scholarly journals A Novel Dictionary-Driven Mental Spelling Application Based on Code-Modulated Visual Evoked Potentials

Computers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Gembler ◽  
Ivan Volosyak

Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) based on code-modulated visual evoked potentials (c-VEPs) typically utilize a synchronous approach to identify targets (i.e., after preset time periods the system produces command outputs). Hence, users have only a limited amount of time to fixate a desired target. This hinders the usage of more complex interfaces, as these require the BCI to distinguish between intentional and unintentional fixations. In this article, we investigate a dynamic sliding window mechanism as well as the implementation of software-based stimulus synchronization to enable the threshold-based target identification for the c-VEP paradigm. To further improve the usability of the system, an ensemble-based classification strategy was investigated. In addition, a software-based approach for stimulus on-set determination is proposed, which allows for an easier setup of the system, as it reduces additional hardware dependencies. The methods were tested with an eight-target spelling application utilizing an n-gram word prediction model. The performance of eighteen participants without disabilities was tested; all participants completed word- and sentence spelling tasks using the c-VEP BCI with a mean information transfer rate (ITR) of 75.7 and 57.8 bpm, respectively.

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 686
Author(s):  
Piotr Stawicki ◽  
Ivan Volosyak

Motion-based visual evoked potentials (mVEP) is a new emerging trend in the field of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP)-based brain–computer interfaces (BCI). In this paper, we introduce different movement-based stimulus patterns (steady-state motion visual evoked potentials—SSMVEP), without employing the typical flickering. The tested movement patterns for the visual stimuli included a pendulum-like movement, a flipping illusion, a checkerboard pulsation, checkerboard inverse arc pulsations, and reverse arc rotations, all with a spelling task consisting of 18 trials. In an online experiment with nine participants, the movement-based BCI systems were evaluated with an online four-target BCI-speller, in which each letter may be selected in three steps (three trials). For classification, the minimum energy combination and a filter bank approach were used. The following frequencies were utilized: 7.06 Hz, 7.50 Hz, 8.00 Hz, and 8.57 Hz, reaching an average accuracy between 97.22% and 100% and an average information transfer rate (ITR) between 15.42 bits/min and 33.92 bits/min. All participants successfully used the SSMVEP-based speller with all types of stimulation pattern. The most successful SSMVEP stimulus was the SSMVEP1 (pendulum-like movement), with the average results reaching 100% accuracy and 33.92 bits/min for the ITR.


Author(s):  
RK Grigoryan ◽  
DB Filatov ◽  
AYa Kaplan

Brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies are actively used in clinical practice to communicate with patients unable to speak and move. Such interfaces imply identifying potentials evoked by stimuli meaningful to the patient in his/her EEG and interpreting these potentials into inputs for the communication software. The stimuli can take form of highlighted letters on a screen, etc. This study aimed to investigate EEG indicators and assess the command input performance of a promising type of BCI utilizing the so-called code-modulated visual evoked potentials (CVEP) appearing in response to a certain sequence of highlights of the desired letter. The operation of the interface was studied on 15 healthy volunteers. During the experiments, we changed the speed of stimuli demonstration and inverted the order of flashing. It was established that the optimal speed of stimulation significantly depends on individual traits of the person receiving the stimuli, and inversion of their sequence does not affect operation of the interface. The median accuracy of selection of commands was as follows: 1 s stimulation cycle mode — 0.96 and 0.95 (information transfer rate 142 and 141 bit per minute); 2 s stimulation cycle mode — 1; 0.5 s cycle — 0.33. The evoked potentials were most expressed at the Oz site. It was assumed that CVEP-based brain-computer interfaces can be optimized through individualization of the set of stimulation parameters.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Wang ◽  
Dan Han ◽  
Binbin Qian ◽  
Zhenhao Zhang ◽  
Zhijun Zhang ◽  
...  

Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) is a periodic response to a repetitive visual stimulus at a specific frequency. Currently, SSVEP is widely treated as an attention tag in cognitive activities and is used as an input signal for brain–computer interfaces (BCIs). However, whether SSVEP can be used as a reliable indicator has been a controversial issue. We focused on the independence of SSVEP from frequency allocation and number of stimuli. First, a cue–target paradigm was adopted to examine the interaction between SSVEPs evoked by two stimuli with different frequency allocations under different attention conditions. Second, we explored whether signal strength and the performance of SSVEP-based BCIs were affected by the number of stimuli. The results revealed that no significant interaction of SSVEP responses appeared between attended and unattended stimuli under various frequency allocations, regardless of their appearance in the fundamental or second-order harmonic. The amplitude of SSVEP suffered no significant gain or loss under different numbers of stimuli, but the performance of SSVEP-based BCIs varied along with duration of stimuli; that is, the recognition rate was not affected by the number of stimuli when the duration of stimuli was long enough, while the information transfer rate (ITR) presented the opposite trend. It can be concluded that SSVEP is a reliable tool for marking and monitoring multiple stimuli simultaneously in cognitive studies, but much caution should be taken when choosing a suitable duration and the number of stimuli, in order to achieve optimal utility of BCIs in the future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document