gluck ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Souto NACIF ◽  
Wanderley Marques BERNARDO ◽  
Luca BERNARDO ◽  
Wellington ANDRAUS ◽  
Lucas TORRES ◽  
...  

Context Biliary strictures after liver transplantation are recognized as its Achilles’ heel. The strictures are classified in anastomotic and ischemic or non-anastomotic biliary strictures, and they figure among the most common complications after liver transplantation. There are some treatment options including balloon dilation, the placement of multiple plastic stents and the placement of self-expandable metal stents and all of them seem to have good results. Objectives The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature concerning the results of the endoscopic treatment of anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation. Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed on the management of anastomotic biliary strictures post- orthotopic liver transplantation. The Medline-PubMed, EMBASE, Scielo-LILACS, and Cochrane Databases were electronically searched from January 1966 to April 2013. Results No well-designed randomized controlled trial was found. Most studies were retrospective or prospective comparisons in design. One study (86 patients) compared the endoscopic and the percutaneous accesses. The sustained clinical success rates were similar but the treatment duration was longer in the percutaneous group access. Two studies (56 patients) compared balloon dilation with balloon dilation and multiple plastic stents. There were no differences concerning sustained clinical success and complication rates. Conclusions Balloon dilation is as effective as balloon dilation plus multiple plastic stenting for the resolution of the anastomotic biliary strictures. Well-designed randomized trials are still needed to compare balloon dilation versus multiple plastic stenting versus metallic stenting.


Endoscopy ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 36 (05) ◽  
pp. 381-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. van Berkel ◽  
D. Cahen ◽  
D. van Westerloo ◽  
E. Rauws ◽  
K. Huibregtse ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Choong Heon Ryu ◽  
Myung-Hwan Kim ◽  
Sang Soo Lee ◽  
Do Hyun Park ◽  
Dong-Wan Seo ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 568-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Tringali ◽  
Daniel Blero ◽  
Ivo Boškoski ◽  
Pietro Familiari ◽  
Vincenzo Perri ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 731-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aydin Seref Koksal ◽  
Ahmet T. Eminler ◽  
Erkan Parlak

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document