scholarly journals The Effects of Habitat Heterogeneity at Distinct Spatial Scales on Hard-Bottom-Associated Communities

Diversity ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiane Gallucci ◽  
Ronaldo A. Christofoletti ◽  
Gustavo Fonseca ◽  
Gustavo M. Dias
Keyword(s):  
Habitat Heterogeneity ◽  
Rocky Shore ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Benthic Communities ◽  
Biotic Interactions ◽  
Habitat Diversity ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Β Diversity ◽  
Biological Substrate ◽  
Mangrove Roots

For marine benthic communities, environmental heterogeneity at small spatial scales are mostly due to biologically produced habitat heterogeneity and biotic interactions, while at larger spatial scales environmental factors may prevails over biotic features. In this study, we investigated how community structure and β-diversity of hard-bottom-associated meio- and macrofauna varied in relation to small-scale (cm–m) changes in biological substrate (an algae “turf” dominated by the macroalgae Gelidium sp., the macroalgae Caulerpa racemosa and the sponge Hymeniacidon heliophile) in a rocky shore and in relation to larger-scale (10’s m) changes in environmental conditions of the same biological substrate (the macroalgae Bostrychia sp) in different habitats (rocky shore vs. mangrove roots). Results showed that both substrate identity and the surrounding environment were important in structuring the smaller-sized meiofauna, particularly the nematode assemblages, whereas the larger and more motile macrofauna was influenced only by larger-scale changes in the surrounding ecosystem. This implies that the macrofauna explores the environment in a larger spatial scale compared to the meiofauna, suggesting that effects of spatial heterogeneity on communities are dependent on organism size and mobility. Changes in taxa composition between environments and substrates highlight the importance of habitat diversity at different scales for maintaining the diversity of the associated fauna.

Spatial variability and human disturbance of sponge assemblages associated with mangrove roots in the southern Caribbean

2011 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edlin Guerra-Castro ◽  
Paula Young ◽  
Adriana Pérez-Vázquez ◽  
Sophie Carteron ◽  
Adriana Alvizu
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Variability ◽  
Human Disturbance ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Caribbean Region ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Ecological Processes ◽  
Human Disturbances ◽  
Β Diversity ◽  
Southern Caribbean ◽  
Mangrove Roots

Assemblages growing on Caribbean red-mangrove roots are very diverse and characteristically dominated by sponges. The scales of spatial variation of this fauna in the Caribbean region have not been hierarchically quantified, although such information is necessary to understand the relative importance of ecological processes and possible responses to anthropogenic disturbances. We used a hierarchical nested design to identify patterns of spatial variability at different scales, namely among roots, sites, localities and regions within the southern Caribbean. Simultaneously, the sampling considered the relative distance from sources of human disturbance to test the null hypothesis of no difference in sponge diversity among localities as a result of anthropogenic stress. Significant spatial variability in species composition was detected at all spatial scales, especially at the among-root scale. However, there were no differences associated with distance from human disturbance. These results indicate high regional and local β diversity, and also suggest that results from small-scale experiments cannot be scaled up to the entire community. Further, spatial analysis of sponge assemblages is not enough to detect deleterious effects of human disturbances on mangrove areas.

scholarly journals The importance of different spatial scales in determining structural and functional characteristics of deep-sea infauna communities

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 4547-4563 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Ingels ◽  
A. Vanreusel
Keyword(s):  
Functional Diversity ◽  
Deep Sea ◽  
Spatial Ecology ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Benthic Communities ◽  
Standing Stock ◽  
Terrestrial Ecosystems ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Functional Characteristics ◽  
Sampling Locations

Abstract. The urge to understand spatial distributions of species and communities and their causative processes has continuously instigated the development and testing of conceptual models in spatial ecology. For the deep sea, there is evidence that structural and functional characteristics of benthic communities are regulated by a multitude of biotic and environmental processes that act in concert on different spatial scales, but the spatial patterns are poorly understood compared to those for terrestrial ecosystems. Deep-sea studies generally focus on very limited scale ranges, thereby impairing our understanding of which spatial scales and associated processes are most important in driving structural and functional diversity of communities. Here, we used an extensive integrated dataset of free-living nematodes from deep-sea sediments to unravel the importance of different spatial scales in determining benthic infauna communities. Multiple-factor multivariate permutational analyses were performed on different sets of community descriptors (structure, structural and functional diversity, standing stock). The different spatial scales investigated cover two margins in the northeast Atlantic, several submarine canyons/channel/slope areas, a bathymetrical range of 700–4300 m, different sampling locations at each station, and vertical sediment profiles. The results indicated that the most important spatial scale for structural and functional diversity and standing stock variability is the smallest one; infauna communities changed substantially more with differences between sediment depth layers than with differences associated to larger geographical or bathymetrical scales. Community structure differences were greatest between stations at both margins. Important regulating ecosystem processes and the scale on which they occur are discussed. The results imply that, if we are to improve our understanding of ecosystem patterns of deep-sea infauna and the relevant processes driving their structure, structural and functional diversity, and standing stock, we must pay particular attention to the small-scale heterogeneity or patchiness and the causative mechanisms acting on that scale.

scholarly journals The importance of different spatial scales in determining structure and function of deep-sea infauna communities

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Ingels ◽  
A. Vanreusel
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Scale ◽  
Deep Sea ◽  
Spatial Ecology ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Benthic Communities ◽  
Standing Stock ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Sampling Locations ◽  
And Function ◽  
Structure Diversity

Abstract. The urge to understand spatial distributions of species and communities and their causative processes has continuously instigated the development and testing of conceptual models in spatial ecology. For the deep-sea, there is evidence that structure, diversity and function of benthic communities are regulated by a multitude of biotic and environmental processes that act in concert on different spatial scales, but the spatial patterns are poorly understood compared to those for other ecosystems. Deep-sea studies generally focus on very limited scale-ranges, thereby impairing our understanding of which spatial scales and associated processes are most important in driving diversity and ecosystem function of communities. Here, we used an extensive integrated dataset of free-living nematodes from deep-sea sediments to unravel which spatial scale is most important in determining benthic infauna communities. Multiple-factor multivariate permutational analyses were performed on different sets of community descriptors (structure, diversity, function, standing stock). The different spatial scales investigated cover two margins in the Northeast Atlantic, several submarine canyons/channel/slope areas, a bathymetrical range of 700–4300 m (represents different stations, 5–50 km apart), different sampling locations at each station (replication distances, 1–200 m), and vertical sediment profiles (cm layers). The results indicated that the most important spatial scale for diversity, functional and standing stock variability is the smallest one; infauna communities changed substantially more with differences between sediment depth layers than with differences associated to larger geographical or bathymetrical scales. Community structure differences were largest between stations at both margins. Important regulating ecosystem processes and the scale on which they occur are discussed. The results imply that, if we are to improve our understanding of ecosystem patterns of deep-sea infauna and the relevant processes driving their structure, diversity, function and standing stock, we must pay particular attention to the small-scale heterogeneity or patchiness and the causative mechanisms acting on that scale.

scholarly journals Co-occurring morphologically distinct algae support a diverse associated fauna in the intertidal zone of Araçá Bay, Brazil

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edson A. Vieira ◽  
Heloísa Romeu Filgueiras ◽  
Marília Bueno ◽  
Fosca Pedini Pereira Leite ◽  
Gustavo Muniz Dias
Keyword(s):  
Rocky Shore ◽  
Biotic Interactions ◽  
Light Limitation ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Rocky Shores ◽  
Associated Fauna ◽  
Close Relationship ◽  
Algal Host ◽  
Species Tolerance ◽  
Terrestrial Insects

Abstract Species diversity is regulated by historical, neutral and niche processes, with species tolerance, dispersal and productivity guiding diversity at larger scales, while habitat heterogeneity and biotic interactions acts in smaller scales. In rocky shores, several organisms provide secondary substrates for mobile fauna, with macroalgae being the most abundant and diverse ones. The patchiness promoted by different macroalgae hosts enhances small-scale heterogeneity and may increase and maintain the diversity of the mobile organisms, since there is a close relationship between the associated fauna and its hosts. In this study we selected three morphologically different macroalgae that coexist in the same rocky shore height in the Araçá Bay, an area under the threat of the nearby harbor expansion, and evaluated the fauna associated to each algal host. Even under similar abiotic pressure (same rocky shore height), the associated fauna of each algal host varied in number and composition, revealing a close relationship. The poorly branched foliose Ulva lactuca sustained a lower density of organisms and was dominated by isopods, while the heavily branched turf and Bostrychietum community showed a high density of organisms, with a dominance of peracarid crustaceans and annelids on the turf and more resistant groups, such as bivalves, acaris and terrestrial insects on the Bostrychietum. Previous studies in the Araçá Bay already revealed a large spatial heterogeneity in the processes and sessile organisms distribution, and here we highlight that this heterogeneity can be observed in an even smaller scale, with different algal hosts mediating the turnover of species in a scale of centimeters and meters, resulting in diversity maintenance of the associated fauna. Since the harbor expansion may prevent the occurrence of macroalgae as a result of light limitation by suspended platforms, we may expect not only a decrease in algal cover but also in the total diversity of the associated fauna in the Araçá Bay.

scholarly journals How Do Geological Structure and Biological Diversity Relate? Benthic Communities in Boulder Fields of the Southwestern Baltic Sea

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Franz ◽  
Gitta Ann von Rönn ◽  
Francisco Rafael Barboza ◽  
Rolf Karez ◽  
Hans-Christian Reimers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Baltic Sea ◽  
Biological Diversity ◽  
Driving Forces ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Benthic Communities ◽  
Habitat Characteristics ◽  
Coastal Zones ◽  
Sediment Distribution ◽  
Β Diversity ◽  
Functional Richness

AbstractEnvironmental factors shape the structure and functioning of benthic communities. In coastal zones of the southwestern Baltic Sea, boulder fields represent one of the most productive habitats, supporting diverse benthic communities that provide many ecosystem services. In this study, the influence of the geological characteristics of boulder fields on the biodiversity of associated hard-bottom communities was investigated at two different spatial scales (few kilometers and tens of kilometers). The analyses on overall richness (taxonomic and functional) and community composition revealed how: (i) locally the size of boulders and (ii) regionally site-specific factors like the boulder density distribution and the sediment distribution can act as environmental driving forces. The overall richness of assemblages was shown to increase with increasing surface area of boulders, by up to 60% for species and up to 40% for functional richness. At both investigated scales, differences in compositional variability (β diversity) of the communities were detected. Locally, smallest boulders hosted more variable communities (β diversity up to 2 times higher), while at the regional level, indications of a larger habitat heterogeneity featuring the highest β diversity were observed. This study exemplifies how geological habitat characteristics shape the biodiversity of boulder field communities. The obtained information could be considered in assessment strategies, in order to avoid misclassifications of habitats naturally limited in biodiversity, making a step forward to the desired objective of protecting, conserving, and managing boulder field communities in the study area and at other comparable sites.

scholarly journals Ecosystem-Scale Effects of Nutrients and Fishing on Coral Reefs

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila M. Walsh
Keyword(s):  
Natural Experiment ◽  
Scale Effects ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Benthic Communities ◽  
Fishing Effort ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Nutrient Pollution ◽  
Manipulative Experiments ◽  
Reef Decline ◽  
Different Levels

Nutrient pollution and fishing are the primary local causes of coral reef decline but their ecosystem-scale effects are poorly understood. Results from small-scale manipulative experiments of herbivores and nutrients suggest prioritizing management of fishing over nutrient pollution because herbivores can control macroalgae and turf in the presence of nutrients. However, ecological theory suggests that the opposite occurs at large scales. Moreover, it is unclear whether fishing decreases herbivores because fishing of predators may result in an increase in herbivores. To investigate this paradox, data on the fish and benthic communities, fishing, and nutrients were collected on Kiritimati, Kiribati. Oceanographic conditions and a population resettlement program created a natural experiment to compare sites with different levels of fishing and nutrients. Contrary to theory, herbivores controlled macroalgae in the presence of nutrients at large spatial scales, and herbivores had greater effects on macroalgae when nutrients were higher. In addition, fishing did not increase herbivores. These results suggest that protecting herbivores may have greater relative benefits than reducing nutrient pollution, especially on polluted reefs. Reallocating fishing effort from herbivores to invertivores or planktivores may be one way to protect herbivores and indirectly maintain coral dominance on reefs impacted by fishing and nutrient pollution.

scholarly journals Post-settlement dispersal: the neglected link in maintenance of soft-sediment biodiversity

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 20140795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Conrad A. Pilditch ◽  
Sebastian Valanko ◽  
Joanna Norkko ◽  
Alf Norkko
Keyword(s):  
Human Activities ◽  
Larval Dispersal ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Benthic Communities ◽  
Larval Settlement ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Soft Sediment ◽  
Species Pools ◽  
And Function ◽  
Metacommunity Dynamics

Seafloor integrity is threatened by disturbances owing to human activities. The capacity of the system to recover from disturbances, as well as maintain resilience and function, depends on dispersal. In soft-sediment systems, dispersal continues after larval settlement, but there are very few measurements of how far the post-settlers disperse in nature. Spatial scales of post-settlement dispersal are, however, likely to be similar to pelagic larval dispersal because of continued, frequent, small-scale dispersal over longer periods. The consequences of this dispersal may be more important for the maintenance of biodiversity and metacommunity dynamics than is pelagic larval dispersal, because of the greater size and competency of the dispersers. We argue that an increased empirical understanding of post-settlement dispersal processes is key for predicting how benthic communities will respond to local disturbances and shrinking regional species pools, with implications for monitoring, managing and conserving biodiversity.

Präzisions-Forstwirtschaft – was ist das? | Precision forestry – what's that?

2007 ◽  
Vol 158 (8) ◽  
pp. 235-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Rudolf Heinimann
Keyword(s):  
Business Processes ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Supply Chain Coordination ◽  
Sensor Technology ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Soil Physics ◽  
Coordination Problem ◽  
Precision Engineering ◽  
Precision Forestry ◽  
And Control

The term «precision forestry» was first introduced and discussed at a conference in 2001. The aims of this paper are to explore the scientific roots of the precision concept, define «precision forestry», and sketch the challenges that the implementation of this new concept may present to practitioners, educators, and researchers. The term «precision» does not mean accuracy on a small scale, but instead refers to the concurrent coordination and control of processes at spatial scales between 1 m and 100 km. Precision strives for an automatic control of processes. Precision land use differs from precision engineering by the requirements of gathering,storing and managing spatio-temporal variability of site and vegetation parameters. Practitioners will be facing the challenge of designing holistic, standardized business processes that are valid for whole networks of firms,and that follow available standards (e.g., SCOR, WoodX). There is a need to educate and train forestry professionals in the areas of business process re-engineering, computer supported management of business transactions,methods of remote sensing, sensor technology and control theory. Researchers will face the challenge of integrating plant physiology, soil physics and production sciences and solving the supply chain coordination problem (SCCP).

THE IMPORTANCE OF BIOTIC INTERACTIONS IN SHAPING EDIACARAN BENTHIC COMMUNITIES: A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY OF THE GAOJIASHAN AND MISTAKEN POINT BIOTAS

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gretchen R. O'Neil ◽  
◽  
James D. Schiffbauer ◽  
James D. Schiffbauer ◽  
John Warren Huntley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Benthic Communities ◽  
Biotic Interactions ◽  
Comparative Case Study

scholarly journals Dispersal and Land Cover Contribute to Pseudorabies Virus Exposure in Invasive Wild Pigs

EcoHealth ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe A. Hernández ◽  
Amanda N. Carr ◽  
Michael P. Milleson ◽  
Hunter R. Merrill ◽  
Michael L. Avery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Land Cover ◽  
Disease Transmission ◽  
Wildlife Conservation ◽  
Pseudorabies Virus ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Information Criterion ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Wild Pigs ◽  
Bacterial Agent ◽  
Open Canopy

AbstractWe investigated the landscape epidemiology of a globally distributed mammal, the wild pig (Sus scrofa), in Florida (U.S.), where it is considered an invasive species and reservoir to pathogens that impact the health of people, domestic animals, and wildlife. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that two commonly cited factors in disease transmission, connectivity among populations and abundant resources, would increase the likelihood of exposure to both pseudorabies virus (PrV) and Brucella spp. (bacterial agent of brucellosis) in wild pigs across the Kissimmee Valley of Florida. Using DNA from 348 wild pigs and sera from 320 individuals at 24 sites, we employed population genetic techniques to infer individual dispersal, and an Akaike information criterion framework to compare candidate logistic regression models that incorporated both dispersal and land cover composition. Our findings suggested that recent dispersal conferred higher odds of exposure to PrV, but not Brucella spp., among wild pigs throughout the Kissimmee Valley region. Odds of exposure also increased in association with agriculture and open canopy pine, prairie, and scrub habitats, likely because of highly localized resources within those land cover types. Because the effect of open canopy on PrV exposure reversed when agricultural cover was available, we suggest that small-scale resource distribution may be more important than overall resource abundance. Our results underscore the importance of studying and managing disease dynamics through multiple processes and spatial scales, particularly for non-native pathogens that threaten wildlife conservation, economy, and public health.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document